Thursday, February 28, 2019

Some Revolutionary & Other Wars UPDATED

Some recent comments (eg "The New Divide In American Politics"; First Things (On Line); 23 May 2018) have pointed out the growing divide in our Republic as perhaps based, in part, on "Religion vs. Not-Religion".

I suggest that the cited division is also based on:
1. Constitutional Laws and "equal justice under law" vs. mob rule;
2. Supporters of the intent of the authors of the 1789 Constitution, The Bill Of Rights and of statutory law as the standard vs. those supporting judges "making and inflicting law and amending our Constitution from the bench";
3. Such Natural Law rights as allow innocent targets of violent criminal attack to immediately use deadly force to stop any "clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" when civil authorities are not able (And sometimes unwilling to do so) to put immediate halt to such threats. [This right may demand the use of deadly force in protecting those who are unable to do so; And, by extension, the right to immediate access to those weapons as allow them to exercise that right and perform that duty (ie Modern, concealable and effective firearms) as so much opposed by the leadership of the Democratic (sic) Party which disorganization is on one side of the noted divide.];
4. Those who support the fullest exercise of "free speech: (ie The necessary, but not sufficient, basis of "Academic Freedom") as allows even the most provoking expression of ideas vs. those who would totally censor what they consider "hate speech"or, even, "disturbing", expressed, ideas.
Today's divisions, in the USA, appear to be approaching those as were existant in the 1770s and the 1850s as led to bloody war.

Those divisions have resulted in wars-between-states as in Central Europe's "Wars of Religion" and our own "War Between The States" as often putting contesting peoples in more-or-less distinct areas.

Our nation's first Revolutionary War, like Spain in the 1930s, was a "Civil War" with the various factions less clearly divided by geography---Especially in its early stages. In Spain the "left" did tend to group in-and-about Catalonia and the forces of Franco and his allies in other places. [The present divisions in the USA are nation wide, but with more weight to the left in our West Coast states and in a few other places as Illinois, New York State and Maryland along with a number of cities/counties ruled by Democrats. They, more generally follow the pattern set by Spain at the beginning of its civil war than the USA in 1860.

At this time the State government of California is in such a "resistance" to Federal authority as was the case in the South in 1859-60 lacking only one, severe, violent act to make its officials guilty of "Treason" as defined by our Constitution and place California and any supporting jurisdictions in a "State Of Rebellion" as would warrant constitutional imposition of martial law along with suspension of Habeas Corpus, military removal of illegal aliens from the USA to to internment camps, use of volley-fire to suppress mobs, courts martial, and other means towards limiting the spread of rebellion to other strongholds of "the left" (As, otherwise, might yield a true "civil war").

Such a conflict might well result in "The Right" using its great advantage in the private possession of modern firearms to privately "liquidate" their opponents---Which may be basic to the Democrats' Jihad against a well armed citizenry.
Here, please note that the vast majority of modern (ie Police & Military grade) firearms privately held in the USA are in the possession of those "on the right".

Returning to the matter of "religion" v. "not-religion" it appears thatRemoving the matrix of Christianity (As based on the teachings of the Jews) from its role of support in what was once Western Civilization in Western nations leaves a gap filled by a most arrogant Atheism as essentially against humane behavior (eg Abortion becoming infanticide) as the spread of the horrid commands of orthodox Islam. In this era, this is most exactly demonstrated by Sweden where both have rotted away real "Charitas", personal freedoms and self-determination in favor of obedience in the style described in the novel 1984. THAT "RELIGION OF ATHEISM" , AS OPPOSED TO THE BEST PRINCIPLES OF JEWS AND CHRISTIANS, IS NOW A CORE, IF HIDDEN, PART OF THE REAL PLATFORM OF THE USA's DEMOCRATIC-SOCIALIST PARTY.

Monday, February 18, 2019

"Microaggressions" & "Snowflakes"

The world is a very dangerous place filled with murderous individuals (Who act alone, in pairs, in small groups or bands, quasi-nations and even full nations). Those animals inflict "Macroaggressions" against others as include murder, rape and robbery.

Examples of such critters include: Those waging Jihad against "unbelievers" in loyal obedience to the unalterable commands of Islam; Latino "drug lords" and gangs (eg MS-13) operating across our too little protected border; And, our nation's own Black thugs who select-out, on the basis of race, White targets for their criminal assaults at a rate many, many, times the reverse.

