Saturday, April 22, 2017

"Gun Violence", Democrats & Venezuela

From the data available it appears that the vast majority of illegal uses of guns to murder or injure others in the USA is inflicted by members or supporters or client-beneficiaries of the Democratic (sic) Party.

That is the same Party whose actors lead the drive to deprive our fellow citizens of the individual right to "keep and bear arms" (Without "infringement").

A cynic might declare that such a drive is based on that Party''s desire to not allow law-abiding and armed citizens to decrease its power-base (eg By "two to the chest and one to the head").

Looking South we should note that the Socialist tyrants in Venezuela first disarmed citizens; But, now declare they will arm (With military-grade guns) their murderous supporters.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

Again: Limits To Free Speech On Campuses


In recent times there have been many in or about our university/colleges who maintain that some ill defined “hate speech”should not be allowed in academia. Some of those persons have even used such criminal mob actions as present “a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others.
The less offensive of those Fascists “shout down” speakers or misuse (Often cowardly) administrators to block any efforts to present them with “politically incorrect” ideas (And heaven fore-fend!) have them run-the-risk of thinking.

Then, what limits should or might be set on speech?
  1. That which the speaker (ie Not criminal respondents) presents the above-cited “clear and present danger” (eg Falsely crying out “FIRE!” in a crowded theater or lecture hall).
  2. That which interferes with the free speech rights of invited/authorized speakers and those who wish to listen to them and think about the views or knowledge presented by such a person.

The dangerous thugs who use or attempt-to-use physical force against rightful speakers (And, their audiences) must be very directly informed that any person can use any level of force to effectively-and-immediately stop a violent attack or even one that is reasonably perceived to be such.

Baring speakers or excluding some from audiences is an attack on both our nation's support of free speech and a cowardly attack on “Academic Freedom”!


NOTA BENE: Please refer to my blog entries of April 10 & 7, 2017.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Why So Many Academics Against Jews & Israel?


Why is there so much angst against Israel and, for that matter, those Jews who “keep the commandments” within our colleges and universities?

I suggest it is because Israel: Is a real democracy; Has a well-armed citizenry most of its men have required (Or for women voluntary) military-combat training with the most modern, individual, weapons; Does not prosecute citizens who shoot-down terrorists; Effectively reduced violent crime by "building a wall"; Has criminally prosecuted its head of government; Does not limit (Non-violent) expressions of religious belief to the inside of houses-of-worshipAnd, understands that the unalterable commands of Islam are evil and directly opposed to all civilized humans (As specially apparent in the "Palestinian State").

These and other like characteristics are so very much hated by the "snowflakes" and other academic Fascists who pollute our campuses.

Some of that hatred and aggression is aided-and-abetted by on-campus Muslims loyally following the commands of Islam to do as much harm as possible to Jews and Israel.

I also suggest that Jews (Like those of Chinese decent) tend to honor scholars over others and academic success over other marks-of-achievement. [This has resulted is some “prestigious” schools setting quotas against both groups for being too academically prepared.]



Sunday, April 09, 2017

Polarization In The USA


Denying the USA's "polarization", from academic ivory towers or reality-denying outlets for "lame street media" writers , does not serve the common good. by failing to provide the People of various points-of-view and the extent to which they do, in fact, divide American citizens, legal immigrants and "illegals".

