Friday, February 05, 2016

If All Blacks Left The USA

IF ALL BLACKS LEFT THE USA

   You just can't dispute basic Math...Unless you attend Brown/Yale/Harvard


WHAT IF ALL BLACKS SUDDENLY LEFT AMERICA (13.3% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION):

The prison population would go down by 37%
There would be 53% less gang members
Obesity percentage would drop 11%
Average IQ would go up 7.4 points putting us 3rd in the world tied with Japan
Average Sat scores would go up almost 100 pts
Average ACT scores would go up 5.5 pts
AIDS & HIV would go down by 65%
Chlamydia cases would go down 54%
Gonorrhea would go down 69%
Syphilis would go down 58%
The average income for Americans would go up over 20,000 dollars a year
Amount of people in poverty would drop 34%
Homelessness would go down 57%
Welfare recipients would go down by 42%

DEMOCRATS WOULD LOSE 76% OF THEIR VOTING BASE

...And many criminal defense attorneys would have to find another line of work!  

Tuesday, January 05, 2016

Executive Orders & New President

Immediately upon being sworn in, the new, GOP, President should sign a previously prepared “Executive Order” suspending all such Orders inflicted on the People during the prior eight years.
 
After that and asap the following “Executive Orders” should be totally vacated and that in the following order:
1.               Those which violate the letter of the Constitution OR the documented intent of the Authors of that, most basic law and of The Bill Of Rights (And, later amendments);
2.               Those which deal with subjects properly under the authority of The Congress;
3.               Those which are opposed to the security and common good of the People; And,
4.               Perhaps, those opposed to the official “Platform” of the GOP as expressed before the prior national election.
 
Remaining, if any, “Executive Orders” may be modified-and-reissued if they serve a public interest OR be properly assigned “to the dustbin of history”.
 
GOP candidates for election to the Presidency should now be asked to very publicly proclaim their commitment to the above actions

Friday, January 01, 2016

Mental Health, Guns, Due Process

I am becoming more-and-more disturbed  about the far too many politicians, news commentators/reporters, those opposed to the fullest exercise of Second Amendment rights and others of that ilk who loosely  substitute the terms  "mentally ill"  OR "emotionally disturbed", for the more accurate term "dangerously mentally ill" as to those who should not be allowed to obtain firearms.


It is fit-and-proper and legally/constitutionally-sound  that someone should be declared "Dangerously Mentally Ill" only after a fact-based and contested hearing before a judge-and-jury, in accordance with our 1000 year old system of laws and our
Constitution. Why? Because to tag any citizen as being "dangerously mentally ill" takes from such citizens as many civil and political rights as a conviction of a felony---And, deserves the same legal protections.  

At this time there are too many government units (
eg -- The FBI) who will accept the unverified and non-judicial comments of some (Anonymous?) Psychologist/Psychiatrist/Other-persons as sufficient "Proof" to deprive citizens of a basic civil right.  Even super-sane me (If, and only if, you accept my self-diagnosis)  once consulted a psychologist, with my wife, to iron out some marital problems---Which smoothing did occur. .

 Should I
or some child with home/school problems who sees a school psychologist or some active-duty member of the Armed Forces/Veteran for whom war/other-problems has resulted in s/he seeking counseling, and other like and law-abiding citizens be deprived of a basic civil right without "due process of law"? [I believe we have another, of too many  Federal Laws which provides for both criminal and civil prosecution for "Deprivation of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which should deal with and punish those who would do so to those who are not dangerously mentally ill.
The FBI has reportedly placed entire groups of innocent military veterans on the "no buy"  list and that without "due process of law".
April, 2013 Note: the New York State Police are seizing guns from citizens who are lawfully taking anti-depression medications without any prior “due process of law”. After the death of my beloved wife I took such “meds” for a short time which, in NY, would have led to my being deprived of my rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution by violating my other rights to “due process of law”. Such are unconstitutional acts of tyrants---About which see President Jefferson’s comments as to tyrants, guns and citizens—As attached..


THE “SOVIET SOLUTION”: As the old USSR developed, a political decision was made to deal with those who “dissented” by considering-and-declaring them, per se, mentally ill for doing so. Such persons were involuntary confined in prison like “hospitals” and subjected to “aggressive” treatment”
It appears that too many (Chiefly, but not universally Democrats) consider anyone who wishes to fully exercise their rights (And, implied duties) under the “Second Amendment” as likewise “mentally ill”. I suspect that many Democrats consider anyone who opposes any of Mr. Obama’s extra-constitutional actions as likewise “crazy”.

LIKEWISE DOCTORS & JOURNALISTS: Doctors and “journalists do NOT “see” the very many whose lives and “bodily integrity” are safe-guarded by the private use (Most often “mere” display) of guns by citizens. They treat and report on only those events as where medical attention is needed OR “politically correct” reporting had.


THOSE WHO ARE NOT CURRENTLY DANGEROUSLY MENTALLY ILL DESERVE THE PROTECTION OF ARMS PROVIDED IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT..

