Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Catholic Teachings On Immigration---And Limits To It

Today, the following information was brought to my attention.

"Catechism Of The Catholic Church (No. 2241)
The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various judicial conditions especially as to the immigrants duties towards the company of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of those who receive them, to obey its laws and assist in carrying out civil burdens". (Bold-face and italics added)

1. The term "Guest" excludes invaders.
2. The noted laws include, in the USA, our democratically-enacted immigration laws and, secondarily, derived and formal policies and regulations. 
3. Respect for our Republic's "spiritual heritage" excludes such acts as: Waving the flags of foreign nations while illegally entering the USAFlying such foreign flags over or instead-of the USA's flag in public forums; And, most horrid of all, destroying or insulting that flag in public places.
4. "Assistance in carrying our civic burdens" includes, but is not limited to, the following: Not working at less than the legal minimum wage which depresses the income of the poorest of America's citizens and other (eg Legal) immigrants; Immediately reporting to the police all observed criminal actsPay all taxes due all units of our governmentsLearn the English language and the basic laws and history of the USAAnd, most of allinsure that their children be taught those subjects and learn to respect them.

At this time those who hate the USA are vomiting out statements about the rights-of and ignoring the duties-of (Illegal) immigrants.

Sunday, June 17, 2018

Immigrant's Tears & A Modest-Scientific Proposal

Over the last few weeks I have been all but drowned in the "tears" of children separated from their also illegal immigrant mothers (Or other offenders) who are violating our democratically enacted immigration laws.

Yet, I have not been even slightly moistened by the tears of the survivors of murders, other homicides (eg By reckless use of guns; Drunken driving) robberies and other life-destroying crimes inflicted by illegal immigrants (ie Who do execute such crimes against innocents at rates much higher than our Republic's citizens and legal-immigrants).

Since some (Many?) of those "children" (Some found to be 19 years-of-age) are not related to those bringing them into the USA AND very many "illegals" do not appear for "Immigration Hearings", I made the following, science-based, proposal.

All presumed illegal immigrants, adults and children, should have the usual (Non-intrusive) DNA sample taken upon first apprehension by any immigration or other authority before further processing OR, for five years, for those deported from the USA. Those DNA records would also be checked against DNA samples provided by law enforcement agencies. Those tests would/must be "coded" as to any claims of family relationships. Any false claims, as established by DNA tests, would result in the confinement of all lying adults (Age 17-years and above) until removal from the USA. The same confinement and condition would be, in future times, be applied to any other persons who have been previously deported OR who have failed to appear for required hearings.

PS---I amThe son and grandson of legal immigrants who followed our laws to enter our Nation; And, a veteran of dangerous military and (Paid and unpaid) civilian service directed towards the protection of Americans.

Saturday, June 16, 2018

That "Moderate" Tennessee Iman


So-Called “Moderate” Muslim Imam In Tennessee Advocates Extermination Of All Other Religions



by Shoebat Foundation on April 28, 2015 in General
By BNI: If you’ve ever wondered why the citizens of Murfreesboro, TN fought so long and hard  against construction of a mega-mosque in their city, but sadly lost, this is why. A prominent Muslim Imam in Tennessee teaches students that “Jews & Christians are filthy, and their lives and property can be taken in jihad by Muslims” in America.

Right Wing News  Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi, a Memphis Imam based in Tennessee, preaches openly about what Islam truly is. He makes no bones about thinking that anyone other than a Muslim doesn’t deserve anything and are less than Muslims. In fact, part of Yasir Qadhi’s preaching includes rhetoric that says non-Muslims lives are forfeit and their property is legal for Muslims to take in jihad, (and this would include women as sex slaves) Recently Yasir Qadhi said that “Jews and Christians filthy, their lives and property can be taken in jihad by the Muslims.”

