After Shooting Someone In Self-Defense

WITH THE PASSAGE OF A CCW LAW IN WISCONSIN, THOSE WHO "CARRY" AND ARE FORCED TO USE A GUN (OR OTHER WEAPON) IN SELF-DEFENSE SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS ARTICLE.

THE BEST ARTICLE OF 2008..
After The Shooting
"...there are some things that you need to remember..."
by Larry Correia
As self-defense oriented people, we tend to think about the actual encounter a lot, and seldom, if ever, about what we should do in the aftermath. If you are unlucky enough to be involved in a violent encounter, there are some things that you need to remember to maximize your chances of a successful outcome.

Call for help immediately. Even if you produced the gun and your assailant retreated with no shots fired, call the police. If there is somebody out there worth pulling a gun on, then the cops need to know about it. They may have just gone around the corner to pick an easier victim.

As soon as it is safe for you to do so, call 911. Always ask for an ambulance. If somebody has been shot, whether injured or even if you are a hundred percent sure that they are dead, I still want you to ask for medical attention. First off, killing people sucks, so if I've got an injured assailant, I don't want him to die, I just wanted to make him leave me alone. Second, if you don't ask for medical attention, then there is a good chance that fact will be brought up during any potential trial. Basically it is just another tool of a prosecutor trying to portray the permit holder as a blood-thirsty vigilante.

If humanly possible, have your weapon secured before the police arrive, at least in your holster, but definitely not in your hand. The responding officers do not know you, and the information they got from dispatch was probably sketchy at best. The last thing you want to do is survive a violent encounter only to get shot by the cops because they think you're the bad guy.

If you are ever in a situation where you still have the gun in your hands, and the police arrive, they are going to order you to drop the gun. Comply with their instructions because otherwise they may think you are the threat and very well may shoot you. Do not start talking or trying to explain what is going on. Don't be offended because they are treating you like the bad guy. This is not the time to get indignant. This is the time to keep from getting shot.

If you have medical training, and you have just shot and injured an attacker, you may be tempted to administer first aid. Keep in mind, however, that a minute ago this person was trying to hurt you bad enough that they were worth shooting. That threat may still be a threat. Your primary advantage is the fact that you have a firearm. If you then put yourself close enough to administer treatment, you are giving up that advantage. He may not be as incapacitated as you thought, and when he wakes up and sees the person who just shot him within arm's length, you have a real good chance of getting your head twisted off your shoulders. He may have a folding knife that you won't know about until it cuts your kidney in half.

Keep in mind that when the police shoot somebody, the paramedics do not rush in and give immediate aid. The police always secure the individual before the paramedics move in. That is for everyone's safety. If you have been through first responder training, keep in mind one of the very first examples that was given to your class. If you come across a car accident, and the car is on fire, you do not have to climb into the burning car to try and help, because now you are just one more injured person to treat. You never want to endanger yourself to administer aid.


Never tamper with the crime scene. You may have heard the old myth, usually given by an imbecile that does not understand self-defense law, "if you shoot the guy on the porch, drag him in the living room." Bad idea. Do not ever do that. Once you shoot someone, wherever it happened is now a crime scene. If you tamper with the evidence, the authorities will figure it out, and this will now create doubt in the minds of the reasonable people looking at your case. If you felt the need to tamper with the scene, they will believe that you are trying to hide something. The only thing you may do is to make the area physically safe for yourself, but other than that, leave it alone.

On that same note, do not flee the scene. Your personal safety comes first, so if you need to get away to keep from being injured, that is one thing, but make sure that you then call the police as quickly as possible. If you flee the scene of a shooting, that once again raises the specter of guilt with the authorities, and that will color their investigation accordingly.

The responding officers are going to question you. I want you to give a brief statement, and then shut up, accent on brief, with little or no details. As in, "Officer, he attacked me, I was in fear for my life, so I shot him." That is it. Do not start to babble to the police. Do not try to explain everything at the time. They will continue to question you. At that point you will politely tell them that you are not going to answer any more questions until you have your attorney present.

When you shoot somebody, unless you have ice water in your veins, you will be going through various stress reactions. Some of you may be in shock, others will be distraught that they just took a life, others may be enraged that some bad guy just threatened their children, but whatever your reaction, you will not be in a calm state of mind. It is a medical fact that adrenalin affects our higher brain functions. You will tend to forget details, some of which may be very important, or even worse, your brain will fill in the forgotten blanks with facts that will later be shown to be incorrect.

Wait until you have an attorney present before you make your complete statement. This gives you the time to compose yourself and calm down. Also, the Bill of Rights gives us the right to legal counsel. Take advantage of it. A good attorney will keep you from saying anything stupid that will be used against you in court later.

Now some of you may not like this. You may have the mistaken belief that it is the bad guys that need the defense attorneys, not us good guys. Unfortunately that is not how it works in real life. We work in an adversarial system, and anything you say during a statement, can and will be used against you in a court of law.

These are just a few basic tips to keep in mind. Your primary consideration in a violent encounter is to first survive the attack, but doing these things may help you survive the aftermath.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

-Larry Correia is an author, firearms instructor, and one of the owners of Fuzzy Bunny Movie Guns in Draper, Utah. FBMG is a gun store, specializing in self-defense needs, training, and full-line smithing. Their online store is at www.fbmginc.com The author can be reached at larry@fbmginc.com

Marriage, Democracy And Like Subjects

I continue to be both amazed and distressed at the too many people who will not accept the democratically expressed will of the People as to, in this case, the support of the traditional definition-of and laws-regarding "marriage". This includes Mr. B. H. Obama as to the "Defense Of Marriage Act" (DOMA), as enacted by our Congress, AND, columnist Sherry Schultz ("No liberty and justice for all in Wisconsin"; Milwaukee Journal Sentinel; July 2, 2011; Page-4J) as to the direct will of the People in enacting an amendment to our Constitution defining marriage and limiting certain benefits to persons in that state. The same and democratic decision was not accepted by the minority in California where a like proposal has been appealed to some judge on the left-coast.

There are those who claim that allowing same-sex "marriages" will lead to demands that multi-partner like relationships to be allowed under law. From hardly noticeD news items, there have been such moves in other places.

If this continues, our only question may be: "WHAT IS THE AGE-OF-CONSENT FOR A SHEEP?".

Dane County Courts VS Democracy

There have been, at least, two Dane County Circuit Court decisions halting the enforcement of our "collective bargaining law"---The last being by Judge Maryann Summi. More recently, another Dane County Circuit Court judge has attempted to nullify the State Constitution's provision defining marriage and forbidding allowing marriage related benefits to "other" couples.

. This again raises this question: Why do the citizens of Dane County (Especially Madison, that "X square miles surrounded by reality") have the unequal power to elect those judges who have the "first shot" at challenging the acts of our Legislature, whose members are elected from all of Wisconsin's counties, and the Administrative Rules of the Executive Branch of our government, headed by a governor elected by all the voters of this State?

Again, this appears to very much be an unequal protection of the law, one acting against the People outside of Dane County.

Again, I suggest randomly selected from all of Wisconsin's Circuit Courts, three judge panels (No two judges from the same Court Of Appeals district), to make decisions on all such challenges to State Acts. With today's teleconferences and like communications, this should not be a problem. Appeals from those panels would go, if accepted, directly to the State Supreme Court.

In fact, it is well-past-the-time when the Legislature should enforce equal rights to those citizens, outside of Dane County, as to judicial reviews of the acts of that Legislature and of our various Administrative Rule making agencies.

Jury Instruction VS Too Complex Laws

Many of our laws (Most specially as to tax-codes, business laws, "green" laws and such like creations of those lawyers lurking in legislative bodies and administrative agencies). "Common sense", as a requirement for citizens who generally wish to obey our laws, has become most uncommon.

As for criminal court (Or other prosecutions) which may result in jail/prison terms or crippling fines, I suggest that the following be the first "jury instruction" given and the first rule for trials without juries or for Administrative Hearing Examiners or tribunals.

(This is written for jury instructions in criminal cases. Like positions should be posited for non-jury trials and administrative hearings.)

"The jury is first to consider if the law in question is one that can be understood by the ordinary citizen, with an average education and without prior consultation with an attorney or other like specialist. If the Jury finds the answer to be "no", it (They) must acquit without further consideration of any facts or other instructions of the Court. The jury must not consider any "should have known" position unless the defendant was proven to be an expert in the applicable part of the Law. If, and only if, the answer is "yes", then they may proceed to the consideration of the other facts and law pertaining to this case/matter."

It is very likely that such an instruction will not be automatically considered by the Court and may, very likely, be rejected by judges. Yet, proposing it and having it rejected offers a wide door for appeals of any convictions.

You may wish to refer to: Silverglate, Harvey A.; "Three Felonies A Day---How the Feds Target the Innocent"; Encounter Books; New York & London; 2009.

The Dark Side Of Compromise

Mr. David M. Shribman (Executive Editor, the "Pittsburgh Post-Gazette") has touted the benefits of compromise in our national-political life ("Loss of compromise is a threat to nation"; "Milwaukee Journal Sentinel"; June 26, 2011; Page- 1J). I suspect that he has put aside his history books some years ago and has forgotten the very "dark side" of compromise.

During the formation of this nation we executed a probably necessary compromise as to counting slaves to determine States' representation in the Congress. During the 1850s the USA compromised further on the question of slavery. The results of such compromises were: A delay in the abolishing of slavery; The bloodiest war fought by the American People; And, an anti-democracy movement from "these United States" to "the United States".

