Mexico Waging War Vs. USA

The drug-lord ruled semi-nation of Mexico has aided those fleeing, rather than fighting (As they have been disarmed), the like semi-governments of Central America to travel through its land and to and, too often, across our Southern Border.

THAT IS AN ACT-OF-WAR BY MEXICO AGAINST THE UNITED STATES! 

The USA should NOW: Advise all of its citizens, in Mexico, to leave that semi-nation asap; Stop all aid to Mexico; Stop all direct and indirect money transfers to Mexico; Put halt to all trade agreements with Mexico; And, shut down all of Mexico's consulates in the USA--Until we have absolute proof-positive that Mexico's government is stopping such movements of illegal immigrants through its land (And check for compliance on a monthly basis).

Discrimination; And Application(s)

“1 a :  to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of

b :  distinguish, differentiate <discriminate hundreds of colors>

2 :  to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences; especially :  to distinguish from another like object

intransitive verb

3 a :  to make a distinction <discriminate among historical sources>

b :  to use good judgment “

Such discrimination can be as to properly selecting:

1. Mind-and-spirit elevating classical and jazz music vs that “rap” and “hip hop” ravings as support murder and abuse of women; 

2. The essential teachings of Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and Sikhs as support peace vs those of the Nazis, Atheistic Communists and Muslims which inflict terrorism on the world; 

3. Such poetry as reflects craftsmanship vs the unorganized flushing of apparently random non-thoughts as come from the distorted minds of those who claim to be poets;

4. The facts that young Black youths commit more violent crimes than those of other races (As properly noted by the Rev. Jessie Jackson as to groups of youths as might be following him down a dark street) vs the claim that acknowledging such reality is race “discrimination”;

5.  The fact that the family, based on pairings of women and men has been the basic unit of (Most) civilizations which have gone beyond primitive hunting-gathering societies vs.the false claim that homosexual couples provide the same value-to and maintaining-of civilization;

6. That the intent of the writers of the Bill Of Rights as to the "Establishment Cause" was to keep only the Federal Government from establishing an official "National Church" vs those who maintain that the "free exercise of religion" should be limited to the insides of homes and places-of-worship;
7. The views of our nation's founders that an armed citizenry is basic to controlling tyranny vs the position that they should be disarmed “for their own good”; And,

8. Those immigrants who legally come into the USA with those skills and cultural conditioning as will improve our Republic Vs. those who: Illegally enter the USA in violation of our democratically enacted laws; Bring with them diseases; Bring other parents' children and cast them on our stressed social services agencies OR sell them into child prostitution; Increase the common good of the USA by providing goods and such services as do NOT depress wages or steal jobs from the poorest of our fellow citizens.

If no one else does so, at least journalists  should use the best definitions of words.

Questions For SCOTUS Nominee(s)

Upon today's news of Mr. Justice Kennedy's retirement from our Republic's Supreme Court, I have elected to ride my "Hobby Horse" into the "conversation" about who will  take the seat vacated by him. 

I  am not interested om which candidate is selected and, without doubt, confirmed by the United States Senate.

I am concerned that President Trump, The Senate and, most importantly, The People know the nominee(s) answers to the questions provided below.

1. Do you agree or disagree that the original Constitution of the United States could not be ratified without a Bill Of Rights, that resulting in the latter document being the first ten amendments to the first?

2. Do you agree or disagree with President Thomas Jefferson that the intent of the authors of the Constitution (ie As the above-noted "Package Deal") is to be considered when involved in interpretation of that document?
3. As to the Second Amendment, do your agree or disagree that we can clearly understand the intent of those authors be understood from the comments of Presidents Jefferson, Washington and Madison---And, the other patriots who established our Republic?
4. Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the "Shall Not Be Infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the strongest statement of a limit-to or prohibition-against Federal acts in violation of the above-noted "package deal"?
5. Will you actively support  the declaring the rights under the Second Amendment as due every citizen without regard to membership in  a "militia" and applicable to all law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizen over the age of 18-years and that in all of the Several States and the other jurisdictions of the USA?