The following should/must be considered:
1. The division, on often geographic/political-district boundaries, between "the right" and the "Nanny State" follower of the DNC as often cause State legislatures to either stop acting OR to to crush the Members of "the other Party" and their requests for "compromise".--Which may OR may-not involve drawing district lines to maximize party majorities in selected districts.
2. The division between those who support democratically passed laws and state-constitutional and traditional definitions of marriage vs. those who oppose such and go to those judges "making law from the bench"----Often in violation of the intent of those who wrote our Constitution and Bill Of Rights . [To Those Who Oppose the provisions of the  Constitution: Please use the democratic process of amendment contained within that basic law rather than the tyranny of judges.]
4. The division between the followers of the "Religion Of Atheism” who wish to, unconstitutionally and in an Islamist style, suppress other religions and drive them out of the public square and view.
5. The like division between the People, legislative bodies as the the fullest exercise of the "right to keep and bear arms" under the Second Amendment (With its "shall not be infringed" clause) as is/was consistent with the intent of the Founders of this Republic---As most often reflects the divisions noted in #1 above).
6. The division between those who seriously (As demonstrated by recent efforts of the People, on a more-or-less ad hoc basis to stop buses loaded with "illegals") object to illegal immigration and those (Including too many elected officials (Of both Parties who are "pimping" for Latino votes) who do not wish the strict enforcement of our democratically passed immigration laws.
7. The division between those who will admit that there is a minority of Blacks who are actively seeking out Whites  to attack by "The knock out game" and violent "Flash Mobs"  and those who recognize that the police are unable (OR, unwilling) to stop such deaths and other injuries to the innocent, leaving them to protect themselves and innocent others.
8. The division between those who hold that Islam is "only just another religion" and those who hold the position that it is a “criminal-terrorist ideology” much like the KKK or the Nazi SS neo-paganism---With only a thin veneer of religiosity.


The real question is: Are those divisions as severe as those of the 1770s and 1850s as led to bloody civil wars---And, an increase of freedom in our land?

Friday, April 07, 2017

Protecting Free Speech & Academic Freedom


There have been Fascist mobs at many colleges/universities who have attacked the constitutional free speech rights (And, “academic freedom”) of invited speakers and those who wished to listen to them.
They have done so by “shouting down” those speakers and by physical assaults as “present a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others---Which perceived danger allows the police or anyone else to use deadly force to protect the innocent.

Before any event likely to produce those tyrannical acts the responsible and duty-bound school administrators should both assure that protected persons who will video-record those talks and insure that a force-sufficient of armed police are present.

Such officials should before and at those events make the following announcements:
1. Announce that any student or college employee who attacks that free-speech exercise of academic freedom will be immediately banned from campus and, after the usual due-process hearing, formally expelled or fired;
2. The audience will be video-recorded and any such persons will be identified;
3. Any concealment of faces-and-identities will also result in the same actions;
4. Police officers have been asked to be present per my request; 
5. Any acts of violence will both result in the above, punitive actions, and arrest by police officers and referral for criminal prosecution;  And,
6. This college has advised those police that it has no objections to the use of any force necessary to execute any such arrests AND, more specially, to halt any acts which represent "a clear and present danger of death OR great bodily harm" to others.

Friday, March 31, 2017

Proposed Constitutional Amemendments

CONCERNING THE CONGRESS: No person who has graduated from a law school or who has practiced law may be a Member of the Congress from six-years after ratification of this article. Nothing in the Constitution shall prevent the Several States from a like restriction as to membership in their legislatures. (Since lawyers, properly, control the Judicial Branch and are well on the way towards control of the Executive Branch, it seems proper to prevent their like control of the Legislative Branch.)

CONCERNING LIMITING JUDICIAL ACTIONS: A. Any judicial decision limiting or overturning an act of the Congress as executed by the President is limited to the judicial district or circuit in which it was made until confirmed by The Congress or The Supreme Court Of The United States; B. Any decision of The Supreme Court Of The United States may be reversed or nullified by a two-thirds vote of the House Of Representatives; C. All decisions of the courts of the United States shall use the intent of the authors of Constitution, its amendments and the Laws of the United States as the basic authority and source for such actions. (These provisions return constitutional power to the People and their democratically elected representatives as taken from them by individual or small groups of unelected judges.)

Concerning Immigration & Citizenship: Persons who illegally enter the United States or illegally remain there after a legal entry or who have falsely applied for citizenship may be immediately removed from the Nation or confined until removal upon only evidence of of those illegal actions. The children of such persons are not citizens of the United States by reason of their birth in our nation but have and maintain the citizenship held by their parent(s). (This article protects the value of lawful citizenship in the USA and is consistent with many nation's laws.)