It is the case that such "tender" creatures (eg "Queer" Faculty at Williams College in recent days) are converting others to such be "professional victims" who, after leaving the womb of academia, will melt away in the heat of the real world---And, likely, blame others for their inability to face reality.

I must also note that claims of "microaggressions" are: Commonly unsupported by such facts as place, time, persons and verifiable acts as would define human behavior as intentional and beyond random behaviors; And, are a sub-class of the all too common, on university/college campuses, of hate crime hoaxes.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Thinking Error On Illegal Drug Entry

Some elected officials and "journalists" have stated that "the numbers" show that the majority of illegal drugs entering the USA come through "points of entry" as are our ports and other places subject to very intense control-and-inspections.

The reality is that the majority of illegal drugs DETECTED are found at those places.

It appears that the best estimates are that 90% of the illegal drugs coming into the USA (And murdering our fellow Americans) enter, UNDETECTED, over our, largely uncontrolled, border with Mexico.

To a very large extent, infliction (By opponents of President Trump) on The People is a LIE!

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Speaker Pelosi Education RE: Guns

Someone please instruct Speaker Pelosi that there is no "Gun Crime" or "Knife Crime" or "Blunt Object Crime" or "Firebomb Crime" or "Fist & Boot Crime". There is only "PEOPLE CRIME".

As to those PEOPLE, please instruct her that the majority of crimes committed with firearms are inflicted on our fellow Americans by members or supporters or client-beneficiaries (ie That majority of Blacks who vote for that Party and illegal immigrants who commit a very high and disproportional share of violent crimes in the USA) of the Democratic (sic) Party.

Please also instruct her that the number of Americans save from murder/rape/other-violent crimes by the use (Often the "mere" display) of firearms is several to very many times the harm caused by the illegal use of guns. 

Please also instruct her that the chief concern of the Patriot Founders of our Republic (And very many of today's, often legally armed, Americans), as to arms, was insuring a well armed citizenry capable of resisting the tyranny of our own governments---Especially those who would, like Pelosi (And her co-actors), inflict the disarming of our law-abiding (Legally presumed sane) good citizens.

Of course, such instruction may not be useful as Ms. Pelosi's pathological lust for, tyrannical, power makes her ineducable. 

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Muslim Congress Member(s) As Dangerous

The real problem with Member-of-Congress I. Omar is not that she is against Jews (And Israel) but that she is for (ie Loyally Supports) the criminal-terrorist ideology termed "Islam".

That ideology has such unalterable commands (Please see the partial list below), binding on its orthodox members, as are directly opposed to civilized behavior and the democratically-enacted laws of our Republic.

Islam and its true-believing followers:
1. Are opposed to "equal rights under law" for women and persons believing in other ideologies or true religions;
2. Allows (Following the personal example of that fellow Mohammed, of Mecca & Medina) the "marriage" and sexual use (ie Rape) of girls down to nine-years-young;
3. Rewards the wagers of Jihad with the "right" to enslave and  rape women and girls---As done by Boko Haram (In West Africa where they also slaughtered students of "Western Knowledge);
4. Demands  governmental rule by only Muslim males; And,
5. Too many other other violations of our laws and the best principles (Based on Judeo-Christian teachings) of our nation and what remains of Western Civilization.

I must wonder if she and the other Muslim Members of the Congress will publicly denounce and reject those horrid teachings of Islam.


•  verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25
Listed below are a few passages from the Quran that clearly compel Muslims to violence.  
Quran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.
Quran 3:28   “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends
Quran 3:85   “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
Quran 5:33   “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.
Quran 8:12   “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran.
Quran 8:60   “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.
Quran 8:65   “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.
Quran 9:50   “When opportunity arises kill the infidels where you find them.
Quran 9:30    "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them.
"Quran 9:123  “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.
Quran 22:19  “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.
Quran 47:4    “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Congress, Muslims & Treason

The Congress now has four Members who are members-and-followers of the criminal-terrorist ideology known as Islam. The below offers my position that being someone who supports that ideology is guilty of TREASON and must be excluded from The Congress.