In the 1930s the United Kingdom and most European nations compromised with Adolf Hitler when a firm "NO!", a few French soldiers and, perhaps, a few rifle shots would have stopped his expansion-of-power into the Saar and throughout Europe. The results of that compromise was many millions of dead and the physical-and-other exhaustion of the USA and other nations.

By "reaching out" and "dialog" the Churches, European nations and the USA are attempting to compromise with a newly resurgent Islam (Which seeks its perpetual goals by traditional means). The results are: Multiple wars in the Middle East; Asymmetrical war with Muslims throughout the world ;Weekly reports of small group or individual, military-style, Jihad everywhere; And severe threats to democracy and public safety in every jurisdiction where Muslims form more that a minute part of the local population.

Within the Congress compromise with morality and financial sanity have yielded a multi-trillion dollar debt, spending well beyond revenues, a great danger to the security of the nation as well as an ongoing roll-call of corruption and anti-democracy arrogance from the White House down to local elected officials.

Compromise with the examples of history will condemn us to repeat the most horrid lessons of history (Paraphrased from George Santayana).

Treason & Support Of Islam

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE-III

Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.
“ Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war."[13]

Under English law effective during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, there were essentially five species of treason.[citation needed] Of the five, the Constitution adopted only two: levying war and adhering to enemies. Omitted were species of treason involving encompassing (or imagining) the death of the king, certain types of counterfeiting, and finally fornication with women in the royal family of the sort which could call into question the parentage of successors. James Wilson wrote the original draft of this section, and he was involved as a defense attorney for some accused of treason against the Patriot cause.

Section 3 also requires the testimony of two different witnesses on the same overt act, or a confession by the accused in open court, to convict for treason. This rule was derived from an older English statute, the Treason Act 1695. In Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (1945), the Supreme Court ruled that "[e]very act, movement, deed, and word of the defendant charged to constitute treason must be supported by the testimony of two witnesses."[14] In Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947), however, the Supreme Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove intent; nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the decision, are required to prove only that the overt act occurred (eyewitnesses and federal agents investigating the crime, for example).
==================================================================================

To me it would seem that such persons as Major Nidal Hasan (Of Fort Hood infamy), those members of the "Fort Dix Six" who were US Citizens. the ex-Marine recently charged with shooting at the Pentagon, the other two and West Coast Muslims recently arrested before they could execute an armed attack on a military installation were all waging war against the USA or planning to do so. But, they were not so charged nor is it likely that the newer cases will result in that object-lesson and most horrid of crimes.

Why? Could it be that Muslims have become "more equal than others" (Like the pigs in "Animal Farm)? Or, could it be that active prosecution of treason cases would place at risk so many editors, publishers, politicians, professors and such persons.
===================================================================================
More specially, I note that it has been clearly demonstrated-and-proved that most contributions to "islamic charities" end up in the hands of terrorists who are, also in fact, involved in active military "jihad" against the Armed Forces of the USA. Such actions meet the requirements of the Constitution and above-reported court case to warrant charges-of and convictions-for treason.

Constitutional Amendment Regarding Lawyers & Congress

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT REGARDING LAWYERS & THE CONGRESS

Section-I: No person who has ever graduated from a school-of-law or has practiced law shall be seated as a Member of the Congress of the United States.

Section-II: Nothing in the Constitution of the United States or in its laws shall prohibit the People of the Several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or of the Territories of the United States from enacting like measures as to the Members of their Legislatures.

Section-III: This Amendment shall take effect five-years after ratification.

========================================================================
NOTE BENE: As lawyers already control the Courts in our national government (And that of the Several States and territories or possessions of the USA) and are well on their way to control the various agencies as make up the Administrative branch of our government(s), it would be well to have one branch free of them. Why?

Attorneys generate laws which are so complex as to insure the full employment of other attorneys (And themselves if removed from office). This complexity leaves the USA in a handicapped place to such economic power-houses, who lack a large lawyer-class, as Japan, Korea, India and the “Peoples Republic” of China.

For the individual citizen or business-owner, the complexity of laws leaves them open to many penalties (Including prison “time”) if they fail to comply with even the smallest detail of some law or Administrative Rule.

“Ignorance of the Law is no excuse—For violating any law” was a sound maxim, when laws (And administrative-rules) were few, written in English and could be known and understood by most citizens with no more than a high-school education. That is no longer the case.

Of course, we could follow William Shakespeare's recommendation (Henry VI, Part-2, Act-4, scene-1) where Dick-The-Butcher states, “The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers”. (I would excuse my lawyer who I like!)

Curtilage--So You Do Not Have To Look It Up

The curtilage is an important legal term to define the land immediately surrounding a house or dwelling, including any closely associated buildings and structures, but excluding any associated 'open fields beyond'. It defines the boundary within which a home owner can have a reasonable expectation of privacy and where 'intimate home activities' take place. It is an important legal concept in some jurisdictions for the understanding of burglary, trespass, and in relation to planning controls.

In urban properties the location of the curtilage may be evident from the position of fences, wall and similar; within larger properties it may be a matter of some legal debate as to where the private area ends and the 'open fields' start.[1]
Contents
[hide]

Curtilage in United States law

This distinction is important in United States law for cases dealing with burglary and with self-defense under the "Castle Doctrine." In some state law, such as Florida, burglary encompasses the English common law definition and adds (among other things) curtilage to the protected area of the dwelling into which intrusion is prohibited. Similarly, under Florida's Castle Doctrine a home-owner does not have to retreat within the curtilage.

The boundary between the home and the curtilage that surrounds it, on the one hand, and the open fields beyond the curtilage, on the other, is also important for the application of the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment applies only to the "home," which courts have construed to include the area immediately surrounding the house in which the intimate home activities occur, but not to the open fields beyond. The requirement that law enforcement officers obtain a warrant before searching a suspect's home extends, therefore, to the curtilage, but not to private property beyond the curtilage, even if their access to such "open fields" without the owner's permission would constitute a trespass. [2]

In United States v. Dunn, the Supreme Court identified four factors as critical when assessing the limits of curtilage: "the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home, whether the area is included wit

Reinstate The Poll Tax!!!

TO MY ELECTED STATE OFFICIALS:

With the "underclass" getting more-and-more out-of-hand and increasing demands on the budgets of our state and local governments (eg Provision of Voter ID Cards for the poor; Costs associated with "punish the voters" recounts), we must find a way to pay for (At the least) such spending of public funds. THEREFORE, we should reinstate the "Poll Tax!

I suggest that the State charge about $30,00 every five-years PLUS the costs of an annual finger-print check (To minimize voting by convicted felons).

Ah, but naysayers will claim that voting (Unlike, for example, legally operating a motor vehicle) is a "constitutional right" AND that poll taxes (Along with ambiguous pre-voting testing of citizens wishing to execute the right to vote) has (have) soundly been declared as truly and fully unconstitutional by the Courts.

This is NOT a problem as the Wisconsin Legislature is intent on imposing like and unconstitutional charges and requirements against citizens who wish to execute the
parallel right (Please see the very broad AND unrestricted Article-1, Section-25 of Wisconsin's Constitution).

I have little doubt that someone will, upon being charges with any CCW under the proposed law, will successfully challenge it on such grounds as were successful in putting-down the Poll Tax and examination pre-conditions.

ARE YOU ASKING FOR TROUBLE?

Jim Crow VS Jaime Cuervo

I doubt me that it is any desire to return to "Jim Crow" in the USA which is driving the push for "Voter ID". I suggest that it is a understanding of a "clear and present danger" to the sanctity of the vote which moves the People towards an anti "Jaime Cuervo" position.

Guns & President Jefferson

The Other Thomas Jefferson Quotes
Much, too much, has been made of the PRIVATE letter of Thomas Jefferson as to the "wall between church and state". Perhaps all should not the following, OTHER, quotes from that founder's statements.

No free man shall ever be debarred
the use of arms.

The strongest reason for the
people to retain the right to keep and bear arms
is, as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.

The tree of liberty must be
refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants.

. President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed.

Exclusion From The House Of Representatives

In 1919 AD the House Of Representatives refused to “seat” Congressman Elect Victor Berger of Wisconsin's Seventh District apparently because: Mr. Berger was honestly an honest Socialist (Of the variety called “Sewer Socialists” who were much more interested in protecting the health and well being of the People than in an “theoretical” socialism); And, in response to violent acts by union members and socialists in other parts of the USA, which had little, if anything, to do with Mr. Berger.

My recollection of contemporary press reports were the considerable number of claims that allowing
Socialists a role in government would result in: Murder and mass-murder in the streets; The disease of “free love” being rampant throughout the nation; The sexual abuse of little girls; Overthrown of our democratic systems of laws and government; Destruction of the Middle Class in this nation, that part of our population seen as the bulwark of our land; And, of everything which makes Western Civilization the mainstay of our world.

The not-seating of Mr. Berger did not appear to stop “free love”, murder and serial mass-murder and various forms of sexual abuse of children. Our subsequent, especially of late, Administrations have made considerable progress in abolishing the Middle Class and weakening those standards and institutions which support Western Civilization.

