Monday, January 21, 2019

16 Democrats Who Support A Terrorist Organization

A very long time ago I enlisted in the US Navy and found myself in one of the six most dangerous (Enlisted grade) specialties. Later I performed (Paid and unpaid) civilian duties as involved physical risk above that of most Americans. Both were directly had for the protection of my fellow citizens (And legal immigrants) against foreign and domestic enemies.

The "Council on American-Islamic Relations" (CAIR) has previously assisted the transfer of money from the USA to Islamist terrorists. To the best of my knowledge that organization has never admitted-to or apologized-for that attack on our Republic. The leaders of that organization should have been charged with "Treason".

Like other Muslim organizations and "leaders", CAIR has never condemned the horrid and unalterable commands of the Koran as are EVIL.

Now, sixteen leading (ie "Possibles" for a nomination in the next presidential election) Democrats have endorsed-and-supported CAIR.

For myself, I strongly assert that any veteran of dangerous military or civilian service who votes for any of those sixteen will have insulted self AND all those who protect the USA from ordinary criminals, other terrorists and other dangers.

All Democrats should  publicly ask their Party's candidates and officers if they support those sixteen betrayers of our Nation.

YOU CAN, WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT, IDENTIFY THOSE DEMOCRATS.

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Rep. Steve King Punished For Being Truthful

TO THE GOP LEADERSHIP:

It has been reported that Representative Steve King has been stripped of his committee assignments for:
1. Telling the truth about our Western Civilization (Or what is left of it) as was invented, nurtured and developed  by White humans; And,
2. Having some minimal contacts with questionable persons who are also opposed to those who would destroy that core of our national and personal beings.

I expected AND expect our (Your???) Party to not surrender-to or adopt-the deceit inflicted by "the other Party" and such other enemies of truth and The People as: CNN; The Washington Compost and The New York Slimes; Such supporters of (Please forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorism as Keith Ellison, CAIR and Rashida Tlaib; And, such supporters of other terrorism as AntiFa and Maxime Waters.

By punishing Mr. the GOP is adding to what is becoming universal deceit. Even the Socialist George Orwell noted "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act". 

Now, the only reason to support our Party is that the alternative is too horrid to allow.

Now, I suggest (Demand) that Mr. King be reinstated in his House assignments AND formally praised for telling the truth.

Sunday, January 13, 2019

DearAmericanMuslim

Dear Mr. American Muslim:

This note, with the definition below, is being sent to you in response to your presumed claim to be a “Moderate Muslim”. If you are indeed such a person, then you will have no problems falling within the definition of “Moderate Muslim” given below.

“MODERATE MUSLIM” DEFINED

1.A person who makes a very public proclamation that s/he is a Muslim along with giving out his/her name, address, occupation and place of employment.
2.A a person who then makes a very public OR on-oath rejection and condemnation of all of the teachings within the Koran, Hadith, Sharia and other Islamic teachings which allow or encourage, and sometimes command, the use of murder (eg Killing anyone who “insults” Mohammed or the Koran), rape and enslavement, genocide (eg Killing all Jews), perpetual war with “unbelievers” until they submit to Islam, lying to and stealing from such “unbelievers” and the very inferior legal and social status given by Islam to all “unbelievers” and all women.
3.A person who then demands that all such teachings be stricken and removed from the Islamic texts noted above.
4.A person who then very publicly inks-out of a copy of the an all those verses which support the above noted, inhumane and anti-civilization acts.

Of course, you would be much more believable, as to your claim of being a “Moderate Muslim” if you would very publicly state the historical truths that Mohammed of Mecca and Medina was a murderer, bandit, liar and treaty-breaker and the sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child.

Now, are you a “Moderate Muslim” or a standard-and-dangerous follower of the ideology called Islam with all of its differences in teachings from the Faiths of the Jews, Christians, Baha'i and Sikhs?

Curiously yours,
James Pawlak

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Certain "African" Immigrants Needed By USA


In recent times some, in my nation, had proposed that the USA "needs more immigrants from Africa".
That is agreeable to me---If, and only if, the ability of individual immigrants to positively contribute to the "Common Good" of the USA is emphasized and group selection is favored, we should look for populations who have a culture or tradition as has already produced educated, knowing our English language and with a cultural commitment to obeying such laws as are democratically enacted.
Two such groups can be found in South Africa. They are the Afrikaners and those known in that land as "The English". At this time those peoples are being persecuted and even threatened with genocide.
Therefore, the "Africans" we should intensely encourage (And recruit), as members of  identifiable groups, to immigrate into our Republic should be from the two, best qualified, African groups noted above.               

PS---I can, again, expect that some will call me a "Racist". However, I am a "Culturist" who knows those committed to the best of what remains of Western Civilization have-made and will-make a better USA----By legal immigration.
HISTORIC NOTE/QUESTION: Some have claimed that the original inhabitants of that land were not "Black", but of another indigenous (Yellow hued skin) race, and that Blacks were driven South to SA by other and more aggressive Blacks not too long before the Afrikaners went inland.

Religious Test---NOT

It has been reported that Senators M. Hirono & K. Harris are proposing that any association with the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations is a block to confirmation as a United States Judge.

