Today's Sexual "Grooming" Of Children

There have been many reports of "educating" (eg In public libraries, schools) as to the correctness of homosexual (Or hetero-sex) outside of marriage.

This appears to be a form of "grooming" children to make them more accepting of sex with adults
(ie Criminal perverts).

A parallel endeavor is being had by teaching the superiority of Islam----Which allows or encourages full sexual "use" of females as young as nine years-of-age AND allows Muslim males to take and "use" females while waging Jihad which is a perpetual requirement of all Muslim males.

"Mayor Pete", God & Sexuality

Mayor Peter Buttigieg has declared himself as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States.

In response to others who hold to the traditional views as to his homosexuality he has also declared that he is (ie An active, practicing, homosexual) what God made him.

Mr. Buttigieg's intelligence and advanced education have also been highly touted.

However, he avoids or denies the following;
1. As far as I know there is no scientific (ie Valid, reliable and confirmed by those "with no axes to grind") proofs that there is any genetic basis for the argument that homosexuals are made (By God if you will); And,
2. As far as I know, basic Christian teachings maintain that each of us has such "Free Will" as allows us to chose between not-good (eg The sterile perversion of homosexuality) and good---Without regard to any "inclinations" towards either.

I must wonder what other denials-of-reality or policy-perversions are at the core of Mr. Buttigieg's thinking and core principles.

"Microaggressions" & "Snowflakes"

The world is a very dangerous place filled with murderous individuals (Who act alone, in pairs, in small groups or bands, quasi-nations and even full nations). Those animals inflict "Macroaggressions" against others as include murder, rape and robbery.

Examples of such critters include: Those waging Jihad against "unbelievers" in loyal obedience to the unalterable commands of Islam; Latino "drug lords" and gangs (eg MS-13) operating across our too little protected border; And, our nation's own Black thugs who select-out, on the basis of race, White targets for their criminal assaults at a rate many, many, times the reverse.

It is the case that such "tender" creatures (eg "Queer" Faculty at Williams College in recent days) are converting others to such be "professional victims" who, after leaving the womb of academia, will melt away in the heat of the real world---And, likely, blame others for their inability to face reality.

I must also note that claims of "microaggressions" are: Commonly unsupported by such facts as place, time, persons and verifiable acts as would define human behavior as intentional and beyond random behaviors; And, are a sub-class of the all too common, on university/college campuses, of hate crime hoaxes.

"Toxic Masculinity" & The APA

Some years ago I defined "Femininity" as the distilled essence of the best of what separates women from men. That quality is not an aspect of sexuality or physical beauty. (One of the most "feminine" woman I knew of was the actress Helen Hayes---In her later years. I have known very young girls who were very feminine well before becoming, physical, women.)

Then, what is "Masculinity"?  As a male I find that harder to define---Without being accused of
self-description or self-inflation.

Perhaps, it is that, greater, willingness to be very forward in risking blood, suffering, limbs and life to protect family, friends, nation and what is otherwise held precious. (Yes, there are females who do so by, for example, police, firefighter and military service; But, they do not seem to stay in those good works for even a small part of the years which males commit to such service.)

Of course, that willingness can be perverted by the influence of tyrannical or insane leaders (Such as
Hitler, Stalin or others of that ilk). For the most part the soldiers of those horrid creatures were more loyal to their comrades-in-arms than to any such mis-leaders (Which characteristic may be much more common to real men than to others).

Why does the American Psychological Association and so many other postulate "Toxic Masculinity" as a clinical-disorder or social-fault or, even, a sin-like disorder?

I will be non-diplomatic (ie "Snarky") and state that those persons are either biological males who are not masculine or biological-females who are, in the common speech, "castrating bitches." or "butches".
















s

Some Questions On Gun Control

1. If some armed monster attacked the school (Without an armed officer immediately at that place) in which your child//grandchild was as student, which alternative would you prefer:
a. Teachers throwing their bodies in front of "their" children, absorbing some bullets and allowing the terrorist to walk around their bodies and massacre children (eg Sandy Hook Elementary School; That Florida High School ); Or,
b. Have multiple teachers use their concealed handguns to shoot that critter to pieces?

2.  If some "crazy" neighbor came charging at you house holding a pail of gasoline, what would you do:
a. Wave your "Mothers' March Against Guns" T-shirt at him/her; Or,
b. Call "911" and be incinerated while waiting for police to arrive; Or,
b. Use your modern and effective firearm (eg An AR-15) to shoot him down at a safe distance from your most precious home?

