Tuesday, July 18, 2017

A Lesson For Marquette Madrasa

Islamophobia???

The term or suffix "phobia" is used too widely and much too incorrectly in such terms as "homophobia" and, as to this note, "islamophobia".

As to the latter term, the following quote is applicable: "A phobia is defined in Webster's dictionary as an "inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of subjects or situation.". Fear of Islamic extremism and its potentially catastrophic consequences is not inexplicable or illogical. It is a rational reaction to dangerous, irrational people who would use weapons of mass destruction to bring about their apocalyptic vision." (From Joseph Klien's "Playing The Islamophobic Card", "Front Page Magazine"; March 5, 2007.)

I suggest that we all now substitute (In our daily use, in magazine/newspaper "Style Books", political speeches, sermons, etc.) the term "ISLAMOFORIA", where the term "foria" derives from the Greek and denotes a state of being-on-guard---Which is the proper response to Islam and all Muslims (Based on their "religious duty" to destroy our culture, government, nation and civilization).

Some Teachings Of The Koran

•  verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25
SOME OTHER UNALTERABLE COMMANDS OF ISLAM
Listed below are a few passages from the Quran that clearly compel Muslims to violence.  
Quran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.
Quran 3:28   “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends
Quran 3:85   “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
Quran 5:33   “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.
Quran 8:12   “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran.
Quran 8:60   “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.
Quran 8:65   “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.
Quran 9:50   “When opportunity arises kill the infidels where you find them.
Quran 9:30    "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them.
"Quran 9:123  “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.
Quran 22:19  “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.

Quran 47:4    “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Guns, Murders & Race In The USA

There are those who point to the very high (For "developed nations" only) rate of murders by misuse of firearms in the USA.

What they do not acknowledge is the fact that if Blacks are removed from the "numbers", the USA would have a rate of such crimes no higher than that of Belgium---Before the Muslims invasion of that nation.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Congress-Critter Brad Sherman & Treason

Member Brad Sherman has introduced “Articles Of Impeachment” against our constitutionally elected President.

I suggest that his priorities are faulty. It would be better for him to first, personally and formally ask for a “presentment”, to a Federal Grand Jury, towards obtaining an indictment charging Hillary Rodham-Clinton with (Felony) violation(s) of 18 US Code 2071.

This would, of course, demonstrate that his interest is in justice and not political revenge.

In fact, he might move to determine the relationship, if any, between “that” sale of Uranium to Russia and the various, direct and indirect, benefits thereafter received by the Clinton family.

Friday, July 14, 2017

Poland, Islam & Western Civilization

After President Trump's speech, in Poland, some noted the history of the courage Poles demonstrated during the horrors of Nazi and Soviet rule.

Such persons are very "near sighted" and ignorant of history or avoiding it to maintain a position of "political correctness" regarding Islam.

If, and only if, those persons were aware-of or honest-about the history of Poland, they would note:
1.  During the 1600s the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth beat back two (Tartar and Ottoman) Islamic invasions on their Eastern frontier at a great cost in blood and treasure;
2. That defense prevented the Germanys and Nordic nations from the horrors of Jihad and the greater tyranny of Muslim rule (As experienced by Greece, Hungary and other nations); And,
3. On September 11-12, 1683 a force led by the Polish king drove the Islamic Turks from the walls of Vienna and further protected the heartland of Europe.

Now, much of Europe (Lacking the racial/national memory of Poles, Hungarians and others) allowed and, perhaps, encouraged the new-style, Muslim, invasions which has brought to Germany, France, Belgium, Sweden and Norway the usual "gifts" of Islam---Murder, rape and destruction of national wealth.

Now, the EU wishes to punish Poland for resisting the new Jihad of Muslim invasion-by-immigration which has protected Poland's citizens from the above-cited horrors.

It would be best for the USA to support AND follow Poland's example.

Saturday, July 01, 2017

Suppress "Outcome Discrimination"!

"Outcome discrimination" is a "standard" maintained by some bureaucratic agencies and courts that holds that there is, for example, racial discrimination if any "class" is not represented in some employment/academic group in proportion to their part of the general population---Without regard to their part of the pool/population of those qualified for the contested employment or matriculation.

