Friday, April 20, 2018

Herr Robert Mueller III Vs. ALL.Privileged Communications

The acts of Herr Robert Mueller (Gestapof├╝hrer) has now caused the FBI (aka KGB) to seize the once "privileged communications" of an attorney.

We may now expect other such Fascists to force the release of like-privileged knowledge of:
1. Loyal wives or husbands;
2. Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Social Workers and other such civil counselors whose help for others demands privacy of much information received and sometimes put down in writing;
3. Confidential information given journalists (ie Especially as to public officials); And,
4. Communications given, in confidence, to Pastors, Rabbis, Priests and other ministers-of-religion.

It appears to be either improper or illegal or "too political" for our President to "fire" Mueller [Please note that I did not support Mr. Trump's campaign until his democratic (Without "Super Delegates) and honest (Without the fraud inflicted by H. R. Clinton on her Party) nomination].

However, Mueller and his co-actors (In the criminal justice meaning) must be removed from their positions by one or more of the following means:
4. Attorney General Sessions doing so by fiat; Or,
5. Attorney General Sessions ordering a Special Prosecutor to investigate their actions and, upon evidence received, make a "presentment" to a Grand Jury as to probable charges of "Violations Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" or "Fraud"; Or,
6. The Congress taking such actions as "Impeachment" and trial OR removing operating funds from those tyrants; Or,
7. Other means not known to me.

THE FAILURE TO DO THIS WOULD BE: AN ATTACK ON ONE OF THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLES OF LAW IN OUR DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC; AND, EVIDENCE OF GROSS COWARDLYNESS BY OUR ATTORNEY GENERAL OR MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS.

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Today's Real Danger To USA's Blacks


The real danger to our Black fellow citizens and legal immigrants, does NOT spring from:
1. Some fool wearing "Blackface" or posting like images on-line and on-campus; OR,
2. The small share (> 0.5%)) of White Americans who can, rationally, be described as "Nazis" or like, mentally deranged, persons; Or,
3. Those Americans of Chinese ancestry who, as a racially identified group, have suffered historical, race-based, abuse (Some by murder) and have left that behind to generally achieve superior academic performance [ie To the extent that some universities (eg Harvard) have been acting against them due to that success] and like success in other areas---And, an almost zero rate of imprisonment or being murdered by members or their own race or being shot by police.

The real danger the USA's Blacks comes from those Black thugs who murder (Quickly by misuse of guns and slowly by illegal drugs), rape and prostitute, rob and otherwise attack, insult and diminish other  (Chiefly law-abiding and innocent) Blacks. (Those critters also select-out, on the basis of race, White victims at rate many, many, times the reverse.

Those delusional or destructive Blacks who cast blame at the first two groups cited above and are:
4. Ignorant of the facts; Or,
5. Are, for their own profit or over-developed sense of self-worth, stirring up inter-racial hate and mistrust; Or,
6. Are so full of self-hate or racist-hate as must be removed from any attention or respect by others.

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

The AR-15---A Citizen Needed “Weapon Of War”




The "AR-15" is short-hand for all semi-automatic-only long arms with magazines holding more than eight-rounds. That (Such) weapons have be decried as "weapons of war" by opponents of the fullest exercise by citizens of "the right to keep and bear arms" (Without "infringement).

Although I do not own such a firearm, I will accept that application---And approve of it on the basis of the following points.

1. The "AR-15" is the ideal weapon to resist the war-like attacks of home-and-business invaders, those waging Jihad and other dangerous thugs as: It  is much more accurate at the usual self-defense distances of 30-feet or less than are hand-guns; Its light weight and recoil make it more suitable for women and trained youths to use in the home/business defense of self and innocent others; And, its "round" will tumble when hitting walls or criminals---And, not go through them to kill or injure other persons at great distances as do, for example, the "30-30" round so common in hunting rifles.
2. Its (Their) large magazines allow the usually-needed three rounds to "put down" some thug and for the (According to reports on home invasions) multiple such critters.
3. As Islamic-Terrorists are now waging war (With both guns and bombs) in the USA, that such war-weapon allows citizens (During the usual too-long wait for effective police action) to have a "war weapon" which allows them some chance of defeating those orthodox Muslims waging Islam's commanded "perpetual war" (Jihad) against those "unbelievers" who are 99% of our fellow citizens.
4. Possession of large numbers of such weapons by law-abiding and sane (Unless declared otherwise, for each challenged citizen, by a court-of-law after a full "due process hearing) citizens provides a safeguard against government tyranny as so properly feared by the Founders of our Republic as exampled by the below quotes.
A. "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE ARMS.” "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (President Thomas Jefferson)
B. . “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Their swords and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birthright of an American. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.” (Emphasis added); “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms (Tench Coxe; Member of The Continental Congress and, later, constitutional scholar and author). [Emphasis added]

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Method For Lowering Handgun Murders


FBI: Handgun Murders Dropped when These States Abolished Concealed Permit Requirements


FBI crime report figures show that Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming–three states that abolished their concealed requirement years ago–have since witnessed a decreased in handgun murders.