3. If your child/grandchild's older sister was home alone with them and someone broke into that home, would you have that, unable to call "911"(Presumed teen):
1. Offer up her body with the faint hope that would protect younger children; Or,
2. Pull out the family gun (eg An AR-14 as, are many such, used for hunting,which she was trained to use) and "liquidate" the intruder?

Genetics, Science & Gender

In recent years there has been (Usually on college/university campuses) a most unscientific movement to deny the reality that our world is occupied (Save for very rare "sports") by bi-sexual organisms---Including we humans.

That bi-sexuality is based on millions of years of natural selection and cannot be vacated by the will of pathological deniers of scientific reality.

There are even those who, in some jurisdictions, demand the recognition of some sixty-plus genders and would criminally punish those who do not use each day's, politically correct, personal pronouns or terms-of-address for each such artificial construct.

Perhaps, they should study the concept of "Occam's Razor" and apply it to their positions on gender. Of course, that would require the intense and superior scholarship needed to work through the most exact "arguments" as support that concept.

Improving "Diversity" At State Universities/Colleges

There are very many at many universities-and-colleges who maintain that their schools are not sufficiently "Diverse" as to the many world cultures. Therefore, I offer the following measures to correct that lack.

1. Provide altars (On pyramids if possible) with the usual blood channels and obsidian knives as will allow the reactivation of the Aztec religion. The first to be sent to "speak to the gods" should be "diversity officers" and those attacking The Bill Of Rights (ie With the meaning as intended by its authors) or physically attacking those exercising peaceful "free speech". [The skinning-alive of virgins will be a problem as they are now an "endangered species".]

2. Provide stoning-pits and tip-over-walls as will allow Muslims to more easily enforce Sharia as to homosexuals and those women accused of adultery who cannot produce the number of witnesses who would swear to their innocence.

3. Allow the very peaceful and civilized Sikhs to carry their prescribed daggers on campus.

4. Allow any worshipers of Kali to practice thugee on campus---Beginning in "diversity" offices  and the meeting places of those served by the officers in such places.

5. For those worshiping "The Old Religion" provide some oak trees from which they may hang (Bound by one hand and one leg) their alive human offerings. (I regret to note that the Druid branch will not be allowed to use the traditional burning-baskets due to the problem of their "carbon footprint".)

6. For Atheists colleges/universities should set up Pol Pot style "reeducation" camps (With the usual burial trench-pits).

New Personal Pronouns & Sexual Identity

At one count there are 61 "sexual identities" beyond the millions-of-years-old male and female.

Some have been searching for new pronouns as apply to the 61 formulations.

Being a helpful person, I have strongly recommended that those who deny genetic reality should be address and described as "IT"---As they have denied their humanity.

Benefits Of Anonymous Statements

“Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.

***

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.”

Anonymous Source

[Historians should note the use of "Broadsides" in the era just before our first Revolution when signing off on them might well result in criminal prosecution by Royal officials. Today, such politically incorrect statements, when the authors are known, has resulted in persecution of the authors or supporters.]

(Left) Coast Vs. American Definitions

In  California                                        In Real America

Diverse or Lifestyle Choice                     Sinful and Perverted
Arsenal of Weapons                               Gun Collection
Delicate Wetlands                                   Swampland
Undocumented Worker                          Illegal Alien
Cruelty-Free Materials                           Synthetic Fiber
Assault and Battery                                Attitude Adjustment
Heavily Armed                                      Well-protected
Narrow-minded                                      Righteous
Taxes or Your Fair Share                      Coerced Theft
Commonsense Gun Control                   Gun Confiscation Plot
Illegal Hazardous Explosives                  Fireworks or Stump Removal
Nonviable Tissue Mass                          Unborn Baby
Equal Access to Opportunity                 Socialism
Multicultural Community                        High Crime Area
Fairness or Social Progress                   Marxism
Upper Class or "The Rich"                    Self-Employed
Progressive, Change                             Big Government Scheme
Homeless or Disadvantaged                  Bums or Welfare Leeches
Sniper Rifle                                           Scoped Deer Rifle
Investment For the Future                     Higher Taxes
Health Care Reform                              Socialized Medicine
Extremist, Judgmental, or Hater            Conservative
Truant                                                  Home schooled child
Victim or Oppressed                            Criminal or Lazy Good-For-Nothing
High Capacity Magazine                       Standard Capacity Magazine
Religious Zealot                                    Church-going
Reintroduced Wolves                           Sheep and Elk Killers
Fair Trade Coffee                                Overpriced Yuppie Coffee
Exploiters or "The Rich"                       Employed or Land Owner
The Gun Lobby                                   NRA Members
Assault Weapon                                  Semi-Auto (Grandpa's M1 Carbine)
Fiscal Stimulus                                     New Taxes and Higher Taxes
Mandated Eco-Friendly Lighting          Chinese Mercury-Laden Light Bulbs