Strangely enough, the Congress has seated two persons who subscribe to a 1400-plus year old, medieval, criminal-terrorist ideology-or-movement which does, in fact, use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, perpetual-and-violent military-level actions (ie “Declared War), lying and organized theft and lying to accomplish its very anti-democracy goals being: The destruction or near suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslim; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement

The 1919 Congress saw even Mr. Berger's brand of Socialism as a clear-and-present danger, That position might, without “20/20 hindsight”, be considered not unreasonable considering the concurrent and bloody revolutions occurring in such newsworthy places as Russia and Germany. Even without that “clarity of vision” as demonstrated by such leftists as Adolph Hitler, J. I. Stalin, Mao and others of that ilk.

It appears that the case of "Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486 (1969) would probably prevent such removal today. However, as the Supreme Court no longer holds fast to the rulings of prior courts, I could be wrong.

With our much better knowledge of history (If we use it as, to paraphrase: “Those who do not study history, learn from history and apply those lessons will be condemned to repeat its worst lessons”) and what should be our better knowledge of the goals-and-means of Islam, we should wonder at why the current Congress and those of future terms should seat any Muslims---Who do not, publicly and fully, deny those horrid and perpetual Islamic goals and means.

PS----CETERUM CENSEO MECCA ESSE DELENDAM /Cato Novo

Tower Of Power

There have been many recommendations as to reducing the “carbon footprint” left by the use of coal and petroleum products, especially as to the generation of electrical power. Some of these proposals are: Nuclear fission plants (What to do with the radio-active waste products?); Wind driven turbines (Apparently OK except off the shores of Senator Kennedy's estate; But, otherwise limited in other locations by terrain, average wind flow, bird migration patterns, etc.); Geo-Thermal “heat wells” (Drilled at a very high cost and requiring water supplies often not readily available in the proper geological areas); Solar reflector arrays with photo-electric cells (VERY expensive) or closed circuit hot fluid-to-steam turbines (One of the better ideas, but dependent on sunshine-per-year amounts and availability of vast spaces); And, some others I cannot recall.

Yet, there is one proposal about which little has been written or, as far as I can tell, considered. That is the use (Especially in desert areas) of a “tower of power”, being a very tall (1000') chimney (As used in many coal fired electric power plants or ore refining facilities; Some still existing without current use), having about it four-to-ten air intakes above the ground effect level (20'-plus), using the heat rising effect to draw in air from the surrounding area and passing it through moderate-to-slow turbines at each such intake or one large, multi-stage, turbine in the stack, all to generate electrical power.

By experiment, gates could be installed to open in the eye of any wind to increase air flow.

I suspect that this type of devise would work best in the hot and dry environment of a desert (eg Southern California, Arizona, parts of Australia, Israel) where the power produced would vary as the day's heat (Which would assist in providing power during the high-demand, air-conditioning, parts of the day).

Of course, we might “go to the source” and erect such a tower over the Capitol Building in Washington (DC), EU headquarters, the UN (Useless Nations) HQ AND, of course, so many academic buildings.

Defining Islam---Again

1. Islam is NOT a religion; But, is a criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology not far
different from the KKK or Nazi-Party (Sharing the same principles of hate-of-Jews and all real religions, use of violence and the other horrors taught in Mein Kampf and the Koran;
2. Islam (Like the KKK, Mafia and the SS brand of Nazism) has/had a very thin veneer of religion;
3. The false-prophet Mohammed (Who was a murderer, liar and treaty breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child) declared perpetual war against all "unbelievers" (Until they join Islam or accept the slave-like state of dhimmitude), a war which continues in our era in the Sudan, Thailand, parts of the Philippines,,Fort.Hood and New York City on "9/11";
4. Most Mosques are, to some extent, funded by the most regressive, medieval and anti-civilization branch of Islam (ie Wahhabism) and use that sect's hate literature, much printed in Saudi Arabia;
5. Lying to "unbelievers" is one of the standard and common responses of Muslims to any questions, about their ideology, from "unbelievers", including before the Courts in the USA whose authority Muslims do NOT recognize;
6. Muslims "behave themselves" ONLY until their part of any local, regional or national population reaches certain levels (eg France; "Londonistan"; the Nordic nations; Dearborn, Michigan);
7. The true believers of Islam must believe that the words of the the Koran are directly from its Allah (Not the same as Arabic speaking Christians) and, along with the sayings and examples of Mohammed, are totally binding on them;
8. The declared goals of Islam include: The destruction or effective suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all real religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslims; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.
9. The allowed, approved and too often commanded methods of Islam and Muslims to achieve those goals include: Murder and mutilation; Rape and enslavement; Genocide;
Perpetual war with "unbelievers" until they become Muslims or accept the slave-like state of "dhimmitude"; Lying to "unbelievers" as the approved and commanded tactic of Muslims as to "pointed questions" regarding Islam; AND, the consideration of any resistance to or complaints about Islam as an attack which the "faithful" are required to counter-attack, very often by physical attack.

Crusader Quotes & Latin Tags

CRUSADER QUOTES
AND
VARIOUS “TAGS”

Tues-les tous, Dieu Redonnatdea les sein! (Norman French: Allegedly advise given by a Abbot to Simon III de Monfort when Simon noted that the heritics-in-question were hiding among other who looked and dressess as orthodox Catholics.)
Caedite eos, Nevit enim Dominus qui sunt elus!
Kill them all, God will know which are His!
Kill them all, God will sort them out! (Viet Nam War usage)

=================================================================

Mecca Delenda Est!
Mecca must be destroyed!

Carthago delenda est (English: "Carthage must be destroyed") or the fuller Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam or also Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam (English: "Furthermore, I think Carthage must be destroyed")


PS----CETERUM CENSEO MECCA ESSE DELENDAM

=======================================================================
Deus Vult!
Deus lo Vult!
God wills it!

Habemus Gladii Duo!
We have two swords!
(See Luke22:35-38)

De Laude Novae Militae
In praise of the new troops/military-order

Si Vis Pachem Para Bellum!
If you wish peace, prepare for war!

Mihi persuasum est odisse acerbe.
I am a believer in tough hate.

Justtitia suum cuique distribuit
Justice renders to everyone what is due him.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.
In all things, whoever spares the bad injures the good.

Of Vigilantes, Peoples Courts, ETC

From time-to-time in such diverse places as the banks off the Mississippi River (Cannibal river pirates), Gold Rush California, 1956 Hungary, the Highlands of Scotland the normal processes of law have been ignored to put-down gross criminality. In some cases the "authorities" were unable, and too often unwilling, to safeguard the innocent.

In some places citizens would take time-off from providing for the support of themselves and their families and would form up "Committees Of Vigilance" (ie Vigilantes) which would inquired into crimes, acting as police and courts, and "execute" justice, if not law' on criminals.

In some revolutionary times, citizens would bring alleged offenders to "People's Courts" which had some semblance of traditional law----Without the nit-picking of lawyers.

I do not maintain that the above two examples protected the "rights" of (Accused) criminals, but they did safeguard that minimum of ORDER as is needed before there can be LAW or the hope for JUSTICE.

In the USA of today, the lawful authorities have NOT maintained order or law along most of our Southern border. Those authorities have failed to use the civil police, the military and even the "Organized Militia" (Which is NOT the "National Guard"!) to maintain minimum order. It may be that is now the duty AND right of the unorganized militia (Being all citizens capable of bearing arms and self-armed), "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts" to maintain order AND safeguard-the-innocent.

The governments of Egypt, the Sudan, "Palestine" and other "nations" with Muslim majority national or local (eg France, Sweden and Dearborn, Michigan) are unable or unwilling to protect non-Muslims from Islamic attacks. Certainly the forces deployed by the UN and African Union have not been able to stop such attacks.

MORE AND MORE THE USA IS SEEING AGGRESSIVE AND VIOLENT ACTS BY MUSLIMS AGAINST THOSE WHO INSIST THAT THE LAWS OF THIS REPUBLIC, THE SEVERAL STATES AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS BE OBEYED.

In fact, some might rightly claim that the Crusaders were such loosely organized and effective bodies of armed men, outside of the authority of civil rulers, who acted to protect the innocent and punish evil-doers. Although they were not successful in the Near East, that crusader spirit was key to the turning back of Islamic aggression in other places AND TO THE PRESERVATION OF CIVILIZATION.

I can think of some persons in the USA who might well be subjected to the authority of "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts"

Wisconsin's "Dead Letter Laws"

Some have stated that Wisconsin's unenforced laws should be removed from our list of criminal offenses. The classic case is "Adultery" where full prosecution of offenders would likely leave us a State without enough people "on the outside" (Of prisons and jails) to take care of those "on the inside". (As a one time Wisconsin Probation & Parole Agent", I can remember a couple who were convicted of that offense), The classic, recent, example of such a criminal is Milwaukee's police chief and his self-admitted adultery.

However, it is a matter for the People's elected legislators to remove such statutes.

At one time Wisconsin had such crimes as "Bank Burglary" (Which allowed a life sentence!), "Rape", "Theft Of Livestock", "Sexual Intercourse With A Child". These were rewritten under different titles or otherwise removed from our stature books---By the Legislature.

I also note that "Treason" (ie Waging war against the State of Wisconsin) remains on our statute book (s.946.01) although as far as I know, there has never been a prosecution for that offense ( Although some of the mob which recently attacked our State Capitol building could be construed as having violated that law; The statutory required acts, as exhibited by the noted mob members, went well beyond the protection for "free speech").

For that matter, I suggest that the Legislature add some sort of "Violation Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which would go beyond the current "Misconduct In Public Office" towards protecting the rights of the People.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.

