Thursday, May 19, 2011

Crusader Quotes & Latin Tags


Tues-les tous, Dieu Redonnatdea les sein! (Norman French: Allegedly advise given by a Abbot to Simon III de Monfort when Simon noted that the heritics-in-question were hiding among other who looked and dressess as orthodox Catholics.)
Caedite eos, Nevit enim Dominus qui sunt elus!
Kill them all, God will know which are His!
Kill them all, God will sort them out! (Viet Nam War usage)


Mecca Delenda Est!
Mecca must be destroyed!

Carthago delenda est (English: "Carthage must be destroyed") or the fuller Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam or also Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam (English: "Furthermore, I think Carthage must be destroyed")


Deus Vult!
Deus lo Vult!
God wills it!

Habemus Gladii Duo!
We have two swords!
(See Luke22:35-38)

De Laude Novae Militae
In praise of the new troops/military-order

Si Vis Pachem Para Bellum!
If you wish peace, prepare for war!

Mihi persuasum est odisse acerbe.
I am a believer in tough hate.

Justtitia suum cuique distribuit
Justice renders to everyone what is due him.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.
In all things, whoever spares the bad injures the good.

Of Vigilantes, Peoples Courts, ETC

From time-to-time in such diverse places as the banks off the Mississippi River (Cannibal river pirates), Gold Rush California, 1956 Hungary, the Highlands of Scotland the normal processes of law have been ignored to put-down gross criminality. In some cases the "authorities" were unable, and too often unwilling, to safeguard the innocent.

In some places citizens would take time-off from providing for the support of themselves and their families and would form up "Committees Of Vigilance" (ie Vigilantes) which would inquired into crimes, acting as police and courts, and "execute" justice, if not law' on criminals.

In some revolutionary times, citizens would bring alleged offenders to "People's Courts" which had some semblance of traditional law----Without the nit-picking of lawyers.

I do not maintain that the above two examples protected the "rights" of (Accused) criminals, but they did safeguard that minimum of ORDER as is needed before there can be LAW or the hope for JUSTICE.

In the USA of today, the lawful authorities have NOT maintained order or law along most of our Southern border. Those authorities have failed to use the civil police, the military and even the "Organized Militia" (Which is NOT the "National Guard"!) to maintain minimum order. It may be that is now the duty AND right of the unorganized militia (Being all citizens capable of bearing arms and self-armed), "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts" to maintain order AND safeguard-the-innocent.

The governments of Egypt, the Sudan, "Palestine" and other "nations" with Muslim majority national or local (eg France, Sweden and Dearborn, Michigan) are unable or unwilling to protect non-Muslims from Islamic attacks. Certainly the forces deployed by the UN and African Union have not been able to stop such attacks.


In fact, some might rightly claim that the Crusaders were such loosely organized and effective bodies of armed men, outside of the authority of civil rulers, who acted to protect the innocent and punish evil-doers. Although they were not successful in the Near East, that crusader spirit was key to the turning back of Islamic aggression in other places AND TO THE PRESERVATION OF CIVILIZATION.

I can think of some persons in the USA who might well be subjected to the authority of "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts"

Wisconsin's "Dead Letter Laws"

Some have stated that Wisconsin's unenforced laws should be removed from our list of criminal offenses. The classic case is "Adultery" where full prosecution of offenders would likely leave us a State without enough people "on the outside" (Of prisons and jails) to take care of those "on the inside". (As a one time Wisconsin Probation & Parole Agent", I can remember a couple who were convicted of that offense), The classic, recent, example of such a criminal is Milwaukee's police chief and his self-admitted adultery.

However, it is a matter for the People's elected legislators to remove such statutes.

At one time Wisconsin had such crimes as "Bank Burglary" (Which allowed a life sentence!), "Rape", "Theft Of Livestock", "Sexual Intercourse With A Child". These were rewritten under different titles or otherwise removed from our stature books---By the Legislature.

I also note that "Treason" (ie Waging war against the State of Wisconsin) remains on our statute book (s.946.01) although as far as I know, there has never been a prosecution for that offense ( Although some of the mob which recently attacked our State Capitol building could be construed as having violated that law; The statutory required acts, as exhibited by the noted mob members, went well beyond the protection for "free speech").