Ultimate Test For Free Speech On Campus

In recent months a University Of Wisconsin (Madison) Black student produced and sold "hoodies" printed with the phrase "ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACISTS"

If, and only if, a college or university allows all the below statements be posted or worn on clothing on campus AND will punish students or employees who physically attack those who post or wear them, then any such school values free speech and academic freedom; Otherwise NOT so.

(Please specially note that I may or may-not support the views expressed below, but provide them as a limiting test.)

CHINESE STUDENTS ARE GENENETICLY SUPERIOR TO YOU!

BLACK LIVES MATTER!

BLUE LIVES MATTER!

UNBORN BABIES LIVES MATTER!

ALL LIVES MATTER!

USA's BLACKS WERE FIRST ENSLAVED BY OTHER BLACKS:

THEY WERE LOSERS THEN---MOST STILL ARE

UNIVERSITIES WERE INVENTED BY WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES

(And Later Perverted By Inferior Others)

APRENDE INGLES O BESAME CULO!

MALE HOMOSEXUALS ARE DISEASE VECTORS

MOHAMMED WAS A SEX PERVERT

Officials Must Obey THE LAW?????

Until the outcome of our most bloody “War Between The States” Blacks were not, by a decision of the Supreme Court Of The United States not consider as full human-citizens.

At that time we also had a Federal “Fugitive Slave Law” as allowed the capture and return to their “owners” of those Blacks who had fled slavery. That law imposed very severe penalties on any official who did not arrest any person alleged to be a fugitive slave upon a sworn claim of ownership. It did not allow such arrested persons any access to the courts to challenge that reinslavement.

Was it proper for officials and others to not obey such “LAW”? [In my Wisconsin the State Courts stated “NO”, but were overturned by SCOTUS. Juror-Citizens, in related trials as to punishing officials and others resisting that legal reinslavement, resorted to “Jury Nullification” and voted “Not Guilty” in opposition to the facts and the law.]

COULD IT BE THAT THOSE OPPONENTS OF SLAVERY WERE OBEYING A “HIGHER LAW” AS IS CLAIMED BY THOSE OPPOSING THE UNDEMOCRATIC SCOTUS DECISION CHANGING OUR BASIC LAW TO ESTABLISH A RIGHT TO SAME SEX “MARRIAGE”? (That is, by amending the Constitution without going through the democratic process required for such an action.)

In recent years many public officials have not complied with other laws as:

1. Issuing permits/licenses to buy/own firearms in accordance with the SCOTUS decision that such is an individual right of citizens (As extended to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution);
2. Mrs. Hilary Clinton's refusal to obey those laws regarding the security of information within the Department Of State;
3. Abusing the great power of the IRS to harass/punish opponents of the present Administration;
4. Violating the provisions/protections, against unreasonable searches/seizures, to punish supporters of Republican Governor Scott Walker.

I have not noted that those persons opposing the decision of a County Clerk to disobey the noted Court made law demanding that public officials obey the law as to items 1-4 above!

Discrimination As Good-And-Proper

“1 a :  to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of

b :  distinguish, differentiate <discriminate hundreds of colors>

2 :  to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences; especially :  to distinguish from another like object

intransitive verb

3 a :  to make a distinction <discriminate among historical sources>

b :  to use good judgment “

Such discrimination can be as to properly selecting:

 Mind-and-spirit elevating classical and jazz music vs that “rap” and “hip hop” ravings as support murder and abuse of women;  The essential teachings of Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and Sikhs as support peace vs those of the Nazis, Atheistic Communists and Muslims which inflict terrorism on the world; Such poetry as reflects craftsmanship vs the unorganized flushing of apparently random non-thoughts as come from the distorted minds of those who claim to be poets;

The facts that young Black youths commit more  violent crimes than those of other races (As properly noted by the Rev. Jessie Jackson as to groups of youths as might be following him down a dark street) vs the claim that acknowledging such reality is race “discrimination”; The fact that the family, based on pairings of women and men has been the basic unit of (Most) civilizations which have gone beyond primitive hunting-gathering societies  vs.the false claim that homosexual couples provide the save value-to and maintaining-of civilization; That the intent of the writers of the Bill Of Rights as to the "Establishment Cause" was to keep only the Federal Government from establishing an official "National Church" vs those who maintain that the "free exercise of religion" should be limited to the insides of homes and places-of-worship;  And, The views of our nation's founders that an armed citizenry is basic to controlling tyranny vs the position that they should be disarmed “for their own good”.