I am now campaigning against such "outcome discrimination" as excludes: Citizens of Puerto Rico in the NBA and NFL; Samoans from roles in classical ballet companies; Those who are carriers of TB, Typhoid and other such diseases from hospital and child-care positions; Those of Chinese and White ancestry from management positions in the NAACP; And, political conservatives from (Tenured) university teaching positions.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

23 Questions About Islam



23 Questions---From The On-Line "American Thinker" Of September 17, 2006

What matters now is not press reports about pieces of a German lecture by Benedict or the Musllim reaction. If we must answer “yes” to all, or any, of the following 23 questions about Islam, are we entitled, nay bound, to be very concerned indeed ?
1. Does Islam claim that every single word in the 6,234 verses of its Quran was not merely divinely inspired, or authorised, but actually dictated, in Arabic, directly by Allah Himself, and revealed over 22 years from 610 CE, and so is uncorrupted and  unalterable ? It descended [nuzila] ready-made and complete from heaven.
2. Does Islam hold the “Principle of Abrogation” – Nasikh -  [Quran 2:106] whereby later verses always over-ride and replace or cancel the earlier ?
3. Are the 14 later [Medina] chapters and over 1,600 verses in the Quran, from 622 CE to 632 CE, thus supreme and unchallengeable when they contradict the earlier Mecca ones ?
4. Are there some 164 later Medina verses [from 24 Surah, between Surah 2 and 76]  favouring violent Jihad, Jihad Bis Saif, by the sword, or Holy War [Qital Fi Sabilillah], not merely Jihad-e-nafs or struggle against desires ? See list, and full texts, on answering-islam.org.uk, including 9:5 “slay the idolaters whereever you find them and take them captive”. And see www.quranbrowser.com/ for 10 different English translations of any verse.
5. Are there many later Medina verses like 5:82 [“the most implacable in their enmity to the faithful are the Jews”] teaching utter hatred for Jews, as 24 Surah and nearly 90 verses translated into English on the Jewishvirtuallibrary web-site, or 20 references in the Fatwa Database from Sheik As-Salam Alaykum on the Islam On-line site, indicate?
6. Does the Quran allow, or even command, the killing of Apostates who leave Islam, like Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali ?
7. Likewise for Blasphemers – like Salman Rushdie?
8. And of Infidels in extending, or restoring, the rule of Islam?
9. And of Gays?
10. Does the Quran provide for hand amputation for thieves, as in 5:38 ?11. For flogging?
12. For public beheading?
13.  For beating wives, as in 4:34?
14. And are there many Hadith which show the Prophet ordered stonings [introduced under the Second Caliph, 634-644 CE, ‘Umar, a Companion of the Prophet’]?
15. Does the Quran demand the eventual Global Rule of Islam, with no secular realm, whereas Judaism is about waiting for their Messiah, and Christianity offers salvation to persons everywhere?
16. Does the Quran demand the ultimate enforcement of Sharia Law everywhere, even on us Infidels?
17. Does the Quran permit Freedom of Worship to all faiths?
18. Or Free Speech?
19. Or the Right of Free Organisation?
20. Does it treat women as inferiors not only regarding inheritance, but as witnesses?
21. Does the Quran command Muslims to never surrender any land once held by them, such as Spain, or Western Palestine/Israel?
22. Did their “Prophet” order or lead 74 raids or wars during his Medina decade from 622 CE to his 632 CE death?
23. Were 600-900 male Jewish prisoners beheaded in March 627 CE [see Surah 33:25-26]?
If the clear honest answer is “yes” to all, or even to any, of these 23 questions, how can Islam [as distinct from other Faiths] be compatibile with either the 1945 UN Declaration of Human Rights, or the US Constitution? And how can we democrats not fear both any such system, and any who seriously adhere to it, and their increasing number in our midst?
We do not [yet] live in Dar al-Islam, the Realm of Submission, which is exactly what the word “Islam” means, that territory where the population have either become ‘submitters’ [muslimun] or else ‘dhimmis’, submitting by paying the Jizya tax, and accepting Muslim Rule. We by contrast, still live in Dar al-Harb, the Realm of War, the territory where all, or most, of the population have not yet submitted, and who must be made to, by force.
Those who argue that Islam was not spread by the Sword because conversion was not encouraged in the early period, totally miss the point that the territory had been captured by force and the population made ‘dhimmis’.
Are we now to condemn “Western Imperialism” but are not allowed to even mention Islamic Imperialism?
Let us have precise answers to such vital questions of principle, not emotive denounciations and abuse. What is the real answer to each of those 23 points ? And what reasonable person or society should tolerate, or surrender under,  any “Dont call us violent, or we’ll kill you” threats, from any quarter?
Tom Carew, Dublin, Ireland   9 18 06

