A Theoretical Note On Fuel Air Bombs

On a purely theoretical basis, I understand that taking an agricultural, high-pressure, large-volume-output spraying apparatus, filling the "pesticide" tanks with light fuel oil, using "liquid-petroleum-gas" rather than air as a carrier, spraying such into the largest room of a large building and then suddenly igniting that cloud (eg With a flare-or-rocket from the type of projector often found in ships' life-boats) will result in the destruction of that large building.

Now, what made me think of this?

Perhaps, it was the usual floor plans of certain buildings used by a well-known,international and 1400-year-old criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology
(eg As planned for downtown New York City and Copenhagen, Denmark).

Select Reading List On Islam

NOTE BENE: If you wish this list sent by email to you, for easier access,please send a request to me a jamespawlak1@gmail.com

(1) Blog: Crusader Knight
Post: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2011/03/islam-dhimmitude-and-freedom.html

(2)    A review of the book
Allah Is Dead: Why Islam Is Not A Religion. (You might find it “convenient” to read the last chapter, a summary, first before attempting to plow through the basic text.)

(3) Post: "The Closing Of The Muslim Mind": A Book Review
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/09/closing-of-muslim-mind-book-review.html

(4) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(5) Post: "Moderate Muslims"???
Link: < http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/08/moderate-muslims.>

(6) Post: Islamophobia???
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2008/07/islamophobia.html


(7) Post: John Q. Adams On Islam & Christianity
Link:

(8) Post: Islam & Like Religious Veneer Terrorist Groups
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/10/islam-like-religious-veneer-terrorist.html

TO OBTAIN EASIER ACCESS TO THESE REFERENCES YOU ARE WELCOME TO SEND A REQUEST, WITH AN EMAIL RETURN ADDRESS TO ME A "james pawlak1 (at) gmail (dot) dom.



                
======================================================================

Forensic Examinaiton Of Documents

To be honest,and as a non-birther, I am appalled by the lack of scientific knowledge as to the (Forensic) examinations of such documents as birth certificates AND the reliance on other-than-scientific evidence by news reporters, commentators and other "folks".

A real examination and proof of validity-or-forgery would require at-the-least:
1. A chemical examination (Requiring only very, very, small samples) of the questioned document and, if applicable, eleven or so before-and-after it in any bound-collection; And,
2. Comparison of the handwriting on that document to the hand-writing of the same persons on similar and other documents from various sources.
3. Careful examination of the type-cases and impressions on relative documents.

As to newspaper "birth announcements" it would be necessary to do the same for hard-copes of old news papers presented as "real". (I do wonder if those which date back more than 20-years are kept in any style other than easily changed electronic records.)

Of course, any records of a VIP (With access to highly skilled persons and the power to buy or otherwise obtain the needed procedures) could be altered by "creating a legend".

A Warning, Wrath & Obama

Can anyone produce any example of Mr. Barrack H. Obama doing anything in the areas of foreign relations and use of our military which has done anything except embarrass and weaken the USA?

He has: Insulted or betrayed our once best allies of the United Kingdom, Poland and the Czech Republic; Weakened us in the eyes of the well source of terrorism and asymmetrical warfare in this world, Islam, by his "Cairo Speech" and bowing down to the effective leader of that ideology, the King of Saudi Arabia; Continued the prior administrations' (Both parties) in maintaining a top-heavy military plagued by too many "political" admirals and generals; Involved us in a third war, in an Islamic nation, without consideration of the end results of that poorly considered action, which may very well be the turn over of that nation to our worst enemies rather than its misrule by a previously cowed dictator; Allowed, Communist China to wage electronic and economic war against the USA without taking such actions (eg Not forcing that arrogant nation to regularized the value of its currency And, other like acts of stumbling error.

In addition, he (Along with some prior administrations) raised our national debt to a nation-destroying level and most certainly appears to have no intention of not continuing that internal war against the People of our nation.

Mr. Obama has (Like prior presidents) failed to take such actions along our Southern border as would effectively stop the flood of job thieves, bearers of untreatable diseases
(eg Drug resistant TB), previously deported "gang bangers", AND heavily armed "hit teams", kidnapping squads, drug smugglers, terrorists and other such scum. This has become much more critical in the last two years by reason of the stresses on our economic well being AND the reported increase of "undocumented" persons of Middle-Eastern origin. Those Americans living on that border are being put in daily and deadly danger from the lack of security in those areas.