Sadness RE: The Church Ignoring Truth

I was saddened by such headlines as "Islamic Scholars Bash Benedict". It is not that I was surprised by such a reaction as Muslims, scholars and clerics more than most, react to any criticism of Islam as an actual attack or "bashing". Such are not interested in truth, but only in forwarding the goals of that ideology which, by the way, include the effective destruction of the Church.

What truly saddens me is the limp-wristed, cowardly and delusional responses of the last series of Popes, the Holy See, so many bishops (Especially in the Eastern Churches), editors-and-publishers of "Catholic" publications and too many others. All of such persons continue to physically-and-spiritually endanger all Catholics, all Christians, Jews (Our spiritual ancestors) and everyone who is not Muslim.

I suggest that we need such popes (And Church supporters) as Urban II (First Crusade), Innocent XI (Turning back the Muslim Turks at Vienna) and St. Pius V (Battle of Lepanto).

Most of all we need to apply the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, a "Doctor Of The Church", who taught us how to properly, ethically and morally "strike blows for Christ". Today's Church seems unable to strike those blows even with the sword-of-truth by declaring: The true nature of Islam by listing its horrid goals and even more horrid means;That Islam regresses to its most medieval modes as its population, in any place, increases; And, that true-believing Muslims are, like pirates, the enemies of all humans.

Of course, words did not and will not protect the Christian and Pagan peoples of the Sudan from the Janjaweed and other Muslim agents of Islamic state terrorism (I am redundant here). Contracting with "Blackwater" or some like security company would have done those victims much more good. A heartfelt shout, from the Vatican, of DEUS VULT! appears to be needed!

I was asked by a regular Catholic columnist, "Are you trying to start a war with over a Billion Muslims?". The fact is that we have been at war with Islam since its inventor declared it to be perpetual until all are under the rule of Muslims and Sharia or have accepted the slave-like status of "dhimitude". That state-of-war continues to this day and for the future without regard of the views expressed by the Holy See, and all those intellectual cowards-and-liars noted in the first paragraph of this letter AND secular persons.

Now, WHO willwar declare the truth that the Pope and those others named above are unwilling to speak or write?

Other Notes On Weapons & Citizens

Best Book: Second Amendment & Bill Of Rights
Halbrook, Stephen P. (Ll.D.);
The Founders' second Amendment: Origins Of The Right To Bear Arms;
Ivan R. Dee (Publisher), In Association With The Independent Institute;
Chicago, 2008
The above cited book is excellent for the following reasons:
1. It provides a deep and well documented (Original documents) review of the development of the Second Amendment to our Constitution and, more generally, of the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution;
2. The author presents both sides of each argument before and during the Revolution and during the development of the Bill Of Rights (Especially as to the Second Amendment) and the Constitution as they occurred and in a logical sequence.;
3. The "Conclusions" chapter are very apparently the opinions of Mr. Halbrook and honestly separated from the body of this history.

Those who teach materials as to the subjects covered in this work would be unprofessional if they do not read this book. "Misconduct In Public Office" would be the least accusation I would make against any law-maker or jurist who fails to do the same before dealing with gun related issues. Editors and publishers who fail to know the materials in this volume should be considered unprofessional if they fail to consider the facts presented and conclusions made by Mr. Halbrook before reporting or writing editorials on the Second Amendment.

The points I found very interesting are here listed.
1. "The Militia" (Or "general militia) is the whole body of adult-and-free citizens who have a Natural Law Right to own weapons and to carry them anywhere they please AND may have a duty to own weapons for defense of self and his State.
2. The "well regulated militia" noted in the Second Amendment is that part of the "general militia" as organized into companies (Often at a town or village level) and equipped with standard firearms, drilled in military skills and organized into larger units (Usually under officers appointed by the Governor of each State).
3. These (Both) militias were seen as necessary for the defense of each State AND, much more important to most of the founders of the USA, to provide a defense against the potential tyranny of an overly powerful Federal government.
4. The "blunderbuss" was an early type of very short barreled shotgun, much like the sawed-off shotguns. These weapons were, in fact, sought by the members of the short-of-weapons early, revolutionary, militias, This is in opposition to the Federal Court case (Citation needed) which ruled that such shotguns were not nor never a militia weapon.
5. Pocket pistols were carried by our Founding Fathers with no concern as to CCW permits.
6. British General Gage was specially concerned about the "back woodsmen" most specially skilled in accurate long range shooting being often dependent on such hunting skills for survival
7. Even at the time of the writing of our Constitution and Bill Of Rights there were persons who distrusted the People as to possessing arms.





From other readings I note that:
1. Abraham Lincoln was elected as an officer of his militia company in the "Black Hawk War"; And,
2. As late as 1856 The US Supreme Court noted (In the Dred Scott case) that only free citizens could arm themselves and then travel as they saw fit. this being a right of citizens at that time (And now)


FROM: www.crusaderknight.blogspot.com>

Monday, July 16, 2007
Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife
On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a local armed robber make a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a large number of armed, law abiding, citizens with licenses to carry concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Guns, Citizens, Police & Rational Thinking
The following letter was sent on Dec. 11, 2007.

TO THE EDITORS, THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL:

First, anyone who is of the opinion that it would be possible to take away all firearms (Even just all handguns) from Americans is in need of therapy for delusional thinking. Such therapy wold be even more required for anyone who believes that criminals would obey any such gun confiscation laws and efforts---Let alone those citizens who have concluded, as did the staff of the US Attorney General, that the right to keep and bear arms is an right of individual citizens and not one limited to members of now non-existent militias.

Secondly, all should note the following:
1. The mass murderer at a Colorado missionary school was killed and stopped by an armed, under that State's just laws, citizen and not by police.
2. The like killer at a same-state mall was enabled in his massacre of our fellow citizens by laws and mall-regulations which made that place a theoretical "gun free zone", which made it into a "free fire zone" for a crazed killer.3.The victims at Virginia Tech and Columbine High School were, in truth, the victims of like "gun free zone" laws, even in State's where citizens generally have the right to CCW (With the inside police officer at the high school apparently running away from danger).
4. The killings at another Virginia university were halted by two students who used their firearms to stop and arrest a killer, even though that beneficial act was delayed by those students having to retrieve their pistols from their autos, the police not being in evidence.
5. In Milwaukee it was armed security guards who shot to death two thugs who fired, from the outside, at the patrons of a well regulated club, the police not being present to protect citizens.
6. In Milwaukee County one unarmed pizza delivery man is murdered by two thugs after another, but armed, such delivery man shoots an "instant socialist" who attempted to take away the product of his honest labor.

Any person with a rational mind should be able to see the pattern as illustrated by the above examples and come (Be forced?) to the conclusion that: Citizens can NOT rely on the police to protect them from killers and other very dangerous criminals; That "gun free zones" (Like the entire State of Wisconsin) are only "free fire zones" for dangerous criminals; And, police objections to CCW are not due to any interest in the safety of their fellow citizens, but only to make their job (Of cleaning up after killings and other crimes) easier and safer for those police officers.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Register Axes !
My June 5th newspaper brought the news of a youth striking his father with an ax. Such weapons are a great hazard to the public safety (As many claim for firearms) and the following steps must be taken by the Congress and the Legislature.
1. All axes must be registered.
2. No one under 21-years of age is to be allowed to purchase
such a weapon and all buyers of such must be checked out
for prior criminal convictions and mental health commitments
as well as current domestic violence matters.
3. If such military weapons (Look to the movie Brave Heart for
examples of military applications) cannot be removed from
all homes, they must have the heads and handles separated and
those parts kept locked up.
4. No axes must be allowed on campuses (Even those teaching
forestry subjects) as such will prevent insane or criminal persons
from using them to harm students and staff. The same should
be enforces for such public events as sports shows and lumber
jack contests except where state licensed ax specialists are
involved AND in complete control of these horrid weapons.

Of course, there are those who claim that axes do not cause death or injury and
only the people who mis-use them are so responsible; But we liberals know better!

Theoretical Notes On Today's Weapons For Free Citizens

I note that full-jacketed 0.308 and 5.7x28mm rounds will easily "punch through" (Especially at "at-your-door") the body armor of Nazi like Storm Troopers and
other criminals (eg. Those "Violating Civil Rights Under Color Of Law").

A little research will provide anyone on how to make "Composition C" or "Plastique".
That stuff, some sheet metal and ball bearings, nuts, bolts, fiberglass (Will not show up on many X-rays) and other junk will make a decent Claymore Mine.

Placed at knee level such cut-down-at-the-knees such invaders defended with most body armor.

Of course there is the risk of prosecution and persecution for even building, let alone using such against storm-troopers or other home invaders.

The same research will provide your with plans for non-WMD flame throwers, some which look like canes.

Rebalencing The Constitutions

The next time (And subsequent times) a candidate for a US Supreme Court appears before the usual committee of the Senate (for a State Supreme Court position) , the following should-and-must be a part of the questioning. Only slight imodifications be needed to use this as a base for interviewing candidates for State Supreme Court positions.

1. Read and attribute the following quote: . President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed"

2. Then ask the candidate if s/he agrees with that principle: In whole and without reservations; Or, in part and with reservations; Or, not at all.

3-A. For the person who responds a total agreement, ask her/him if they will apply the exact words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the writers as their primary references in writing decisions on cases brought before the Court.

3-B. For those having reservations, ask each such person what those are and "the reasons why" for not agreeing with Mr. Jefferson AND to what extent and under what conditions will such a disagreement take effect.

3-C. For those who fully disagree with Mr.Jefferson, ask them "Why?".