For that matter, I suggest that the Legislature add some sort of "Violation Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which would go beyond the current "Misconduct In Public Office" towards protecting the rights of the People.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Sadness RE: The Church Ignoring Truth

I was saddened by such headlines as "Islamic Scholars Bash Benedict". It is not that I was surprised by such a reaction as Muslims, scholars and clerics more than most, react to any criticism of Islam as an actual attack or "bashing". Such are not interested in truth, but only in forwarding the goals of that ideology which, by the way, include the effective destruction of the Church.

What truly saddens me is the limp-wristed, cowardly and delusional responses of the last series of Popes, the Holy See, so many bishops (Especially in the Eastern Churches), editors-and-publishers of "Catholic" publications and too many others. All of such persons continue to physically-and-spiritually endanger all Catholics, all Christians, Jews (Our spiritual ancestors) and everyone who is not Muslim.

I suggest that we need such popes (And Church supporters) as Urban II (First Crusade), Innocent XI (Turning back the Muslim Turks at Vienna) and St. Pius V (Battle of Lepanto).

Most of all we need to apply the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, a "Doctor Of The Church", who taught us how to properly, ethically and morally "strike blows for Christ". Today's Church seems unable to strike those blows even with the sword-of-truth by declaring: The true nature of Islam by listing its horrid goals and even more horrid means;That Islam regresses to its most medieval modes as its population, in any place, increases; And, that true-believing Muslims are, like pirates, the enemies of all humans.

Of course, words did not and will not protect the Christian and Pagan peoples of the Sudan from the Janjaweed and other Muslim agents of Islamic state terrorism (I am redundant here). Contracting with "Blackwater" or some like security company would have done those victims much more good. A heartfelt shout, from the Vatican, of DEUS VULT! appears to be needed!

I was asked by a regular Catholic columnist, "Are you trying to start a war with over a Billion Muslims?". The fact is that we have been at war with Islam since its inventor declared it to be perpetual until all are under the rule of Muslims and Sharia or have accepted the slave-like status of "dhimitude". That state-of-war continues to this day and for the future without regard of the views expressed by the Holy See, and all those intellectual cowards-and-liars noted in the first paragraph of this letter AND secular persons.

Now, WHO willwar declare the truth that the Pope and those others named above are unwilling to speak or write?

Monday, May 16, 2011

Other Notes On Weapons & Citizens

Best Book: Second Amendment & Bill Of Rights
Halbrook, Stephen P. (Ll.D.);
The Founders' second Amendment: Origins Of The Right To Bear Arms;
Ivan R. Dee (Publisher), In Association With The Independent Institute;
Chicago, 2008
The above cited book is excellent for the following reasons:
1. It provides a deep and well documented (Original documents) review of the development of the Second Amendment to our Constitution and, more generally, of the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution;
2. The author presents both sides of each argument before and during the Revolution and during the development of the Bill Of Rights (Especially as to the Second Amendment) and the Constitution as they occurred and in a logical sequence.;
3. The "Conclusions" chapter are very apparently the opinions of Mr. Halbrook and honestly separated from the body of this history.

Those who teach materials as to the subjects covered in this work would be unprofessional if they do not read this book. "Misconduct In Public Office" would be the least accusation I would make against any law-maker or jurist who fails to do the same before dealing with gun related issues. Editors and publishers who fail to know the materials in this volume should be considered unprofessional if they fail to consider the facts presented and conclusions made by Mr. Halbrook before reporting or writing editorials on the Second Amendment.

The points I found very interesting are here listed.
1. "The Militia" (Or "general militia) is the whole body of adult-and-free citizens who have a Natural Law Right to own weapons and to carry them anywhere they please AND may have a duty to own weapons for defense of self and his State.
2. The "well regulated militia" noted in the Second Amendment is that part of the "general militia" as organized into companies (Often at a town or village level) and equipped with standard firearms, drilled in military skills and organized into larger units (Usually under officers appointed by the Governor of each State).
3. These (Both) militias were seen as necessary for the defense of each State AND, much more important to most of the founders of the USA, to provide a defense against the potential tyranny of an overly powerful Federal government.
4. The "blunderbuss" was an early type of very short barreled shotgun, much like the sawed-off shotguns. These weapons were, in fact, sought by the members of the short-of-weapons early, revolutionary, militias, This is in opposition to the Federal Court case (Citation needed) which ruled that such shotguns were not nor never a militia weapon.
5. Pocket pistols were carried by our Founding Fathers with no concern as to CCW permits.
6. British General Gage was specially concerned about the "back woodsmen" most specially skilled in accurate long range shooting being often dependent on such hunting skills for survival
7. Even at the time of the writing of our Constitution and Bill Of Rights there were persons who distrusted the People as to possessing arms.

