The New & The Old Socialists

As some of the "New Democrats" describe themselves as "Democratic SOCIALISTS" we should all remember the "track record" of the following persons who began or described themselves as socialists: Adolf Hitler; Joseph Stalin; Mao; Pol Pot; Fidel Castro; And, the current and penultimate, tyrannical, rulers of Venezuela.

We should look at those "track records" as to: Assassinations; Show trials; Torture; Genocide; Starvation of their people while remaining well fed with the best foods; Destruction of free speech and academic freedom---As parallels their taking modern weapons away those who might be opposed to them or their night-raiding police; And, attacks on Christianity in those nations where it previously existed and supported some, better, levels of morality and justice. 

In fact, we must examine those new "Democratic SOCIALISTS" to see which of those goals they support or, in fact, have already begun attacking.

PS---"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it". (George Santayana)

A Co-Equal Commander-in-Chief

The President Of The United States. acting as "Commander-in-Chief", has powers which cannot be reversed or limited by the Courts of the United States except, perhaps, by the Supreme Court Of The United States,

That is, no jumped-up District Court judge or Circuit Court Of Appeals judges is have the power to restrain-or-enjoin POTUS acting in that capacity.

That is, if POTUS declares a "State Of Emergency" and invokes his powers as Commander-In-Chief, he should and must ignore any contrary-or-countermanding orders from courts lower than SCOTUS while performing those duties for the physical protection of the citizens, sovereignty and the common good of our Republic. As far as SCOTUS is concerned, POTUS may "consider" its orders.

After all, the powers of "Commander-in-Chief" are established by our most basic law, our nation's Constitution. The performance-or-execution of those duties are NOT some violation-of-law; But, an affirmation of the apparent intent of the Founders and beyond the authority of those judges who "make law from the bench" or, worse yet, amend that Constitution without going through the prescribed and democratic amendment procedures.

Those persons or organizations who physically attempt to interfere with such lawful orders must be placed under arrest by our military and tried under military law (ie With first appeals only to the "Military Court Of Appeals and only thereafter to SCOTUS.)

Congress, the other and co-equal branch of our national government, has the authority to impeach, try, convict and remove from office any President for gross violations of that basic law or other-and-specified violations-of-law.

Life Before Columbus

It appears that the average life span for male members of the "First Peoples", in the Americas, was about 26-years (Lower for women as is common in all early populations). The following factors, among others, seem to be basic to those "short, dirty and dark" lives:
1, Periodic periods of starvation as common to hunter-gatherer and marginal-farming societies (eg As based on one crop---Potatoes or Corn);
2. Deaths of women and new-born children aggravated by both such lack of proper foods and that same poor prevention of death as was, also, common in the West until c. 1900;
4. The most primitive of medical care as was also common in Europe until about the same time; And,
5. War and genocide as evidenced by such events as: "The dark and bloody ground" between the Eastern Northern and Southern First Nations; And, the "Flower Wars" of the "Aztecs" as were waged to allow its priests to rip the hearts of many thousands out of living humans or, skin alive, girls.

Since Columbus and others coming to The Americas, from Europe, were totally unaware of the nature of infectious diseases (ie Which, like, "The Black Death") also killed many of them. In fact, that plague killed off a very large part of Europe's population Lacking that knowledge Europeans had and do not have any moral guilt for those diseases which killed First Peoples.

Europeans did bring to the Americas: Better medicine; Better variations-in and distribution-of foods; The basics of Science as already was germinating in Europe; Such music and other arts as were welcomed by those First Peoples; And, perhaps greatest of all, LITERACY. (Before Columbus there were NO "vibrant" cultures in the Americas, but only very STAGNANT cultures and societies which, with the possible exception of the murderous "Aztecs", were NOT civilizations.

LEST WE FORGET, THE "FIRST PEOPLES" WERE ALSO IMMIGRANTS INTO THE AMERICAS.

The Sin Of Bishop Joseph Foy

I have considered the knee-jerk and condemnatory response of Covington (KY) Bishop Joseph Foy (And the Principal of his diocese's high school) to the carefully-and-maliciously edited story about the interactions between the very Catholic students in Washington and those Black racists who attacked them and a lying member of some band of the USA's "First Nations" who has joined in the more general attack on those, most excellent young men, truth.

