Monday, July 30, 2018

The Best. Persecuted, Immigrants For The USA

After considering all of the arguments supporting the USA's taking in alleged victims of terrorism (From Central America)as refugees (ie Most of whom are not literate or not literate in English and are a "clear and present danger" to our stressed social systems) I suggest that we and very quickly offer refugee status to those non-Black (ie Boer and "English") victims of murderous Black racism in South Africa. 

After all they are known as hard-working and (Even most Boers) literate in English, educated, skilled workmen, willing to obey such just laws as are the general rule in the USA (Outside of our West Coast and New York State) and most unlikely to include Islamist terrorists or nation-destroying (eg As in Venezuela) Socialists among their members.

As the "leaders" of the USA's Blacks support the uncontrolled immigration of job-stealing and income-suppressing Latino "illegals" (Whose primary victims are poor Blacks), there should be no rational objections to these South African immigrants who are unlikely to do anything but improve our Republic.

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Why Simple, when with a little effort. . . "---Court Decision On Guns


Although I approve of the ruling in the above-cited case I maintain that the judges were closely following the maxim, "Why simple, when with a little effort, it can be made so beautifully complicated".

All that was necessary was to state:
1. The Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution is directly founded on the intent of the Founders (B);
2. Subsequent restrictions, by laws or regulations, on the rights of law-abiding and legally presumed sane citizens [ie Above the age of 18-years] to keep and bear (Modern) arms, without infringements, are unconstitutional. and serve only in the interests of those favoring racial or political enslavement of our fellow such citizens.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

Trump, Putin & China

Joseph Stalin was a genocidal, insane, pervert. He was the second most horrid man inflicted on the world during my lifetime. Yet, Franklin D. Roosevelt (And many others) made common cause with him against the more immediate threat of the worst such critter---Adolf Hitler.

From all reports Vladimir Putin is a cunning man and retail murderer. However, he is:
1. No greater a liar than many national leaders (eg Obama);
2. Not someone intending to found a political dynasty as opposed to many (eg The Kennedy and Bush families); And,
3. Is a Russian patriot more than some of our Presidents (I name no name) have been American patriots (eg Who have, very directly, aided and abetted inter-national terrorists and other enemies of the USA).

I certainly hope that our constitutionally elected President Trump (Or his cohorts) understand and have reminded President Putin that his nations most dangerous enemy is "The Peoples Republic Of China" which:
4. Looms over a border with Russia;
5. Since 1929 has fought many, "unofficial", mini-wars against Russia ;
6. Represents a clear-and-present danger to Russia by its support of North Korea's nuclear-armed dictator; And, 
7. Has been, as far as I can tell, very interested in the undeveloped resources of Russia's Siberia.

We should not "trust" President Putin or his inept efforts to interfere in the USA's political processes (eg As have been likewise failures in the case of Obama's efforts against "Brexit" and opposing Israel's Prime Minister).

The USA will benefit from finding some common cause against the often genocidal and always aggressively expansionist PRC [Which has been waging economic war against the USA for many years and is expanding it military forces at a horrid rate for no good for the USA, Russia, Vietnam (Which has been resisting Chinese aggression for hundreds of years and to this era) and many other nations.]

Those liars and America-haters in "The Resistance" and among RINOs (And even some real Americans) appear to not understand the above. Some of them wish for such immediate "success" from President Trump's contacts with Putin as is a demand for "instant gratification"---Which is arch-typical of infants and criminals.

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

The "Why" Of Those Who Oppose Judge Brett Kavanaugh

There are many who are vomiting out objections to the appointment of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to a position on The Supreme Court Of The United States. Their motives appear to be very various.

Among those motives are:
1. A fear that a Mr. Justice Kavanaugh will apply our Republic's Constitution in accordance with the intent of the authors of it and its amendments;
2. That fear extends to such probable rulings as will call halt to those tyrannical judges who "make law from the bench" and, much more horridly, amend our Constitution without going through the democracy-based amendment process required by that, most basic, law and, thereby, keep the most basic power in the hands of THE PEOPLE;
3. Those who fear that Judge Kavanaugh will be a part of a too long delayed SCOTUS ruling that our law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) fellow Americans have a right to "keep and bear arms "without "infringement" in the accordance with the views of such Patriots as: Presidents Washington, Madison, Jefferson; Benjamin Franklin; Patrick Henry; Samuel Adams; And, George Mason (Who feared such internal tyranny as is now the case in California and New York and maintained that a well armed citizenry was the best defense for our righs);
4. Those who hate such Christians as Judge Kavanaugh who prove their Faith through the fruits of good works as quietly given to family, community and the World; And,
5. Those that fully understand that they are inferior human beings when compared to Judge Kavanaugh.

SCOTUS, Trump & "The Right To Petition"

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    "The right to petition is protected by the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.
    In the United States the right to petition is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which specifically prohibits Congress from abridging "the right of the petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
    Although often overlooked in favor of other more famous freedoms, and sometimes taken for granted, many other civil liberties are enforceable against the government only by exercising this basic right. The right to petition is regarded as fundamental in some republics, such as the United States, as a means of protecting public participation in government."
    There are those who attack President Trump's use of suggestions, for judicial nominations, from the Federalist Society as being enslavement to a "far right organization".
  • Those suggestions are, in fact, an example of the execution of the above-cited and most basic constitutional right.
  • The "grievance" addressed is the making-of-law and amending the Constitution from the bench by those judges who would take that power from The People as executed through their democratically elected representatives.

