Becoming Concerned About Race-Based Protests

I would be much more impressed with the causes of "racial justice protesters" if, and only if, the following were the case:

1. That White police officers were more likely to shoot Blacks than Black officers;

2. That Black criminals were not very much more involved in those crimes which "represent a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" as allows OR requires the use of lethal force to stop and that yielding a higher rate of Blacks being killed by police;

3. That there would be as much concern (eg Wakes, marches and the involvement of such as Al Sharpton) about the murder, by a looter, of retired St. Louis police officer David Dorn as there was for George Floyd;

4. That Black thugs would not select-out, on the basis of race, White victims at a rate many, many, times the reverse;

5. If those "after dark protesters" would not be so actively involved in arson, physical attacks on innocent Americans, looting and that as, very much, destroys the honest, family-supporting, employment of people-of-color workers and like employer's businesses; And,

6. If the, by many orders of magnitude, the primary murders of Blacks were not other Blacks.

Please let me know when all of the above is the rule so I can "become concerned".

Free Speech At Universities & High Schools

The law supporting free speech (ie The required, but not sufficient, basis for academic freedom) on public university campuses (And those private universities which accept any Federal monies) is extensive and clear. Lacking are those students who will bring civil suits against violating universities and, as individuals, violating university officials/administrators---And such attorneys who will risk bringing and trying such actions.

Perhaps, President Trump's, other, "Executive Order", to protect free speech on those campuses may forward the protection of the first provision of The Bill Of Rights.

The constitutional, free speech, rights of high school students are still murky. It appears that such schools may limit those rights if they disrupt instruction.

However, it also appears that that disruption must be a "clear and present threat" or actual event AND not some theoretical possibility imagined by some school officials or police officer or Fascist politician. 

In recent cases persecution of those wearing MAGA hats or showing like banners has been, in the same schools, contemporary with the display of other, very political or ideological slogans.

Even the ACLU (Now the "American Christian Loathing Union") once supported the free speech rights of high school students. (I doubt me if the ACLU would now defend students wearing MAGA hats.)

IN THOSE STATE WHICH REQUIRE DECLARATION OF PARTY FOR VOTING IN PRIMARY ELECTIONS THE PARTY AFFILIATION OF HIGH SCHOOL OFFICIALS/ADMINISTRATORS WHO DEMAND THE DEPARTURE OF MAGA (OR OTHER LIKE, "CONSERVATIVE", DISPLAYS SHOULD BE KNOWN---AND MAY SUPPORT CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR "VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS".

All Fascists should remember that the forceful (Attempted) taking of a MAGA hat (Or like banner) is "Robbery" a felony which (In most jurisdictions) may be resisted by all (Including deadly) force needed to prevent that crime. It is a most serious violation of American's rights that most prosecuting attorneys will not bring felony charges against such thugs who rob or attempt-to-rob citizens (Of all ages) of political materials.

The dangerous animal who "slugged" a citizen, on a California campus, should have immediately been "put down" by anyone as the university police were unable or unwilling to protect an innocent, non-aggressive, citizen from a very dangerous attack.

Troops Back From Middle East??

There are good reasons to bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan and, thereafter, from the EU.

1. These battle hardened troops could be redeployed to our border with Mexico to insure border security (Against job-and-identity thieves, Middle-Eastern terrorists disguised as Latinos, "gang bangers", drug lords' "hit" and kidnapping squads, previously deported criminals and other such scum), prevent or react to a Pancho Villa style raid on US territory AND to complete an effective border-fence (Not less than four rows of razor ribbon required) by use of engineer units backed-up by regulars.
2. To be available to execute their right to vote (Well before the 2012 elections) , now often very difficult to those troops (Could keeping them overseas be part of Mr.Obama's plan for reelection?).
3. To let those unruly and Islamic terrorists of that region kill each other as they have for the last 1400-years rather than focusing on killing "unbelievers".
4. To be available to suppress Islamic violence in the USA, most specially in the "no go" (And probably heavily armed) Muslim enclaves in our nation.

After that, the US troops in the EU should be recalled to the USA to the savings of much of our tax dollars. If, and only if, the nations of the EU wish to defend themselves from the aggression of Czar Putin and the too many Muslims now living there they must then increase their armed forces and related spending (It would be best if they did not arm-and-train terrorists---Muslims).

The disadvantages of the above actions are based on the fact that such Middle-Eastern combat makes our troops (At a terrible cost in blood and treasure) battle hardened and the only remaining large military force in the world in that condition. (UK and Canadian troops are excellent; But, they are parts of very small forces. Also, it is better to fight the criminal-terrorist movement known as Islam away from our cities and fields.

Canadian Humor

Now that Vancouver will be hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics, these are some questions people from all over the world are asking.

Believe it or not these questions about Canada were posted on an International Tourism Website.

Obviously the answers are a joke; but the questions were really asked!


Q: I have never seen it warm on Canadian TV, so how do the plants grow? ( England )
A. We import all plants fully grown and then just sit around and watch them die.

Q: Will I be able to see Polar Bears in the street? ( USA )
A: Depends on how much you've been drinking.

Q: I want to walk from Vancouver to Toronto - can I follow the Railroad tracks? ( Sweden )
A: Sure, it's only Four thousand miles, take lots of water.

Q: Is it safe to run around in the bushes in Canada ? ( Sweden )
A: So it's true what they say about Swedes.

Q: Are there any ATM's (cash machines) in Canada ? Can you send me a list of them in Toronto , Vancouver , Edmonton and Halifax ? ( England )
A: No, but you'd better bring a few extra furs for trading purposes.