Supporting Islam = Treason (#2)

I have elected to apply the "KISS Principle" to this matter.
1. Treason, under our 
Constitution, is limited to waging war against the USA (Which includes adhering-to or supporting those who are active in such acts).
2. Islam has been in a state of self-declared war against all non-Muslims for 1400-years.
3. Islam requires all of its adult male members to either be personally involved in such warfare
Jihad) or to "support it with all their wealth".
4, Much (Most?) of all contributions to "Islamic Charities" ends up, as the 
Koran commands in the hands of terrorists whose program includes attacks on the USA.
5. No believing Muslim will publicly condemn or deny those parts of the 
Koran or other Islamic teachings which call for such wars---Including against the non-Muslim citizens of and lawful visitors to the USA.
Muslims' murderous attacks, in the name of Jihad, against the USA (And its citizens and allies) have been ongoing, as acts-of-war, both within and without the USA. Those acts are "Treason". Those who support them (By words, moneys and acts) are also guilty of "Treason".

Tuesday, June 07, 2011

Exclusion From The House Of Representatives

In 1919 AD the House Of Representatives refused to “seat” Congressman Elect Victor Berger of Wisconsin's Seventh District apparently because: Mr. Berger was honestly an honest Socialist (Of the variety called “Sewer Socialists” who were much more interested in protecting the health and well being of the People than in an “theoretical” socialism); And, in response to violent acts by union members and socialists in other parts of the USA, which had little, if anything, to do with Mr. Berger.

My recollection of contemporary press reports were the considerable number of claims that allowing Socialists a role in government would result in: Murder and mass-murder in the streets; The disease of “free love” being rampant throughout the nation; The sexual abuse of little girls; Overthrown of our democratic systems of laws and government; Destruction of the Middle Class in this nation, that part of our population seen as the bulwark of our land; And, of everything which makes Western Civilization the mainstay of our world.

The not-seating of Mr. Berger did not appear to stop “free love”, murder and serial mass-murder and various forms of sexual abuse of children. Our subsequent, especially of late, Administrations have made considerable progress in abolishing the Middle Class and weakening those standards and institutions which support Western Civilization.
Strangely enough, the Congress has seated two persons who subscribe to a 1400-plus year old, medieval, criminal-terrorist ideology-or-movement which does, in fact, use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, perpetual-and-violent military-level actions (ie “Declared War), lying and organized theft and lying to accomplish its very anti-democracy goals being: The destruction or near suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslim; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.

The 1919 Congress saw even Mr. Berger's brand of Socialism as a clear-and-present danger, That position might, without “20/20 hindsight”, be considered not unreasonable considering the concurrent and bloody revolutions occurring in such newsworthy places as Russia and Germany. Even without that “clarity of vision” as demonstrated by such leftists as Adolph Hitler, J. I. Stalin, Mao and others of that ilk.

It appears that the case of "Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486 (1969) would probably prevent such removal today. However, as the Supreme Court no longer holds fast to the rulings of prior courts, I could be wrong.

With our much better knowledge of history (If we use it as, to paraphrase: “Those who do not study history, learn from history and apply those lessons will be condemned to repeat its worst lessons”) and what should be our better knowledge of the goals-and-means of Islam, we should wonder at why the current Congress and those of future terms should seat any Muslims---Who do not, publicly and fully, deny those horrid and perpetual Islamic goals and means.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

"Red Flag" Laws---NOT

I have read and heard much of "Red Flag Laws" which allow any person to request the police, with some-sort-of judicial approval to take guns (And other weapons?) away from Americans upon a claim that such persons are too dangerous to have weapons.

The taking of guns or other property (Except on an immediate arrest for a probable, criminal, violation of law) from an American requires:
1. An arrest or search warrant issued, only on "probable cause" that a crime has been committed, by a judge/magistrate of a "Court Of Record"; Or, 
2. The prior provision of a notice for a judicial hearing to consider the taking of such property as provides the "reasons why" (In detail as supported by judicially allowable evidence), the name(s) of those who have requested that hearing, a time distant enough for the property owner to obtain legal counsel (Please see below) and to prepare a defense against that action;

I must wonder if, in "Red Flag" seizures of guns: If the owner is immediately provided with a competent (Experienced in such constitutional matters) if her/his income does not allow retaining of such; And, in the case where the guns are ordered returned to the owner the immediate payment by the Court (To be collected later by Order from those requesting that action) which would protect the average American from the untimely and expensive methods of obtaining such payments (As might represent many weeks of wages or other income).

I recommend that such laws provide for the immediate punishment (For "Perjury" or "False Swearing" or, more immediately, "Contempt Of Court") of those providing false or very misleading information to the Courts  (eg Vindictive spouses during who are planning/forwarding a divorce).