Monday, July 16, 2018

The Suppression Of Mobs

This is in response to Chicago's riot of this week.

Mobs are, as such, a probable “clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others..
When such mobs are armed or commit such dangerous crimes as “Arson” (eg Both evident at Berkeley in recent days) they clearly demonstrate and multiply that “clear and present danger”---And justify the police or any good citizen to use any level of force (Including deadly force) to suppress that danger.

In fact, the failure of police (Or, if called up by Governors who understand their duties, the National Guard), to fire upon such extremely dangerous mobs as both individuals (ie By snipers under the direct control of a command officer) and by volley-fire in the case of any group attack is a gross neglect of duty.

Of course, free (ie Armed) citizens can assist the police by "marking" such and other violent criminals with holes [eg .222', 9mm, .32' (The diameter of "OO" buckshot),
.38', .45'].

[For general information, the hard touch of a triangular file to the lands of a gun's barrel and the lighter touch of a flat file to the firing-pin and extractor of such will negate the usual forensic information.]

[The above possibility of citizen actions may well be the reason that the mis-leaders of the Democratic (sic) Party have taken the lead in attempts to deprive our fellow citizens of modern-and-effective firearms. "Putting down" such dangerous animals is likely to reduce the Democrats power base.]

Thursday, July 12, 2018

A Cowardly SCOTUS

The Supreme Court Of The United States has, again, refused to review ( SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFF SILVESTER, ET AL. v. XAVIER BECERRA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 17–342. Decided February 20, 2018.) as to another attack on that part of The Bill Of Rights as should protect the ajudicated-and-individual rights of citizens to "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").

As a (Self-declared) "Avocational Historian" I suggest that SCOTUS is avoiding confronting this matter as they realize that it would require them to confront the intent of the Founders of our Republic and their legal reasoning as to that constitutional right as the primary test for rulings (As our Constitution does not contain any provision for "evolving standards" outside of its own provisions for amendment).

They might also be required to address the question: "Are there any constitutional grounds to deny those (Law-abiding and presumed sane) citizens, from 18 to 21 years of age any constitutional rights including those under the 'Second Amendment'?" 

The Congress should address those issues by such legislation as enforces this and other provision of The Bill Of Rights---Especially against: Judges "making law and amending our Constitution from the bench" as such Fascists as misrule California.

All should remember that depriving a citizen of this, individual-constitutional, right can legally only be done by a court of record, after a full "due process of law" hearing as would find each, individual, citizen too criminal or too dangerously mentally ill to "keep and bear arms".

                                 VERUM ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

Tuesday, July 03, 2018

SCOTUS, Religious Test & Defense

It appears that there are those (eg Democrats, Atheists, Tyrants) who will attack President Trump's nominee for a seat on The Supreme Court Of The United States:
1. On the basis of that most-excellent person's religious faith (If any);
2. With special regard to the case of Roe v. Wade.

Article VI (Clause 3) of our Republic's Constitution forbids any (Emphasis added) "religious test" for such positions as a Justice of SCOTUS.

It appears likely that some such opponents of our Constitution will, during hearings or debate, on such nominations attack (ie Probably by carefully composed, but indirect, questions)  any faithful nominee on their religious beliefs regarding abortion. 

The chairman of the Senate committee or sub-committee considering such a nomination must, instantly, rule any such questions illicit, forbidden and out-of-order upon the authority of the noted and exact prohibition provided as cited-above.

It is not allowable to excuse so ruling on the basis of "Senatorial Courtesy" or the informal customs of the Senate's "Old Boys/Girls Club".

Sunday, July 01, 2018

Lessons From Annapolis Newspaper Shooting

The domestic terrorist who shot up The Capital Gazette [Annapolis (MD)] newspaper office was able to murder five and wound two of our fellow citizens:
1. With a legally purchased and commonly had hunting weapon; And,
2. In police saturated Annapolis where it only took about one-minute for them to arrive [Uncommonly rapid for almost all the USA).]

If, and only if, one/more of those journalists had ready (ie Concealed carry) access to a modern and effective firearm, they might well have popped-up and put all rounds (eg Best with hollow point bullets) into the head of that monster---Reducing the "body count".

[At age 70-plus I self-trained and that within 40-hours, with a semi-automatic handgun, to: At the common distances in such offices; Charging, side-to-side, at the target; And, placing seven of eight rounds in the head of the silhouette target. An experienced instructor could do that training in less time. (A very few hours each month are required to keep up those skills).]

Since most of "The Media" and governments dominated by Democrats (eg Maryland) are intensely opposed to our law-abiding and legally presumed sane citizens having such ready access and such modern weapons, the staff of The Capital Gazette were offered up on the bloody altar of "Political Correctness". That betrayal of reality ignores the fact that the defensive (Often by "mere" display) use of guns by those good Americans prevents harm to innocents at a rate many, many, times that inflicted by criminal misuse of firearms.