Thursday, December 31, 2015

Helping Obama ID Terrorists



We Just Can't Seem to Pinpoint the Problem", says OBAMA.....


The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims.
 

Think of it: So, What are their Major Organizations?

Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS/ISIL : AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION

AND A LOT MORE!

And We just can't figure out who's causing the problem.

But at least President Obama knows it's not the Muslims.

Monday, December 14, 2015

Guns And Self-Defense


Crime and Self-Defense

* Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms.[11]

* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[12]

* Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders.[13] [14] [15] Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun.[16]

* Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18]

* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 3.5% of households had members who had used a gun "for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 1,029,615 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[19]

* A 1994 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that Americans use guns to frighten away intruders who are breaking into their homes about 498,000 times per year.[20]

* A 1982 survey of male felons in 11 state prisons dispersed across the U.S. found:[21]
 
34% had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"
40% had decided not to commit a crime because they "knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun"

69% personally knew other criminals who had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"[22]

Monday, December 07, 2015

There Are NO "Radicalized" Muslims

THERE ARE NO "RADICALIZED" MUSLIMS! 

There are those who closely follow the commands contained in the Koran. Those commands include that of waging of military war (Jihad) against "unbelievers" (Or, supporting its warriors with all their wealth) and to use the allowed/encouraged/commanded acts of murder, rape, genocide, torture, banditry, etc. to win battles and wars against opponents to real Islam. These are Muslims.

Anyone else who claims to be a Muslim and does not obey those commands is guilty of Bid'ah (Essentially "Heresy") as they vary-from or leave those core teachings of Islam and may be killed or otherwise punished by true Muslims.That authority to kill and so many person's demonstrated-and-enthusiastic willingness to do so condemns the entire community of Islam (Ummah) to never fully leave the medieval, murderous, tyrannical and self-defeating ideology as taught by Mohammed (Who was, himself, a murderer, bandit, liar and treaty-breaker and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child---Which makes him the "Ideal Man" and example for all of his followers.)

As there is no true central authority in Islam each-and-every Muslim (Male as females do not "count") is expected to be the self-judge of his status as areal follower of Mohammed. No "radicalization" is needed except, only perhaps, some reminder (By a person or current events) of the command to wageJihad binding on individuals (eg Nidal Hasan of Fort Hood treason)  or bands/small-groups (eg The District Of Columbia "Belt Line Shooters"; This week's shooters in San Bernardino) or much larger (Even such semi-national groups as ISIS or Boku Haram or HAMAS) or entire nations (eg Ottoman Turkey or today's Iran).

It may be "politically correct" to refer to Islamist-Terrorists as "radicalized" or "extremest" Muslims. However, they would better AND more honestly be described as "orthodox" Muslims.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

ISIS Is NOT The Problem

ISIS is NOT "The Problem"!  The same can be written of Boku Haram, Hamas, CAIR, The Muslim Brotherhood and other like organizations as have, boil-like, erupted in our world---And, will do so under other names in the future. The same can be said of "Lone Wolf Islamist Terrorist" (eg The traitor Nidal Hasan of Ft. Hood infamy) OR very small groups of like critters (eg The pair who were the "Inside The Belt-Line" snipers; Those who fired upon a US Army recruiting station murdering one of our Soldiers).

"The Problem" is the core and essential teachings of Islam which include:
1. The command for almost all Muslims to wage "perpetual war" (Jihad) against all "unbelievers" until they become Muslims OR abjectly accept the slave-like state some call dhimmitude; And,
2. The encouragement/permission/commands to those waging Jihad to use murder, genocide, rape, torture, banditry and other horrors to forward Islam or "reward" those creatures.

Anyone who does not declare that to be true is:
1. Ignorant of the writings of Islam and the 1400-year record of Muslims applying those commands by gross acts-of-violence; OR,
2. Is maliciously (As a form of treason for supporting those waging war against the USA?) not making that true statement to The People---And,  attempting to form public policy on that offence-against-truth.

If there is some Muslim who declares that Islamist-Terrorists are not "Real Muslims", s/he must be commanded to back that claim up by (As video recorded for later broadcast) state the following:
1. Her/His name, address and the name and address of employer;
2. An absolute and perpetual condemnation of the above-noted-teachings-and-practices of Islam as contained in the Koran and other cannons of Islam; And,
3. Then publicly inks out of an Arabic copy of the Koran all those verses as command or support such crimes against humans and humanity.

No such Muslim should be allowed to continue with statements "defending" Islam until they fulfill the above conditions.

There is some "research" as demonstrates that not less than 50% of Muslims support the "fullness" of Jihad.  There is some reason to believe that the current Administration favors the immigration of Muslims (ie Who are not likely to comply with the above) over the real targets of Jihad---Christians.

Now, does you your public official or candidate or religious leader or other associate proclaim the above truths about Islam?

Although the USA may not be at war with Islam, Islam is at war with the USA.