If, and only if, any Fascist Members of the Judiciary Committee would present that violation of Article-VI, Clause-3 of our Republic's Constitution during hearings on those nominated by POTUS, the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee must rule that "line of questioning" is not allowed upon the authority of the above-cited provision.

Such violations of the Constitution must not be excused by "Senatorial Privilege" or any other practice. We might consider that such questions are "a violation of civil rights".

Wednesday, January 09, 2019

The Right To Defend Vs. Fascist Critters

Tonight, Mr. Tucker Carlson listed-and-described some who have physically and economically attacked and injured those who exercised the constitutional right of "free speech" and that without injuring other persons. Those Fascists have not been "punished" for their attacks.

Among those were the following:
1. An employee of a very, very, powerful corporation who was fired for a mild disagreement with those controlling that company;
2.A university professor driven off campus by mobs which the police failed to confront-and-control, and later forced, by such threats and lack of protection, to resign his academic position (Because he disagreed with Anti-White racist actions);
3. A teacher who was fired after, respectfully, refusing to use one of the several "pronouns" demanded by people  who claim to be one of the 50-plus "sexes"(sic) now in vogue; And,
4. A teacher who used a lock-on-chain to strike and injure those whose views he disliked as did result in an arrest but not a trial in spite of video evidence showing him inflicting "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" on others who were not physically attacking him.

The last case, in the lack of effective action by "the criminal justice system" could be solved by the use-of-arms (ie  Modern and effective firearms instantly available for self-protection and the protection of innocent others) by law-abiding, presumed sane and courageous citizens who would have "put down" that dangerous animal. [That attack was in one of the States who are misgoverned by Democrats who are the prime actors attempting to suppress the individual rights under the Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution. Mr. Tucker's home, with his terrified wife alone-at-home, was also attacked by a mob. That mob-action is in the District of Columbia which is the most tyrannical opponent of allowing citizens the means to defend themselves against such and other criminals (Those police did not arrive in time to arrest those thugs.)]

The other crimes should be a matter of great concern to: POTUS who should instruct the (New) US Attorney General to (Civilly or criminally prosecute the offenders); Some private organizations which will now defend Americans from Fascists (As did the ACLU which has now become the "American Christian Loathing Union").

Lacking effective actions, by those agencies, the only recourse is to follow President Jefferson's prescription: "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE ARMS.”

As Jefferson did not foresee private organization with the income and power grater than some nations, his instruction applies to those Fascist cess pools.

I also note that AntiFa is NOT active in such States as Texas and Wisconsin which have many thousands of citizens licensed to carry concealed weapons---And, do so.


                  VERITAS ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI


Saturday, January 05, 2019

Commander-In-Chief, The Border & Emergency Powers

President Trump (And any POTUS), as "Commander-in-Chief" of our Armed Forces, has the authority to:
1. Declare parts of our border with Mexico as "Military Exclusion Zones" (Or such security sites as "Area 51") and restrict, with the use of lethal force allowed to maintain security, unauthorized crossings;
2. Provide for the "clearance" of residents and their guests and employees to be in such places;
3. Move our regular troops, reservists and National Guard (Military police, combat units and other personnel) to those places to prevent the illegal entry-into and passage-through those places; And,
4. To place those areas under military law (eg As civilians are on US Navy ships) with violations of the UCMJ to be by courts martial, with appeals to the "Military Court Of Appeals" before any appeal to SCOTUS.

It would be best to limit such actions to those wild areas as cannot be effectively controlled by the "Border Patrol"or other civil authorities. This would allow those non-military forces to be focused on: Airports; Seaports; The arrest, detention, prosecution and expulsion of those aliens who have overstayed or otherwise violated (eg Working and stealing jobs from Americans) the conditions of visas; More intense scrutiny at the usual places of entry.

I still maintain that all  "barriers" to illegal entry into my nation be supplemented by four-plus rolls of "razor ribbon" (aka "Barbed tape").

Funds for such actions could be had within DOD (eg By reducing "Flag Officers" to a much smaller portion of military personnel).

Wednesday, January 02, 2019

Defending Against Horrid Attacks On Border

In recent days Federal agents have been subject to such attacks (eg Thrown rocks, bottles and dangerous fecal materials) from across our border with Mexico. The attacking thugs have put women and children near or in front of them as human shields.

THOSE ATTACKS PRESENT "A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER OF DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM' TO AMERICAN CITIZENS! THEY FULLY AND LEGALLY ALLOW THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE TO STOP SUCH ATTACKS.

For myself, I recommend that high towers be built at the appropriate places to support a sniper, spotter and a command officer. Such persons would identify, target and kill those attacking US citizens from inside Mexico.

If the Mexican government does not want shots fired into that nation's (sic) territory, then it is the absolute duty of it to use its police and army to immediately-and-effectively stop those attacks.

[I, again, suggest/demand that: Five-plus rows of "razor ribbon" (ie "Barbed tape") be added to any "wall" or "barrier"); And, (Applying the authority of the President as "Commander-in-Chief") set up "military exclusion zones" in the wild-parts of that border where military law would apply and our troops ordered to use all force necessary (ie Including shooting, without warning, any armed invaders) to repel all invaders of the USA.]