CONCERNING ARMS: No citizen of the United States shall be forbidden from possessing or carrying any individual weapon commonly issued to the members of the Militia or National Guard or Armed Forces except: If such citizen has been found too dangerously mentally ill or too criminal to do so by a court-of-record; Or, where such carrying presents a clear-and-present-danger of death-or-great-bodily-harm to others; Or, is a fully-automatic firearm or explosive device or uses poisons or radio-active materials. (This article confirms the intent of the Founders as to an armed citizenry and extends full rights to law-abiding and sane citizens who are 18 to 21 years of age.)

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Immigration: Failure Of Black "Leaders"

 The term "undocumented immigrants" is willfully false. Those persons are "illegal immigrants" who have begun their lives in my nation in violation of our democratically enacted laws. They continue to violate those law by stealing jobs from our fellow citizens, especially the poorest among us.
I still wonder at the failure of "Black leaders" to forcefully and always demand the enforcement of our democratically enacted immigration laws---As "illegals" steal or occupy jobs which should be held by the poorest among us (Black youths).
I am the son and grandson of legal immigrants.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Returning To Effective "Balance Of Powers"

When the founders of this nation outlined our government in our Constitution, they set a careful balance between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. That balance has been seriously disturbed and the whole structure of our government now is moving towards collapse and the dictatorship of the judicial elite---Who care little for democracy. That balance must be reset. My suggestion to enact the following Amendment to the Constitution, which would give the Congress the power to correct the errors which have infiltrated our society by judicial usurpations.

"The Congress of the United States may reverse or nullify any decision of the 
Supreme Court of the United States or of the lesser Courts of Appeal by a two-
thirds vote of the member present and voting in either House OR by a simple 
majority of the members present and voting in both the Senate and House of 
Representatives. The vote of each member of the Congress in such matters is to 
be separately recorded and immediately made public. Such matters are to have 
priority over all other business of the Congress".

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Travel Hints For USA's Criminals

These countries currently have no extradition treaty with the United States

Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central

African Republic, Chad, Mainland China, Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican, Vietnam and Yemen.

President Jefferson On The Press

Document 29
Thomas Jefferson to John Norvell
14 June 1807Works 10:417--18
To your request of my opinion of the manner in which a newspaper should be conducted, so as to be most useful, I should answer, "by restraining it to true facts & sound principles only." Yet I fear such a paper would find few subscribers. It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of it's benefits, than is done by it's abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knolege with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live & die in the belief, that they have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time; whereas the accounts they have read in newspapers are just as true a history of any other period of the world as of the present, except that the real names of the day are affixed to their fables. General facts may indeed be collected from them, such as that Europe is now at war, that Bonaparte has been a successful warrior, that he has subjected a greatportion of Europe to his will, &c., &c.; but no details can be relied on. I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.
Perhaps an editor might begin a reformation in some such way as this. Divide his paper into 4 chapters, heading the 1st, Truths. 2d, Probabilities. 3d, Possibilities. 4th, Lies. The first chapter would be very short, as it would contain little more than authentic papers, and information from such sources as the editor would be willing to risk his own reputation for their truth. The 2d would contain what, from a mature consideration of all circumstances, his judgment should conclude to be probably true. This, however, should rather contain too little than too much. The 3d & 4th should be professedly for those readers who would rather have lies for their money than the blank paper they would occupy.


The Founders' Constitution
Volume 5, Amendment I (Speech and Press), Document 29
The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Collected and edited by Paul Leicester Ford. Federal Edition. 12 vols. New York and London: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1904--5.th

Monday, March 13, 2017

A Free Press????

Since President Trump (Who I did not support until his formal nomination by my Party)  took office and began direct communications with The People, there are very many in the "Lame Street Media" who are whining and sniveling about his critiques of them and their co-actors as "attacks on the free press".

But, is there a "Free Press"?  A far too large a part of today's media are self-enslaved to the Fascist and very anti-democracy tenets of Die Fuehrer of the Democratic (sic) Party's bosses  and their various agents, sponsors and other "Enemies Of The People".