"Turning The Other Cheek" & The Downside Of Anger

Yes, the Christ told us to respond to insults, even to a slap to the face, by “turning the other cheek”. That is, even the most gross insults are not an excuse for such evils as revenge by criminal infliction of death or injury or great fear.

To better understand this, it must be remembered that for time immemorial any blow to the head or face was the worst of insults in most cultures. Even in the “civilized” Western world, it has not been so many years since such a blow would result in two “gentlemen” standing ten-paces from each other with pistols in hand and murder in their hearts.

Yet, I do not find in the Scriptures any instructions to accept murder, rape, genocide, mutilation or even robbery/theft (ie The taking of that part of a honest person's life expended in honestly earning property) without taking effective and immediate actions to forestall the execution of such crimes. Such are beyond insults and are dealt with such force (Even deadly force) as is needed to stop such crimes.

Anger does have the following "downside": It spoils the accurate aiming of modern-and-effective firearms in "putting down" dangerous animals.

Maxime Waters Calling For Fascist Violence

Representative Maxime Waters (D-CA) has solicited others to actively "confront" members of President Trumps Administration so that they cannot function in our nation as do other Americans. (<http://thehill.com/homenews/house/393874-maxine-waters-calls-on-supporters-to-confront-trump-officials-in-public-spaces>).

It is well known that "confrontation", too often, leads to such violence or perceived threat of "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm". Such a real or reasonably perceived threat allows the direct target of such "confrontation" OR a near-by person to use even deadly force in self-defense.

I have no doubts but that Representative will protect herself by not being anywhere near such "incidents" and will deny any fault if someone is hurt or killed as a result of her asking others to commit crimes.

Yet, I think that the House Of Representatives should begin an investigation of her misconduct as to a possible expulsion from The House and, for the remainder of this term,  remove her from all committee assignments.

If They Want War

Our (First) American Revolution truly began at Lexington, MA on April 19, 1775 when some armed citizens lined up (And some died) to protect their freedom (ie Against tyrant’s efforts to seize their arms and munitions).

There and before the shooting began, Militia Captain John Parker is alleged to have declared, "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here".

The shooting of Americans, at an Arlington (Virginia) park, by a follower of Senator Sanders is only one example of an act-of-war inflicted by the far-left (And their allies of "The Resistance") against the Constitution, laws and People of the USA. [Other examples of such declarations-of-war have recently been displayed at such places as the University of California---Berkeley and other academic cess-pools.]

The only proper response to such war-waging tyrants is to use effective-and-immediate, deadly, force. [In the Arlington case, it was only the chance presence of police which prevented a massacre. Where the police are not immediately available OR are unwilling (As at Berkeley) OR are ordered to not act (As at the Madison campus of the University of Wisconsin) to put-down dangerous thugs, the only recourse of the targets of such terrorists is to have ready access to modern firearms and to use them to for self-defense AND the defense of innocent other humans, our Constitution, our laws and the security of The Republic.]  

NOTA BENE:  The vast majority of modern and effective firearms (ie At military and police levels), as are privately held in the USA, are in the hands of "political conservatives" who will use deadly force to defend themselves and innocent others from any threat as is or appears to be "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm". THIS APPEARS TO BE BASIC TO THE DEMOCRAT'S JIHAD AGAINST CITIZEN'S FULLEST EXERCISE OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO OUR CONSTITUTION.

Self-Defense Protocols

SELF-DEFENSE PROTOCOLS

AGAINST CRIMINALS [OF ANY AGE] PRESENTING A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER OF DEATH OR

GREAT BODILY INJURY TO OTHERS

1. From the FBI---"Two to the chest and one to the head”; OR,
   2.  From the SEALS/SAS---"A double tap to the head"; OR,
   3. From the "Old Sarge"---"Four inches with the point and twist the blade, REPEAT"; Or,
   4. From other sources--- "An intense strike to the temple, spine or "Adam’s Apple" with a heavy cane OR use of the point of a cane or umbrella or “teacher’s pointer” to the throat, groin, eyes or male genitals---Followed by a disabling/killing thrust to the base of the skull or spine; Or, Any of the common cuts in kenjitsu.

