Tuesday, July 18, 2017

A Lesson For Marquette Madrasa

Islamophobia???

The term or suffix "phobia" is used too widely and much too incorrectly in such terms as "homophobia" and, as to this note, "islamophobia".

As to the latter term, the following quote is applicable: "A phobia is defined in Webster's dictionary as an "inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of subjects or situation.". Fear of Islamic extremism and its potentially catastrophic consequences is not inexplicable or illogical. It is a rational reaction to dangerous, irrational people who would use weapons of mass destruction to bring about their apocalyptic vision." (From Joseph Klien's "Playing The Islamophobic Card", "Front Page Magazine"; March 5, 2007.)

I suggest that we all now substitute (In our daily use, in magazine/newspaper "Style Books", political speeches, sermons, etc.) the term "ISLAMOFORIA", where the term "foria" derives from the Greek and denotes a state of being-on-guard---Which is the proper response to Islam and all Muslims (Based on their "religious duty" to destroy our culture, government, nation and civilization).

Some Teachings Of The Koran

•  verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25
SOME OTHER UNALTERABLE COMMANDS OF ISLAM
Listed below are a few passages from the Quran that clearly compel Muslims to violence.  
Quran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.
Quran 3:28   “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends
Quran 3:85   “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
Quran 5:33   “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.
Quran 8:12   “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran.
Quran 8:60   “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.
Quran 8:65   “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.
Quran 9:50   “When opportunity arises kill the infidels where you find them.
Quran 9:30    "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them.
"Quran 9:123  “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.
Quran 22:19  “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.

Quran 47:4    “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Guns, Murders & Race In The USA

There are those who point to the very high (For "developed nations" only) rate of murders by misuse of firearms in the USA.

What they do not acknowledge is the fact that if Blacks are removed from the "numbers", the USA would have a rate of such crimes no higher than that of Belgium---Before the Muslims invasion of that nation.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Congress-Critter Brad Sherman & Treason

Member Brad Sherman has introduced “Articles Of Impeachment” against our constitutionally elected President.

I suggest that his priorities are faulty. It would be better for him to first, personally and formally ask for a “presentment”, to a Federal Grand Jury, towards obtaining an indictment charging Hillary Rodham-Clinton with (Felony) violation(s) of 18 US Code 2071.

This would, of course, demonstrate that his interest is in justice and not political revenge.

In fact, he might move to determine the relationship, if any, between “that” sale of Uranium to Russia and the various, direct and indirect, benefits thereafter received by the Clinton family.

Friday, July 14, 2017

Poland, Islam & Western Civilization

After President Trump's speech, in Poland, some noted the history of the courage Poles demonstrated during the horrors of Nazi and Soviet rule.

Such persons are very "near sighted" and ignorant of history or avoiding it to maintain a position of "political correctness" regarding Islam.

If, and only if, those persons were aware-of or honest-about the history of Poland, they would note:
1.  During the 1600s the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth beat back two (Tartar and Ottoman) Islamic invasions on their Eastern frontier at a great cost in blood and treasure;
2. That defense prevented the Germanys and Nordic nations from the horrors of Jihad and the greater tyranny of Muslim rule (As experienced by Greece, Hungary and other nations); And,
3. On September 11-12, 1683 a force led by the Polish king drove the Islamic Turks from the walls of Vienna and further protected the heartland of Europe.

Now, much of Europe (Lacking the racial/national memory of Poles, Hungarians and others) allowed and, perhaps, encouraged the new-style, Muslim, invasions which has brought to Germany, France, Belgium, Sweden and Norway the usual "gifts" of Islam---Murder, rape and destruction of national wealth.

Now, the EU wishes to punish Poland for resisting the new Jihad of Muslim invasion-by-immigration which has protected Poland's citizens from the above-cited horrors.

It would be best for the USA to support AND follow Poland's example.

Saturday, July 01, 2017

Suppress "Outcome Discrimination"!

"Outcome discrimination" is a "standard" maintained by some bureaucratic agencies and courts that holds that there is, for example, racial discrimination if any "class" is not represented in some employment/academic group in proportion to their part of the general population---Without regard to their part of the pool/population of those qualified for the contested employment or matriculation.

I am now campaigning against such "outcome discrimination" as excludes: Citizens of Puerto Rico in the NBA and NFL; Samoans from roles in classical ballet companies; Those who are carriers of TB, Typhoid and other such diseases from hospital and child-care positions; Those of Chinese and White ancestry from management positions in the NAACP; And, political conservatives from (Tenured) university teaching positions.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

