Wednesday, October 21, 2020

"Hate Speech" Defined

 



It appears that the only sound definition of that is: "Hate Speech"; Noun; Those spoken or written statements which irritate an opponent of the USA's Bill Of Rights' first article".

Sunday, October 18, 2020

Ginsburg's Legacy AND Reversing SCOTUS Precedents

 Ruth Bader Ginsburg did leave the USA a silent legacy. That is the unheard, silent, screams of the many thousands of unborn babies slaughtered by the genocidal abortionists she supported and enabled.


There are some (ie Chiefly in the "Democrat Socialist Fascist Party") who claim that a Justice Amy Coney Barrett will ignore judicial precedent (Stare Decisis) and rule/vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113.  

Do those "persons" also regret the overturning of judicial precedent in such cases as Dred Scott v. Stanford, 60 US 393 and Plessey v. Ferguson, 163 US 537

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Counting Non_Citizens To Allocate House Seats?

 

  • At the time of the founding of our Republic there were no real bars to anyone entering our Nation except for, after a date-certain, slaves. 

    But, was there any intent on the part of the Founders to exclude those not citizens from being counted, every ten-years, as the basis of allocating seats in The House Of Representatives? 

    If, and only if, their intent was to count (ie For the purpose of allocating seats in the House) only citizens (And, then, slaves as 2/3 of free men) then aliens, until they became citizens, must be excluded from such counts for allocation of seats in The House Of Representatives.

     Going back-in-time, towards 1789, the below provided item may give some hint of the thinking before too many judges began "making law" AND "amending the Constitution" "from the bench".

    I now ask those "Learned In The Law" to comment on the above.

    It might be well to delay any hearing(s) on the counting of immigrants until after the expected confirmation of tie breaking Amy Coney Barrett to a seat on SCOTUS---And enable/allow her to consider the written and any oral pleadings on this case. [It appears that Nominee Amy Coney Barrett is a very strong "believer" in interpenetrating the 1789 Constitution Of The United States and its amendments according to the intent of the authors of those most basic laws and that to override any contrary judicial/legislative/executive actions or rulings (Which position I, most strongly, support!)]

                              Curiously and constitutionally yours,
                                                                             James Pawlak
    NOTE

    <http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2018/10/intent-of-14th-amendments-authors.html>

    Tuesday, October 30, 2018

    Intent Of The 14th Amendment's Authors

    Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which drafted the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14thAmendment by stating:

    "Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

    This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."

    The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.





Friday, October 16, 2020

What Is "Due Process Of Law"

 

  1. Right to sufficient-time prior (Written) notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizenThe Laws/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony or other evidence (eg Documents/physical-evidence) as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to have legal counsel present at any hearings and to fully represent the accused.
  3. The right to compel in-person testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted) AND to cross-examine those witnesses.
  4. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  5. The right to a written decision from that examiner
  6. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions if a public institution is involved OR to the highest authority in a private organization (If that private organization receives Federal or, likely, any government's dollar

Saturday, October 10, 2020

FBI Finally Discovers White Terrorist Group---MAYBE!!!

 Well, the FBI has finally found its target of a "White Terrorist Group"---MAYBE!


After all, those fantasy game players never executed any violent act against any American.

Will the FBI now admit that the actual infliction of such violent crimes, by "terrorists", is the sole/almost-exclusive "property" of Black terrorists (eg The "Acton Wing" of the Marxist led BLM) or such as their Anarchist allies (eg AntiFa)? 

Wednesday, October 07, 2020

Stopping Unlawful Violence Against Blacks

The first-and-foremost method of reducing unlawful violence against the USA's Blacks is to remove (By one means or another) those Black slugs who murder them (eg By misuse of  guns or the distribution of such dangerous-and-illegal drugs as have killed so many hundreds-of-thousands of Amerucabs). Those murders are: 1. At a rate many times that of Whites murdering other Whites; And, at a rate almost infinitely (ie Approaching Zero) that of those Americans whose ancestry is in China/India/Korea/Japan "murdering their own".

The liquidation of those murderers would be greatly aided by Blacks openly and often admitting that the above facts are TRUE.

It is the case that Black criminals are more likely than those of other races to attempt such crimes as "present a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm to others" as allows or requires the immediate use of lethal force to protect the innocent.

Then, some attention must be paid to those Black criminals who, on the basis of race, select-out White victims at a rate many times the reverse as has been mathematically established.

As to "police violence": 1. As far as I know, White police officers are no more likely to shoot Blacks than are Black officers; And, 2. There is a valid-and-reliable (ie Scientific) method of screening-out those persons unsuited for police work (Which is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory).




Saturday, October 03, 2020

Peaceful AND Legal Transfer Of POTUS Power

I have NO doubts but that President Donald J. Trump will peacefully leave his office upon being defeated in a LEGAL election.

That legality first depends on allowing only qualified citizens to vote. In the case of doubt about such voters it may be necessary to, voter-by-voter, use such methods as comparing signatures on Absentee OR "Mail In & Out" ballots with those previously submitted as part of prior "General Elections: AND denying all "duplicate ballots"  (Of which many, many, thousands have been mailed to real or fictional voters).

Secondly, by nullifying all corruptions of the intent of the authors of our Republic's Constitution as to the execution of "The Electoral College" which may include, but are not limited to: Tying any State's Elector Vote to the popular vote in any other State or the entire United States; And, perhaps, dividing any States Electoral Voted on the basis of the popular votes in any such State.

Ginsburg's "Silent Legacy" AND Overturning Judicial Precedents

 Ruth Bader Ginsburg did leave the USA a silent legacy. That is the unheard, silent, screams of the many thousands of unborn babies slaughtered by the genocidal abortionists she supported and enabled.


There are some (ie Chiefly in the "Democrat Socialist Fascist Party") who claim that a Justice Amy Coney Barrett will ignore judicial precedent (Stare Decisis) and rule/vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 

Do those "persons" also regret the overturning of judicial precedent in such cases as Dred Scott v. Stanford, 60 US 393 and Plessey v. Ferguson, 163 US 537