This runs completely counter to the left’s doom and gloom predictions whereby they claim doing away with a government-issued carry permit will mean more bad guys carrying guns, more shootings and violence, etc.
FBI figures published by the NRA show that Alaska’s handgun murder rate “declined after the state enacted permitless carry in 2003.” Moreover, in the years since Alaska’s permit requirement was abolished “handgun murders have declined as a percentage of the total number of murders.”
A drop in handgun murders also took place in Arizona after that state abolished its concealed carry permit requirement in 2010. And in Wyoming–which abolished its permit requirement in 2011–handgun murders have declined as well.
A total of 12 states have abolished their concealed carry permit requirement. Those are Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming, and West Virginia. And Arkansas and Montana recognize permitless carry in the vast majority of their states too.
Republican lawmakers in Michigan and North Carolina are currently pushing to abolish concealed permit requirements in their states. Gabby Giffords’ gun control group is opposing these efforts by ominously warning that “almost anyone could carry a concealed, loaded gun in public” if the permit requirement is abolished. In reality, the only people who would legally be able to carry without a permit are those who could now meet the legal threshold to carry with a permit. And gun controllers’ hand wringing ignores the hard evidence that permitless carry led to lower handgun murder rates in Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming.
AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of “Bullets with AWR Hawkins,” a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

Sunday, April 08, 2018

"Gun Insurance"

The proposal to require "Gun Insurance" of those law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizens who wish to "keep and bear arms" is an unconstitutional "infringement" on those rights which should be protected by Amendments II and XIV to our Republic's Constitution as they limit those rights by income (This would be parallel to the "Poll Tax" as has been declared unconstitutional!).

Friday, April 06, 2018

National Defense Zone On Southern Border

As an "Old Navy Hand" I recall that there were and are places, including along our nation's shorelines, as exclude citizens and other unqualified persons, from entry. Although most of these areas have been or are used for "live fire exercises" other such zones (Unless my memory has failed me) were for other national security reasons.

I must wonder if such a zone can be established North (eg 1000 yards) from our border with Mexico:
1. Would declare its residents and their ("Checked out") guests, employees and agents as authorized persons;
2. Would be under only military law (By Act Of Congress) as would exclude the jurisdiction of civilian courts;
3. Might not be in urban areas where the Border Patrol could saturate those places;
4. Provide commissioned officers of our Armed Forces the authority to arrest unauthorized persons found in those zones and to use enlisted personnel to do so;
5. Authorize, if not require, them to force across our Southern border any persons entering those zones from the South---And, to use any level of force to do so; And,
6. Authorize, if not require, them to immediately use lethal force against any persons "presenting a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" against members of our armed forces or authorized civilians in those zones.

Sunday, April 01, 2018

Alternatives To Knives Or Guns---Updated

Since police are often unable (Or is it unwilling?) to protect the People from criminals, those potential victims should take measures to protect themselves. As too many officials (Especially very "political" Police) appears to frown on citizens having readily accessible firearms or, even knives, to do so, I suggest that the People keep ready and use one or more of the following: Gas or elastic powered fish spears; Ordinary harpoons; Maces or "War Hammers" of the many historical varieties; Home made (Liquid Petroleum Gas) flame throwers disguised as walking sticks OR other "innocent" objects; Sling shots"  with steel ball bearings as projectiles; Chain saws; Lead shot filled garden hose sections; Chinese style repeating cross bows; Batons plugged into wall current OR (Disguised as walking sticks or other "innocent" objects and with today's high discharge-rate batteries and capacitors) with sharp prong electrodes to jab into thugs; Old style "zip guns" using sharpened flooring materials as projectiles; Packets of red pepper dust to be followed with boots and clubs (The Maori and Iroquois have some nice designs); "Nail Guns"; And, any number of other improvised weapons.