Monday, June 19, 2017

Redistricting In Wisconsin

1. "Partisan = Democracy" as is the means of declaring our fellow citizens (Not some elitists') differing views on what should be the laws of our State and our Republic;
2. That choice is represented by the constitutional/democratic choices of the People in the only polls that matter AND not by two/three appointed and also anti-democracy Federal judges;
3. In Wisconsin the turning over of authority-and-responsibility for redistricting to the GOP is a result of both the popular vote, our Constitution and law and the nation-wide movement towards like transfers-of-power in an ever increasing number of States;
4. Any rational and pro-democracy citizen should compare the map of the original "Gerrymandering" Vs. Wisconsin's last, legal and democratically established, map and see that there is no valid comparison---Especially when considering our laws regarding such districtsAnd, 
5. Although the lawful maps may give the GOP some small advantages, any map which would be inflicted by appointed judges  would be both unconstitutional and against the will of a majority of our citizens (As is the very apparent goal of Democrats and their Fascist co-actors)

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Protecting Free Speech On Campuses

Alert university/college authorities considering the future appearances of speakers who might generate strong feelings about their positions (And even thuggish responses to them) should/must, very publicly, make the following prior announcements---And take the cited actions as required to protect free speech and academic freedom.

1. Announce that any student or college employee who attacks that free-speech exercise of academic freedom will be immediately banned from campus and, after the usual due-process hearing, formally expelled or fired;
2. Speaker's audiences will be video-recorded and any such persons will be identified;
3. Any concealment of faces-and-identities will also result in the same actions;
4. Police officers have been asked to be present per our school's formal request; 
5. Any acts of violence will both result in the above, punitive actions, and arrest by police officers and referral for criminal prosecution;  And,

6. This college has advised those police that it has no objections to the use of any force necessary to execute any such arrests AND, more specially, to halt any acts which represent "a clear and present danger of death OR great bodily harm" to others---OR, even a reasonably perceived such danger.

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Trump, Bader & Muslim Immigration

It appears that some (eg Judges) maintain that President Donald Trump's pre-election comments on the immigration of Muslims into our Republic vacate his constitutional and statutory authority to restrict immigration under Article-I of our Constitution and as per 8 US Code 1182, (f).


If that is the case, do the pre-election comments, about those statements by President Trump, by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg disqualify her from ruling on President Trump's pending appeal? (Would her failure to then recluse herself be cause for impeachment and trial?)

Friday, June 02, 2017

Social Programs & Science

Almost every week brings news of some new program as to various "Social Problems" (eg Homelessness, Domestic/Street Violence, Under-Achieving Schools/Students).

What is lacking for most (Almost all? All?) of those proposals/programs is some, built-in, plan to scientifically determine if each such program is effective and a wise use of both public and private monies. (Please remember that private contributions are often used to reduce the tax-liability of donors which reduces government's funds and places increased burdens on our fellow citizens.)

There are two basic models for any such scientific evaluations.

One is the "Control Group Vs. Experimental Group(s)" where random selection of subjects (eg
From the pool of all persons alleged to need a proposed program) is made and like subjects are assigned to the studied program. After the unmodified programs are in-place for some reasonable time, a statistical analysis is done to see if there is any, positive/negative differences can be found to exactly determine if that program had: A positive effect; Or, a negative effect; Or, no effect.

The other might be termed "Multi-Factor Analysis". In this mode, all in a larger number of subjects are involved in the considered program; But, all such persons are classified by very many characteristics (eg Age, gender, race, history of  AODA, age of mothers at first birth, academic testing, results of MMPI testing). Thereafter, a more convoluted study can be done to determine any outcomes as can, mathematically, establish those results noted above and may provide more and useful information as to which personal characteristic result in those outcomes.