Mr. Obama has been too much aided in the above offenses by too many Members of the Congress, most in his own Party, but also those RINOs who have been corrupted by too many years "inside the belt-line".

If this continues all political leaders, most specially those who continue to support the above and dangerous behaviors, will do well to FEAR the wrath of the People and, perhaps, that of our Legions (Who will be supported by their fellow citizens).


SOME RELEVANT QUOTES
(1)
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (George Santayana)

(2) The piece – whose authenticity is admittedly open to question – is attributed to “Centurion Marcus Flavinius, Second Cohort, Augusta Legion to his cousin Tertullus in Rome.


“We had been told, on leaving our native soil,” wrote the centurion Marcus Flavius to a cousin back in Rome, “that we were going to defend the sacred rights conferred on us by so many of our citizens [and to aid] populations in need of our assistance and our civilization.” For such a cause, he and his comrades had willingly offered to “shed our quota of blood, to sacrifice our youth and our hopes.” Yet the news from the homeland was disconcerting: The capital was seemingly rife with factions, treachery and petty politics. “Make haste,” Marcus Flavius continued, “and tell me that our fellow citizens understand us, support us and protect us as we ourselves are protecting the glory of the empire.”

“If it should be otherwise, if we should have to leave our bleached bones on these desert sands in vain,then beware of the anger of the legions."


(3) Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam!

Islam VS Democracy---Again

From today's news we were informed that, in an apparently fair election, the People of Nigeria reelected their Christian president over a Muslim opponent. The result was riots, gun fire, an externally forced prison break and other violence by Muslims.

At least those Muslims are consistent in following the teachings of Mohammed as to Muslims to be ruled only by Muslims. They also reinforced the predictions, based on
the percentage of Muslims in any given jurisdiction (eg Somalia, The Sudan, Dearborn, Michigan), given by at least one scholar. (1).

This was no reaction only by some small sub-class of "extremists", but the predictable reaction to be expected of Muslims who are any appreciable portion of the general population, which should be known to all who study history.

Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam! (2)

NOTES
(1) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(2) Post: "Mecca Delenda Est"--The Why & How
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/01/mecca-delenda-est-why-how.html

Creating A Personal "Legend"

In the world of espionage there is the concept of a “legend” a created personal history based on: Real facts; Modified facts; And, most importantly, invented facts by such means as faked documents and inserting them in both public and private record bases. Where that cannot be done, it is not unheard of to eliminate or block-block access to them.

For example, if I had the money and political power I might be able to create a new identity for myself by such means as: Inserting birth certificates in county, state and hospital records; Inserting birth announcements in newspapers' “morgues”; Blocking access to such by use of the laws regarding them; Blocking access to claimed school records by misapplying the laws allowing such confidentiality as forbid schools from even acknowledging that a person attended or did-not attend a school; And, like techniques.

Does this bring anyone to mind?

Oh Hell: Let's Offend Everyone!

Q. What's the Cuban National Anthem?
A. Row, Row, Row Your Boat.

Q. Where does an Irish family go on vacation?
A. A different bar.

Q. What did the Chinese couple name their
tan, curly-haired baby?
A. Sum Ting Wong.

Q. What do you call it when an Italian has
one arm shorter than the other?
A. A speech impediment.

Q. Why are there no Muslims in Science Fiction TV shows and movies?
A. Because: There were none in Mohammed's flat-earth Arabia; "Allahu Akbar" does not translate into Klingon; Islam has no future; And, there are no goats in outer space.

Q. Why aren't there any Puerto Ricans on Star
Trek ?
A. Because they're not going to work in the future either.

Q. Why do Driver Ed classes in redneck schools use the car only on Mondays,
Wednesdays and Fridays?
A. Because on Tuesday and Thursday, the Sex Ed class uses it.

Q. What's the difference between a southern zoo and a northern zoo?
A. The southern zoo has a description of the animal along with a recipe.

Q. How do you get a sweet little 80-year-old
lady to say the 'F' word?
A. Get another sweet little 80-year-old lady to yell, 'BINGO!'

Q. What's the difference between a northern
fairytale and a southern fairytale???
A. A northern fairytale begins, ...'Once upon a time...'A southern fairytale
begins, ... 'Y'all ain't gonna believe this shit.'