Yasir Qadhi is not only a Memphis Imam, but is is also the Dean of Academic Affairs at the Al-Maghrib Institute. He is a hafiz (has memorized the Qur’an) and he has an M.A. in the Islamic Creed and a B.A. in Islamic Sciences from Islamic University of Medina, as well as a master’s and a doctorate in Islamic Studies from Yale. During a lecture on Shirk, or polytheism, Yasir Qadhi said that Jews and Christians are mushrikoon, or polytheists, because they have made partners with Allah. From Yasir Qadhi’s perspective, only Muslims are monotheists.

He also claims that it is the responsibility of every single human being to bear witness that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah, and him alone. Now pay attention here. Yasir Qadhi now will tell you what the result and command that stems from this twisted principle. “And it is because of this same principle of monotheism that the prophet has been commanded to doJjihad.”

So where are all the leftists protesting “hate speech?” Is the NSA watching this homegrown jihadist or does he get a pass because he is a Muslim ‘scholar?

Immigration And The Chirst---Updated

A prior (Since removed from office for "gross misconduct") Cardinal-Archbishop of Los Angeles and many other Catholic “leaders” have made claims that Jesus the Christ would have supported open-borders and free immigration into the USA.


That is a lie!

First, Jesus' kingdom was NOT of this world. How do I know? He said so himself! There is very little in the Gospels with direct application to government as opposed to the great number of verses addressed to the redemption of individuals and preaching His Word to the nations.

The most direct statement as to government was the classic “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's”. At the time of Jesus citizenship and residency in the Empire did, in fact, belong to Caesar and the Roman Senate. Through time that, in the USA, has passed to the Congress 

Thursday, June 14, 2018

I WAS A Democrat

Feb 25, 2017 


 I was a Democrat in the days of such great-and-honest men as President Harry Truman and Member of Congress Clement Zablocki.

 For only that reason I listened to today's "Victory Speech" of Mr. Tom Perez, the new Chairman of the DNC. I had hoped that Democrats would return to the reasoned policies and practices of such honest men as cited above. That would help bring all Americans back together from some extremists in the GOP and the "far out" drive of the Democratic (sic) Party' "leadership" to leave behind our ConstitutionThe Bill Of Rights and our "exceptionalism" as based on the best principles of Western Civilization (In turn based on the best of Judeo-Christian teachings and evolving away from earlier primitive practices).


I am sorry to report that I heard a speech as out-of-contact with reality as the "Victory Speeches" ranted-out by Adolf Hitler as the shells from Soviet cannon were hitting Berlin. Mr. Perez' speech had the same qualities of hysteria and pathological divorce from reality as did his earlier, hopefully unintentional, model.


He even, while calling for his Party's efforts in winning State elections, did not dare to admit that the GOP has steadily been winning control of State Houses and State Legislature   against the efforts of a Party moving so far from traditional American values as to be in another universe, "far, far, away".


 The Democrats elected (By mob acclamation) Keith Ellison-Muhammed as "Deputy DNC Chair". That Islamist has, as far as I know, never rejected-and-condemned the horrid, anti-civilization and unalterable teachings of Islam as command "perpetual war" (Jihad) against all "unbelievers" (99% of our fellow Americans) and allows or encourages or commands the use of murder, rape, torture, genocide, banditry and other horrors by those waging Jihad.


They would have done better to place Jabba The Hutt in that "Deputy Chair" position---Or, in the primary Chair.


 If I were more Republican than American I would thank the Democrats for insuring future GOP victories outside of our two "Left Coasts" as are under Fascist occupation.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Jefferson On The Constitution---Updated

        President Jefferson On The Constitution

On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed." [Please specially note that the term "trying" was used as in "boiling down" something (eg Whale blubber or the Constitution) to obtain what the actors wish (eg Whale oil or perverse decisions by judges "making law from the bench"; About which "Trying" please see the novel Moby Dick.]

Insulting President Jefferson

Anyone who insults President Jefferson must: First demonstrate his/her equally great or superior contributions to our Republic; And, be subjected to a forensic examination of their life as to sexual-offenses OR any other crimes.