Unless such evaluations are built-into such programs (And exactly followed), the only sure results of such programs are: The wages/salaries paid those who are employed by them; A waste of public/private funds; And, to make some people "feel good"---Without due cause.

Thursday, May 25, 2017

"Cultural Appropriation"

Universities, as we know them, were invented and chiefly developed by White, Christian, males. Anyone, who does not belong to that group, should not be a student or faculty of such colleges/universities.

Any such persons whose income derives from a prior education at such institutions, should be forced out of her/his employment. All should now and shortly read of newspapers, universities and other such organizations (Who are waging a Jihad against "cultural appropriation") firing of all of their employees as have been appropriating the above cultural property of White, Christian, males.


It might be more “ethical” for such purists to not use other products (eg Most of modern medicine, motor vehicles, the rotary press) as generally invented and developed by the graduates of such universities/colleges or other White males.

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Why Democrat Leaders Oppose An Armed Citizenry




The possibility of law-abiding citizens using guns to effectively-and-immediately stop criminal attacks may well be the reason that the mis-leaders of the Democratic (sic) Party have taken the lead in attempts to deprive our fellow citizens of modern-and-effective firearms. That is, the effective-and-immediate use of firearms, by law abiding citizens, to "put down" dangerous criminals is more likely to reduce the Democrat's “power base” than otherwise.

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Mobs & Their Suppression

Mobs are, as such, a probable “clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others..
When such mobs are armed or commit such dangerous crimes as “Arson” (eg Both evident at Berkeley in recent days) they clearly demonstrate and multiply that “clear and present danger”---And justify the police or any good citizen to use any level of force (Including deadly force) to suppress that danger.

In fact, the failure of police (Or, if called up by Governors who understand their duties, the National Guard), to fire upon such extremely dangerous mobs as both individuals (ie By snipers under the direct control of a command officer) and by volley-fire in the case of any group attack is a gross neglect of duty.

It might be well for those who are members of such mobs or instigate-and-support such Fascist thugs to remember that the vast majority of privately held, military/police grade, firearms in the USA are in the possession of those citizens who are capable-and-willing to protect themselves, family, friends and “the common good” by using them to put down dangerous mobs in those failed jurisdictions where the police will not do so!

Such actions are matters of self-defense as extends to defense of others and community.

[The above possibility of citizen actions may well be the reason that the mis-leaders of the Democratic (sic) Party have taken the lead in attempts to deprive our fellow citizens of modern-and-effective firearms.]


[For general information, the hard touch of a triangular file to the lands of a gun's barrel and the lighter touch of a flat file to the firing-pin and extractor of such will negate the usual forensic information.]

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Due Process Rights Updated Again


  1. Right to sufficient-time prior (Written)notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; The  Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony ;or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted) AND to cross-examine those witnesses.
  3. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  4. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  5. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions if a public institution is involved OR to to the highest authority in a private organization.


These were the rights given to convicted criminals facing revocation of probation/parole by Wisconsin's Department Of Corrections. I fail to understand why universities will not provide the same “Due Process” to students facing in-school disciplinary actions. (Where guilt or probable cause was found by a court-of-record, some of these rights were not given.)

Sunday, May 14, 2017

Recusal Of Judges

In Wisconsin and like democracy-based States judges are elected.

There are those who maintain that even its Supreme Court justices should "recuse" themselves if some prior contributor to their election campaign has some interest in a case before them.

What such proponents skillfully avoid is:
1. That position has been well known-to and apparently rejected by the People who cast their ballots for those justices;
2. Contributions are made to such campaigns not as an effort to buy/rent/lease justices, but because the citizens using money to express their "free speech rights" approve of the candidates' general philosophy on The Law or oppose their opponents' like stances;
3. Requiring some judges to so recuse themselves provides a default victory to their opponents; And,
4. Attempts to inflict such recusal is a Fascist effort to vacate the above-noted democratic acts of our fellow citizens.

Thursday, May 11, 2017

The Law VS Censorship Of Public University Students

The first quote provided below is from Professor Eugene Volokh's editorial as published on May 11, 2017 by The Washington Post.


