Sunday, June 30, 2013

Effective Control Of Illegal Immigration

Many have claimed that the Senate's immigration bill(S.744) is "good for business, right for the U.S.". Those supporters  have neglected the facts about that Bill.
1.  It both fails to provide effective  control of who enters the USA and allows bureaucrats to nullify its few good measures designed for the protection of the citizens and lawfully here immigrants.
2. That those who now and will illegally enter the USA include those invaders who are too often: Bearers of illegal drugs; Carriers of horrid diseases (eg Drug resistant TB, Polio); Often armed with the most modern and fully-automatic, true, assault rifles; Members of Mexican criminal kidnapping and “hit” squads; And, most harmful to our unemployed citizens (Especially Black youths) those uneducated and under-qualified persons who steal (Very often entry level) jobs from those good people.

I am curious as to why you continue to "throw under the bus"  the USA's unemployed and marginally employed. As you are not elected officials, you do not even have the "need" to pimp for Latino votes as basic to your one-side presentation of pro-immigration views.
-As I am loath to present a problem (As to border control) I offer the following proposals.

If, and only if, The Congress wishes to protect us from such invaders, it must:
  1. Declare that those entering the USA at other than designated crossing points are invaders;
  2. Declare that the USA, like all other nations, has the right and, to its citizens, duty to effectively protect from such invaders;
  3. Declare that illegal immigrants have no rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as they have avoided the “jurisdiction” of the USA, as required by that Amendment, through their illegal entry or staying in the USA in violation of visas;
  4. Declare that the children of such illegal immigrants are not US citizens for the same reason;
  5. Enact such laws as will truly-and-effectively secure our Southern border and protect our citizens by the methods described below.

Effective Use Of Military To Secure USA Borders

1. Restrict the Border Patrol to urban areas and a thousand yards on either side of authorized, rural crossing points;
2. Allow anyone to cross into Mexico, without question, at any authorized crossing point or station;
3. Use four rows of “Razor Ribbon” (“Barbed Tape”) coils In addition to the fences yet to be build and those sort-of in place along the entire border except for roads leading to authorized crossing points;
4. Make the balance of our border, for the first 1000-yards into the USA, a military zone with posted notices in English, Spanish, Parsi, Arabic and local Native American languages that persons entering illegally there will be treated as invaders and will be shot, without warning if they are armed or resist arrest, and otherwise taken into custody for forced deportation or TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION. 
5, Insure enough military personnel (Or alternatives described below) to insure "24/7" visual (ie "Mark-1, Mod-1 Eyeball") ovesight of every foot of our border AND to provide the below described and physical reaction to those invaders.

The troops could be regulars (Some brought back from Europe whose countries appear unwilling to defend themselves), reservists, National Guard and members of the General Militia (Also ad hoc posses raised by Sheriffs, mayors, JPs and other local government officials)

More On Effective Control Of US Border

It is NOT sufficient to merely order units of the National Guard to the border. They must be given "general orders" as will allow them to protect the USA. I suggest the following.
1.                  All persons entering the USA at other than approved places, manned by the Border Patrol, are invaders.
2. All such persons are to immediately be forced back across the border by use of such force as is required to do so.
3. Any such persons who are armed are to be immediately fired upon and that without warning.
4. If the Border Patrol or the Armed Forces of the USA (Or, civilians under their protection) are fired upon from across our border, the Border Patrol and the Armed Forces will react to such attacks by small arms fire, field guns or aviation delivered ordinance.
5. The National Guard, Army and, if necessary, the General Militia shall support the emplacement of not less than six coils of "razor ribbon" (aka "Barbed Tape") along every foot of a ocean-to-ocean fence.
6. Provide for high-speed and armed patrol boats and aircraft to prevent illegal immigration by sea and air under the same “General Order” as provided above.

State Protections Vs. Federal Tyranny

Every day brings more news of gross corruption in the Federal government and attacks on those rights which should be guarded by the Bill Of Rights (Especially the First, Second, Fourth and Tenth Amendments, for which please read). It is most certain that the Federal government is not exercise its primary duty to protect the People. Given the very apparent failure of the "Washington Government" do so, I strongly suggest that the power to do so is then allocated to the States or the People.