4. For the latter two types of persons, ask: Does the Constitution internally provide for changes (Especially in rights added for or taken away from the People); AND, where in the Constitution is there any provisions for "evolving standards"?

After that first use of these questions, they should be applied to all nominees for Federal (State?) Judicial positions.

The Congress (Legislature), itself, could preface Bills by requiring adherence to Mr. Jefferson's above-cited quote by use of a common preface which requires judges to interpret the subject legislation: First in terms of the words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the relevant authors; Then, the words of the legislation and the intent of its authors. Failure to comply with this could be prima faciie grounds for impeachment and trial.

I think it well past the time when the Peoples elected representative, the Congress (Legislature), should re-balance the three branches of our Federal (State) Government, which balance has become harmful to the Republic due to too much power flowing into the Courts and the Administrative branches.

Another Note To A "Pathological Pacifist"

ttps://mail.google.com/mail/?zx=85pqjprzs4fn&shva=1#inbox/12ff061382d491ab>

Yesterday I received another note from a very "nice" (NOT in the eariler meaning of accurate and exact) person who is what I consider a "pathological pacifist".
Below you will find another letter-in-depth.

Dear Friends In Christ:

I noted the message you sent me. The following points are made.
1. At this moment I do not have the time to research the noted speech and cannot tell if the quote was or was-not
"taken out of context".
2. As a Latin Rite Catholic I know that I have no need to believe in or follow the "teachings" of any Pope unless he
speaks-or-writes "ex cathedra"
3. As I have previously noted the "peace" you propose is the "peace of desolation", that desolation and ruin (In this era)
comes primarily from Islam's true believers for whom peace-without-conquest if a sin and is an evil. That hard-rock position and
its related crimes must be combated for the sake of the innocent under the authority given to all of his creations by Natural Law.
Natural which includes the hate-less use of such force (Including deadly force) as are needed to defend self and innocents from
criminal (Islamic) attacks.
4. The "peace" you propose-and-defend is, in fact, a form of physical-and-spiritual suicide and, therefore, a most serious sin..
5. Although The Christ indicated that we should "turn the other cheek" after being slapped on the face (Only the most ignorant
would not know that such was a much more serious insult in His era than today), He did not command us to not resist murderers,
rapists, arsonists, child-abusers and others of that horrid ilk.
6. I am, myself, willing to forgive "70 times 70 times" if, and only if, the usual preconditions of the Church are met, being: Declaring
the sin; Stating the acts(s) as sin(s); Asking for forgiveness; Expressing an heart-felt intention to not so sin again; And, in some
cases making restitution and penance. [Over history, the Christians and, for them, the Churches, have done that for the sins committed
against others in the name of Christianity. Over history and to this day, Muslims will NOT do so as to the almost infinite crimes they
have inflicted on the innocent in the name of Islam.]
7. As noted above, hate (And other illicit passions) is (Are) the real risk to the Christian warrior as any use of force (Including
deadly force) must be done in the name of Justice and The Just Judge, without such moral handicaps. (Passion also cripple
the warrior and makes moral and combat judgements dangerous to self-and-others.) Therefore, "striking blows for Christ", AND
NOT FOR SELF, is allowed according to the teachings of the Church as so well defined, by that "Doctor Of The Church"
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae".
9. For myself, I will: Not ask soldiers to give up their profession, but only ask that they be just; Will praise most of the USA's
"Centurions" of this era as men of great Faith; Will maintain the authority of the state to "use the sword" (Or AR-15s) to punish evil-doers;
And, will maintain my right, under Natural Law and in a democracy, to be a citizen-soldier, a centurion and, as a part of the first line of just
defense against all domestic and foreign criminals, a user of the sword-of-justice.
10. I am fully prepared to be judged for these positions and any related acts, At age 72-years, I do not expect to wait long for that
Judgement.

CHRIST RULER! CHRIST VICTOR!


PS---Oh yes: Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, have mercy on me a sinner; Savior of the world, save thy people!

My Final Position On CCW For Wisconsin

I have recently: Reread Article-1, Section-25 of the Wisconsin Constitution; Reconsidered the many laws we have against the misuse of firearms (eg Murder. Substantial Battery; Reckless/Intoxicated Used Of Firearms; Possession Of A Firearm By A Felon); The fact that the punishments for other crimes can be enhanced by the possession of a firearm while committing such a crime); And, the below-noted and anti-democracy "tricks" used to repress the rights of the People.

Please remember that excessive fees (ie Poll Taxes) have been previously used to exclude Blacks and poor people from exercising their constitutional rights. The costs associated with any mandatory training, fingerprint checks and ID cards could add up to like excessive costs.

The costs of any CCW license (If, and only if, any is required) should be no more than the cost of an ID card (eg As issued by DOT) and the cost of doing a electronic check to see if the applicant is qualified under either Wisconsin or US law to purchase a firearm.

I also note that unreasonable and ambiguous tests have likewise been used to limit constitutional rights. As to shooting tests the usual 50-foot test is NOT applicable to self-defense as the usual distance in self-defense is not more than half that distance AND the most common use of firearms for that purpose is the "mere" display of a gun. How does anyone test the ability of a citizen to use a concealed knife or other non-firearm weapon as surprise is essential to the effective use of such devices?

The "1000-foot) exclusion around schools make it impossible to exercise the "right to keep and bear arms" in any urban area.

The rational and pro-freedom solution is to punish only misuses of weapons and not the mere carrying of them---Which is already done by those who misuse weapons AND, to be honest, by many otherwise law-abiding citizens who wish equal rights with robbers and other criminals..

Private property (Along with jails, prisons, mental health facilities, court houses, power plants) can be "posted" against the carrying of weapons and violations treated as "Criminal Trespass". As constitutional rights do not stop at the physical boundaries of publicly funded-and-owned UW, that disorganization shall not be able to forbid CCW on campus.

Therefore, the only CCW law we should have is no such law; But, the ongoing and strict enforcement of our already existing laws for the misuse of such inanimate devices.


PS #1---The Shepherd Express and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's editorial positions on CCW tipped me from supporting a very loose and "must issue" CCW permit law to the "no permit required" position defended above. I thank them!!!

PS #2---Before Michigan passed its CCW law, various Police Chiefs there predicted "blood running in the streets". That did not happen. At least one Chief had the good grace to note his error.

PS #3---Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam


================================================================

NOTES

MAXIM: "When a criminal attack is only seconds away, the police are only minutes away (And in rural or wilderness areas, only hours away)".
=================================================================

Please Specially Note: There is no positive correlation between CCW and violent crimes (Including night time burglary of homes). There are such positive correlations between such crimes and: Race; And, cities under Democrat administration or with mayors-and-aldermen associated with that Party.

==================================================================
Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife

On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a Milwaukee area and armed robber made a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a larger number of armed, law abiding, citizens carrying concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.


Perhaps, the recent drop in violent crimes is more a matter of more citizens ignoring

anti-CCW laws than by any police actions. The police are usually too late to do anything but "count bodies and pick up pieces".


=================================================================
Gun Free Zone = Free Fire Zone
I have been reliably informed that the Omaha mall, the site of a recent massacre, was a "Gun Free Zone" by State Law and mall regulations. Like Virginia Tech (Columbine HS, Wisconsin's Weston HS, and other schools and places) "Gun Free Zone" really means "Free Fire Zone For Crazy Criminals", who can kill people in such places with the reasonable expectation that the police, who never seem to prevent such offenses, and armed citizens (Such as high and grade school staff), who are barred from carrying weapons, will nothing to stop them OR do so at great-and-fatal risk to themselves.

Of course, in Wisconsin the entire State is a "Free Fire Zone" for such murderers due to the State Supreme Court's failure to understand the very exact language of our Constitution as to the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms AND to the Legislature's failure to enforce the will of about 75% of Wisconsin's voters who added Article-I, Section-25 to Wisconsin's basic law.
=================================================================

Old Enough To Serve & Die: We have still to address the fact that many good citizens, under the age of 21-years are old enough to serve in our Armed Forces, be trained in the most modern and deadly weapons; But, are not old enough to buy a firearm or CCW under any proposed law. They are "old enough to die" in the service of our nation.

Calling On God For Help

A man was caught in a flood. Two men came by in a boat to rescue him, but he
> waved them away shouting "no the Lord will save me!" One hour later another
> boat came along but again the man cried "no the Lord will save me!"
>
> Eventually a helicopter arrived but still the man insisted"the Lord will save
> me!" unfortunately the man drowned. When he got to the gates of heaven he
> asked St. Peter, " why didn't the Lord save me?" and St. Peter replied "For
> crying out loud, He sent two boats and a helicopter! what more do you want?"

Equitable Responces To Islamic Attacks

There is a world-wide campaign of attacks against Jewish, Christian Buddhist. Sikh and other true religions' communities, places-of-worship and individuals by Muslims acting alone (As a result of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"), small groups, larger mobs and regional OR world wide organizations.

Yet, when any Muslim is asked about such attacks, their usual response is that, "Oh. those are the other and radicalized Muslims". That is a lie OR a much more dangerous "half-truth" or "half-lie"---For the following reasons.
1. All Muslims must believe that the whole of the Koran are the actual words of their Allah and may not be altered or modified or softened by any person since the death of Mohammed AND such commandments and examples are to be followed;
2. The Koran (Along with the sayings of Mohammed and the examples of his life) encourage or allow, and often command, the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, banditry, perpetual war with "unbelievers", sexual use of girl-children as young as nine-years-of-age and the other horrors taught by that creature.
3. One of the best kept secrets of Islam is that all Muslims consider themselves of a world-wide brotherhood (ie Ummah) with full responsibility for each other and with a duty to support each other against the "unbelievers".