From other readings I note that:
1. Abraham Lincoln was elected as an officer of his militia company in the "Black Hawk War"; And,
2. As late as 1856 The US Supreme Court noted (In the Dred Scott case) that only free citizens could arm themselves and then travel as they saw fit. this being a right of citizens at that time (And now)


Monday, July 16, 2007
Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife
On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a local armed robber make a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a large number of armed, law abiding, citizens with licenses to carry concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Guns, Citizens, Police & Rational Thinking
The following letter was sent on Dec. 11, 2007.


First, anyone who is of the opinion that it would be possible to take away all firearms (Even just all handguns) from Americans is in need of therapy for delusional thinking. Such therapy wold be even more required for anyone who believes that criminals would obey any such gun confiscation laws and efforts---Let alone those citizens who have concluded, as did the staff of the US Attorney General, that the right to keep and bear arms is an right of individual citizens and not one limited to members of now non-existent militias.

Secondly, all should note the following:
1. The mass murderer at a Colorado missionary school was killed and stopped by an armed, under that State's just laws, citizen and not by police.
2. The like killer at a same-state mall was enabled in his massacre of our fellow citizens by laws and mall-regulations which made that place a theoretical "gun free zone", which made it into a "free fire zone" for a crazed killer.3.The victims at Virginia Tech and Columbine High School were, in truth, the victims of like "gun free zone" laws, even in State's where citizens generally have the right to CCW (With the inside police officer at the high school apparently running away from danger).
4. The killings at another Virginia university were halted by two students who used their firearms to stop and arrest a killer, even though that beneficial act was delayed by those students having to retrieve their pistols from their autos, the police not being in evidence.
5. In Milwaukee it was armed security guards who shot to death two thugs who fired, from the outside, at the patrons of a well regulated club, the police not being present to protect citizens.
6. In Milwaukee County one unarmed pizza delivery man is murdered by two thugs after another, but armed, such delivery man shoots an "instant socialist" who attempted to take away the product of his honest labor.

Any person with a rational mind should be able to see the pattern as illustrated by the above examples and come (Be forced?) to the conclusion that: Citizens can NOT rely on the police to protect them from killers and other very dangerous criminals; That "gun free zones" (Like the entire State of Wisconsin) are only "free fire zones" for dangerous criminals; And, police objections to CCW are not due to any interest in the safety of their fellow citizens, but only to make their job (Of cleaning up after killings and other crimes) easier and safer for those police officers.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Register Axes !
My June 5th newspaper brought the news of a youth striking his father with an ax. Such weapons are a great hazard to the public safety (As many claim for firearms) and the following steps must be taken by the Congress and the Legislature.
1. All axes must be registered.
2. No one under 21-years of age is to be allowed to purchase
such a weapon and all buyers of such must be checked out
for prior criminal convictions and mental health commitments
as well as current domestic violence matters.
3. If such military weapons (Look to the movie Brave Heart for
examples of military applications) cannot be removed from
all homes, they must have the heads and handles separated and
those parts kept locked up.
4. No axes must be allowed on campuses (Even those teaching
forestry subjects) as such will prevent insane or criminal persons
from using them to harm students and staff. The same should
be enforces for such public events as sports shows and lumber
jack contests except where state licensed ax specialists are
involved AND in complete control of these horrid weapons.

Of course, there are those who claim that axes do not cause death or injury and
only the people who mis-use them are so responsible; But we liberals know better!

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Theoretical Notes On Today's Weapons For Free Citizens

I note that full-jacketed 0.308 and 5.7x28mm rounds will easily "punch through" (Especially at "at-your-door") the body armor of Nazi like Storm Troopers and
other criminals (eg. Those "Violating Civil Rights Under Color Of Law").

A little research will provide anyone on how to make "Composition C" or "Plastique".
That stuff, some sheet metal and ball bearings, nuts, bolts, fiberglass (Will not show up on many X-rays) and other junk will make a decent Claymore Mine.

Placed at knee level such cut-down-at-the-knees such invaders defended with most body armor.

Of course there is the risk of prosecution and persecution for even building, let alone using such against storm-troopers or other home invaders.

The same research will provide your with plans for non-WMD flame throwers, some which look like canes.

