Thursday, November 15, 2018

Lincoln And Press "Enemies Of The People" (2)

I recently came across the below item as might address those who have criticized our constitutionally elected (Without an majority of popular votes cast as was Lincoln who received 1,865,908 while his opponents had 2,816,122)


"Major-General John A. Drx, Commanding at New York:
Whereas there has been wickedly and traitorously printed and published this morning in the New York World and New York Journal of Commerce, newspapers printed and published in the city of New York, a false and spurious proclamation purporting to be signed by the President and to be countersigned by the Secretary of State, which publication is of a treasonable nature, designed to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States and to the rebels now at war against the Government and their aiders and abettors, you are therefore hereby commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command the editors, proprietors, and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers, and all such persons as, after public notice has been given of the falsehood of said publication, print and publish the same with intent to give aid and comfort to the enemy; and you will hold the persons so arrested in close custody until they can be brought to trial before a military commission for their offense. You will also take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce, and hold the same until further orders, and prohibit any further publication therefrom.
A. LINCOLN"

Citation: Abraham Lincoln: "Executive Order—Arrest and Imprisonment of Irresponsible Newspaper Reporters and Editors," May 18, 1864. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=70018.

In time SCOTUS supported the above action against those POTUS declared as "enemies of the people".  Since some  (In "The Resistance") are wondering if SCOTUS-Nominee Brett Kavanaugh will follow Stare Decisis on the Roe Vs. Wade decision, will "The Resistance" support such, Lincoln-Model AND legal, actions against The New York Slimes or The Washington Compost

President Lincoln's measure was executed when our Republic was in a state of war and combating a rebellion. We now remain in a state-of-war against those waging Jihad against the USA and some of its allies and facing an invasion of illegal immigrants as includes criminals and may include Islamist-Terrorists (Please excuse the redundancy!). The USA is also facing possible rebellion as initiated by such as AntiFa.

Monday, November 12, 2018

A French-European Army?

TO THE FRENCH PEOPLE

The present President of France (May his name be forgotten within ten years) now declares a need for an "European Army" as, no doubt, dominated by France as the Germans have lost military courage.

He also is  the President of a Republic as does not meet its contracted, upon its honor, obligations to NATO which has protected France from Soviet and, now Russian, aggression. In other words, he has prostituted the Honor of France and all of its citizens.

The army of France does present very impressive parades on 14 July of each year; But, cannot halt Islamist violence within your nation.

With the exception of the Foreign Legion, the following advertisement might well appear to apply to your army: "French Army Rifle For Sale---Never Fired, Dropped only once."

=============================================


AU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS

L'actuel président de la France (qQe son nom soit oublié d'ici dix ans) déclare maintenant la nécessité d'une "armée européenne", sans aucun doute dominée par la France, les Allemands ayant perdu courage

Il est également président de la République car il ne respecte pas les obligations contractées vis-à-vis de l'OTAN, qui ont protégé la France contre l'agression soviétique et désormais russe. En d'autres termes, il a prostitué l'Honneur de la France et de tous ses citoyens .

L’armée de France présente des défilés très impressionnants le 14 juillet de chaque année; Mais, ne peut pas arrêter la violence islamiste au sein de votre nation.

À l'exception de la Légion étrangère, la publicité suivante peut sembler s'appliquer à votre armée: "Carabine de l'armée française à vendre --- jamais tirée, larguée une seule fois"

Missing From Mass Shooting Stories

Missing from "Mass Shooting" stories (eg A "club" in California & a Synagogue in Pittsburgh) are reports of some law-abiding. legally presumed sane and courageous citizen pulling out a (Legally) conceal handgun and, as easily trained, "putting down" dangerous animals.

Of course, such an action is likely to stop killings before they meet the usual definition of "five or more dead in a single incident".

But, the Democrats in those and like jurisdictions have been waging a Jihad against what should be the rights of all good citizens to "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").

I must wonder if the bosses of that Party are less concerned about the safety of our fellow citizens and much more worried that the shooting-down of criminals will reduce their power base.

Thursday, November 08, 2018

SCOTUS, History & Democracy


As a (Self-declared) "Avocational Historian" I know that the Founders of our Republic were in favor of England's parliamentary governance. Their primary, constitutional, problem was that the freemen of American were not allowed the (Still very limited) "Rights Of Englishmen".

I also know that they were the product of a system in which the Legislature had (Or was developing) towards near total control of government and The Law.

That, approved, Parliament, did give "The Law Lords" some authority. But, that power was limited to reviews of court decisions and did NOT extend to legislative acts.

It appears that the Founders established SCOTUS to take the place of the "law lords" in a nation which, very specially, rejected nobility.

In the first years of the new USA, SCOTUS was a "very dull place"with one Justice resigning for, perhaps, wont of work or mental stimulation.

