Thursday, May 30, 2019

Designation Of "Hate Crimes"

First, all must exclude all reports from foreign nations as many of those places: Either ignore claims of such offences; Or, punish their citizens/subjects for telling the truth about a "certain ideology", with unalterable commands to murder others, as a "hate crime".

Within the USA we must ask:
1. How many (What part) of reported "hate crimes" resulted in the filing of criminal charges;
2. As most (All?) States have "hate crime statutes", how many of those claimed crimes resulted in formal prosecution under such laws;
3. How many of those claims resulted in (Under our constitutional demand for "presumption of innocence" and "due process of law") convictions for "hate crimes" or any, related, crimes;
4. How many of those claims (eg Young Muslim woman in New York who lied about being attacked for being a Muslim) have been proven as false; And,
5. How many (If any) of those liars were charged and convicted for inflicting such false claims?

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Hunter & "Joe" Biden WITH The PRC

tAs I lack a law-degree, expertise in such "deals" and a sure and certain knowledge of the full details of the deals arranged by Mr. Biden's son with the Peoples' Republic (sic) of China I cannot know:
1. How many of the USA's "Blue Collar Jobs" will or may-be destroyed by those "deals" OR be otherwise opposed to the interests of organized "Labor";
2. Are those deals "legal" or in civil/criminal violation of our democratically-enacted laws0 (eg Mail Fraud);
3. If our constitutionally-established government (eg Treasury Department; Attorney General) will investigate those "arrangements" to determine and publicly declare if they are or are-not in violation of our laws; And,
4. Will those deals help or hurt the pension funds of middle/lower-class workers in which many millions of their, hard earned, dollars are invested?

We must also ask will reporters or union officials or other Democrats ask "Joe" Biden about the above matters? [As "Joe" may have "flipped" on the threat of the PRC (Like on abortion), he might well be asked about his extortion, for the benefit of his son, in The Ukraine!]

Oh, lest I forget, Russia is NOT the chiefest nation-enemy of the USA. The PRC is and is actively increasing that danger to the USA and other nations by spying (Often through our universities and other research organization), sending poisons (eg Fentanyl, toys with toxic paint); Occupying islands owned by other nations (eg The Philippines); Building islands (And them with military bases) to establish military control over shipping lanes or possible oil strataAND, maintaining such economic and trade policies hurt the citizens of our Republic and that most likely the lower and middle class Americans.

Friday, May 24, 2019

The Costs Of Wars

After considering the objections to the USA's deployment of forces near Iran and the risk of a shooting war by such actions, I must ask what would have been the costs of France and Great Britain stopping Hitler at the Western border of Czechoslovakia (Which contained its best natural and augmented defenses) by sending divisions of troops there as compared with the costs (In blood and treasure) of World War II. It appears that such a deployment of forces would have put halt to his land grab there and if, and only if, like confrontations, on land and by sea, were executed in other such places against Hitler and, for that matter, Mussolini and Tojo.

I am a veteran of dangerous military and (Paid & unpaid) civilian service as directed towards the physical safety of my nation's People and that of its allies. I, quickly and greatly, discount the views about military risks inflicted by politicians, "journalists" and academics who have not put themselves at real and ongoing physical risks to protect their fellow humans.

Monday, May 20, 2019

Illegal Immigrants & Outlawry

The vast majority of illegal immigrants who are claiming asylum under our democratically-enacted laws either do no appear for the set hearing for adjudication or fail to obey lawful orders to leave the USA. (Those criminal are in addition to those who lawfully entered the our nation, by the grace of
visas who are, also, now like "illegals" by reason of their violations of the time-limits or non-employment or university-attendance or other conditions.)


Perhaps, the USA should bring back the concept of "Outlawry" for those aliens who have inflicted that state on themselves.

That is such persons should be the subject of public notice [To the last known address with a copy in a "newspaper of general circulation" (In English and any/all other languages spoken/read by the outlaw)]  that s/he must leave the USA on-or-before a date-certain or be declared an outlaw with no rights of person-or-property against anyone who would attack either-or-both. (If, and only if, necessary, a judicial, on-the-record-only, hearing might be required before that action is had.

That is, any citizen or legal-immigrant who takes declared-outlaw's money/goods or who physically attacks them would have an absolute defense against civil or criminal prosecution.

That seizure of money and property might well pay for some of efforts to physically deport those outlaws who physically survive outlawry to the point of arrest by any police or like officials.

Upon written application I will provide answers to well stated questions about executing this concept.

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Science & Infant Or New-Mother Deaths

The questions below were first posited as to infant deaths as reported as more common among Blacks than Whites. However, most of them apply to evaluating the problem of new-mother deaths as rated by race.

It might be well to include records of prior abortions.

I do wonder if the various reporters and noted agencies considered, without regard to race, the following "hard"data.
1. Age of the mother at the birth of the deceased child;
2. Her age at her first pregnancy;
3. Her age at the birth of her first child;
4. Any history of prior miscarriages, or STDs;
3. Any history of a  prior, early death of infants;
5. Was the noted mother using illegal drugs or excessively using alcohol during
   pregnancy or at the time of the infant's death;
6. Was the infant living with the mother most of the time between birth and death (If released from the hospital);
7. Was the father of the child living with the mother during the period of the pregnancy and until the death of the child?
8. Did the biological father have a history of substance abuse.