Today's Slavery In The USA

Requiring free citizens to "serve"other is "involuntary servitude"  (SLAVERY).

Forcing a Muslim florist to provide flowers for a Jewish wedding OR a Black organization to rent ins hall for a KKK meeting OR Ex-Mayor Bloomberg to host a NRA meeting OR a strict Christian baker to provide the product of her/his hands-and- mind to a homosexual "marriage" are all examples of such slavery.

Which Rights Will Be Enforced????

Well, SCOTUS has declared "Marriage" a basis constitutional right of all (Adult) citizens without regard to gender---And, in oppositions to thousands of years of history, the lack of noting that institution in the Constitution and in opposition to Article-X of the amendments to the Constitution being the last and most abused part of The Bill Of Rights. 

"Adult" appears to mean someone 18-years or older; "Citizen" is someone born in the USA or who has been naturalized. Such rights should be inviolate except when a court of law finds a person guilty of some crime allowing removal of those rights or too mentally ill to exercise them.

I have no doubt that the Federal (And some other) courts will be fierce in enforcing the noted, judicial, amendment of our Constitution. But, how have other "rights" fared (Or are likely to fare) in those courts and by the administrative branch of many/most governments?

OWNING PROPERTY:  The right to keep lawfully obtained property has been all but destroyed by SCOTUS by:

1. Allowing the seizure of real property for the benefit of private developers under a "legal fiction" that such will benefit the "common good"; And, 

2. Not suppressing the seizure of private property by government bureaucrats without prior judicial approval OR a clear-and-present danger of harm to others or "probable cause" that a crime has been committed.

VOTING: As for other basic rights of citizenship, this now is provided all citizens 18-years of age or older except where a court of law has ruled otherwise.

       Yet, too many Federal judges (And others) use every means to deprive all citizens of the value-and-weight of their votes by attempts to block verification of citizenship before casting ballots.

FREE SPEECH: The Obama Administration has abused the too-great powers of the IRS to abuse the free speech rights of those who oppose his misrule.

      Some have reasonably claimed that the worst abuse of that right is by public universities who punish students for "political incorrect statements" made as public speech and in academic documents OR set, as has the University Of California, "prohibited language" as a work rule for non-tenured faculty allowing firing for their violations---As a gross violation of what was once "Academic Freedom".

      Under the present Administration a US Attorney has threatened those who peacefully ask questions about the "Dark Side" of Islam.

FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION: It should be remembered that: The religious provisions of The Bill Of Rights were established to keep the Federal Government (Only) from setting up an official religion; Some of the original States maintained "official religions into the 1830s---Without judicial interference; And, the author of the current misreading of that  provision was a long time member of the KKK and a life-long hater of the Catholic Church.

      Since the establishment of our Republic until very recent years the public expression of religion by such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and very many other public officials was not only allowed but expected.

      The various courts' prohibition of such public statements as The Ten Commandments: Is in violation of those traditions; And, does not seem to have moved SCOTUS to remove such symbols from its primary building.

      The Seventh US Court Of Appeals have given Atheists the same "religious" protections as other "believers". Therefore, their "religion" must not be given the power to remove the symbols of other "faiths" from "the public square" (And schools).

SEARCH & SEIZURE:  The forced (At gunpoint) police entries into homes after the Boston-Marathon bombings, by Federal officials without probable cause  to believe a wanted criminal was within a home (Where a "hot" tear-gas bomb was thrown into the occupied crib of an infant yielding serious burns to that baby), the taking of property (Not contraband as such and not described in search warrants) by police everywhere---Including that initiated by Milwaukee County's PERsecutor against supporters of Governor Walker) are too many to list here.

KEEPING & BEARING ARMS:  SCOTUS has declared the the rights under the Second Amendment as the individual rights of every citizen and that without membership in any "Militia". It has extended that right to all the States.

       Yet, that and other Federal (And State) courts have not ruled against Federal, State and local actions which "INFRINGE' (To use the Second Amendment's language) upon those, under 21-years of age, citizen's exercise of those rights.