That Bishop was, most exactly, "Bearing False Witness"! He joined with those who oppose the Church and would destroy it.

Islam NOT A Relligion

1. Islam is NOT a religion; But, is a criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology not far
different from the KKK or Nazi-Party (Sharing the same principles of hate-of-Jews and all real religions, use of violence and the other horrors taught in Mein Kampf and the Koran;
2. Islam (Like the KKK, Mafia and the SS brand of Nazism) has/had a very thin veneer of religion;
3. The false-prophet Mohammed (Who was a murderer, liar and treaty breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child) declared perpetual war against all "unbelievers" (Until they join Islam or accept the slave-like state of dhimmitude), a war which continues in our era in the Sudan, Thailand, parts of the Philippines,,Fort.Hood and New York City on "9/11";
4. Most Mosques are, to some extent, funded by the most regressive, medieval and anti-civilization branch of Islam (ie Wahhabism) and use that sect's hate literature, much printed in Saudi Arabia;
5. Lying to "unbelievers" is one of the standard and common responses of Muslims to any questions, about their ideology, from "unbelievers", including before the Courts in the USA whose authority Muslims do NOT recognize;
6. Muslims "behave themselves" ONLY until their part of any local, regional or national population reaches certain levels (eg France; "Londonistan"; the Nordic nations; Dearborn, Michigan);
7. The true believers of Islam must believe that the words of the the Koran are directly from its Allah (Not the same as Arabic speaking Christians) and, along with the sayings and examples of Mohammed, are totally binding on them;
8. The declared goals of Islam include: The destruction or effective suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all real religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslims; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.
9. The allowed, approved and too often commanded methods of Islam and Muslims to achieve those goals include: Murder and mutilation; Rape and enslavement; Genocide;
Perpetual war with "unbelievers" until they become Muslims or accept the slave-like state of "dhimmitude"; Lying to "unbelievers" as the approved and commanded tactic of Muslims as to "pointed questions" regarding Islam; AND, the consideration of any resistance to or complaints about Islam as an attack which the "faithful" are required to counter-attack, very often by physical attack.

16 Democrats Who Support A Terrorist Organization

A very long time ago I enlisted in the US Navy and found myself in one of the six most dangerous (Enlisted grade) specialties. Later I performed (Paid and unpaid) civilian duties as involved physical risk above that of most Americans. Both were directly had for the protection of my fellow citizens (And legal immigrants) against foreign and domestic enemies.

The "Council on American-Islamic Relations" (CAIR) has previously assisted the transfer of money from the USA to Islamist terrorists. To the best of my knowledge that organization has never admitted-to or apologized-for that attack on our Republic. The leaders of that organization should have been charged with "Treason".

Like other Muslim organizations and "leaders", CAIR has never condemned the horrid and unalterable commands of the Koran as are EVIL.

Now, sixteen leading (ie "Possibles" for a nomination in the next presidential election) Democrats have endorsed-and-supported CAIR.

For myself, I strongly assert that any veteran of dangerous military or civilian service who votes for any of those sixteen will have insulted self AND all those who protect the USA from ordinary criminals, other terrorists and other dangers.

All Democrats should  publicly ask their Party's candidates and officers if they support those sixteen betrayers of our Nation.

YOU CAN, WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT, IDENTIFY THOSE DEMOCRATS.

Rep. Steve King Punished For Being Truthful

TO THE GOP LEADERSHIP:

It has been reported that Representative Steve King has been stripped of his committee assignments for:

1. Telling the truth about our Western Civilization (Or what is left of it) as was invented, nurtured and developed  by White humans; And,

2. Having some minimal contacts with questionable persons who are also opposed to those who would destroy that core of our national and personal beings.

I expected AND expect our (Your???) Party to not surrender-to or adopt-the deceit inflicted by "the other Party" and such other enemies of truth and The People as: CNN; The Washington Compost and The New York Slimes; Such supporters of (Please forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorism as Keith Ellison, CAIR and Rashida Tlaib; And, such supporters of other terrorism as AntiFa and Maxime Waters.