Of course, this data could (Should?) be cross-referenced to race/place-of-birth.


A. Was there any "self-selection/referral" by the subjects used in the various studies by the noted medical experts OR by the interviewers (Both always a potential source of bias);
. Were standardized questions or interview-protocols used to obtain data in those studies;
B. Were White, Latino, etc, mothers considered in each of the cited studies;
C. Were the studies on a basis of control-vs-experimental groups or multi-factor-matching?
D. What was the level-of-reliability (0.50 = random chance) for those studies; AND,
E. The other standards for valid-and-reliable scientific studies?

Thursday, May 16, 2019

Our Southern Borders And TREASON

United States Constitution, Article-III, Section-3: Section 3: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court." (nb Boldface and underlining added)

There is nothing in that section as 
requires that the enemies be: The forces of some, traditional nation; Or, such quasi-nations as ISIS (Or any other group of orthodox Muslims waging Jihad against the USA or its citizens; Or groups of bandits (eg As led by "Poncho" Villa who came across our unprotected Southern Border and ruined a New Mexico town and fought some US Army troops).

Yes, aiding those groups is, without doubt, Treason. But, I see no reason that those who are purposely poisoning, by smuggled illegal drugs, our fellow Americans should not also be designated as "
Enemies". I see no reasons why those who misuse their positions of power to sabotage efforts to secure our Southern border (Across which the vast majority of illegal drugs do come!) should not be charged with "TREASON".

Please specially note the bold-face and underlined portions of the above (Modified) definition of Treason as. most clearly, separated "levying war" from "
. . . in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort". Interfering with any President's acts to defend our Southern Border is giving "aid and comfort".

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

White Privilege

"WHITE PRIVILEGE": The assignment to Whites of a disproportional share of the dollar, pain, terror and other costs of the disproportional share of crime AND other social dysfunction of the United States' Black citizens as exampled by such thugs as Trayvon  Martin, Michael Brown, those who "play the knock-out game" and such of their active, lying and corrupt supporters as Al Sharpton. [We should consider the great poverty of the Jewish, Polish, Asian and others who came up out of poverty by: Honoring scholarship; And, maintaining a sound (Traditional, man-woman, marriage) family structure.]

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Islam Is NOT Simply A Religion

"The most important thing for a non-Muslim to understand about Islam is that Islam is not simply a religion. Islam is a social and political system, an indivisible melding of religion and state.
It is a socio-political, socio-religious, socio-economical, socio-educational, socio-judiciary, legislative militaristic system cloaked and garbed in religious terminology.
We must never forget that Islam is an all-encompassing ideological system, and as such wherever there is a Muslim community there will be Sharia and wherever there is a there is an Islamisation of the territory and ultimately of the nation."

(Sam Solomon; 7 June 2011)

Thursday, May 02, 2019

Duty Before Power

In the past I have noted that many in political power have never put themselves at bodily risk in defense of their fellow Americans.

Some of those who did have been such as: The planter George Washington;  Storekeeper, Flatboatsman and Postmaster Abraham Lincoln; And, Haberdasher Harry S. Truman---And that by service in dangerous military actions. [For myself, I did enlist in the US Navy and found myself in one of the six-or-so most dangerous, enlisted grade, specialties; After that service I did obtain a university degree, was employed by a "Department Of Corrections", working with some dangerous criminals. and assisted fire fighters in putting down a fire involving many gallons of very dangerous solvents.]

Other, parallel, dangerous work as can be had (Even by females in this era) to demonstrate the willingness to take real risks for the "common good" include (But are not limited to): Full time and volunteer fire fighters (Including those who combat forest fires); Peace officers; Guards in maximum and super-maximum security prisons; Doing "community work" and living in such places as the South sides of Chicago and Los Angeles; And, doing such work and living in the rural areas of
Sub-Saharan Africa or the Favelas of Brazil.

Those ladies (Yes, I know that I am not "politically correct") who seek power (Or success in academia) in later life can demonstrate such risk-taking by carrying, birthing and educating (In the broadest sense) their children to law-abiding and contributing places in our Republic.

In more recent times I have noted the "snowflakes" and "professional victims" in our colleges and universities have, most exactly, demonstrated that lack of dangerous service to others. It appears that such lesser creatures, even lacking that service, assume that they are entitled to attack the free speech (ie The necessary, but not sufficient, basis of academic freedom).

Perhaps, those "snowflakes" would be less likely to melt in the real world, after leaving the womb of too many schools, if they were exposed-to and hardened-by some, at risk, work in the real world before matriculation. If not required, I suggest that admission and scholarship officers give such "servants of the people" massive priority over others and more so over those who have been buying their way into universities.

Those who hire faculty or other school employees would do magnify their schools by looking to the same prior services.