Q. Why doesn't Mexico have an Olympic team?
A. Because all the Mexicans who can run, jump or swim are
already in the United States ?!!!!

AND, AS A POLE, MY FAVORITE---
Q. How did all the Pollacks get here?
A. Two swam over and the rest walked over on the scum.


OH shut up ... just pass it on!.....

Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note

DURIE, Mark; THE THIRD CHOICE: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; (Forward by Bat Ye'or);
Deror Press; ISBN 978-0-9807223-0-7.

This work presents Islam in a rational, logical, well foot-noted and dispassionate manner as leaves it free of any hint of “Islamophobia” and other forms of bias. It could and should be used as a basic text in any courses, touching on Islam, in: Anthropology; Sociology; Comparative legal systems; Political Science; History; Social Psychology.

Muslims are likely to reject and resent this work as it clearly illuminates the “disinformation” (ie Lying) used by them to hide the dark side of Islam, its founder, teachings and collective behaviors over the last 1400-plus years.

I suggest that any public figure who speaks or writes on Islam and Muslims, once notified of this work, who does so without reading it is lying-to-self and all who hear or read their offerings AND join in the basic Islamic tactic of “disinfomation”.

Ideal Affirmative Action Candidate

The ideal candidate for California's or other jurisdiction's affirmative action discrimination programs IS a: Hispanic surnamed, Black, Lesbian, sex-changed, "female", "kill and immediately eat red meat fanatic", substance abusing, dishonorably discharged military vet, parolee, with one leg, a glass eye, a very repulsive skin disease and bad breath, who is now unemployed after being fired from "her" prior position as a Priestess within a San Francisco Satan-Worshiping congregation for being "too evil"and was previously expelled by the University Of California-Berkely (Political Science Major) AND from all local political organizations and Mosques for being "too radically leftist" or too violent

Will The National Guard Teach My Children

"Will The National Guard Teach My Children" was a sign carried, I assume by a teacher, among the other noisy and noisome mob in and about Wisconsin's Capitol Building.

In fact, that is a most excellent idea---If we would expand it to retired military and those who have completed their rehabilitation for war-wounds. These men and women, many of whom have university degrees or their equivalents or such experience in what are known as "the trades" as would allow them to teach the academic-of-vocational classes assigned to them.

Much more importantly, they could-and-would teach the true value of duty as a balance to and prerequisite to both priviledges (As union bargining, driving an auto) or true rights (eg Voting, keeping and bearing arms, free speech and free practice of religion).

It might be very good for that more-than-zaftig teacher to be replaces by a lean ex-trooper (Perhaps without legs as replaced by steel devices) who is very interested in the real future of American by teaching duty-and-responsibility, in addition to academic/vocational class materials. This is the real meaning of being an American. Certainly, our future voters should learn those subjects and the "price of freedom".

Olive Branches & Limits Of Compromise

On Feb. 26, 2011 the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel offered the editorial "Offer an oliver branch" as advise to Wisconsin's Republicans. This editorial suggests that Wisconsin Republicans compromise with the Legislature's Democrat Senators. As the Editors pointed out, this would NOT be a reflection of what Democrats did, two years' ago, when the People reelected that Party to control of our State's government and a tax increase bill was inflicted, without debate, on Wisconsin by Democrats.

Keep in mind: Compromise with a child's (Or the wearers of jail-house-orange shirted mobs') tantrums only encourages more of the same; Compromise with law breakers (eg Street criminals, unlawfully absent teachers and State Senators) does the same; Compromise with pirates (As in Somalia), dictators (eg Hitler) and other evil men only encourages them to expand their evil.

This is based on both the evidence of scientific psychology and the examples of history. (To paraphrase: Those who do not study, learn from and act upon the lessons of history will be condemned to repeat it.)

In other words, there is a boundry between "compromise as the "life-blood of politics" and illicit, asinie and crime-producing compromise. The noted editorial encouraged the latter.

Christ & Self-Defense

Jesus the Christ sent his disciples out without any possession to spread "The Good News" (Luke 22:35). Upon their return and (Can we assume?) because of what they experienced on that earlier expedition on the dangerous roads and among the contentious people of Israel and surrounding areas, He had other instructions and commands for them.