By punishing Mr. the GOP is adding to what is becoming universal deceit. Even the Socialist George Orwell noted "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act". 

Now, the only reason to support our Party is that the alternative is too horrid to allow.

Now, I suggest (Demand) that Mr. King be reinstated in his House assignments AND formally praised for telling the truth.

DearAmericanMuslim

Dear Mr. American Muslim:

This note, with the definition below, is being sent to you in response to your presumed claim to be a “Moderate Muslim”. If you are indeed such a person, then you will have no problems falling within the definition of “Moderate Muslim” given below.

“MODERATE MUSLIM” DEFINED

1.A person who makes a very public proclamation that s/he is a Muslim along with giving out his/her name, address, occupation and place of employment.
2.A a person who then makes a very public OR on-oath rejection and condemnation of all of the teachings within the Koran, Hadith, Sharia and other Islamic teachings which allow or encourage, and sometimes command, the use of murder (eg Killing anyone who “insults” Mohammed or the Koran), rape and enslavement, genocide (eg Killing all Jews), perpetual war with “unbelievers” until they submit to Islam, lying to and stealing from such “unbelievers” and the very inferior legal and social status given by Islam to all “unbelievers” and all women.
3.A person who then demands that all such teachings be stricken and removed from the Islamic texts noted above.
4.A person who then very publicly inks-out of a copy of the an all those verses which support the above noted, inhumane and anti-civilization acts.

Of course, you would be much more believable, as to your claim of being a “Moderate Muslim” if you would very publicly state the historical truths that Mohammed of Mecca and Medina was a murderer, bandit, liar and treaty-breaker and the sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child.

Now, are you a “Moderate Muslim” or a standard-and-dangerous follower of the ideology called Islam with all of its differences in teachings from the Faiths of the Jews, Christians, Baha'i and Sikhs?

Curiously yours,

James Pawlak

Certain "African" Immigrants Needed By USA

In recent times some, in my nation, had proposed that the USA "needs more immigrants from Africa".

That is agreeable to me---If, and only if, the ability of individual immigrants to positively contribute to the "Common Good" of the USA is emphasized and group selection is favored, we should look for populations who have a culture or tradition as has already produced educated, knowing our English language and with a cultural commitment to obeying such laws as are democratically enacted.

Two such groups can be found in South Africa. They are the Afrikaners and those known in that land as "The English". At this time those peoples are being persecuted and even threatened with genocide.

Therefore, the "Africans" we should intensely encourage (And recruit), as members of  identifiable groups, to immigrate into our Republic should be from the two, best qualified, African groups noted above.               

PS---I can, again, expect that some will call me a "Racist". However, I am a "Culturist" who knows those committed to the best of what remains of Western Civilization have-made and will-make a better USA----By legal immigration.

HISTORIC NOTE/QUESTION: Some have claimed that the original inhabitants of that land were not "Black", but of another indigenous (Yellow hued skin) race, and that Blacks were driven South to SA by other and more aggressive Blacks not too long before the Afrikaners went inland.

Religious Test---NOT

It has been reported that Senators M. Hirono & K. Harris are proposing that any association with the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations is a block to confirmation as a United States Judge.

If, and only if, any Fascist Members of the Judiciary Committee would present that violation of Article-VI, Clause-3 of our Republic's Constitution during hearings on those nominated by POTUS, the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee must rule that "line of questioning" is not allowed upon the authority of the above-cited provision.

Such violations of the Constitution must not be excused by "Senatorial Privilege" or any other practice. We might consider that such questions are "a violation of civil rights".

The Right To Defend Vs. Fascist Critters

Tonight, Mr. Tucker Carlson listed-and-described some who have physically and economically attacked and injured those who exercised the constitutional right of "free speech" and that without injuring other persons. Those Fascists have not been "punished" for their attacks.