This is often demonstrated by:
1. Their state of dhimmitude exposed by biased and grossly dishonest reporting on Islam and the horrid acts of its most loyal and orthodox followers as executed in strict obedience to the unalterable commands of that criminal-terrorist ideology; And,
2. Their disdain for all parts of The Bill Of Rights (eg The "free exercise of religion" as intended by the Founders; Article II and Article X) as do not deal with a "free press.





Friday, March 10, 2017

Universities' Duty To Protect

The gross number of "politically incorrect" persons being shouted-down at universities is too large to accurately establish. Yet, university authorities have failed to: Video tape those enemies of free speech and academic freedom; Identify them; Formally expel students involved in such actions; And, for the much smaller number of staff-fascists, terminate their employment (ie Without regard to tenured status).

The mob actions (eg University Of Wisconsin-Madison, UC-Berkeley, Middlebury College) are very, very, much more serious as they presented "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" to others. At UW the police were instructed to "not interfere". At Middlebury College the mob followed an invited speaker out of the cancelled meeting, attacked his auto and inflicted neck injuries on his faculty supporter. The danger by arson and other means at UC-Berkely have been widely reported.

It was the duty for University officials to call upon law enforcement agencies to use such force (Even deadly force) to suppress those mob actions. They failed of their "duty to protect".

That failure invokes the statutory and Natural Law right of others to use any level of force needed to immediately suppress such mob actions.

                                      IN RE BESTIAS PESSIMAS CADITE EOS


Dem Saboteurs: Lessons-Of-History

Does this sound familiar?

The Republicans have a very thin majority in the House Of Representatives and the US Senate. There is a Republican President; But, he is opposed or not fully supported by many members of his own Party.

Congressional Democrats are using every trick allowed under the House Rules to stop the Republican Party from moving its agenda through the Congress.

The year was 1890!

Those assassins of democracy, in the. Congress were finally suppressed by a courageous Speaker (Mr. Thomas Brackett Reed) who crushed those petty-tyrants by a “creative” use of his authority.

Perhaps Speaker Paul Ryan should take-a-lesson from the above---If, and only if, he has the courage to do so.

The same might be asked of the GOP "leaders" in the US Senate.

Monday, March 06, 2017

Due Process Updated


  1. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony ;or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted).
  3. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  4. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  5. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions.
  6. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  7. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted)---And to cross-examine those witnesses.
  8. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  9. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  10. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions.

These were the rights given to convicted criminals facing revocation of probation/parole by Wisconsin's Department Of Corrections. I fail to understand why universities will not provide the same “Due Process” to students facing in-school disciplinary actions.

Saturday, March 04, 2017

Travel Hints For Anti-Democracy Critters

The following is provided for the immediate use of those who cannot abide:
1. The constitutional election of President Donald J. Trump;
2. The ongoing control of The Congress by the Republican Party; And,
3. That Party's steadily increasing control of State Houses and State Legislatures.

TRAVEL HINTS

These countries currently have no extradition treaty with the United States

Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central
African Republic, Chad, Mainland China, Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican, Vietnam and Yemen.


Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Noting The Death Spiral Of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel


TO THE EDITORS, THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL:

Your February 26, 2017 issue inflicted a wide range of (Coordinated?) excuses as to the current cut-backs in what you offer/sell to your readers. (I have been a subscriber since 1967---A status unlike to exist beyond the end of my present subscription).

It appears that I will be forced to obtain news-and-views on-line. For those parallel to what you have been recently offering I can access al Jazeera, the Advocate, The People's World, the Onion, the Shepherd Express and USA Today (Now that Der Angriff is out-of-print).

Rather than read (As seldom done) the columns of your Pseudo-Republican columnists, I can directly access RINO ravings at the National Review. If I wish more Anti-American views (ie Opposed to the views of the patriotic Founders of our Republic), I can subscribe to the "on-line" version of the New York Times and support its hope for the success of its policy of "Tell A Lie Often Enough And It Becomes The Truth" (ie As shared by CNN, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times).