Since #3 above is true, I see no reason to NOT hold any Muslim (Group) responsible for the actions of ANY other Muslim Group(s) anywhere in the world.

Therefore, the burning of a Christian Church in Egypt could result in the like destruction of a Mosque in the USA or Londonistan or Paris. The like destruction of a Sikh temple (Gurdwara) in Cape Town would result in parallel and counter action in Denmark. The same should hold for Muslims' attacks Synagogues, Hindu-Buddhist temples, Etc..

The just means of doing so would require:
1. Prior and world-wide warning of such actions-to-come if the noted Islamic attacks do not fully stop;
2. Further such warnings after the first few instances of such "reactions";
3. That should be done without hate or other illicit passions and only as a "teaching example"or matter-of-justice or "balancing Karma". [For traditional Christians, the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae" should be applied .]
4. Unlike Muslims, others should not attack women children and should attempt to, as much as possible, minimize "collateral damage".

It may be that Muslims will not respond to such attacks by stopping their attacks as they worship death and welcome such for their Allah (NOT the same as Arabic speaking Christians and other non-Muslims).

But, we must remember that compromise with evil is evil and our human and basic goal, under "Natural Law", is Justice above Peace.

Those who object by saying "Do you want to start a war with 1.5 Billion Muslims should be remember that Mohammed declared perpetual war against "unbelievers", which war obviously continues to this day.

Paraprosdokians

Many of the following could be applied to editors, professors, "religious leaders",
"anti-religious leaders", politicians, other "yous" and, most specially, ME

HT: Phil B.

..
A paraprosdokian is a figure of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected in a way that causes the reader or listener to reframe or reinterpret the first part. It is frequently used for humorous or dramatic effect, sometimes producing an anticlimax.

1. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

2. Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.

3. The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.

4. If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

5. We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

6. War does not determine who is right - only who is left AND who writes the histories.

7. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

8. Evening news is where they begin with 'Good evening', and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.

9. A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station.

10.. How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?

11.. Dolphins are so smart that within a few weeks of captivity, they can train people to stand on the very edge of the pool and throw them fish.

12.. I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted pay checks.

13.. Whenever I fill out an application, in the part that says "In an emergency, notify:" I put "Doctor".

14.. I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

15.. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.

16.. You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

17.. The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!

18.. Hospitality: Making your guests feel like they're at home, even if you wish they were.

19.. I discovered I scream the same way whether I'm about to be devoured by a great white shark or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot.

20.. There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.

21.. I always take life with a grain of salt, plus a slice of lemon, and a shot of tequila.

22.. When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water.

23.. You're never too old to learn something stupid.

24.. To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.

25. I prayed to God for a new bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and prayed for forgiveness.

A Theoretical Note On Fuel Air Bombs

On a purely theoretical basis, I understand that taking an agricultural, high-pressure, large-volume-output spraying apparatus, filling the "pesticide" tanks with light fuel oil, using "liquid-petroleum-gas" rather than air as a carrier, spraying such into the largest room of a large building and then suddenly igniting that cloud (eg With a flare-or-rocket from the type of projector often found in ships' life-boats) will result in the destruction of that large building.

Now, what made me think of this?

Perhaps, it was the usual floor plans of certain buildings used by a well-known,international and 1400-year-old criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology
(eg As planned for downtown New York City and Copenhagen, Denmark).

Select Reading List On Islam

NOTE BENE: If you wish this list sent by email to you, for easier access,please send a request to me a jamespawlak1@gmail.com

(1) Blog: Crusader Knight
Post: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2011/03/islam-dhimmitude-and-freedom.html

(2)    A review of the book
Allah Is Dead: Why Islam Is Not A Religion. (You might find it “convenient” to read the last chapter, a summary, first before attempting to plow through the basic text.)

(3) Post: "The Closing Of The Muslim Mind": A Book Review
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/09/closing-of-muslim-mind-book-review.html

(4) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(5) Post: "Moderate Muslims"???
Link: < http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/08/moderate-muslims.>

(6) Post: Islamophobia???
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2008/07/islamophobia.html


(7) Post: John Q. Adams On Islam & Christianity
Link:

(8) Post: Islam & Like Religious Veneer Terrorist Groups
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/10/islam-like-religious-veneer-terrorist.html

TO OBTAIN EASIER ACCESS TO THESE REFERENCES YOU ARE WELCOME TO SEND A REQUEST, WITH AN EMAIL RETURN ADDRESS TO ME A "james pawlak1 (at) gmail (dot) dom.



                
======================================================================

Forensic Examinaiton Of Documents

To be honest,and as a non-birther, I am appalled by the lack of scientific knowledge as to the (Forensic) examinations of such documents as birth certificates AND the reliance on other-than-scientific evidence by news reporters, commentators and other "folks".

A real examination and proof of validity-or-forgery would require at-the-least:
1. A chemical examination (Requiring only very, very, small samples) of the questioned document and, if applicable, eleven or so before-and-after it in any bound-collection; And,
2. Comparison of the handwriting on that document to the hand-writing of the same persons on similar and other documents from various sources.
3. Careful examination of the type-cases and impressions on relative documents.

As to newspaper "birth announcements" it would be necessary to do the same for hard-copes of old news papers presented as "real". (I do wonder if those which date back more than 20-years are kept in any style other than easily changed electronic records.)

Of course, any records of a VIP (With access to highly skilled persons and the power to buy or otherwise obtain the needed procedures) could be altered by "creating a legend".

A Warning, Wrath & Obama

Can anyone produce any example of Mr. Barrack H. Obama doing anything in the areas of foreign relations and use of our military which has done anything except embarrass and weaken the USA?

He has: Insulted or betrayed our once best allies of the United Kingdom, Poland and the Czech Republic; Weakened us in the eyes of the well source of terrorism and asymmetrical warfare in this world, Islam, by his "Cairo Speech" and bowing down to the effective leader of that ideology, the King of Saudi Arabia; Continued the prior administrations' (Both parties) in maintaining a top-heavy military plagued by too many "political" admirals and generals; Involved us in a third war, in an Islamic nation, without consideration of the end results of that poorly considered action, which may very well be the turn over of that nation to our worst enemies rather than its misrule by a previously cowed dictator; Allowed, Communist China to wage electronic and economic war against the USA without taking such actions (eg Not forcing that arrogant nation to regularized the value of its currency And, other like acts of stumbling error.

In addition, he (Along with some prior administrations) raised our national debt to a nation-destroying level and most certainly appears to have no intention of not continuing that internal war against the People of our nation.

Mr. Obama has (Like prior presidents) failed to take such actions along our Southern border as would effectively stop the flood of job thieves, bearers of untreatable diseases
(eg Drug resistant TB), previously deported "gang bangers", AND heavily armed "hit teams", kidnapping squads, drug smugglers, terrorists and other such scum. This has become much more critical in the last two years by reason of the stresses on our economic well being AND the reported increase of "undocumented" persons of Middle-Eastern origin. Those Americans living on that border are being put in daily and deadly danger from the lack of security in those areas.

Mr. Obama has been too much aided in the above offenses by too many Members of the Congress, most in his own Party, but also those RINOs who have been corrupted by too many years "inside the belt-line".

If this continues all political leaders, most specially those who continue to support the above and dangerous behaviors, will do well to FEAR the wrath of the People and, perhaps, that of our Legions (Who will be supported by their fellow citizens).


SOME RELEVANT QUOTES
(1)
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (George Santayana)

(2) The piece – whose authenticity is admittedly open to question – is attributed to “Centurion Marcus Flavinius, Second Cohort, Augusta Legion to his cousin Tertullus in Rome.


“We had been told, on leaving our native soil,” wrote the centurion Marcus Flavius to a cousin back in Rome, “that we were going to defend the sacred rights conferred on us by so many of our citizens [and to aid] populations in need of our assistance and our civilization.” For such a cause, he and his comrades had willingly offered to “shed our quota of blood, to sacrifice our youth and our hopes.” Yet the news from the homeland was disconcerting: The capital was seemingly rife with factions, treachery and petty politics. “Make haste,” Marcus Flavius continued, “and tell me that our fellow citizens understand us, support us and protect us as we ourselves are protecting the glory of the empire.”

“If it should be otherwise, if we should have to leave our bleached bones on these desert sands in vain,then beware of the anger of the legions."


(3) Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam!

Islam VS Democracy---Again

From today's news we were informed that, in an apparently fair election, the People of Nigeria reelected their Christian president over a Muslim opponent. The result was riots, gun fire, an externally forced prison break and other violence by Muslims.

At least those Muslims are consistent in following the teachings of Mohammed as to Muslims to be ruled only by Muslims. They also reinforced the predictions, based on
the percentage of Muslims in any given jurisdiction (eg Somalia, The Sudan, Dearborn, Michigan), given by at least one scholar. (1).

This was no reaction only by some small sub-class of "extremists", but the predictable reaction to be expected of Muslims who are any appreciable portion of the general population, which should be known to all who study history.

Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam! (2)

NOTES
(1) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(2) Post: "Mecca Delenda Est"--The Why & How
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/01/mecca-delenda-est-why-how.html

Creating A Personal "Legend"

In the world of espionage there is the concept of a “legend” a created personal history based on: Real facts; Modified facts; And, most importantly, invented facts by such means as faked documents and inserting them in both public and private record bases. Where that cannot be done, it is not unheard of to eliminate or block-block access to them.