Thursday, June 07, 2018

Due Process On Campuses

  1. Right to a timely AND sufficient-time prior (Written)notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; The  Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony ;or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to a timely “due process” hearing to prevent the departure of witnesses or deterioration of other evidence;
  3. The right to have legal counsel present at all hearings and such council allowed full and active participation in all proceedings.
  4. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted) AND to personally OR by counsel cross-examine those witnesses.
  5. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  6. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  7. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions if a public institution is involved (OR to to the highest authority in a private organization).

These were the rights given to convicted criminals facing revocation of probation/parole by Wisconsin's Department Of Corrections. I fail to understand why universities will not provide the same “Due Process” to students facing in-school disciplinary actions. (Where guilt or probable cause was found by a court-of-record, some of these rights were not given.)
ALSO:  RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNCIL IN UNIVERSITY DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS:  
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDACASE NO: 9:16-CV-80850-ROSENBERG/BRANNON
JOHN DOE, Plaintiff v. LYNN UNIVERSITY, INC., A Florida not for profit corporation, 
 Lynn University, Defendant

Free Speech On Campuses

The first quote provided below is from Professor Eugene Volokh's editorial as published on May 11, 2017 by The Washington Post.


"The Supreme Court has made “crystal clear” that the government may not discriminate based on viewpoint, even in limited public fora such as university open spaces (or for that matter even university programs for funding student speech). Lower courts have consistently struck down campus speech codes aimed at supposedly bigoted speech. See, e.g., Dambrot v. Central Michigan Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1184-85 (6th Cir. 1995); DeJohn v. Temple Univ., 537 F.3d 301, 316-17, 320 (3d Cir. 2008); McCauley v. Univ. of V.I., 618 F.3d 232, 237-38, 250 (3d Cir. 2010); Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason Univ., 993 F.3d 386, 388-89, 391, 393 (4th Cir. 1993); College Republicans v. Reed, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1010-11, 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2007); Roberts v. Haragan, 346 F. Supp. 2d 853, 870-72 (N.D. Tex. 2004); Bair v. Shippensburg Univ., 280 F. Supp. 2d 357, 373 (M.D. Pa. 2003); Booher v. Bd. of Regents of N. Ky. Univ., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11404, *28-*31 (E.D. Ky. 1998); UWM Post, Inc. v. Regents, 774 F. Supp. 1163, 1165-66, 1173, 1177 (E.D. Wis. 1991); Doe v. Univ. of Mich., 721 F. Supp. 852, 856, 864-66 (E.D. Mich. 1989). And in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010), the Court gave students’ freedom to “express any viewpoint they wish — including a discriminatory one” as an example of “this Court’s tradition of protect[ing] the freedom to express the thought that we hate” (quotation marks omitted). There is no First Amendment exception for “hate speech” or “racist signs, symbols and speech.”.

Why An "Electoral College" & Voter Fraud

Why we have the Electoral College. 

In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation? 
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense. 
Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood. 
There are 3,141 counties in the United States. 
Trump won 3,084 of them. 
Clinton won 57. (let that sink in) 
There are 62 counties in New York State. 
Trump won 46 of them. 
Clinton won 16. 
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes. 
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) 
Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton won 4 of these counties; Trump only won Richmond) 
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country. 
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. 
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles. 
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election. 
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country! 
And...it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment. 

Voter Fraud

The counties noted above are notorious for the exercise of voter fraud. In California there is a possible-to-probable inclusion of "illegals" voting.

Monday, June 04, 2018

Face Recognition, Race, Crime & Democrats

      It has been reported that the "Congressional Black Caucus" is essentially against Amazon's "facial recognition technology". Some of their co-actors complained that this will only aid what they claim is "over policing" of Blacks and "undocumented" (ie Illegal) immigrants.

      It is a fact that Blacks commit (On the basis of their share of the general population) more crimes, more serious crimes and them more often that Whites and almost infinitely more than those of Chinese ancestry.  I suggest that the cited caucus' real motive is a fear that such technology will remove more Black criminals (And "illegals?) from the open community---AND FROM BEING VOTING PARTS OF THE DEMOCRATS' POWER BASE.