Among those other commands was that they should do every thing possible (Including selling their most basic garments) to obtain swords. When his disciples presented him with the two such weapons they had, He said: "They are sufficient" or "They are enough" (Variation by translation for the balance of Luke 22:35). Since the Christ was NOT sending out armies to reestablish an independent Israel (A disappointment to some of his followers), two swords appeared to be "sufficient" to protect his law-abiding followers on their travels.

Now--I have read a variety of interpretations of these verses which all appear to be pathological pacifists' misreadings of plain text. Some have claimed that Jesus was being sarcastic or ironic or using a parable--Without any proofs of that and in opposition to the most direct statement and the usual parable-style of His other teachings.

Others have claimed that Jesus, the "Prince of Peace", would not support the arming of his followers with swords (The AK-47s or AR-15s of that era), conveniently forgetting his whipping out of the money changers in the Temple, his words about child abusers and Judas and the frequent Words about the punishment of evil doers and unworthy servants.

Yes--He did teach peace and "turning the other cheek"--To insults. However, there is nothing in the Gospel teaching that anyone should submit to such criminal attacks as murder, rape, robbery, genocide (The use of which are supported by the Koran, Nazi ideology and practices and the injustices inflicted by other tyrants now and throughout history),

We should also remember: The advice of St. John the Baptist to the soldiers, which was NOT to give up their swords and profession; The writings of St. Paul as to the State's authority to use the sword to punish wrongdoers; And, the very clear advise of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (In his De Laude Novae Militae) as to waging war against those who attack Christians (Muslims in his time and, as likely as not, in our time).

Pathological Pacifists Worshiping Death

In recent months I have had many contacts with a couple who I can only describe as “pathological pacifists”. These individuals BELIEVE that it is against the teachings of Jesus the Christ to offer any resistance to evil doers, even murderers, rapists, child-molester, arsonists, the Jihad-waging followers of the false prophet Mohammed and others of that ilk. They BELIEVE that no Christian should ever, never, use deadly force to resist those monsters.

I could not get them to directly address the Christ's acts and words of violence. Most specially I could not get them to directly address Jesus' absolute command to his disciples to arm themselves with swords (The AK-47s and AR-16s of that time) as noted in Luke 22:36-38; Two swords being enough to protect the disciples on the bandit infested roads of that day, yet not enough to give the impression of any attempt to set up a worldly kingdom.

Those pathological pacifists, in fact, worship death and, doing so, are no better than the Thugee of India, the blood cultists of the Aztecs Hitler's SS and, most specially, those who follow the teachings of the Koran.

Teach Intolerance!

Today I noted some return address labels, in my collection from various charitable organizations, which read "Teach Tolerance".

Rather I would prefer such as state "Teach Intolerance!"! That is, teach intolerance of murder, genocide, rape, enslavement, perpetual war, those who oppose real science and creative arts, equal and Natural rights for all humans and the like.

In other words, teach intolerance of Nazism, Fascism, Atheistic Communism AND, especially in this era, Islam (As there are no declared "moderate Muslims").

Oh, I threw the noted labels away.

Congress & GOP Leading By Example---NOT

Buried in today's paper was an article noting that the Congress has proposed a cut in its budget much smaller than that proposed for the other parts of our government.

Now that the Republican Party has control of the House Of Representatives, out of which all money spending Bills must come, there is no excuse for this horrid example of "do as I say and not as I do" anti-philosophy.

I will "believe" that Republicans are sincere and effective about controlling our Federal government's spending when they initiate and force through such measures as would: Reduce their salaries by 10% until such time as we have a balanced budget without borrowing money; Require Members and their staff to pay "fair market value" for such fringe benefits as retirement, health insurance, hair cuts, meals in the Congress' restaurants and the other like "goodies" they get; Require members to cut their staff budgets by 10% (Same condition as above; And, without "out-sourcing")

The House can also cut the number and grossly over-pay of Federal bureaucrats; And, should start with Mr. Obama's Czars who are not subject to the same Congressional control as the already in-place Department Secretaries and Under-Secretaries.

Any refusal by Democrats will make good "ammo" for the GOP's use in the 2012 election. Refusal by Republicans would provide the "other Party" with far too much like "ammo".

I will believe the effectiveness of "Tea Party" organizations when they make very public either parties' Members refusal to go along with such measures

Effective Use Of Military To Secure USA Borders

I strongly disagree with the statement that we have "tried everything" to secure our Southern border against the flood of drug dealers, terrorists, gang-members and paroled prisoners returning here after prior deportation, carriers of untreatable diseases (eg Drug resistant TB), job and identity thieves and such like unamerican trash.