Rebalencing The Constitutions

The next time (And subsequent times) a candidate for a US Supreme Court appears before the usual committee of the Senate (for a State Supreme Court position) , the following should-and-must be a part of the questioning. Only slight imodifications be needed to use this as a base for interviewing candidates for State Supreme Court positions.

1. Read and attribute the following quote: . President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed"

2. Then ask the candidate if s/he agrees with that principle: In whole and without reservations; Or, in part and with reservations; Or, not at all.

3-A. For the person who responds a total agreement, ask her/him if they will apply the exact words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the writers as their primary references in writing decisions on cases brought before the Court.

3-B. For those having reservations, ask each such person what those are and "the reasons why" for not agreeing with Mr. Jefferson AND to what extent and under what conditions will such a disagreement take effect.

3-C. For those who fully disagree with Mr.Jefferson, ask them "Why?".

4. For the latter two types of persons, ask: Does the Constitution internally provide for changes (Especially in rights added for or taken away from the People); AND, where in the Constitution is there any provisions for "evolving standards"?

After that first use of these questions, they should be applied to all nominees for Federal (State?) Judicial positions.

The Congress (Legislature), itself, could preface Bills by requiring adherence to Mr. Jefferson's above-cited quote by use of a common preface which requires judges to interpret the subject legislation: First in terms of the words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the relevant authors; Then, the words of the legislation and the intent of its authors. Failure to comply with this could be prima faciie grounds for impeachment and trial.

I think it well past the time when the Peoples elected representative, the Congress (Legislature), should re-balance the three branches of our Federal (State) Government, which balance has become harmful to the Republic due to too much power flowing into the Courts and the Administrative branches.

Another Note To A "Pathological Pacifist"


Yesterday I received another note from a very "nice" (NOT in the eariler meaning of accurate and exact) person who is what I consider a "pathological pacifist".
Below you will find another letter-in-depth.

Dear Friends In Christ:

I noted the message you sent me. The following points are made.
1. At this moment I do not have the time to research the noted speech and cannot tell if the quote was or was-not
"taken out of context".
2. As a Latin Rite Catholic I know that I have no need to believe in or follow the "teachings" of any Pope unless he
speaks-or-writes "ex cathedra"
3. As I have previously noted the "peace" you propose is the "peace of desolation", that desolation and ruin (In this era)
comes primarily from Islam's true believers for whom peace-without-conquest if a sin and is an evil. That hard-rock position and
its related crimes must be combated for the sake of the innocent under the authority given to all of his creations by Natural Law.
Natural which includes the hate-less use of such force (Including deadly force) as are needed to defend self and innocents from
criminal (Islamic) attacks.
4. The "peace" you propose-and-defend is, in fact, a form of physical-and-spiritual suicide and, therefore, a most serious sin..
5. Although The Christ indicated that we should "turn the other cheek" after being slapped on the face (Only the most ignorant
would not know that such was a much more serious insult in His era than today), He did not command us to not resist murderers,
rapists, arsonists, child-abusers and others of that horrid ilk.
6. I am, myself, willing to forgive "70 times 70 times" if, and only if, the usual preconditions of the Church are met, being: Declaring
the sin; Stating the acts(s) as sin(s); Asking for forgiveness; Expressing an heart-felt intention to not so sin again; And, in some
cases making restitution and penance. [Over history, the Christians and, for them, the Churches, have done that for the sins committed
against others in the name of Christianity. Over history and to this day, Muslims will NOT do so as to the almost infinite crimes they
have inflicted on the innocent in the name of Islam.]
7. As noted above, hate (And other illicit passions) is (Are) the real risk to the Christian warrior as any use of force (Including
deadly force) must be done in the name of Justice and The Just Judge, without such moral handicaps. (Passion also cripple
the warrior and makes moral and combat judgements dangerous to self-and-others.) Therefore, "striking blows for Christ", AND
NOT FOR SELF, is allowed according to the teachings of the Church as so well defined, by that "Doctor Of The Church"
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae".
9. For myself, I will: Not ask soldiers to give up their profession, but only ask that they be just; Will praise most of the USA's
"Centurions" of this era as men of great Faith; Will maintain the authority of the state to "use the sword" (Or AR-15s) to punish evil-doers;
And, will maintain my right, under Natural Law and in a democracy, to be a citizen-soldier, a centurion and, as a part of the first line of just
defense against all domestic and foreign criminals, a user of the sword-of-justice.
10. I am fully prepared to be judged for these positions and any related acts, At age 72-years, I do not expect to wait long for that


PS---Oh yes: Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, have mercy on me a sinner; Savior of the world, save thy people!