My Sunday reading of your paper was in the following order: Comics; News; "Crossroads"; Business; And others.
1. You have cut back the Comics section eliminating the more artistic and elegant offerings; 
2. I have addressed you news section above and by many prior comments on your biased selection, placement and editorializing of "News"; 
3.Have eliminated "Dilbert" as was generally against asinine  behavior in private companies (Of which you have today provided clear-and-present examples); And, 
4. You have castrated the "Crossroads" (Sunday editorial) section and will be doing the same to the weekly editorial page (Are the editors too lazy to write?). [Although I disagreed with most of the editorial and reader views inflicted by your paper, they did stimulate my mind---Usually to point-out their divorce-from-facts and pathological bias to you and others.]

I also-and-specially have noted your lack: Of using the "the scientific method" to evaluate the  sundry "social justice" programs pimped by you; News relating to the basic, unalterable and horrid teaching of Islam and the support by actions, contributions and other means by a majority of Muslims; Facts regarding the dollar costs of illegal immigrants; Any information as to the age-race-gender of those involved in illegal misuses of firearms; And, other like, "Politically Incorrect" facts.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

To Those Against Statues Of CSA Warriors


A "poem" (I am being charitable) written by one Henri André Fourroux III to support the removal of statutes of Confederate warriors was sent to me by a "pathological pacifist". Below is my response.


I am still waiting upon statues honoring:
1. This era's many Blacks murdered by other Blacks;
2. The White victims, selected out on the basis of race, by Black thugs at a rate many, many, times the reverse;
3. The many Christians murdered, raped, tortured and exiled by the orthodox followers (So much protected by B. H. Obama and others of his ilk) of the false prophet Mohammed; 
4. The many armed citizens who risked all to protect the innocent by the use (Most often the "mere" display) of readily available guns as kept many-times-more from being murdered and maimed than those so insulted by illegal use of weapons); And,
5. The unborn children murdered by those "Liberals" who support elective abortions (Where the life of the "mothers" are not in "clear and present danger"---And, form up a large part of those who opposed the election of Donald Trump and support many of your positions.). 

I also point out to you the following fact: If Blacks were removed from "the numbers" regarding crimes committed with the use of firearms, the USA's rate of such crimes would be about average for "developed nations" (eg Belgium ---Before the increase of such crimes exactly attributed to Muslims in recent years).


PS---JUSTTITIA SUUM CUIQUE DISTRIBUIT---FIAT

Saturday, February 25, 2017

MEDIA: Protect ALL Of The Bill Of Rights

CNN's Jake Tapper and many other members of the "Lame Street Media" have gotten their black lace panties in knots about President Trump's exposing their warts and pimples---A matter of "Free Speech" as is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution. That reaction is proof that such persons are only concerned about that part of The Bill Of Rights as deals with a "free press". 

It would be well for such persons to be as active in supporting those provisions directed at:
1. Protecting the "free exercise of religion" within the meaning (A) established in 1789 and NOT the perversion authored by a SCOTUS justice who was a member of the KKK and a hater of the most orthodox of Christian Churches;
2. Protecting the individual rights of (Law abiding and properly presumed sane) citizens to "keep and bear arms" as also within the intent (B) of the Founders of our Republic; 
3. Protecting the free speech and "due process" rights of university/college students against the aggressive tyranny of Fascist school officials, And,
4. Protecting the rights of "the States and the People" from the cancerous growth of the Federal government  as is very opposed to the provisions (And underlying intent) of Amendments IX and X.

The "Media" also generally failed to attack the Obama Administration's violations of First Amendment rights by such means as: Abusing the too great powers of the IRS to suppress the free speech and free press rights of Obama's opponents; Having a US Attorney threaten those who exercised free speech by merely asking questions about the "Dark Side" of Islam; And too many other violations of constitutional rights to list here
                                      

Friday, February 24, 2017

Stopping Criminals By Gunfire

FBI Study


The FBI study In the Line of Fire: Violence against Law Enforcement—A Study of Felonious Assaults on Law Enforcement Officers shows that 41 percent of officers who fired in the study hit their intended targets, and the average distance to the target was 21 feet.4 Although this is a limited study, these averages are fairly consistent with the multiple shooting data available.