A. "The Supreme Court has made “crystal clear” that the government may not discriminate based on viewpoint, even in limited public fora such as university open spaces (or for that matter even university programs for funding student speech). Lower courts have consistently struck down campus speech codes aimed at supposedly bigoted speech. See, e.g., Dambrot v. Central Michigan Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1184-85 (6th Cir. 1995); DeJohn v. Temple Univ., 537 F.3d 301, 316-17, 320 (3d Cir. 2008); McCauley v. Univ. of V.I., 618 F.3d 232, 237-38, 250 (3d Cir. 2010); Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason Univ., 993 F.3d 386, 388-89, 391, 393 (4th Cir. 1993); College Republicans v. Reed, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1010-11, 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2007); Roberts v. Haragan, 346 F. Supp. 2d 853, 870-72 (N.D. Tex. 2004); Bair v. Shippensburg Univ., 280 F. Supp. 2d 357, 373 (M.D. Pa. 2003); Booher v. Bd. of Regents of N. Ky. Univ., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11404, *28-*31 (E.D. Ky. 1998); UWM Post, Inc. v. Regents, 774 F. Supp. 1163, 1165-66, 1173, 1177 (E.D. Wis. 1991); Doe v. Univ. of Mich., 721 F. Supp. 852, 856, 864-66 (E.D. Mich. 1989). And in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010), the Court gave students’ freedom to “express any viewpoint they wish — including a discriminatory one” as an example of “this Court’s tradition of protect[ing] the freedom to express the thought that we hate” (quotation marks omitted). There is no First Amendment exception for “hate speech” or “racist signs, symbols and speech.”.
B. "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" 

Sunday, May 07, 2017

President John Adams On Religion & The USA

Human passions unbridled by morality and religion…would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.”
Without religion this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean Hell.”
Thanks to God that he gave me stubbornness when I know I am right.” 


Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people”. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

Monday, May 01, 2017

"Man" Is Correct Usage


When real universities were developed (By White Christian males) the common language was Latin.
Those early academics very surely knew the difference between “Vir” (As relates to only males) and “Homo” (As designates all humans).

As English universities drifted away from Latin and English became their common tongue (And later the most common international language), the term “Man” became the accepted term used in place of “Homo”.

Only the ignorant or politically correct Fascists or their slaves would deny the above.


It has been reported that some university students have been punished for using “man” (Rather than “submitting” to the above-cited Fascists). Some such petty-tyrants have used the excuse of “style books” as written by other like critters or their subjugated, gonad-less, “Men”.

Although I am not a lawyer, I must wonder if such penalties are free-speech "Violations Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" as might allow penalized students to recover severe damages from schools and individual teachers.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

Again: Limits To Free Speech On Campuses


In recent times there have been many in or about our university/colleges who maintain that some ill defined “hate speech”should not be allowed in academia. Some of those persons have even used such criminal mob actions as present “a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others.
The less offensive of those Fascists “shout down” speakers or misuse (Often cowardly) administrators to block any efforts to present them with “politically incorrect” ideas (And heaven fore-fend!) have them run-the-risk of thinking.

Then, what limits should or might be set on speech?
  1. That which the speaker (ie Not criminal respondents) presents the above-cited “clear and present danger” (eg Falsely crying out “FIRE!” in a crowded theater or lecture hall).
  2. That which interferes with the free speech rights of invited/authorized speakers and those who wish to listen to them and think about the views or knowledge presented by such a person.

The dangerous thugs who use or attempt-to-use physical force against rightful speakers (And, their audiences) must be very directly informed that any person can use any level of force to effectively-and-immediately stop a violent attack or even one that is reasonably perceived to be such.

Baring speakers or excluding some from audiences is an attack on both our nation's support of free speech and a cowardly attack on “Academic Freedom”!


NOTA BENE: Please refer to my blog entries of April 10 & 7, 2017.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Why So Many Academics Against Jews & Israel?


Why is there so much angst against Israel and, for that matter, those Jews who “keep the commandments” within our colleges and universities?

I suggest it is because Israel: Is a real democracy; Has a well-armed citizenry most of its men have required (Or for women voluntary) military-combat training with the most modern, individual, weapons; Does not prosecute citizens who shoot-down terrorists; Effectively reduced violent crime by "building a wall"; Has criminally prosecuted its head of government; Does not limit (Non-violent) expressions of religious belief to the inside of houses-of-worshipAnd, understands that the unalterable commands of Islam are evil and directly opposed to all civilized humans (As specially apparent in the "Palestinian State").