A Bill (#:LRB-2063/1) has been introduced into Wisconsin's Legislature to empower Wisconsin to fill the gap in protecting the People from abuses of their individual rights (Declared so by SCOTUS which ruling was extended to the States)---Such as the
"Toomey-Manchin Proposal". Measures parallel to LRB-2063 are pending or in-effect in other States.

Some doctors have come out against this Bill. They appear to be ignorant ofThe apparent inverse relationship between the ownership of and ready access to guns and crimes;  And, the recent study which supports that position . They are very different from those patriotic physicians who signed the Declaration Of Independence and pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor to winning the independence of our nation! If, and only if, those physicians were truly interested in protecting innocent children (Often the physical/emotional victims of home invasions), they would strongly oppose any restrictions on the possession of and ready access to modern firearms.

Everyone should consider the views of our "Founding Fathers" ( As to guns as noted in other blog entries)--And, such tyranny as the Federal government is now inflicting on the People.

Psychiatrists have been central to the violation of the Second Amendment rights of military troops and veterans and residents of New York State Therefore, I suggest that the legislature void the exception given to Psychiatrists in the original Bill!

The restrictions on physicians should be extended to psychologists, social workers and other licensed medical care workers or counselors.

Rather than make special provisions for peace officers I strongly suggest that violation of the proposed Law be included in our "Misconduct In Public Office" which provides for imposing those conditions on all public officials and employees.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

The FIRST Duty Of Government

The first duty of the government is to protect the People from the government.  If  governments fail of that purpose, then we may resort to the advise of President Thomas Jefferson: "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

You might ask yourselves why so many in the Democrat Party wish to take from the People those guns (Semi-automatic; With larger magazines) most useful in suppressing both the tyranny of the usual criminals and that of government agents.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

FBI = Federal Bureau Of ISLAM

From recent and reliable reporting, it appears that the FBI has become the "Federal Bureau of Islam" under the misguidance of Director Robert (aka Abdul)  Mueller. Mr. Mueller appears to have fallen into a state of dhimmitude (A word he should look into as a mirror).
  1. All Muslims are required to go on Jihad (Which is a military-combat occupation and not some form of spiritual self-improvement) or “support it with all their wealth” . Every Muslim or Islamist organization (Including the “Muslim Brotherhood” and CAIR) which cleaves to the teachings of Islam is either involved in terrorist actions (ie Jihad) or at a high level of personal/organizational preparation for such anti-civilization actions.
    As in the case of the traitor Nidal Hasan (Of Fort Hood infamy) no believing adult male Muslim can be trusted . There are no “Moderate Muslims”! There are only true-believing Muslims and all other people. If you doubt me,then apply (In public and before witnesses, on the record) the test provided at below.
  2. Islam is not a religion! It is a criminal-terrorist movement with a very thin veneer of religiosity.
    Islam's not-nice teachings were given at Media after that fellow Mohammed had gained military and political power. Those horrid teachings are noted in other places in this blog..
          Islam is certainly very, very, different from the true monotheistic religions of the world as likewise noted.
          Even President John Q. Adams understood the differences between Christianity (The base upon which Western Civilization has been built) and Islam as noted in this blog
  3. With the loose and intricate inter-relations between the various terrorist organizations, the FBI does not have any proofs that Al Queda was not involved in the noted bombings; Probability theory supports some sort of relationship.
  4. The “overall tenor” of the presentation was not “too informal”, but too close to the truth.
  5. Abdul (ie “Slave”) Mueller (And all) need to consider what is a “Mosque” . In addition to that presentation, it should be remembered that: Mosques are those places where the horrid teachings of Islam) are pounded, again and again, into the brains of those there (Which might explain the increase in native-born US Citizens who attack others in the name of Islam); And, some Mosques (Or their out-buildings) have been arsenals).
  6. Asserting that the Koran is the collection of the “revealed work of God is: A support of a particular religion in violation to this era's legal status of the “separation of church and state, a crime or tort under various statutes; And, not supported by history as there is only the word of Mohammed for that assertion.
  7. Our experience with terrorist is that: Most of the terrorism in today's world comes out of Islam's teachings-and-practices; And, most of the active Islamist terrorists are, in fact, youths (eg The Boston bombers) from the Middle East or Islam dominant neighboring lands.
  8. Islamic militancy” is most often expressed by violent acts from mass murder to assaulting persons who inadvertently photograph Muslim females.
  9. Islam's war (Jihad) against “unbelievers” was declared perpetual by Mohammed until all humans either join Islam or abjectly accept the slave-like state some call dhimmitude. That war continues to this day against 99% of Americans. Supporting that war, by supporting Islam appears to meet the definition of Article-III, Section-3 of the Constitution---For TREASON.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