Q: Can you give me some information about hippo racing in Canada ? ( USA )
A: A-Fri-ca is the big triangle shaped continent south of Europe Ca-na-DA is that big country to your North...oh forget it. Sure, the hippo racing is every Tuesday night in Calgary Come naked.

Q: Which direction is North in Canada ? ( USA )
A: Face south and then turn 180 degrees Contact us when you get here and we'll send the rest of the directions.

Q: Can I bring cutlery into Canada ? ( England )
A: Why? Just use your fingers like we do.

Q: Can you send me the Vienna Boys' Choir schedule? ( USA )
A: Aus-t RI-a is that quaint little country bordering Ger-man-y, which is...oh forget it. Sure, the Vienna Boys Choir plays every Tuesday night in Vancouver and in Calgary , straight after the hippo races. Come naked.

Q: Do you have perfume in Canada ? ( Germany )
A: No, WE don't stink.

Q: I have developed a new product that is the fountain of youth. Where can I sell it in Canada ? ( USA )
A: Anywhere significant numbers of Americans gather.

Q: Can you tell me the regions in British Columbia where the female population is smaller than the male population? ( Italy )
A: Yes, gay nightclubs.

Q: Do you celebrate Thanksgiving in Canada ? ( USA )
A: Only at Thanksgiving.

Q: Are there supermarkets in Toronto and is milk available all year round? ( Germany )
A: No, we are a peaceful civilization of Vegan hunter/gathers. Milk is illegal.

Q: I have a question about a famous animal in Canada , but I forget its name. It's a kind of big horse with horns. ( USA )
A: It's called a Moose. They are tall and very violent, eating the brains of anyone walking close to them. You can scare them off by spraying yourself with human urine before you go out walking.

Q: Will I be able to speak English most places I go? ( USA )
A: Yes, but you will have to learn it first.


Please send this on to any Canadian (or others) who you think will enjoy it.

IN RE: Proposed Australian Bill-Of-Rights

Having gone over the proposed, Australian, Bill Of Rights the following comments leapt our of my mind.
1. It appears to be written by attorneys for attorneys, and to insure that that group
of persons (Who produce nothing which can be eaten, worn, provide shelter or
give innocent pleasure) lose any income if it is enacted.
2. It fails (Like the Bill Of Rights in the USA) to define "religion" and exclude from
inclusion in that definition ideologies which encourage, solicit and command
physical attacks on humans outside each such ideology's membership.
3. Unless I missed it, it does not provide for each citizen's Natural Law right to
defend themselves and innocent others from dangerous, physical, attacks AND,
where the forces of government cannot provide instant protection from such
attacks, the full right to do so AND the means to enforce that right.
4. I fail to understand the separation of Article-7 and Article-8 and would welcome
some explanation of that action. (In any case and to avoid the errors of the
Canadian system, I would suggest the addition of some such wording as "No
person has any right to expect protection from intellectual attacks on his/her
religion or ideologies or political positions or any non-physical object by other
persons exercising their rights under this section.".)
5, Article-20 should include an exception for sentences (eg "At hard labour") imposed
by a court upon conviction of a crime.
6. Article-28should include the same provision forbidding retroactive civil penalties.
7. MOST IMPORTANTLY, AUSTRALIANS SHOULD INCLUDE SOME PROVISION FOR
THE LEGISLATIVE OVERTURNING OF SUPREME OR OTHER FEDERAL COURT
DECISIONS---PERHAPS BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT
IN BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT. (This to keep the definition of "rights" within
the legislative branch, as has NOT been the case in the USA, and the gross
abuse of the law, generally, by the too-independent courts of Canada. This would do
much to relieve the concerns of those who fear the imposition of a god-like
judiciary.)

Testing Canada's Human Rights Commissions

As a citizen of the USA I have been following the "progress" of Canada's "Human Rights Commissions" and do have the following questions:
1. Must complaints to that commission be filed by Canadian Citizens or legal residents;
2. Could a "mere" visitor to Canada file such complaints; And,
3. Should someone file such a complaint against all publishers, importers, sellers, public holders (eg Public Libraries), teachers (Including University professors, Imams, Mullahs) who sell or transfer or use the Koran in business transactions or public discourse?

It appears that the Koran has sufficient "hate content" (Please see the references below) to warrant a prima facie case which would warrant a full and public hearing.

I do wonder what would occur if, on the same day, such complaints were concurrently filed in every Canadian city. [In truth, I would hope that your Courts or Parliament would declare the free speech and free press rights of Canadian citizens to be of greater force and value than the actions of those commissions in all areas.]


HANDY REFERENCES TO THE KORAN


* verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25:27—29; 26:96—99; 3:85; 8:38; 31:13; 29:41—42; 37:22—25; 37:26—32; 25:17—19; 7:173; 21:66—67; 21:98—100; 16:20—21; 6:22—23; 6:40—41; 6:148; 2;221; 24:3)

Canada VS. Human Rights

Canada's so-called "Human Rights Commissions" have been very, very, busy in well documented efforts to destroy the right of free speech-and-press and of religion in that nation.

Now, some Toronto, nanny-state, politicians have called on Canada's Parliament to declare all handguns illegal in that nation (The usual second step towards confiscation of all firearms after Canada's already inflicted first step of gun registration).

It is not a new pattern to first eliminate private possession of effective weapons and then to attack all freedoms. After all, such enemies of freedom as Stalin, Hitler and the followers of Mohammed all did so.

Of course, such disarming of law abiding citizens also deprives them of the means to execute their Natural Law rights to effective and immediate defense against home invasions and other criminal attacks--The police being always too late to do so.

Those persons and organizations who focus too closely on only one human right (eg Free speech-or-press) lose sight of the fact that all basic rights are interlinked.