Chief Justice Marshall's premeditated and engineered decision in Marbury Vs. Madison took power and authority away from the People who (Then indirectly) elected POTUS and the Senate and, more directly the Members of The House Of Representatives. That is, he took away the power to remove from office those officials who are judged by The People to be wrong in their actions and made a few Justices (And all Federal judges) immune from democracy  (Except by the very rare us of the impeachment, trial (Before the Senate) and removal-from-office as removed only eight federal justices in the 229 years of our nation).

Wednesday, November 07, 2018

Saudis & Turks

The Saudi's have been responsible for the murder of a Washington Compost reporter. If it were not for oil and their "Custody" of Mecca and Medina that family business would be of no import on our world. There is little doubt that Saudi Arabia has been, directly-or-indirectly and overtly-or-covertly, responsible for the illicit deaths of many others since its creation c. 1927-1930. This even involves some small-scale genocide in neighboring nations.

Under would be Caliph Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Turkey has abruptly reversed its steady course, begun under the very great (Mustafa)  Kemal Ataturk, towards being a democratic-republic. Now, the basic civil-legal rights of Turkish citizens [And others within and without  Turkey are of no value under that tyrant. Turkey is now an Islamic-Islamist terrorist state. It is directly involved in genocide (eg Against, also Muslim, Kurds).

As both of those nations support the horrid and unalterable commands of Islam, I say "A plague on both of their houses!".

=============================
There is a petition circulating to have the street in front of the Saudi Embassy, in the District Of Columbia, renamed "Kashoggi Way" after the one person, a member of the protected-and-privileged class of journalists, was murdered by Saudi officials.

I HAVE "NO PROBLEM" WITH THAT PROPOSITION!

However, I do note the fact that Turks raped and massacred many, many, thousands of Armenians AND still refuses to admit to the facts of that genocide.


Therefore, I (Most strongly) recommend that the street in front of the Turkish Embassy, in the District Of Columbia (Where Turkey's official-thugs recently attacked our nation's citizens or guests) as "Armenian Genocide Street".

National Defense & "Posse Comitatus Law"

One of the primary duties of POTUS is to defend the United States from foreign invasions and to use the, even deadly, force of our military to do so. Any failure to energetically and effectively execute that duty would be grounds for impeachment, trial and removal from office.

Any, attempt to invade the USA requires POTUS to order our Armed Forces to use all necessary (Even deadly) force to stop any such invasion. It is NOT necessary that such invaders be member of some other nation's armed forces (eg We have used such force against Islamist terrorists, the current hoard, with plans to invade the USA, may include such critters) to use such force.

Our troops. Border Patrol and police, defending the USA from mobs, are not required to tolerate thrown rocks or the body-mass of mobs or other attacks as present "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm". The have both Natural Law and statutory rights to self-defense---AS OVERRIDE ANY "POLITICAL CORRECT" DECISIONS-MADE OR ORDERS-ISSUED BY THOSE HIDING IN OFFICES FAR AWAY FROM DANGER.

The use of such self-defense is NOT in violation of the "Posse Comitatus Law" as our troops would not, by using self-defense, being called on by civil authority to exercise police functions.

There is NOT violation of that law by our military defending our nation from foreign invasion.

Yes, such a military (But constitutional, lawful and demanded) response may result in "collateral damage" to children. The fault of any such is directly-and-solely assigned to the adults (Especially parents) who put children in harms way. (You might recall the like "collateral damage" during the destruction of Nazi Germany and the once Imperial Japan as was necessary to destroy threats to our Republic.)

Monday, November 05, 2018

Iran Is At War With The USA


All should now review some history lessons. On November 4, 1979 terrorist agents of Iran's Ayatollahs invaded the United States by violently occupying our Embassy in that tyrant ruled nation. They also took our Americans stationed there as hostages in gross violation of well established international law (eg As obeyed by the USA even after the December 7, 1941 Japanese sneak attack on Hawaii by safely transporting them out of the USA). Those American hostages in Iran were freed only after a "Surrender Monkey Democrat" was replaced (On January 20, 1981) by Republican  President Ronald Reagan. 

As far as I know no Iranian, having Islamic or government authority, has ever apologized for those violations of law. As far as I know Iran has not paid reparations to those American victims of Islamist crimes or to our nation.

Since that Islamist takeover, Iran has been waging "undercover war" against the USA---Some by paid and foreign terrorists. 

Iran remains the enemy of the USA and is still at war with our Republic.

Friday, November 02, 2018

USA's New Well-Source/Cess-Poll Of Jew Hatred

The Hadith (Second only to the Koran among Muslims, has the following declarations: “The Jews will hide behind rocks and the trees”; And, “But the rocks and the trees will say, ‘Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.".

The study of modern (From 1900 AD on) clearly shows the severe Jihad against Jews as exampled by:
1. The "Grand Mufti Of Jerusalem" formally joining Hitler and his genocidal campaign against Jews; And,
2. The fact that Jews have been driven out of all Muslim majority nations.

In more recent years there has been a legal and illegal influx of Muslims (Given preference over Christians by Obama & Company) into the USA. [In Dearborn (Michigan) Christians on public property were stoned by Muslims for the crime-against-Islam of exercising their constitutional rights to freely practice their religion---AND those Islamists were defended by the local police and courts.]