The only insurance that an attacker or bully or other tyrant is no longer a danger is when s/he has stopped breathing.

Catholic Teachings On Immigration---And Limits To It

Today, the following information was brought to my attention.

"Catechism Of The Catholic Church (No. 2241)

The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various judicial conditions especially as to the immigrants duties towards the company of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of those who receive them, to obey its laws and assist in carrying out civil burdens". (Bold-face and italics added)

1. The term "Guest" excludes invaders.

2. The noted laws include, in the USA, our democratically-enacted immigration laws and, secondarily, derived and formal policies and regulations. 

3. Respect for our Republic's "spiritual heritage" excludes such acts as: Waving the flags of foreign nations while illegally entering the USA; Flying such foreign flags over or instead-of the USA's flag in public forums; And, most horrid of all, destroying or insulting that flag in public places.

4. "Assistance in carrying our civic burdens" includes, but is not limited to, the following: Not working at less than the legal minimum wage which depresses the income of the poorest of America's citizens and other (eg Legal) immigrants; Immediately reporting to the police all observed criminal acts; Pay all taxes due all units of our governments; Learn the English language and the basic laws and history of the USA; And, most of all, insure that their children be taught those subjects and learn to respect them.

At this time those who hate the USA are vomiting out statements about the rights-of and ignoring the duties-of (Illegal) immigrants.

Immigrant's Tears & A Modest-Scientific Proposal

Over the last few weeks I have been all but drowned in the "tears" of children separated from their also illegal immigrant mothers (Or other offenders) who are violating our democratically enacted immigration laws.

Yet, I have not been even slightly moistened by the tears of the survivors of murders, other homicides (eg By reckless use of guns; Drunken driving) robberies and other life-destroying crimes inflicted by illegal immigrants (ie Who do execute such crimes against innocents at rates much higher than our Republic's citizens and legal-immigrants).

Since some (Many?) of those "children" (Some found to be 19 years-of-age) are not related to those bringing them into the USA AND very many "illegals" do not appear for "Immigration Hearings", I made the following, science-based, proposal.

All presumed illegal immigrants, adults and children, should have the usual (Non-intrusive) DNA sample taken upon first apprehension by any immigration or other authority before further processing OR, for five years, for those deported from the USA. Those DNA records would also be checked against DNA samples provided by law enforcement agencies. Those tests would/must be "coded" as to any claims of family relationships. Any false claims, as established by DNA tests, would result in the confinement of all lying adults (Age 17-years and above) until removal from the USA. The same confinement and condition would be, in future times, be applied to any other persons who have been previously deported OR who have failed to appear for required hearings.

PS---I am: The son and grandson of legal immigrants who followed our laws to enter our Nation; And, a veteran of dangerous military and (Paid and unpaid) civilian service directed towards the protection of Americans.

That "Moderate" Tennessee Iman

So-Called “Moderate” Muslim Imam In Tennessee Advocates Extermination Of All Other Religions

by Shoebat Foundation on April 28, 2015 in General

By BNI: If you’ve ever wondered why the citizens of Murfreesboro, TN fought so long and hard  against construction of a mega-mosque in their city, but sadly lost, this is why. A prominent Muslim Imam in Tennessee teaches students that “Jews & Christians are filthy, and their lives and property can be taken in jihad by Muslims” in America.

Right Wing News  Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi, a Memphis Imam based in Tennessee, preaches openly about what Islam truly is. He makes no bones about thinking that anyone other than a Muslim doesn’t deserve anything and are less than Muslims. In fact, part of Yasir Qadhi’s preaching includes rhetoric that says non-Muslims lives are forfeit and their property is legal for Muslims to take in jihad, (and this would include women as sex slaves) Recently Yasir Qadhi said that “Jews and Christians filthy, their lives and property can be taken in jihad by the Muslims.”