These and other like characteristics are so very much hated by the "snowflakes" and other academic Fascists who pollute our campuses.

Some of that hatred and aggression is aided-and-abetted by on-campus Muslims loyally following the commands of Islam to do as much harm as possible to Jews and Israel.

I also suggest that Jews (Like those of Chinese decent) tend to honor scholars over others and academic success over other marks-of-achievement. [This has resulted is some “prestigious” schools setting quotas against both groups for being too academically prepared.]



Sunday, April 09, 2017

Polarization In The USA


Denying the USA's "polarization", from academic ivory towers or reality-denying outlets for "lame street media" writers , does not serve the common good. by failing to provide the People of various points-of-view and the extent to which they do, in fact, divide American citizens, legal immigrants and "illegals".

The following should/must be considered:
1. The division, on often geographic/political-district boundaries, between "the right" and the "Nanny State" follower of the DNC as often cause State legislatures to either stop acting OR to to crush the Members of "the other Party" and their requests for "compromise".--Which may OR may-not involve drawing district lines to maximize party majorities in selected districts.
2. The division between those who support democratically passed laws and state-constitutional and traditional definitions of marriage vs. those who oppose such and go to those judges "making law from the bench"----Often in violation of the intent of those who wrote our Constitution and Bill Of Rights . [To Those Who Oppose the provisions of the  Constitution: Please use the democratic process of amendment contained within that basic law rather than the tyranny of judges.]
4. The division between the followers of the "Religion Of Atheism” who wish to, unconstitutionally and in an Islamist style, suppress other religions and drive them out of the public square and view.
5. The like division between the People, legislative bodies as the the fullest exercise of the "right to keep and bear arms" under the Second Amendment (With its "shall not be infringed" clause) as is/was consistent with the intent of the Founders of this Republic---As most often reflects the divisions noted in #1 above).
6. The division between those who seriously (As demonstrated by recent efforts of the People, on a more-or-less ad hoc basis to stop buses loaded with "illegals") object to illegal immigration and those (Including too many elected officials (Of both Parties who are "pimping" for Latino votes) who do not wish the strict enforcement of our democratically passed immigration laws.
7. The division between those who will admit that there is a minority of Blacks who are actively seeking out Whites  to attack by "The knock out game" and violent "Flash Mobs"  and those who recognize that the police are unable (OR, unwilling) to stop such deaths and other injuries to the innocent, leaving them to protect themselves and innocent others.
8. The division between those who hold that Islam is "only just another religion" and those who hold the position that it is a “criminal-terrorist ideology” much like the KKK or the Nazi SS neo-paganism---With only a thin veneer of religiosity.


The real question is: Are those divisions as severe as those of the 1770s and 1850s as led to bloody civil wars---And, an increase of freedom in our land?

Friday, April 07, 2017

Protecting Free Speech & Academic Freedom


There have been Fascist mobs at many colleges/universities who have attacked the constitutional free speech rights (And, “academic freedom”) of invited speakers and those who wished to listen to them.
They have done so by “shouting down” those speakers and by physical assaults as “present a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others---Which perceived danger allows the police or anyone else to use deadly force to protect the innocent.

Before any event likely to produce those tyrannical acts the responsible and duty-bound school administrators should both assure that protected persons who will video-record those talks and insure that a force-sufficient of armed police are present.

Such officials should before and at those events make the following announcements:
1. Announce that any student or college employee who attacks that free-speech exercise of academic freedom will be immediately banned from campus and, after the usual due-process hearing, formally expelled or fired;
2. The audience will be video-recorded and any such persons will be identified;
3. Any concealment of faces-and-identities will also result in the same actions;
4. Police officers have been asked to be present per my request; 
5. Any acts of violence will both result in the above, punitive actions, and arrest by police officers and referral for criminal prosecution;  And,
6. This college has advised those police that it has no objections to the use of any force necessary to execute any such arrests AND, more specially, to halt any acts which represent "a clear and present danger of death OR great bodily harm" to others.