During court proceedings concerning an officer-involved shooting, the number of rounds fired by the officer or officers involved will be released to provide full disclosure. Grand juries often question why numerous rounds were fired. It is important, especially in handgun shootings, to show that (1) immediate incapacitation of the target with handgun rounds is not a reliable factor, even if there is a direct central nervous system shot; and (2) direct shots that cause lethal blood loss are also not immediate. There is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10 seconds to 15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed.
5 A determined individual who has received a fatal shot may continue to function because of adrenalin, sheer emotion, or stimulants in their system. Law enforcement personnel are taught to shoot at center mass and to continue until the threat is removed. Under stress, it is difficult to fire accurate shots that strike vital organs, and, in the average shooting, less than half of the shots fired hit the intended target. As the distance increases, more shots may be fired by officers to compensate for decreased accuracy.
Bullets do not physically knock people to the ground. Jury participants often have limited weapons knowledge or experience and base their perceptions on novels, TV shows, or movies in which the hit ratio is high and bodies fall violently after being shot. It is important to explain that a fired round’s impact on the body is no more than recoil from the weapon. Sir Isaac Newton proved this in the seventeenth century with his hypothesis: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. To stop a determined threat, multiple rounds are often needed. To stop shooting also causes a delay because the officer’s senses must send a message to their brains to stop the physical movement of trigger pulls..

OTHER CITATION

Adams. Ronald Et. Al.Street Survival---Tactics for Armed Encounters; Caliber Press; 1987.

(At Page-215) “Medical researchers have established that nearly 20 percent of the time, suspects who are shot will not be incapacitated by just one round even though they are fatally wounded. (Followed by some examples and a photo of an armed robber's body where 33 rounds were needed to “put him down.)


Sunday, February 19, 2017

Washington, Lincoln & Thanks To God

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Thanksgiving Proclamations

Our great, national, holiday of Thanksgiving is again upon us! I think it would be in the best interests of your readers to print one or both of the presidential thanksgiving proclamations reproduced below between now and that celebration so dear to so many families in this land---And, remind all of the historical and real meaning of that day.

GEORGE WASHINGTON’S THANKSGIVING PROCLAMATION – 1789:

“Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly implore His protection and favor; and whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to recommend to the people of the United States a day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.

“Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the twenty-six of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that Great and Glorious Being, who is the Beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country, previous to their becoming a nation; for the single manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of His providence, in the courage and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish Constitutions of Government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

“And also, that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the Great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether
in public or private institutions, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a government of wise,
just, and constitutional laws, discretely and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us) and to bless them with good governments,
peace and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science, among them and us; and generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity an He alone knows to be best.”





Abraham Lincoln statute, Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C. Photo courtesy of Wallbuilders.
Proclamation of Thanksgiving
by the President of the United States of America

The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful years and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the Source from which they come, others have been added which are of so extraordinary a nature that they can not fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of Almighty God.

In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign states to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere, except in the theater of military conflict, while that theater has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.

Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the field of peaceful industry to the national defense have not arrested the plow, the shuttle, or the ship; the ax has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than theretofore. Population has steadily increased notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege, and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and one voice, by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and union.

In testimony wherof I have herunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

[Signed]
A. Lincoln

Friday, February 17, 2017

Benefits Of Anonymous Statements

Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.
***
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.”


Anonymous Source

[Historians should note the use of "Broadsides" in the era just before our first Revolution when signing off on them might well result in criminal prosecution by Royal officials. Today, such politically incorrect statements, when the authors are known, has resulted in persecution of the authors or supporters.]

Democrats & "Russian" (?) Hacking

The Democratic (sic) continues to vomit-out screes, whines and other evidences of pathology about “Russian Hacking”.

Having an intellect superior to most I fully understand the reasons basic to their sniveling.