       As special cases: The Federal Government (And State governments) do not allow full citizens who are 18-to-21 years of age to purchase firearms; And, most public universities (Bound by The Bill Of Rights) do not allow such in buildings without lockers for securely checking-in arms lawfully carried on campus grounds.

THE SOLUTION: MANY (MOST?) MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS MUST SHIFT THEIR ATTENTION FROM CAMPAIGN FUND RAISING (AND ENRICHING THEMSELVES BY "INSIDER TRADING" AS BIND OTHER CITIZENS AND BY OTHER MEANS) AND RE-BALANCE THE POWER BETWEEN THE CONGRESS AND PEOPLE VS. THE TYRANNY IMPOSED BY THE COURTS AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES OF WHAT WAS ONCE "OUR GOVERNMENT".

This can be done by amending The Constitution:

1. To allow a simple majority of both Houses of The Congress OR a 2/3 majority of those present-and-voting of one House to vacate a SCOTUS decision;

2. To Allow any 20 Members of the Senate or 50 Members of the House, by signing a "Complaint" or like document to have "standing" to bring any action before the US Courts;

3. To allow the House or Senate, by a majority of those present-and-voting to independently bring criminal charges against any Federal official or employee and likewise prosecute such matters without interference by the Judicial or Administrative branches of the Federal Government.

4. Make themselves and all other Federal officials bound by the same laws (eg "Insider Trading") as bind other citizens.

Marriage: The Constitution & The Courts

There is nothing in the Constitution of the United States as addresses marriage. For most of our Republic's history the regulation of that civilization-sustaining institution (Of one man and one woman) was left to the States in obedience to the Tenth Amendment to that base of our government, that being a part of The Of Rights.

Those who claim that the Fourteenth Amendment allows the courts to bypass the democratic votes of the People and require that the States recognize and government enforce (By punishments) "Homosexual Marriage" forget that the intent of the authors of that provision was only to provide the then recently freed Black slaves with a certain minimum of political rights----And NOT to give judges the power to "make law from the bench" and amend the Constitution without going through that Constitution's, internal-and-democratic, means of change.

The same provisions apply to the States deciding who is a qualified voters and, if the People of the States so chose by democratic  voting, what proofs  of such qualification they may require.

Such persons also fail to admit that religion parts of the First Amendment were only to prevent the Federal Government from establishing a single "official church" [Some of the States maintained official churches, without constitutional challenge, into the

1830s---As is the current Administration's present-and-unconstitutional support of the "Religion-Of-Atheism" (And Islam) against Christians, Jews and others].

Of course, that is not unexpected as those same persons (Especially Federal judges) will not admit that the "shall not be infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the most severely worded-and-intended limit on Federal government (And, now, lesser governments.)---And do everything to, most undemocratically, deny the enforcement of that provision as was supported by the patriotic Founders of our Republic.

Ideal Model For/Of Homosexual Lobby

The ideal for/of the "homosexual lobby" IS a: Hispanic surnamed, Black, Lesbian/Bi-Sexual, sex-changed, "female", who physically attacks meat eaters, substance abusing, dishonorably discharged military vet, parolee, with one leg, a glass eye, a very repulsive skin disease and bad breath, who is now unemployed after being fired from "her" prior position as a Priestess within a San Francisco Satan-Worshiping congregation for being "too evil"and was previously expelled by the University Of California-Berkeley (Political Science Major) AND from all local political organizations and Mosques for being "too radically leftist" or too violent

Homosexuality---A Review

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

"Homoaidia" Not "Homophobia"

The term "homophobia" should not be used as that word is based on the word for "fear", which emotion is not the usual reaction to (Male) homosexuals. I suggest the term "Homoaidia" based on the word for the usual and natural reaction to such creatures, disgust or revulsion.

The only time a "fear" based word should be used is when discussing male homosexuals as disease vectors (HIV/AIDS) or when considering those who sexually abuse boys.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Bible Does Condemn Homosexuality

From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel of 17 October 2011 (Page15A).