Friday, March 31, 2017

Proposed Constitutional Amemendments

CONCERNING THE CONGRESS: No person who has graduated from a law school or who has practiced law may be a Member of the Congress from six-years after ratification of this article. Nothing in the Constitution shall prevent the Several States from a like restriction as to membership in their legislatures. (Since lawyers, properly, control the Judicial Branch and are well on the way towards control of the Executive Branch, it seems proper to prevent their like control of the Legislative Branch.)

CONCERNING LIMITING JUDICIAL ACTIONS: A. Any judicial decision limiting or overturning an act of the Congress as executed by the President is limited to the judicial district or circuit in which it was made until confirmed by The Congress or The Supreme Court Of The United States; B. Any decision of The Supreme Court Of The United States may be reversed or nullified by a two-thirds vote of the House Of Representatives; C. All decisions of the courts of the United States shall use the intent of the authors of Constitution, its amendments and the Laws of the United States as the basic authority and source for such actions. (These provisions return constitutional power to the People and their democratically elected representatives as taken from them by individual or small groups of unelected judges.)

Concerning Immigration & Citizenship: Persons who illegally enter the United States or illegally remain there after a legal entry or who have falsely applied for citizenship may be immediately removed from the Nation or confined until removal upon only evidence of of those illegal actions. The children of such persons are not citizens of the United States by reason of their birth in our nation but have and maintain the citizenship held by their parent(s). (This article protects the value of lawful citizenship in the USA and is consistent with many nation's laws.)


CONCERNING ARMS: No citizen of the United States shall be forbidden from possessing or carrying any individual weapon commonly issued to the members of the Militia or National Guard or Armed Forces except: If such citizen has been found too dangerously mentally ill or too criminal to do so by a court-of-record; Or, where such carrying presents a clear-and-present-danger of death-or-great-bodily-harm to others; Or, is a fully-automatic firearm or explosive device or projects poisons or radio-active materials. (This article confirms the intent of the Founders as to an armed citizenry and extends full rights to law-abiding and sane citizens who are 18 to 21 years of age.)

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Immigration: Failure Of Black "Leaders"

 The term "undocumented immigrants" is willfully false. Those persons are "illegal immigrants" who have begun their lives in my nation in violation of our democratically enacted laws. They continue to violate those law by stealing jobs from our fellow citizens, especially the poorest among us.
I still wonder at the failure of "Black leaders" to forcefully and always demand the enforcement of our democratically enacted immigration laws---As "illegals" steal or occupy jobs which should be held by the poorest among us (Black youths).
I am the son and grandson of legal immigrants.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Returning To Effective "Balance Of Powers"

When the founders of this nation outlined our government in our Constitution, they set a careful balance between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. That balance has been seriously disturbed and the whole structure of our government now is moving towards collapse and the dictatorship of the judicial elite---Who care little for democracy. That balance must be reset. My suggestion to enact the following Amendment to the Constitution, which would give the Congress the power to correct the errors which have infiltrated our society by judicial usurpations.

"The Congress of the United States may reverse or nullify any decision of the 
Supreme Court of the United States or of the lesser Courts of Appeal by a two-
thirds vote of the member present and voting in either House OR by a simple 
majority of the members present and voting in both the Senate and House of 
Representatives. The vote of each member of the Congress in such matters is to 
be separately recorded and immediately made public. Such matters are to have 
priority over all other business of the Congress".

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Travel Hints For USA's Criminals

These countries currently have no extradition treaty with the United States

Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central

African Republic, Chad, Mainland China, Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican, Vietnam and Yemen.

President Jefferson On The Press

Document 29
Thomas Jefferson to John Norvell
14 June 1807Works 10:417--18
To your request of my opinion of the manner in which a newspaper should be conducted, so as to be most useful, I should answer, "by restraining it to true facts & sound principles only." Yet I fear such a paper would find few subscribers. It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of it's benefits, than is done by it's abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knolege with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live & die in the belief, that they have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time; whereas the accounts they have read in newspapers are just as true a history of any other period of the world as of the present, except that the real names of the day are affixed to their fables. General facts may indeed be collected from them, such as that Europe is now at war, that Bonaparte has been a successful warrior, that he has subjected a greatportion of Europe to his will, &c., &c.; but no details can be relied on. I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.
Perhaps an editor might begin a reformation in some such way as this. Divide his paper into 4 chapters, heading the 1st, Truths. 2d, Probabilities. 3d, Possibilities. 4th, Lies. The first chapter would be very short, as it would contain little more than authentic papers, and information from such sources as the editor would be willing to risk his own reputation for their truth. The 2d would contain what, from a mature consideration of all circumstances, his judgment should conclude to be probably true. This, however, should rather contain too little than too much. The 3d & 4th should be professedly for those readers who would rather have lies for their money than the blank paper they would occupy.