For example, if I had the money and political power I might be able to create a new identity for myself by such means as: Inserting birth certificates in county, state and hospital records; Inserting birth announcements in newspapers' “morgues”; Blocking access to such by use of the laws regarding them; Blocking access to claimed school records by misapplying the laws allowing such confidentiality as forbid schools from even acknowledging that a person attended or did-not attend a school; And, like techniques.

Does this bring anyone to mind?

Oh Hell: Let's Offend Everyone!

Q. What's the Cuban National Anthem?
A. Row, Row, Row Your Boat.

Q. Where does an Irish family go on vacation?
A. A different bar.

Q. What did the Chinese couple name their
tan, curly-haired baby?
A. Sum Ting Wong.

Q. What do you call it when an Italian has
one arm shorter than the other?
A. A speech impediment.

Q. Why are there no Muslims in Science Fiction TV shows and movies?
A. Because: There were none in Mohammed's flat-earth Arabia; "Allahu Akbar" does not translate into Klingon; Islam has no future; And, there are no goats in outer space.

Q. Why aren't there any Puerto Ricans on Star
Trek ?
A. Because they're not going to work in the future either.

Q. Why do Driver Ed classes in redneck schools use the car only on Mondays,
Wednesdays and Fridays?
A. Because on Tuesday and Thursday, the Sex Ed class uses it.

Q. What's the difference between a southern zoo and a northern zoo?
A. The southern zoo has a description of the animal along with a recipe.

Q. How do you get a sweet little 80-year-old
lady to say the 'F' word?
A. Get another sweet little 80-year-old lady to yell, 'BINGO!'

Q. What's the difference between a northern
fairytale and a southern fairytale???
A. A northern fairytale begins, ...'Once upon a time...'A southern fairytale
begins, ... 'Y'all ain't gonna believe this shit.'

Q. Why doesn't Mexico have an Olympic team?
A. Because all the Mexicans who can run, jump or swim are
already in the United States ?!!!!

AND, AS A POLE, MY FAVORITE---
Q. How did all the Pollacks get here?
A. Two swam over and the rest walked over on the scum.


OH shut up ... just pass it on!.....

Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note

DURIE, Mark; THE THIRD CHOICE: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; (Forward by Bat Ye'or);
Deror Press; ISBN 978-0-9807223-0-7.

This work presents Islam in a rational, logical, well foot-noted and dispassionate manner as leaves it free of any hint of “Islamophobia” and other forms of bias. It could and should be used as a basic text in any courses, touching on Islam, in: Anthropology; Sociology; Comparative legal systems; Political Science; History; Social Psychology.

Muslims are likely to reject and resent this work as it clearly illuminates the “disinformation” (ie Lying) used by them to hide the dark side of Islam, its founder, teachings and collective behaviors over the last 1400-plus years.

I suggest that any public figure who speaks or writes on Islam and Muslims, once notified of this work, who does so without reading it is lying-to-self and all who hear or read their offerings AND join in the basic Islamic tactic of “disinfomation”.

Ideal Affirmative Action Candidate

The ideal candidate for California's or other jurisdiction's affirmative action discrimination programs IS a: Hispanic surnamed, Black, Lesbian, sex-changed, "female", "kill and immediately eat red meat fanatic", substance abusing, dishonorably discharged military vet, parolee, with one leg, a glass eye, a very repulsive skin disease and bad breath, who is now unemployed after being fired from "her" prior position as a Priestess within a San Francisco Satan-Worshiping congregation for being "too evil"and was previously expelled by the University Of California-Berkely (Political Science Major) AND from all local political organizations and Mosques for being "too radically leftist" or too violent

Will The National Guard Teach My Children

"Will The National Guard Teach My Children" was a sign carried, I assume by a teacher, among the other noisy and noisome mob in and about Wisconsin's Capitol Building.

In fact, that is a most excellent idea---If we would expand it to retired military and those who have completed their rehabilitation for war-wounds. These men and women, many of whom have university degrees or their equivalents or such experience in what are known as "the trades" as would allow them to teach the academic-of-vocational classes assigned to them.

Much more importantly, they could-and-would teach the true value of duty as a balance to and prerequisite to both priviledges (As union bargining, driving an auto) or true rights (eg Voting, keeping and bearing arms, free speech and free practice of religion).

It might be very good for that more-than-zaftig teacher to be replaces by a lean ex-trooper (Perhaps without legs as replaced by steel devices) who is very interested in the real future of American by teaching duty-and-responsibility, in addition to academic/vocational class materials. This is the real meaning of being an American. Certainly, our future voters should learn those subjects and the "price of freedom".

Olive Branches & Limits Of Compromise

On Feb. 26, 2011 the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel offered the editorial "Offer an oliver branch" as advise to Wisconsin's Republicans. This editorial suggests that Wisconsin Republicans compromise with the Legislature's Democrat Senators. As the Editors pointed out, this would NOT be a reflection of what Democrats did, two years' ago, when the People reelected that Party to control of our State's government and a tax increase bill was inflicted, without debate, on Wisconsin by Democrats.

Keep in mind: Compromise with a child's (Or the wearers of jail-house-orange shirted mobs') tantrums only encourages more of the same; Compromise with law breakers (eg Street criminals, unlawfully absent teachers and State Senators) does the same; Compromise with pirates (As in Somalia), dictators (eg Hitler) and other evil men only encourages them to expand their evil.

This is based on both the evidence of scientific psychology and the examples of history. (To paraphrase: Those who do not study, learn from and act upon the lessons of history will be condemned to repeat it.)

In other words, there is a boundry between "compromise as the "life-blood of politics" and illicit, asinie and crime-producing compromise. The noted editorial encouraged the latter.

Christ & Self-Defense

Jesus the Christ sent his disciples out without any possession to spread "The Good News" (Luke 22:35). Upon their return and (Can we assume?) because of what they experienced on that earlier expedition on the dangerous roads and among the contentious people of Israel and surrounding areas, He had other instructions and commands for them.

Among those other commands was that they should do every thing possible (Including selling their most basic garments) to obtain swords. When his disciples presented him with the two such weapons they had, He said: "They are sufficient" or "They are enough" (Variation by translation for the balance of Luke 22:35). Since the Christ was NOT sending out armies to reestablish an independent Israel (A disappointment to some of his followers), two swords appeared to be "sufficient" to protect his law-abiding followers on their travels.

Now--I have read a variety of interpretations of these verses which all appear to be pathological pacifists' misreadings of plain text. Some have claimed that Jesus was being sarcastic or ironic or using a parable--Without any proofs of that and in opposition to the most direct statement and the usual parable-style of His other teachings.

Others have claimed that Jesus, the "Prince of Peace", would not support the arming of his followers with swords (The AK-47s or AR-15s of that era), conveniently forgetting his whipping out of the money changers in the Temple, his words about child abusers and Judas and the frequent Words about the punishment of evil doers and unworthy servants.

Yes--He did teach peace and "turning the other cheek"--To insults. However, there is nothing in the Gospel teaching that anyone should submit to such criminal attacks as murder, rape, robbery, genocide (The use of which are supported by the Koran, Nazi ideology and practices and the injustices inflicted by other tyrants now and throughout history),

We should also remember: The advice of St. John the Baptist to the soldiers, which was NOT to give up their swords and profession; The writings of St. Paul as to the State's authority to use the sword to punish wrongdoers; And, the very clear advise of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (In his De Laude Novae Militae) as to waging war against those who attack Christians (Muslims in his time and, as likely as not, in our time).

Pathological Pacifists Worshiping Death

In recent months I have had many contacts with a couple who I can only describe as “pathological pacifists”. These individuals BELIEVE that it is against the teachings of Jesus the Christ to offer any resistance to evil doers, even murderers, rapists, child-molester, arsonists, the Jihad-waging followers of the false prophet Mohammed and others of that ilk. They BELIEVE that no Christian should ever, never, use deadly force to resist those monsters.

I could not get them to directly address the Christ's acts and words of violence. Most specially I could not get them to directly address Jesus' absolute command to his disciples to arm themselves with swords (The AK-47s and AR-16s of that time) as noted in Luke 22:36-38; Two swords being enough to protect the disciples on the bandit infested roads of that day, yet not enough to give the impression of any attempt to set up a worldly kingdom.

Those pathological pacifists, in fact, worship death and, doing so, are no better than the Thugee of India, the blood cultists of the Aztecs Hitler's SS and, most specially, those who follow the teachings of the Koran.

Teach Intolerance!

Today I noted some return address labels, in my collection from various charitable organizations, which read "Teach Tolerance".

Rather I would prefer such as state "Teach Intolerance!"! That is, teach intolerance of murder, genocide, rape, enslavement, perpetual war, those who oppose real science and creative arts, equal and Natural rights for all humans and the like.

In other words, teach intolerance of Nazism, Fascism, Atheistic Communism AND, especially in this era, Islam (As there are no declared "moderate Muslims").

Oh, I threw the noted labels away.

Congress & GOP Leading By Example---NOT

Buried in today's paper was an article noting that the Congress has proposed a cut in its budget much smaller than that proposed for the other parts of our government.

Now that the Republican Party has control of the House Of Representatives, out of which all money spending Bills must come, there is no excuse for this horrid example of "do as I say and not as I do" anti-philosophy.