Anti-Jewish attacks are endemic on many university/college campuses (Especially in California) where school officials are unwilling to protect Jews and their supporters from Muslim mini-mobs and other attacks on free speech and academic freedom. 

In California, primary graded students were forced (Without parental knowledge or consent) to attend Mosques and go through the motions of Muslim worship.

FOR ONE, I MUST WONDER IF THE INCREASE IN ANTI-JEWISH ATTACKS IS SUPPORTED BY THE INCREASE OF "TRUE BELIEVING" MUSLIMS IN THE USA.


Dealing With Jew Haters

When hatred of Jews goes beyond braying (As protected by The Bill Of Rights) to physical violence or such threats as present OR are reasonably believed to present "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm", the only solution is to "put down" such dangerous animals as quickly as is possible.

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Intent Of 14th Amendment's Authors


Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which drafted the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14thAmendment by stating:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."


This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."
The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.
(Underling added)

Trump & Children Of "Illegals"


Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Children Of Illegal Immigrants


If Ivan Boris Doe and Juan Batista Roe embezzle money from their employers, fail to pay lawful taxes, rob banks and on-the-street citizens and put all of their illegal gains in a trust fund for their children, are those children entitled to those funds? I think not.

If Ivan Boris Doe and Juan Batista Roe illegally come to the USA and engender children here, are those children entitled to the benefits of US citizenship? That is a debatable legal issue!

Section-1 of the 14th Amendment to our Constitution gives the rights of citizenship only to those persons under the jurisdiction of this nation.
Illegal immigrants have, by their unlawful entry into the USA, avoided that jurisdiction. Therefore, they have no more rights to give the highly valued fact of citizenship to their children born here than would the above noted Ivan Doe or Juan Roe have to pass on their ill gotten gains to their children.This concept has not been tested in the Courts; But, it should be. After all, the 14th Amendment was designed to deal with slaves who had just been given freedom and NOT immigrants.


The intent of that Amendment had nothing to do with the children of illegal immigrants. Any Executive Order or Act-Of-Congress would only return the law from its unwarranted expansion by Judges."making law from the bench" to the meaning of the Authors of the 14th Amendment.

Tuesday, October 30, 2018


Intent Of 14th Amendment's Authors


Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which drafted the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14thAmendment by stating:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."


This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."
The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.
(Underling added)

Friday, March 31, 2017

Proposed Constitutional Amemendments



Concerning Immigration & Citizenship: Persons who illegally enter the United States or illegally remain there after a legal entry or who have falsely applied for citizenship may be immediately removed from the Nation or confined until removal upon only evidence of of those illegal actions. The children of such persons are not citizens of the United States by reason of their birth in our nation but have and maintain the citizenship held by their parent(s). (This article protects the value of lawful citizenship in the USA and is consistent with many nation's laws.)

CONCERNING LIMITING JUDICIAL ACTIONS: A. Any judicial decision limiting or overturning an act of the Congress as executed by the President is limited to the judicial district or circuit in which it was made until confirmed by The Congress or The Supreme Court Of The United States; B. Any decision of The Supreme Court Of The United States may be reversed or nullified by a two-thirds vote of the House Of Representatives; C. All decisions of the courts of the United States shall use the intent of the authors of Constitution, its amendments and the Laws of the United States as the basic authority and source for such actions. (These provisions return constitutional power to the People and their democratically elected representatives as taken from them by individual or small groups of unelected judges.)

Thursday, March 17, 2016

President Jefferson On The Constitution

On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed." [Please specially note that the term "trying" was used as in "boiling down" something (eg Whale blubber or the Constitution) to obtain what the actors wish (eg Whale oil or perverse decisions by judges "making law from the bench"; About which "trying" please see the novel Moby Dick.]

INSULTING PRESIDENT JEFFERSON: Anyone who diminishes Jefferson's statements must first:
1. Demonstrate their equal or greater contributions to our Republic; And,
2. Be subject to an intense-forensic study of their entire life as to sexual or any other crimes.

Dealing With Terrorists

There is only  way of stopping mass shootings or other (As presents "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily injury) threatened acts of terrorists.. That is having our fellow, law-abiding, legally presumed sane and courageous, adult, citizens have immediate access (eg By concealed carry) to modern firearms "put down" such dangerous animals.

It is usually the case that police will not be on-site to do so. (In a few cases, the police have been unwilling to do their duty.)

Anyone who is opposed to such laudable possession and use-of-arms is an advocate for all criminal-terrorists.

The leaders of religious communities must remember that self-defense is a "Natural Law" right. [Some maintain that the defense of innocent others is a like and a religious duty.]

Christians should consider The Christ's command as declared in Luke 22:35-38 (http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2012/07/luke-22-35-38-different-view.html). Sikhs should look to their history of going armed to defend themselves and all others from criminal attacks---Especially those based on religion. Jews should remember: Babalonian Talmud; Sanhdren 72:1---"If someone comes to kill you, get up early and kill him first".