Such provisions allow full "due process of law" for the poorer or, even, the average citizen.

Such laws also appear to be in violation of our Republic's Founders in establishing the individual rights in The Bill Of Rights AND for providing "Due Process Of Law", in a very timely way, to citizens who cannot afford or retain qualified attorneys.

Saturday, February 09, 2019

Islam & Science Today

A very long time ago there were two "Golden Ages" in Muslim ruled lands as chiefly were in the Iberian peninsula and centered about Baghdad. During those too short years Muslims did:
1. Take in and share with the West that scientific and other knowledge that existed in India, Greece, Egypt and other Pre-Islamic lands; And,
2. Both improved some of that learning and added to it.

However, the ultra-orthodox theologians of Islam found much of that new knowledge as a threat to the teachings-and-commands of Mohammed (Of Mecca & Medina) and, through orthodox rulers, suppressed such "seeking" as would now be called "research".

With the exception of the products of weapons technology and, for the rules, Western medicine, that distrust and dislike (Hate?) of study outside of the Koran, Hadith and some limited-and-derivative sources still continues as well-and-exactly exampled by:
3. Muslims' murder of Western medical staff bring Polio vaccine for the children in Afghanistan; And,
4. The massacre, by Boko Haram, of technical school students for studying "Western Knowledge". [Those monsters also followed Islamic permission, for those waging Jihad, and kidnapped young girls and "Sexually Used" (ie Raped) them.]

Tuesday, February 05, 2019

"Religious Test" At Public Universities

The Constitution of the USA prohibits any religious test for appointment to any employment by the United States.

Some public universities (eg The University of Colorado) demands that faith-based organizations allow its officers to be of any or no faith. I must wonder if such a demand is unconstitutional.

As such demands have been, for the most part, been made on Christian organizations, such may be made to advance the religion of Atheism ***. That is a most clear violation of the current Law on the "separation of church and state".

James J. Kaufman
Gary R. McCaughtey, et. al.
7th US Court Of Appeals
Decided Aug. 19, 2005.

Saturday, February 02, 2019

"Toxic Masculinity" & The APA

Some years ago I defined "Femininity" as the distilled essence of the best of what separates women from men. That quality is not an aspect of sexuality or physical beauty. (One of the most "feminine" woman I knew of was the actress Helen Hayes---In her later years. I have known very young girls who were very feminine well before becoming, physical, women.)

Then, what is "Masculinity"?  As a male I find that harder to define---Without being accused of
self-description or self-inflation.

Perhaps, it is that, greater, willingness to be very forward in risking blood, suffering, limbs and life to protect family, friends, nation and what is otherwise held precious. (Yes, there are females who do so by, for example, police, firefighter and military service; But, they do not seem to stay in those good works for even a small part of the years which males commit to such service.)

Of course, that willingness can be perverted by the influence of tyrannical or insane leaders (Such as
Hitler, Stalin or others of that ilk). For the most part the soldiers of those horrid creatures were more loyal to their comrades-in-arms than to any such mis-leaders (Which characteristic may be much more common to real men than to others).

Why does the American Psychological Association and so many other postulate "Toxic Masculinity" as a clinical-disorder or social-fault or, even, a sin-like disorder?

I will be non-diplomatic (ie "Snarky") and state that those persons are either biological males who are not masculine or biological-females who are, in the common speech, "castrating bitches." or "butches".


Friday, February 01, 2019

The Real Danger To Virginia's Blacks

The real, physical-and-mortal, danger to Virginia's (And other State's) Blacks is not some fool (eg Dr. R. N.) wearing "Black Face" or a KKK uniform. The real-and-deadly danger comes from:
1. "Medical professionals" aborting Black, unborn, babies at a rate many times than those of other races; And,
2. Those Black thugs who murder (Quickly by the misuse of guns and slowly by illegal drugs) other Blacks at a rate many, many, times: That between White criminals and their White victims; And, many, many, more times than those Blacks murdered or otherwise maimed/injured by Whites.

The above applies to all of the "Several States" and, as to abortion, is now lurching towards the murder of babies at the point-of-viable birth OR AFTERWARDS.

As a "strict constitutionist" and a (Self-declared) avocational historian, I am compelled to note that the same Party which supports that disproportional murder of Black babies is the same Party as is attempting to deprive the American People of those weapons as, now, allows them to resist the above-cited thugs---And other, political, criminals.