Friday, May 13, 2011

My Final Position On CCW For Wisconsin

I have recently: Reread Article-1, Section-25 of the Wisconsin Constitution; Reconsidered the many laws we have against the misuse of firearms (eg Murder. Substantial Battery; Reckless/Intoxicated Used Of Firearms; Possession Of A Firearm By A Felon); The fact that the punishments for other crimes can be enhanced by the possession of a firearm while committing such a crime); And, the below-noted and anti-democracy "tricks" used to repress the rights of the People.

Please remember that excessive fees (ie Poll Taxes) have been previously used to exclude Blacks and poor people from exercising their constitutional rights. The costs associated with any mandatory training, fingerprint checks and ID cards could add up to like excessive costs.

The costs of any CCW license (If, and only if, any is required) should be no more than the cost of an ID card (eg As issued by DOT) and the cost of doing a electronic check to see if the applicant is qualified under either Wisconsin or US law to purchase a firearm.

I also note that unreasonable and ambiguous tests have likewise been used to limit constitutional rights. As to shooting tests the usual 50-foot test is NOT applicable to self-defense as the usual distance in self-defense is not more than half that distance AND the most common use of firearms for that purpose is the "mere" display of a gun. How does anyone test the ability of a citizen to use a concealed knife or other non-firearm weapon as surprise is essential to the effective use of such devices?

The "1000-foot) exclusion around schools make it impossible to exercise the "right to keep and bear arms" in any urban area.

The rational and pro-freedom solution is to punish only misuses of weapons and not the mere carrying of them---Which is already done by those who misuse weapons AND, to be honest, by many otherwise law-abiding citizens who wish equal rights with robbers and other criminals..

Private property (Along with jails, prisons, mental health facilities, court houses, power plants) can be "posted" against the carrying of weapons and violations treated as "Criminal Trespass". As constitutional rights do not stop at the physical boundaries of publicly funded-and-owned UW, that disorganization shall not be able to forbid CCW on campus.

Therefore, the only CCW law we should have is no such law; But, the ongoing and strict enforcement of our already existing laws for the misuse of such inanimate devices.

PS #1---The Shepherd Express and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's editorial positions on CCW tipped me from supporting a very loose and "must issue" CCW permit law to the "no permit required" position defended above. I thank them!!!

PS #2---Before Michigan passed its CCW law, various Police Chiefs there predicted "blood running in the streets". That did not happen. At least one Chief had the good grace to note his error.

PS #3---Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam



MAXIM: "When a criminal attack is only seconds away, the police are only minutes away (And in rural or wilderness areas, only hours away)".

Please Specially Note: There is no positive correlation between CCW and violent crimes (Including night time burglary of homes). There are such positive correlations between such crimes and: Race; And, cities under Democrat administration or with mayors-and-aldermen associated with that Party.

Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife

On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a Milwaukee area and armed robber made a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a larger number of armed, law abiding, citizens carrying concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.

Perhaps, the recent drop in violent crimes is more a matter of more citizens ignoring

anti-CCW laws than by any police actions. The police are usually too late to do anything but "count bodies and pick up pieces".

Gun Free Zone = Free Fire Zone
I have been reliably informed that the Omaha mall, the site of a recent massacre, was a "Gun Free Zone" by State Law and mall regulations. Like Virginia Tech (Columbine HS, Wisconsin's Weston HS, and other schools and places) "Gun Free Zone" really means "Free Fire Zone For Crazy Criminals", who can kill people in such places with the reasonable expectation that the police, who never seem to prevent such offenses, and armed citizens (Such as high and grade school staff), who are barred from carrying weapons, will nothing to stop them OR do so at great-and-fatal risk to themselves.

Of course, in Wisconsin the entire State is a "Free Fire Zone" for such murderers due to the State Supreme Court's failure to understand the very exact language of our Constitution as to the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms AND to the Legislature's failure to enforce the will of about 75% of Wisconsin's voters who added Article-I, Section-25 to Wisconsin's basic law.

Old Enough To Serve & Die: We have still to address the fact that many good citizens, under the age of 21-years are old enough to serve in our Armed Forces, be trained in the most modern and deadly weapons; But, are not old enough to buy a firearm or CCW under any proposed law. They are "old enough to die" in the service of our nation.