"Those" Teachngs Of Islam


* verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25:27—29; 26:96—99; 3:85; 8:38; 31:13; 29:41—42; 37:22—25; 37:26—32; 25:17—19; 7:173; 21:66—67; 21:98—100; 16:20—21; 6:22—23; 6:40—41; 6:148; 2;221; 24:3)

Sunday, June 09, 2013

Gen. James Clapper Vs. The Constitution & Civil Rights

Mr. James R. Clapper was a general, is our nation's intelligence chief and appears to be a liar. He also is another advocate for limiting the constitutional rights (Especially as to the Fourth Amendment) of citizens.

He also is in favor of uncontrolled government "snooping" into the private communications of citizens outside of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searched (ie Without a judicially issued warrant based on probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and the target of any proposed search contains named evidence as to such a crime.

He has forgotten or is ignoring that In “striking a balance” as to national security and citizens' rights he and all others might recall the following ancient and more-modern quotes.



The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government” (This last quote is from President Thomas Jefferson who, I suspect, was aware of the other maxims.)

Thursday, June 06, 2013

US Attorney Attacks Critics Of Islam

Will Mr. "Bill" Killian (US Attorney for the Eastern District Of Tennessee) become Mr. B. H. Obama's next Attorney General. His ability to mix outright lies with "half-truths/half-lies", towards harming the USA and destroying truth seems to qualify him for that position.

Mr. Killian has recently been quoted as stating: That publishing "Media Posts" "trashing" Muslims may violate their civil rights (And hinted at prosecution for doing so); That Islam is "the same" as such religions as are protected by the Bill Of Rights; That the First Amendment to the Constitution was to prevent Christians from abusing power against other religions as was the case in Britain before the first American Revolution; That some of the nicest people he has met have been Muslim; That there have been terrorists other than Muslims; And, there must be more "reaching out" to Muslims.

1.  Mr. Killlian has forgotten the protections given "free speech" by the First Amendment; And, that truth (eg About the teachings and history of Islam) is an absolute defense against slander, libel and other such crimes-and-torts (Except as present such a clear-and-present danger as falsely crying "FIRE!" in a crowded theater).  Of course his "Maximum Leaders" have not shown much regard for any constitutional protections for their political-and-policy opponents.
2. Islam is not like other religions still active in the world (A, B & C).  Its murderous teachings and practices are more like the now defunct "religions" of the pre-conquest Aztecs of Mexico or the Kali worshiping Thugee of India based on like practices of murdering other people and stealing from them.
3. The "free exercise of religion" clause of the First Amendment was established only to prevent only the Federal Government from establishing a State Church as was the "Established Church" in England, the "Kirk" in Scotland, the Lutheran Churches in Northern-Western Europe, The Orthodox Church in Russia, The Catholic Church in other parts of Europe and, for that matter, Islam in the Turkish Empire.  As a matter-of-fact some of the Several States maintained official churches into the 1820s.In England and the most of the other Christian Nations of Europe the number of Jews and, certainly, Muslims were so small to be statistically meaningful. The noted official churches used law to insure that only their church was "in charge". Mr. Killian gets an "F" in History and truthfulness.
4.  It appears that Mr. Killian has met only one sub-population of Muslims. If he believes that they are "Moderate Muslims" he,or someone defending against some civil-rights persecution, should ask them, on the record and in public, to meet my reasonable definition of that term (D). I do wonder if
Mr. Killians' views about Muslims would be different if he had: Been in New York's Twin Towers on "9/11"; In a certain place in Fort Hood when Nidal Hasan committed his treason and murders; Personally viewed the mutilated bodies of young girls victimized in "honor killings"; Been walking about Dearborn (Michigan) when Muslims, supported by the local, Sharia enforcing police, attacked Christians in a public place; And, the many thousands of like Islamic acts, following the Jihad commands of the Koran as require every Muslim male to "go on Jihad" or "support it with all their wealth" (Which last phrase might give the reader a hint as to the end-destination of moneys given to "Muslim Charities").
5. Yes, there have been other terrorists in the USA (eg By the now defunct KKK,  the very active Black gangs who are now involved in the "knock down game" in many American cities. Latino drug lord supported kidnapping gangs and "hit squads"). But, the fact is that the great majority of terrorism in our world is inflicted by Muslims following the perpetual commands of the Koran.
6. Mohammed (Of Mecca & Medina;The inventor of Islam) declared perpetual war against all "unbelievers" until they either became Muslims or abjectly accepted the slave-like state some call Dhimmitude. (Lest I, you and Mr. Killian forget: Even today Muslim clerics approve of physical slavery and Muslims practice it in some Muslim ruled nations.)  That declaration-of-war continues to this day, is demonstrated by Muslims' attacks on the USA and its troops and other citizens. Since the death of that fellow Mohammed, that command cannot be changed or abrogated.
7. Therefore, any US citizen who performs any act (eg Contributing moneys which end up in the hands of those Jihadists attacking Americans, at home or abroad, meets the constitutional definition in its Article-III, Section-3 of TREASON (F)! Any citizen who aids such persons commits the same crime.
8. As to "reaching out" to Muslims, the very hard lessons of history provide instruction that there is only one style of communications (G) which has proved effective with Muslims.
9. The only nation which has taken effective action in eliminating the considerable threat of Islam against The Nation was Spain which, in 1492AD, expelled all Muslims from Iberia. This is another hard lesson of History.