Among those were the following:
1. An employee of a very, very, powerful corporation who was fired for a mild disagreement with those controlling that company;
2.A university professor driven off campus by mobs which the police failed to confront-and-control, and later forced, by such threats and lack of protection, to resign his academic position (Because he disagreed with Anti-White racist actions);
3. A teacher who was fired after, respectfully, refusing to use one of the several "pronouns" demanded by people  who claim to be one of the 50-plus "sexes"(sic) now in vogue; And,
4. A teacher who used a lock-on-chain to strike and injure those whose views he disliked as did result in an arrest but not a trial in spite of video evidence showing him inflicting "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" on others who were not physically attacking him.

The last case, in the lack of effective action by "the criminal justice system" could be solved by the use-of-arms (ie  Modern and effective firearms instantly available for self-protection and the protection of innocent others) by law-abiding, presumed sane and courageous citizens who would have "put down" that dangerous animal. [That attack was in one of the States who are misgoverned by Democrats who are the prime actors attempting to suppress the individual rights under the Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution. Mr. Tucker's home, with his terrified wife alone-at-home, was also attacked by a mob. That mob-action is in the District of Columbia which is the most tyrannical opponent of allowing citizens the means to defend themselves against such and other criminals (Those police did not arrive in time to arrest those thugs.)]

The other crimes should be a matter of great concern to: POTUS who should instruct the (New) US Attorney General to (Civilly or criminally prosecute the offenders); Some private organizations which will now defend Americans from Fascists (As did the ACLU which has now become the "American Christian Loathing Union").

Lacking effective actions, by those agencies, the only recourse is to follow President Jefferson's prescription: "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE ARMS.”

As Jefferson did not foresee private organization with the income and power grater than some nations, his instruction applies to those Fascist cess pools.

I also note that AntiFa is NOT active in such States as Texas and Wisconsin which have many thousands of citizens licensed to carry concealed weapons---And, do so.

                  VERITAS ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

Commander-In-Chief, The Border & Emergency Powers

President Trump (And any POTUS), as "Commander-in-Chief" of our Armed Forces, has the authority to:
1. Declare parts of our border with Mexico as "Military Exclusion Zones" (Or such security sites as "Area 51") and restrict, with the use of lethal force allowed to maintain security, unauthorized crossings;
2. Provide for the "clearance" of residents and their guests and employees to be in such places;
3. Move our regular troops, reservists and National Guard (Military police, combat units and other personnel) to those places to prevent the illegal entry-into and passage-through those places; And,
4. To place those areas under military law (eg As civilians are on US Navy ships) with violations of the UCMJ to be by courts martial, with appeals to the "Military Court Of Appeals" before any appeal to SCOTUS.

It would be best to limit such actions to those wild areas as cannot be effectively controlled by the "Border Patrol"or other civil authorities. This would allow those non-military forces to be focused on: Airports; Seaports; The arrest, detention, prosecution and expulsion of those aliens who have overstayed or otherwise violated (eg Working and stealing jobs from Americans) the conditions of visas; More intense scrutiny at the usual places of entry.

I still maintain that all  "barriers" to illegal entry into my nation be supplemented by four-plus rolls of "razor ribbon" (aka "Barbed tape").

Funds for such actions could be had within DOD (eg By reducing "Flag Officers" to a much smaller portion of military personnel).

Defending Against Horrid Attacks On Border

In recent days Federal agents have been subject to such attacks (eg Thrown rocks, bottles and dangerous fecal materials) from across our border with Mexico. The attacking thugs have put women and children near or in front of them as human shields.

THOSE ATTACKS PRESENT "A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER OF DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM' TO AMERICAN CITIZENS! THEY FULLY AND LEGALLY ALLOW THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE TO STOP SUCH ATTACKS.

For myself, I recommend that high towers be built at the appropriate places to support a sniper, spotter and a command officer. Such persons would identify, target and kill those attacking US citizens from inside Mexico.

If the Mexican government does not want shots fired into that nation's (sic) territory, then it is the absolute duty of it to use its police and army to immediately-and-effectively stop those attacks.

[I, again, suggest/demand that: Five-plus rows of "razor ribbon" (ie "Barbed tape") be added to any "wall" or "barrier"); And, (Applying the authority of the President as "Commander-in-Chief") set up "military exclusion zones" in the wild-parts of that border where military law would apply and our troops ordered to use all force necessary (ie Including shooting, without warning, any armed invaders) to repel all invaders of the USA.]