Calling On God For Help

A man was caught in a flood. Two men came by in a boat to rescue him, but he
> waved them away shouting "no the Lord will save me!" One hour later another
> boat came along but again the man cried "no the Lord will save me!"
> Eventually a helicopter arrived but still the man insisted"the Lord will save
> me!" unfortunately the man drowned. When he got to the gates of heaven he
> asked St. Peter, " why didn't the Lord save me?" and St. Peter replied "For
> crying out loud, He sent two boats and a helicopter! what more do you want?"

Monday, May 09, 2011

Equitable Responces To Islamic Attacks

There is a world-wide campaign of attacks against Jewish, Christian Buddhist. Sikh and other true religions' communities, places-of-worship and individuals by Muslims acting alone (As a result of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"), small groups, larger mobs and regional OR world wide organizations.

Yet, when any Muslim is asked about such attacks, their usual response is that, "Oh. those are the other and radicalized Muslims". That is a lie OR a much more dangerous "half-truth" or "half-lie"---For the following reasons.
1. All Muslims must believe that the whole of the Koran are the actual words of their Allah and may not be altered or modified or softened by any person since the death of Mohammed AND such commandments and examples are to be followed;
2. The Koran (Along with the sayings of Mohammed and the examples of his life) encourage or allow, and often command, the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, banditry, perpetual war with "unbelievers", sexual use of girl-children as young as nine-years-of-age and the other horrors taught by that creature.
3. One of the best kept secrets of Islam is that all Muslims consider themselves of a world-wide brotherhood (ie Ummah) with full responsibility for each other and with a duty to support each other against the "unbelievers".

Since #3 above is true, I see no reason to NOT hold any Muslim (Group) responsible for the actions of ANY other Muslim Group(s) anywhere in the world.

Therefore, the burning of a Christian Church in Egypt could result in the like destruction of a Mosque in the USA or Londonistan or Paris. The like destruction of a Sikh temple (Gurdwara) in Cape Town would result in parallel and counter action in Denmark. The same should hold for Muslims' attacks Synagogues, Hindu-Buddhist temples, Etc..

The just means of doing so would require:
1. Prior and world-wide warning of such actions-to-come if the noted Islamic attacks do not fully stop;
2. Further such warnings after the first few instances of such "reactions";
3. That should be done without hate or other illicit passions and only as a "teaching example"or matter-of-justice or "balancing Karma". [For traditional Christians, the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae" should be applied .]
4. Unlike Muslims, others should not attack women children and should attempt to, as much as possible, minimize "collateral damage".

It may be that Muslims will not respond to such attacks by stopping their attacks as they worship death and welcome such for their Allah (NOT the same as Arabic speaking Christians and other non-Muslims).

But, we must remember that compromise with evil is evil and our human and basic goal, under "Natural Law", is Justice above Peace.

Those who object by saying "Do you want to start a war with 1.5 Billion Muslims should be remember that Mohammed declared perpetual war against "unbelievers", which war obviously continues to this day.

Sunday, May 08, 2011


Many of the following could be applied to editors, professors, "religious leaders",
"anti-religious leaders", politicians, other "yous" and, most specially, ME

HT: Phil B.

A paraprosdokian is a figure of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected in a way that causes the reader or listener to reframe or reinterpret the first part. It is frequently used for humorous or dramatic effect, sometimes producing an anticlimax.

1. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

2. Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.

3. The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.

4. If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

5. We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

6. War does not determine who is right - only who is left AND who writes the histories.

7. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

8. Evening news is where they begin with 'Good evening', and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.

9. A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station.

10.. How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?

11.. Dolphins are so smart that within a few weeks of captivity, they can train people to stand on the very edge of the pool and throw them fish.

12.. I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted pay checks.

13.. Whenever I fill out an application, in the part that says "In an emergency, notify:" I put "Doctor".

14.. I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

15.. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.

16.. You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

17.. The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!

18.. Hospitality: Making your guests feel like they're at home, even if you wish they were.

19.. I discovered I scream the same way whether I'm about to be devoured by a great white shark or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot.

20.. There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.

21.. I always take life with a grain of salt, plus a slice of lemon, and a shot of tequila.

22.. When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water.

23.. You're never too old to learn something stupid.

24.. To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.

25. I prayed to God for a new bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and prayed for forgiveness.