Yasir Qadhi is not only a Memphis Imam, but is is also the Dean of Academic Affairs at the Al-Maghrib Institute. He is a hafiz (has memorized the Qur’an) and he has an M.A. in the Islamic Creed and a B.A. in Islamic Sciences from Islamic University of Medina, as well as a master’s and a doctorate in Islamic Studies from Yale. During a lecture on Shirk, or polytheism, Yasir Qadhi said that Jews and Christians are mushrikoon, or polytheists, because they have made partners with Allah. From Yasir Qadhi’s perspective, only Muslims are monotheists.

He also claims that it is the responsibility of every single human being to bear witness that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah, and him alone. Now pay attention here. Yasir Qadhi now will tell you what the result and command that stems from this twisted principle. “And it is because of this same principle of monotheism that the prophet has been commanded to doJjihad.”

So where are all the leftists protesting “hate speech?” Is the NSA watching this homegrown jihadist or does he get a pass because he is a Muslim ‘scholar?

Immigration And The Chirst---Updated

A prior (Since removed from office for "gross misconduct") Cardinal-Archbishop of Los Angeles and many other Catholic “leaders” have made claims that Jesus the Christ would have supported open-borders and free immigration into the USA.

That is a lie!

First, Jesus' kingdom was NOT of this world. How do I know? He said so himself! There is very little in the Gospels with direct application to government as opposed to the great number of verses addressed to the redemption of individuals and preaching His Word to the nations.

The most direct statement as to government was the classic “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's”. At the time of Jesus citizenship and residency in the Empire did, in fact, belong to Caesar and the Roman Senate. Through time that, in the USA, has passed to the Congress 

I WAS A Democrat

Feb 25, 2017 

 I was a Democrat in the days of such great-and-honest men as President Harry Truman and Member of Congress Clement Zablocki.

 For only that reason I listened to today's "Victory Speech" of Mr. Tom Perez, the new Chairman of the DNC. I had hoped that Democrats would return to the reasoned policies and practices of such honest men as cited above. That would help bring all Americans back together from some extremists in the GOP and the "far out" drive of the Democratic (sic) Party' "leadership" to leave behind our Constitution, The Bill Of Rights and our "exceptionalism" as based on the best principles of Western Civilization (In turn based on the best of Judeo-Christian teachings and evolving away from earlier primitive practices).

I am sorry to report that I heard a speech as out-of-contact with reality as the "Victory Speeches" ranted-out by Adolf Hitler as the shells from Soviet cannon were hitting Berlin. Mr. Perez' speech had the same qualities of hysteria and pathological divorce from reality as did his earlier, hopefully unintentional, model.

He even, while calling for his Party's efforts in winning State elections, did not dare to admit that the GOP has steadily been winning control of State Houses and State Legislature   against the efforts of a Party moving so far from traditional American values as to be in another universe, "far, far, away".

 The Democrats elected (By mob acclamation) Keith Ellison-Muhammed as "Deputy DNC Chair". That Islamist has, as far as I know, never rejected-and-condemned the horrid, anti-civilization and unalterable teachings of Islam as command "perpetual war" (Jihad) against all "unbelievers" (99% of our fellow Americans) and allows or encourages or commands the use of murder, rape, torture, genocide, banditry and other horrors by those waging Jihad.

They would have done better to place Jabba The Hutt in that "Deputy Chair" position---Or, in the primary Chair.

 If I were more Republican than American I would thank the Democrats for insuring future GOP victories outside of our two "Left Coasts" as are under Fascist occupation.

Jefferson On The Constitution---Updated

        President Jefferson On The Constitution

On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed." [Please specially note that the term "trying" was used as in "boiling down" something (eg Whale blubber or the Constitution) to obtain what the actors wish (eg Whale oil or perverse decisions by judges "making law from the bench"; About which "Trying" please see the novel Moby Dick.]

Insulting President Jefferson

Anyone who insults President Jefferson must: First demonstrate his/her equally great or superior contributions to our Republic; And, be subjected to a forensic examination of their life as to sexual-offenses OR any other crimes.