HOMOSEXUALITY

Bible does condemn homosexual acts

It is absolutely incredible that Mark Achtemeier, in his op-ed "Celebrating this servant of God," would argue that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality as sinful (Perspectives, Oct. 11).
I have read through the Greek New Testament multiple times, read the Torah in Hebrew, translated the Aramaic portions of the Bible, edited a book on the text of Scripture and teach Greek and Hebrew at the college and seminary level in the Milwaukee area.
Old Testament texts such as: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination" (Lev 18:22) and New Testament texts such as Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, and many others, mean, in Greek and Hebrew, exactly what they mean in English.
Achtemeier's denomination decided, in the 1920s, to turn away from its former faith in an infallible Bible, an act that led to the resignation of the cream of the faculty of his denomination's seminary, Princeton, at that time.
If he agrees with his denomination that the Bible is filled with errors, let him say so. But to argue that the Bible does not condemn homosexual acts is an egregious misuse of the plain meaning of many passages.
(Author's Name Left Purposely Out)

Monday, November 01, 2010

Male Homosexuals & Disease Vectors-Revised

Milwaukee Magazine's August, 2007 issue contained the story "Gay in the City" which brought to my mind the possible need to cut away all questions of religion or morality when the behaviors of male homosexuals are discussed and limit debate and actions to the purely scientific base of proven public health practices.

From a purely scientific point-of-view, most male homosexuals (Who have clearly demonstrated a general lack of self control and sense of the "common good") represent a disease vector as do the plague bearing fleas on rats, the flies and cockroaches who hang about "unprotected" food and garbage, mosquitoes who carry malaria and other diseases and other like threats to the health of all People.

If the general and Jewish-Christian foundations of morality are ignored (As is the constant drum beat of the homosexual lobby) and only the science of successful public health programs is applied, the best prevention of any epidemic or endemic disease, including HIV/AIDS, is to liquidate the disease vector(s) most responsible for the spread of the attacking illnesses. Therefore, we kill rats and fleas, destroy flies and cockroaches as much as is possible, destroy mosquitoes and ...!

Of course, I cleave to those standards of human-and-humane behaviors held up by traditional Christian and Jewish standards and maintain that the best reaction is: Love the sinner and hate the sin" AND not the views held up (If not reflected in practice) by Muslims and their cousins, the NAZIs.

Monday, February 01, 2010

Defining "Political Correctness"

The following is the 2007 winning entry from an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term. This year's term was 'Political Correctness'.

The winner wrote: "Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

Mentally Ill Vs. Dangerously So & Guns

I am becoming more-and-more disturbed  about the far too many politicians, news commentators/reporters, those opposed to the fullest exercise of Second Amendment rights and others of that ilk who loosely  substitute the terms  "mentally ill"  OR "emotionally disturbed", for the more accurate term "dangerous mentally ill" as to those who should not be allowed to obtain firearms.

It is fit-and-proper and legally/constitutionally-sound  that someone should be declared "Dangerously Mentally Ill" only after a fact-based and contested hearing before a judge-and-jury, in accordance with our 1000 year old system of laws and our Constitution. Why? Because to tag any citizen as being "dangerously mentally ill" takes from such citizens as many civil and political rights as a conviction of a felony---And, deserves the same legal protections.  

At this time there are too many government units (eg -- The FBI) who will accept the unverified and non-judicial comments of some (Anonymous?) Psychologist/Psychiatrist/Other-persons as sufficient "Proof" to deprive citizens of a basic civil right.  Even super-sane me (If, and only if,  you accept my self-diagnosis)  once consulted a psychologist, with my wife, to iron out some marital problems---Which smoothing did occur. .

 Should I or some child with home/school problems who sees a school psychologist or some active-duty member of the Armed Forces/Veteran for whom war/other-problems has resulted in s/he seeking counseling, and other like and law-abiding citizens be deprived of a basic civil right without "due process of law"? [I believe we have another, of too many  Federal Laws which provides for both criminal and civil prosecution for "Deprivation of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which should deal with and punish those who would do so to those who are not dangerously mentally ill.

the FBI has reportedly placed entire groups of innocent military veterans on the "no buy"  list and that without "due process of law".

 I suspect that only a very small percentage of those with "emotional problems" are dangerous. This is probably a small/smaller portion  that of semi-automatic rifles with 10+ round magazines  used in unlawful shootings.

Constitution, Jefferson & Whaling

Much (Too much and in a  too expansive SCOTUS opinion written by an one-time, active, member of the KKK.) has been made as to President Thomas Jefferson's private letter noting his support of the "separation of church and state". Below is his view, also in a private letter, as to interpreting the Constitution.

"On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed. "

Please specially note that the term "trying" was used as in "boiling down" something (eg Whale blubber or the Constitution) to obtain what the actors wish (eg Whale oil or perverse decisions by judges "making law from the bench")

Please specially note that Wisconsin's applicable constitutional amendment was subject to repeated votes of our democratically elected legislators and by a direct, democratic and secret vote of the People.