The Founders' Constitution
Volume 5, Amendment I (Speech and Press), Document 29
The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Collected and edited by Paul Leicester Ford. Federal Edition. 12 vols. New York and London: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1904--5.th

Monday, March 13, 2017

A Free Press????

Since President Trump (Who I did not support until his formal nomination by my Party)  took office and began direct communications with The People, there are very many in the "Lame Street Media" who are whining and sniveling about his critiques of them and their co-actors as "attacks on the free press".

But, is there a "Free Press"?  A far too large a part of today's media are self-enslaved to the Fascist and very anti-democracy tenets of Die Fuehrer of the Democratic (sic) Party's bosses  and their various agents, sponsors and other "Enemies Of The People".

This is often demonstrated by:
1. Their state of dhimmitude exposed by biased and grossly dishonest reporting on Islam and the horrid acts of its most loyal and orthodox followers as executed in strict obedience to the unalterable commands of that criminal-terrorist ideology; And,
2. Their disdain for all parts of The Bill Of Rights (eg The "free exercise of religion" as intended by the Founders; Article II and Article X) as do not deal with a "free press.





Friday, March 10, 2017

Universities' Duty To Protect

The gross number of "politically incorrect" persons being shouted-down at universities is too large to accurately establish. Yet, university authorities have failed to: Video tape those enemies of free speech and academic freedom; Identify them; Formally expel students involved in such actions; And, for the much smaller number of staff-fascists, terminate their employment (ie Without regard to tenured status).

The mob actions (eg University Of Wisconsin-Madison, UC-Berkeley, Middlebury College) are very, very, much more serious as they presented "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" to others. At UW the police were instructed to "not interfere". At Middlebury College the mob followed an invited speaker out of the cancelled meeting, attacked his auto and inflicted neck injuries on his faculty supporter. The danger by arson and other means at UC-Berkely have been widely reported.

It was the duty for University officials to call upon law enforcement agencies to use such force (Even deadly force) to suppress those mob actions. They failed of their "duty to protect".

That failure invokes the statutory and Natural Law right of others to use any level of force needed to immediately suppress such mob actions.

                                      IN RE BESTIAS PESSIMAS CADITE EOS


Dem Saboteurs: Lessons-Of-History

Does this sound familiar?

The Republicans have a very thin majority in the House Of Representatives and the US Senate. There is a Republican President; But, he is opposed or not fully supported by many members of his own Party.

Congressional Democrats are using every trick allowed under the House Rules to stop the Republican Party from moving its agenda through the Congress.

The year was 1890!

Those assassins of democracy, in the. Congress were finally suppressed by a courageous Speaker (Mr. Thomas Brackett Reed) who crushed those petty-tyrants by a “creative” use of his authority.

Perhaps Speaker Paul Ryan should take-a-lesson from the above---If, and only if, he has the courage to do so.

The same might be asked of the GOP "leaders" in the US Senate.

Monday, March 06, 2017

Due Process Updated


  1. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony ;or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted).
  3. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  4. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  5. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions.
  6. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  7. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted)---And to cross-examine those witnesses.
  8. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  9. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  10. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions.

These were the rights given to convicted criminals facing revocation of probation/parole by Wisconsin's Department Of Corrections. I fail to understand why universities will not provide the same “Due Process” to students facing in-school disciplinary actions.

Saturday, March 04, 2017

Travel Hints For Anti-Democracy Critters

The following is provided for the immediate use of those who cannot abide:
1. The constitutional election of President Donald J. Trump;
2. The ongoing control of The Congress by the Republican Party; And,
3. That Party's steadily increasing control of State Houses and State Legislatures.

TRAVEL HINTS

These countries currently have no extradition treaty with the United States

Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central
African Republic, Chad, Mainland China, Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican, Vietnam and Yemen.