Monday, September 21, 2015

Islam & The US Constitution

If, and only if, Islam was a "religion", Article-VI, Section-3 of our Constitution would preclude consideration of a citizen's status as a Muslim in his/her efforts to gain any political office--Including that of our nation's President..

1. But, Islam  NOT  a religion; But, is a criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology not far different from the KKK or Nazi-Party (Sharing the same principles of hate-of-Jews and all real religions, use of violence and the other horrors taught in Mein Kampf and the Koran
2. Islam (Like the KKK, Mafia and the SS brand of Nazism) has had a very thin veneer of religion; The false-prophet Mohammed (Who was a murderer, liar and treaty breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child) declared perpetual war (Jihad) against all "unbelievers" (Until they join Islam or abjectly accept the slave-like state some call dhimmitude), a war which has continue in our era in the Sudan, Thailand, parts of the Philippines,,Fort.Hood, New York City on "9/11, Paris (France), Nigeria, Syria, Fort Hood (Texas), other US military stations AND throughout the world.
3. Muslims are allowed or encouraged or commanded to forward that Jihad by the used of murder, rape and other sexual abuse of females and boys, genocide, torture, theft (Including the lands held by Christians for 2000-years),"tactical" lying (To  we "unbelievers"), Etc..
4. Despite very short "Golden Ages" the leaders of Islam have used every means (Including Murder) to oppose the study of science and most knowledge outside of the Koran, Hadith and a very few related texts. [However, civil engineering and the development of weapons, to support Jihad, appear to be allowed-and-encouraged.]

If you believe that you know a "Moderate Muslims" who does not support the above horrors, demand that person to very publicly  (To be audio-and-visually recorded) condemn those teachings AND (On camera) ink-out of an Arabic copy of the Koran those verses which support them or, yourself, very publicly, discredit any such person (Or, all such persons).

As the leaders of Iran and other Muslim ruled states are waging overt-or-covert war against the USA, aiding (Or, even, not opposing) them in such matters as the development of atomic weapons is a violation of Article-III, Section-3 of our Constitution and 18 US Coder 2381 as define TREASON.

Wednesday, September 09, 2015

Officials Must Obey THE LAW?????

Until the outcome of our most bloody “War Between The States” Blacks were not, by a decision of the Supreme Court Of The United States not consider as full human-citizens.

At that time we also had a Federal “Fugitive Slave Law” as allowed the capture and return to their “owners” of those Blacks who had fled slavery. That law imposed very severe penalties on any official who did not arrest any person alleged to be a fugitive slave upon a sworn claim of ownership. It did not allow such arrested persons any access to the courts to challenge that reinslavement.

Was it proper for officials and others to not obey such “LAW”? [In my Wisconsin the State Courts stated “NO”, but were overturned by SCOTUS. Juror-Citizens, in related trials as to punishing officials and others resisting that legal reinslavement, resorted to “Jury Nullification” and voted “Not Guilty” in opposition to the facts and the law.]

COULD IT BE THAT THOSE OPPONENTS OF SLAVERY WERE OBEYING A “HIGHER LAW” AS IS CLAIMED BY THOSE OPPOSING THE UNDEMOCRATIC SCOTUS DECISION CHANGING OUR BASIC LAW TO ESTABLISH A RIGHT TO SAME SEX “MARRIAGE”? (That is, by amending the Constitution without going through the democratic process required for such an action.)

In recent years many public officials have not complied with other laws as:
  1. Issuing permits/licenses to buy/own firearms in accordance with the SCOTUS decision that such is an individual right of citizens (As extended to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution);
  2. Mrs. Hilary Clinton's refusal to obey those laws regarding the security of information within the Department Of State;
  3. Abusing the great power of the IRS to harass/punish opponents of the present Administration;
  4. Violating the provisions/protections, against unreasonable searches/seizures, to punish supporters of Republican Governor Scott Walker.


I have not noted that those persons opposing the decision of a County Clerk to disobey the noted Court made law demanding that public officials obey the law as to items 1-4 above!

Tuesday, September 01, 2015

Discrimination As Good-And-Proper

“1 a :  to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of
b :  distinguish, differentiate <discriminate hundreds of colors>
2 :  to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences; especially :  to distinguish from another like object
intransitive verb
3 a :  to make a distinction <discriminate among historical sources>
b :  to use good judgment “

Such discrimination can be as to properly selecting:
 Mind-and-spirit elevating classical and jazz music vs that “rap” and “hip hop” ravings as support murder and abuse of women;  The essential teachings of Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and Sikhs as support peace vs those of the Nazis, Atheistic Communists and Muslims which inflict terrorism on the world; Such poetry as reflects craftsmanship vs the unorganized flushing of apparently random non-thoughts as come from the distorted minds of those who claim to be poets;
The facts that young Black youths commit more  violent crimes than those of other races (As properly noted by the Rev. Jessie Jackson as to groups of youths as might be following him down a dark street) vs the claim that acknowledging such reality is race “discrimination”; The fact that the family, based on pairings of women and men has been the basic unit of (Most) civilizations which have gone beyond primitive hunting-gathering societies  vs.the false claim that homosexual couples provide the save value-to and maintaining-of civilization; That the intent of the writers of the Bill Of Rights as to the "Establishment Cause" was to keep only the Federal Government from establishing an official "National Church" vs those who maintain that the "free exercise of religion" should be limited to the insides of homes and places-of-worship;  And, The views of our nation's founders that an armed citizenry is basic to controlling tyranny vs the position that they should be disarmed “for their own good”.