I will "believe" that Republicans are sincere and effective about controlling our Federal government's spending when they initiate and force through such measures as would: Reduce their salaries by 10% until such time as we have a balanced budget without borrowing money; Require Members and their staff to pay "fair market value" for such fringe benefits as retirement, health insurance, hair cuts, meals in the Congress' restaurants and the other like "goodies" they get; Require members to cut their staff budgets by 10% (Same condition as above; And, without "out-sourcing")

The House can also cut the number and grossly over-pay of Federal bureaucrats; And, should start with Mr. Obama's Czars who are not subject to the same Congressional control as the already in-place Department Secretaries and Under-Secretaries.

Any refusal by Democrats will make good "ammo" for the GOP's use in the 2012 election. Refusal by Republicans would provide the "other Party" with far too much like "ammo".

I will believe the effectiveness of "Tea Party" organizations when they make very public either parties' Members refusal to go along with such measures

Effective Use Of Military To Secure USA Borders

I strongly disagree with the statement that we have "tried everything" to secure our Southern border against the flood of drug dealers, terrorists, gang-members and paroled prisoners returning here after prior deportation, carriers of untreatable diseases (eg Drug resistant TB), job and identity thieves and such like unamerican trash.

One and untried method is as offered here:
1. Restrict the Border Patrol to urban areas and a thousand yards on either side of authorized, rural crossing points;
2. Allow anyone to cross into Mexico, without question, at any authorized crossing point or station;
3. Use four rows of razor ribbon coils In addition to the fences yet to be build and those sort-of in place along the entire border except for roads leading to authorized crossing points;
4. Make the balance of our border, for the first 1000-yards into the USA, a military zoneith posted notices in English, Spanish, Parsi, Arabic and local Native American languages that persons entering illegally there will be treated as invaders and will be shot, without warning if they are armed or resist arrest, and otherwise taken into custody for forced deportation or TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION.

The troops could be regulars (Some brought back from Europe whose countries appear unwilling to defend themselves), reservists, National Guard and members of the General Militia (Also ad hoc posses raised by Sheriffs, mayors, JPs and other local government officials)

Attorneys & GNP

It appears that the usually billed "services" of attorneys are included in the USA 's Gross National Product.along with those of dentists, physicians, landscapers and other independent craftsmen, legitimate massage therapists , and other like persons.

But, what do attorneys produce? Oh, there are some who defend the innocent, prosecute the guilty, insure a fair criminal or civil trial, arrange for the proper distribution of the property of those who have died and, sometimes, bring people closer together than otherwise.

But, too many (Most?) of attorneys in the USA feed off the overly complex laws and government regulations inflicted on the People; Laws-and-rules that they, for the most part, created as members of the Congress and other legislative bodies, as well as the administrative agencies that they dominate. Of course, they properly also control the remaining, judicial, branch of government (Although there are other models for oversight of the judicial process.)

We should ask the following questions and reflect on them and the probable answers.
1.. What part of our GNP is "services by attorneys"?
2. How does that compare with today's economic powerhouses of Japan , India and the People's Republic of China ?
3. How many words of laws and regulations are in-effect and put-into-effect in the USA each year VS. those other nations?
4. Would the People of the USA be better off if Attorneys were barred, by Amending our Constitution, from being Members of the Congress? (And allowing the Several States to do the same for their Legislatures?)

Guns 1000-ft From Congress-Critters: NOT+

With very rare exceptions I have agreed with and supported the positions Congressman Peter King has put forth! The only such exception I can think of is his very recent proposal to forbid the possession of a firearm within 1,000-feet of a Member of the Congress.

That proposal fails tests-of-reason, of which I have provided below a few.
1. Criminals and "crazies" do NOT obey such laws.
2. A thousand-feet is a "close in shot" for many trained riflemen such as the Texas Tower Killer and the left-wing goon who murdered President Kennedy.; Some riflemen can hit targets at over 1,500-yards.
3. "Gun free zones" quickly become "free fire zones" (eg Virginia Tech U., Northern Illinois University and, for that matter, Columbine High School, where the on-site police officer ran away from danger) The presumption of gun-free-status can lean to relaxed security.
4. As a matter of "due process", how could an apolitical hunter know than a Member in within a 1000-feet of where s/he might be?

I am very grateful that the Arizona killer did not use a vest/car/fuel-air bomb

Constitutionally Protecting The Constitution

The greatest internal danger to the rights, under our Constitution, of US Citizens lies not in revolutionaries, jihadi, dishonest politicians, but in those Federal Courts where the judges worshipTHE LAW and themselves far more than those rights and, most particularly, the intent of the authors of the constitution and of its later amendments.

Those judges have "discovered" rights not in the Constitution and not intended by the above noted authors. Those judges have established "evolving standards..." which are most certainly not in the Constitution. In both cases, the Constitution, itself, provides the means, by amendment, to do such things.

To constitutionally protect the Constitution from such abuses I suggest we look to President Thomas Jefferson for guidance and enact an amendment to our basic law, TO WIT:
" (A) In all decisions of the Courts of the United States judges shall declare those parts of the Constitution, as amended, upon which those decisions are based and consider the words and intent of the authors of the Constitution and its Amendments as the primary base for such judicial actions to the exclusion of all other views.
(B) Those courts shall not rely upon the decisions of courts or other bodies outside the United States as to the Constitution and laws of the United States and of the Several States.
(C) The Constitution is the sole authority for the adding to or removing of the rights of the People of the United States.
(D) This Amendment shall take effect upon ratification; But it is not retroactive in its force."

I put to you that this will return the authority and power of the Constitution to the People AND bring back into balance the power of the three branches of government.

Our Real State Religion

Forget that nonsense that there is a wall of separation between church and state in the USA. We have an official, growing and ever more powerful state religion. That religion is the Law---As made by judges, especially those in our Federal Courts. You think not? Please examine the present and probable future state of the law under our judges as if it were a religion. You will see the religion-of-the-law exposed in the facts.

Our law has a “holy book”, called the Constitution. Our judges claim that they cling to the teachings of that document; But, vary from it as much as did the Catholic and Protestant fanatics of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation varied from the teachings of Jesus Christ when they burned and murdered each other. The “priests” or “mullahs” of that religion are, of course, judges. The “High Priests” or “Grand Ayatollahs” are the Supreme Court Justices. Their “dogma” is set in their judgments. Our judges take the clear and simple teachings of the Constitution and subject them to “mystical interpretation” in an effort to make us think that black-is-white, up-is-down and truth-is-lies.

They claim to uphold the Constitution's protection of individuals, but had allowed children, at the point-of-birth, to have their brains sucked out of their little skulls to facilitate abortions (And still allow the dismemberment of such children)---Even when there is no threat to the life of their mothers. Those judges claim to only interpret our American Constitution in light of the democratically passed laws of the People's elected representative, but use the legal decisions of foreign nations in their making of laws. They ignore the provision in our Constitution for its amendment and declare that new “rights” exist without the consent of the People. They repeatedly inflict their own social and political judgments and show great disdain for democratically approved laws. They suppress the joined freedom-of-speech and free expression of religion by denying the People to present their religion by such expressions as posting or exhibiting the Ten Commandments or other like symbols on public land. [This last technique is one common to power hungry priest-hoods, which is to do every thing possible to suppress and destroy other religions.].

When the founders of this nation outlined our government in our Constitution, they set a careful balance between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. That balance has been seriously disturbed and the whole structure of our government now is moving towards collapse and the dictatorship of the judicial elite---Who care little for democracy. That balance must be reset. My suggestion to enact the following Amendment to the Constitution, which would give the Congress the power to correct the errors which have infiltrated our society by judicial usurpations.

The Congress of the United States may reverse or nullify any decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States or of the lesser Courts of Appeal by a two-
thirds vote of the member present and voting in either House OR by a simple
majority of the members present and voting in both the Senate and House of
Representatives. The vote of each member of the Congress in such matters is to
be separately recorded and immediately made public. Such matters are to have
priority over all other business of the Congress.

The recording and immediate release is to prevent the members of the Congress from hiding behind the curtain of voice votes. The granting of such matters absolute priority is to prevent such matters from being “buried in committee”.

Of course, the “bother” of amending the Constitution could be avoided by the confirmation of new Justices on our Supreme Court and judges to other courts as will NOT make laws, but only interpret them according to our State and Federal Constitutions and the intent of the People as expressed by the intent of their representatives who wrote those documents.

I also note that this “worship” of the “Great God Law” is only the face of “Secular Humanism” which, in turn, is the front or false-flag for the “religion” of Atheism. (Every court decision restricting the rights of “free exercise” of other religions is a blow for the USA's state religion of law, secular humanism and atheism.)


At the least, the Federal Courts have declared “Atheism” a religion (James J. Kaufman VS Gary R. McCaughtey et.al.; 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, #04-1914; Decided On
August 19, 2005)

World's Largest Army---US Hunters?

The World's Largest Army. America's Hunters?

The state of Wisconsin has gone an entire deer hunting season without someone getting killed. That's great. There were over 600,000 hunters. Allow me to restate that number. Over the last two months, the eighth largest army in the world - more men under arms than Iran; more than France and Germany combined - deployed to the woods of a single American state to help keep the deer menace at bay. But that pales in comparison to the 750,000 who are in the woods of Pennsylvania this week. Michigan 's 700,000 hunters have now returned home. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia , and it is literally the case that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world. America will forever be safe from foreign invasion of troops with that kind of home-grown firepower.

Hunting - it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's a matter of national security!

Now you know why the liberal anti-gun group wants to take the guns away.