23 Questions About Islam



23 Questions---From The On-Line "American Thinker" Of September 17, 2006

What matters now is not press reports about pieces of a German lecture by Benedict or the Musllim reaction. If we must answer “yes” to all, or any, of the following 23 questions about Islam, are we entitled, nay bound, to be very concerned indeed ?
1. Does Islam claim that every single word in the 6,234 verses of its Quran was not merely divinely inspired, or authorised, but actually dictated, in Arabic, directly by Allah Himself, and revealed over 22 years from 610 CE, and so is uncorrupted and  unalterable ? It descended [nuzila] ready-made and complete from heaven.
2. Does Islam hold the “Principle of Abrogation” – Nasikh -  [Quran 2:106] whereby later verses always over-ride and replace or cancel the earlier ?
3. Are the 14 later [Medina] chapters and over 1,600 verses in the Quran, from 622 CE to 632 CE, thus supreme and unchallengeable when they contradict the earlier Mecca ones ?
4. Are there some 164 later Medina verses [from 24 Surah, between Surah 2 and 76]  favouring violent Jihad, Jihad Bis Saif, by the sword, or Holy War [Qital Fi Sabilillah], not merely Jihad-e-nafs or struggle against desires ? See list, and full texts, on answering-islam.org.uk, including 9:5 “slay the idolaters whereever you find them and take them captive”. And see www.quranbrowser.com/ for 10 different English translations of any verse.
5. Are there many later Medina verses like 5:82 [“the most implacable in their enmity to the faithful are the Jews”] teaching utter hatred for Jews, as 24 Surah and nearly 90 verses translated into English on the Jewishvirtuallibrary web-site, or 20 references in the Fatwa Database from Sheik As-Salam Alaykum on the Islam On-line site, indicate?
6. Does the Quran allow, or even command, the killing of Apostates who leave Islam, like Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali ?
7. Likewise for Blasphemers – like Salman Rushdie?
8. And of Infidels in extending, or restoring, the rule of Islam?
9. And of Gays?
10. Does the Quran provide for hand amputation for thieves, as in 5:38 ?11. For flogging?
12. For public beheading?
13.  For beating wives, as in 4:34?
14. And are there many Hadith which show the Prophet ordered stonings [introduced under the Second Caliph, 634-644 CE, ‘Umar, a Companion of the Prophet’]?
15. Does the Quran demand the eventual Global Rule of Islam, with no secular realm, whereas Judaism is about waiting for their Messiah, and Christianity offers salvation to persons everywhere?
16. Does the Quran demand the ultimate enforcement of Sharia Law everywhere, even on us Infidels?
17. Does the Quran permit Freedom of Worship to all faiths?
18. Or Free Speech?
19. Or the Right of Free Organisation?
20. Does it treat women as inferiors not only regarding inheritance, but as witnesses?
21. Does the Quran command Muslims to never surrender any land once held by them, such as Spain, or Western Palestine/Israel?
22. Did their “Prophet” order or lead 74 raids or wars during his Medina decade from 622 CE to his 632 CE death?
23. Were 600-900 male Jewish prisoners beheaded in March 627 CE [see Surah 33:25-26]?
If the clear honest answer is “yes” to all, or even to any, of these 23 questions, how can Islam [as distinct from other Faiths] be compatibile with either the 1945 UN Declaration of Human Rights, or the US Constitution? And how can we democrats not fear both any such system, and any who seriously adhere to it, and their increasing number in our midst?
We do not [yet] live in Dar al-Islam, the Realm of Submission, which is exactly what the word “Islam” means, that territory where the population have either become ‘submitters’ [muslimun] or else ‘dhimmis’, submitting by paying the Jizya tax, and accepting Muslim Rule. We by contrast, still live in Dar al-Harb, the Realm of War, the territory where all, or most, of the population have not yet submitted, and who must be made to, by force.
Those who argue that Islam was not spread by the Sword because conversion was not encouraged in the early period, totally miss the point that the territory had been captured by force and the population made ‘dhimmis’.
Are we now to condemn “Western Imperialism” but are not allowed to even mention Islamic Imperialism?
Let us have precise answers to such vital questions of principle, not emotive denounciations and abuse. What is the real answer to each of those 23 points ? And what reasonable person or society should tolerate, or surrender under,  any “Dont call us violent, or we’ll kill you” threats, from any quarter?
Tom Carew, Dublin, Ireland   9 18 06

Monday, June 19, 2017

Redistricting In Wisconsin

1. "Partisan = Democracy" as is the means of declaring our fellow citizens (Not some elitists') differing views on what should be the laws of our State and our Republic;
2. That choice is represented by the constitutional/democratic choices of the People in the only polls that matter AND not by two/three appointed and also anti-democracy Federal judges;
3. In Wisconsin the turning over of authority-and-responsibility for redistricting to the GOP is a result of both the popular vote, our Constitution and law and the nation-wide movement towards like transfers-of-power in an ever increasing number of States;
4. Any rational and pro-democracy citizen should compare the map of the original "Gerrymandering" Vs. Wisconsin's last, legal and democratically established, map and see that there is no valid comparison---Especially when considering our laws regarding such districtsAnd, 
5. Although the lawful maps may give the GOP some small advantages, any map which would be inflicted by appointed judges  would be both unconstitutional and against the will of a majority of our citizens (As is the very apparent goal of Democrats and their Fascist co-actors)