Wednesday, June 05, 2013

Politics Belong In The Pulpit

In the USA politics have belonged in the pulpit and have always belonged there. This was true when preachers raised questions about the propriety of the British rule in the 1770s, when anti-slavery ministers preached against slavery in the 1840-1850s (And Rev. Beecher shipped the most modern rifles, those then "assault rifles" called "Beecher's Bibles", to "Bleeding Kansas" in the mini-war there before the "War Between The States"), such as Dr. Martin Luther King who preached against involuntary racial segregation and many other Christians (eg Dr. Benjamin Carson) who use "public pulpits" to preach against the public sins of this time.

Tuesday, June 04, 2013

Partial History Of Federal Attacks On Rights

All politicians and citizens should know that the purpose of the Second Amendment was to give every citizen (Each a member of the "General Militia") to have such firearms as were equal to those issued to regular, federal, soldiers. That constitutional requirement is still in effect. All should be aware of President Jefferson's comments on guns, free men and government as reproduced below.

If you are under the illusion that our national government is incapable of tyranny, you might consider:
1. The forced and racist removal of the Cherokee from their lands by such a dictator as President Jackson;
2. The imprisonment and other persecution of those opposed to World War-I by Democrat President Wilson;
3. The racist and forced internment of loyal Americans of Japanese ancestry by Democrat President F. D. Roosevelt;
 4. The murder of an unarmed woman, holding her infant child, at Ruby Ridge (Under President G. W; H. Bush who may or may-not known of the irregular "rules of engagement of the FBI for that incident, being a "kill first and ask questions later operation);
5. The mass murder of unarmed women and children at the Branch Davidian compound under the administration of Democrat William Clinton; And,
6.  The ongoing violations of our democratically passed laws by Democrat B. H. Obama, some of which violations have caused many deaths in the USA and Mexico (eg "Fast & Furious").

Monday, June 03, 2013

First They Came For Me....

(A) From Pastor Martin Niemoller

First they came for the communists
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
(B) From James Pawlak FOR Too Many Liberals
First they came for the gun owners and I didn't speak out because I owned no guns and opposed the full exercise of Second Amendment rights.
Then they came for those who exercise their free speech rights under the First Amendment and I didn't speak out because I never spoke out AND most certainly never "spoke truth to power".
Then they came for those who wished to freely exercise my religion and I didn't speak out because I had no religion.
Then they came for honest journalists and I didn't speak out because I never read newspapers nor viewed any but the most liberal TV news broadcasts.
Then they came for me and there was no one left with the power or public voice or faith to speak for me.