Due Process On Campuses

1. Right to a timely AND sufficient-time prior (Written)notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; The  Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony ;or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
2. The right to a timely “due process” hearing to prevent the departure of witnesses or deterioration of other evidence;
3. The right to have legal counsel present at all hearings and such council allowed full and active participation in all proceedings.
4. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted) AND to personally OR by counsel cross-examine those witnesses.
5. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
6. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
7. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions if a public institution is involved (OR to to the highest authority in a private organization).

These were the rights given to convicted criminals facing revocation of probation/parole by Wisconsin's Department Of Corrections. I fail to understand why universities will not provide the same “Due Process” to students facing in-school disciplinary actions. (Where guilt or probable cause was found by a court-of-record, some of these rights were not given.)

ALSO:  RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNCIL IN UNIVERSITY DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS:  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDACASE NO: 9:16-CV-80850-ROSENBERG/BRANNON

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff v. LYNN UNIVERSITY, INC., A Florida not for profit corporation, 

 Lynn University, Defendant

Free Speech On Campuses

The first quote provided below is from Professor Eugene Volokh's editorial as published on May 11, 2017 by The Washington Post.

"The Supreme Court has made “crystal clear” that the government may not discriminate based on viewpoint, even in limited public fora such as university open spaces (or for that matter even university programs for funding student speech). Lower courts have consistently struck down campus speech codes aimed at supposedly bigoted speech. See, e.g., Dambrot v. Central Michigan Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1184-85 (6th Cir. 1995); DeJohn v. Temple Univ., 537 F.3d 301, 316-17, 320 (3d Cir. 2008); McCauley v. Univ. of V.I., 618 F.3d 232, 237-38, 250 (3d Cir. 2010); Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason Univ., 993 F.3d 386, 388-89, 391, 393 (4th Cir. 1993); College Republicans v. Reed, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1010-11, 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2007); Roberts v. Haragan, 346 F. Supp. 2d 853, 870-72 (N.D. Tex. 2004); Bair v. Shippensburg Univ., 280 F. Supp. 2d 357, 373 (M.D. Pa. 2003); Booher v. Bd. of Regents of N. Ky. Univ., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11404, *28-*31 (E.D. Ky. 1998); UWM Post, Inc. v. Regents, 774 F. Supp. 1163, 1165-66, 1173, 1177 (E.D. Wis. 1991); Doe v. Univ. of Mich., 721 F. Supp. 852, 856, 864-66 (E.D. Mich. 1989). And in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010), the Court gave students’ freedom to “express any viewpoint they wish — including a discriminatory one” as an example of “this Court’s tradition of protect[ing] the freedom to express the thought that we hate” (quotation marks omitted). There is no First Amendment exception for “hate speech” or “racist signs, symbols and speech.”.

Why An "Electoral College" & Voter Fraud

Why we have the Electoral College. 

In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation? 
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense. 
Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood. 
There are 3,141 counties in the United States. 
Trump won 3,084 of them. 
Clinton won 57. (let that sink in) 
There are 62 counties in New York State. 
Trump won 46 of them. 
Clinton won 16. 
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes. 
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) 
Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton won 4 of these counties; Trump only won Richmond) 
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country. 
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. 
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles. 
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election. 
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country! 
And...it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment. 

Voter Fraud

The counties noted above are notorious for the exercise of voter fraud. In California there is a possible-to-probable inclusion of "illegals" voting.

Face Recognition, Race, Crime & Democrats

      It has been reported that the "Congressional Black Caucus" is essentially against Amazon's "facial recognition technology". Some of their co-actors complained that this will only aid what they claim is "over policing" of Blacks and "undocumented" (ie Illegal) immigrants.

      It is a fact that Blacks commit (On the basis of their share of the general population) more crimes, more serious crimes and them more often that Whites and almost infinitely more than those of Chinese ancestry.  I suggest that the cited caucus' real motive is a fear that such technology will remove more Black criminals (And "illegals?) from the open community---AND FROM BEING VOTING PARTS OF THE DEMOCRATS' POWER BASE.