Their ire is not about any danger-to or, even, attack-on the sanctity of our election system. After all, it has survived the corrupt Tammany Hall and the Chicago Democrat machine.

The reasons for their projection-of-guilt include, but are not limited-to, the following: The “Russians” (If, and only if, they were the primary hackers) were able to break into only their systems as:

  1. Clearly re-enforced the proof that such as H. Clinton were unable or unwilling to protect secretes for both their Party and, by I inference, for the protection of the American People if allowed full access to to state secretes; And,
  2. Among the information derived, directly or indirectly, from that hacking was the DNC's conspiracy against Senator “Bernie” Sanders and the advance leading of presidential debate questions to Ms. Clinton's staff---Which was a direct attack on our presidential selection system.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

John Wesley On Islam/Muslims

“Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations vanished from the earth ! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.” (John Wesley)

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

CONSTITUTIONAL "DUE PROCESS"---UPDATED

CONSTITUTIONAL “DUE PROCESS”
IN
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES

  1. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted).
  3. The right to confront witnesses AND to cross-examine them.
  4. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  5. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  6. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and on state and federal constitutions.

When employed by a State department-of-corrections I was a “Preliminary Hearing Officer” in hearings as to motions to revoke the parole/probation of convicted criminals. The above were the rights given to those persons.


[At the least, those rights should/must be given to presumed, law-abiding, students facing university or college disciplinary actions/hearings.]

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

"PARTISAN = DEMOCRACY"

I continue to be concerned about the ranting people who complain about “Partisan” politics! They fail to understand the following equation PARTISAN = DEMOCRACY (Or are waging a Fascist campaign-or-Jihad against democracy and the USA).

“Partisan” is shorthand for the differences in our fellow citizen's views on what should be the laws, policies, and practices of our government(s). It also represents the differences in who should be our elected officials and, through some of them, who is appointed to be judges, SCOTUS justices and policy making-and-executing officials.


In recent years those partisan differences have: Resulted in the constitutional election of President Donald J. Trump (Who received a majority of votes if Berkeley-style-mob ruled California election results are discounted); Ongoing control of The Congress by the GOP; And a steady increase in the number of State Houses and State legislatures by Republicans.

Monday, February 13, 2017

Adopt A Violent Illegal Immigrant Letter

Do you know any Democrats, Federal Judges, Editors and others of that ilk who should get this letter?

Dear Mrs. Johnson:

Thank you for your many letters demanding our attempts to deport illegal immigrants with criminal records out of the USA.

President Trump takes these matters seriously and your opinions were
 heard loud and clear here in our nation's capitol. You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new department here at the Department of Homeland Security, to be called “Liberals Accept Responsibility for Illegal-Violent Criminals”.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new
 program, we have decided, on a trial basis, to divert several such violent, illegal immigrants and place them in homes of concerned citizens such as yourself, around the country, under those citizens personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence on Monday.

Jorge Gonzales y Ramos is your detainee, and is to be cared for
 pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. You will be pleased to know that we will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Jorge are commensurate with your recommendations.

Although Jorge is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his 'attitudinal problem' will help him overcome those character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home schooling, however, we strongly recommend that you hire some assistant caretakers.

Since this immigrant refused to learn English you will be required to hire (At your own cost) a translator.

Please advise any Anglo friends, neighbors or relatives about your house guest, as he might get agitated or even violent in their presence, but we are sure you can reason with him. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless in your opinion, this might offend him. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in prison-yard combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills either in your home or wherever you choose to take him while helping him adjust to life in our country.

Even in prison Jorge was able to obtain a large variety of dangerous and illegal drugs. It would be best if you did not eat or drink anything that he has been able to access.
As Jorge has been convicted of rape and sexual abuse of little girls he will not wish to interact with you or your daughters except sexually, since he views females as a form of property, thereby having no rights, including refusal of his sexual demands.

You take good care of Jorge and remember that we will try to have a
 counselor available to help you over any difficulties you encounter while Ahmed is adjusting to the culture of our nation,

Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you
 keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. Good luck and God bless you.


/Kurt William Schawartman