One and untried method is as offered here:
1. Restrict the Border Patrol to urban areas and a thousand yards on either side of authorized, rural crossing points;
2. Allow anyone to cross into Mexico, without question, at any authorized crossing point or station;
3. Use four rows of razor ribbon coils In addition to the fences yet to be build and those sort-of in place along the entire border except for roads leading to authorized crossing points;
4. Make the balance of our border, for the first 1000-yards into the USA, a military zoneith posted notices in English, Spanish, Parsi, Arabic and local Native American languages that persons entering illegally there will be treated as invaders and will be shot, without warning if they are armed or resist arrest, and otherwise taken into custody for forced deportation or TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION.

The troops could be regulars (Some brought back from Europe whose countries appear unwilling to defend themselves), reservists, National Guard and members of the General Militia (Also ad hoc posses raised by Sheriffs, mayors, JPs and other local government officials)

Attorneys & GNP

It appears that the usually billed "services" of attorneys are included in the USA 's Gross National Product.along with those of dentists, physicians, landscapers and other independent craftsmen, legitimate massage therapists , and other like persons.

But, what do attorneys produce? Oh, there are some who defend the innocent, prosecute the guilty, insure a fair criminal or civil trial, arrange for the proper distribution of the property of those who have died and, sometimes, bring people closer together than otherwise.

But, too many (Most?) of attorneys in the USA feed off the overly complex laws and government regulations inflicted on the People; Laws-and-rules that they, for the most part, created as members of the Congress and other legislative bodies, as well as the administrative agencies that they dominate. Of course, they properly also control the remaining, judicial, branch of government (Although there are other models for oversight of the judicial process.)

We should ask the following questions and reflect on them and the probable answers.
1.. What part of our GNP is "services by attorneys"?
2. How does that compare with today's economic powerhouses of Japan , India and the People's Republic of China ?
3. How many words of laws and regulations are in-effect and put-into-effect in the USA each year VS. those other nations?
4. Would the People of the USA be better off if Attorneys were barred, by Amending our Constitution, from being Members of the Congress? (And allowing the Several States to do the same for their Legislatures?)

Guns 1000-ft From Congress-Critters: NOT+

With very rare exceptions I have agreed with and supported the positions Congressman Peter King has put forth! The only such exception I can think of is his very recent proposal to forbid the possession of a firearm within 1,000-feet of a Member of the Congress.

That proposal fails tests-of-reason, of which I have provided below a few.
1. Criminals and "crazies" do NOT obey such laws.
2. A thousand-feet is a "close in shot" for many trained riflemen such as the Texas Tower Killer and the left-wing goon who murdered President Kennedy.; Some riflemen can hit targets at over 1,500-yards.
3. "Gun free zones" quickly become "free fire zones" (eg Virginia Tech U., Northern Illinois University and, for that matter, Columbine High School, where the on-site police officer ran away from danger) The presumption of gun-free-status can lean to relaxed security.
4. As a matter of "due process", how could an apolitical hunter know than a Member in within a 1000-feet of where s/he might be?

I am very grateful that the Arizona killer did not use a vest/car/fuel-air bomb

Constitutionally Protecting The Constitution

The greatest internal danger to the rights, under our Constitution, of US Citizens lies not in revolutionaries, jihadi, dishonest politicians, but in those Federal Courts where the judges worshipTHE LAW and themselves far more than those rights and, most particularly, the intent of the authors of the constitution and of its later amendments.

Those judges have "discovered" rights not in the Constitution and not intended by the above noted authors. Those judges have established "evolving standards..." which are most certainly not in the Constitution. In both cases, the Constitution, itself, provides the means, by amendment, to do such things.

To constitutionally protect the Constitution from such abuses I suggest we look to President Thomas Jefferson for guidance and enact an amendment to our basic law, TO WIT:
" (A) In all decisions of the Courts of the United States judges shall declare those parts of the Constitution, as amended, upon which those decisions are based and consider the words and intent of the authors of the Constitution and its Amendments as the primary base for such judicial actions to the exclusion of all other views.
(B) Those courts shall not rely upon the decisions of courts or other bodies outside the United States as to the Constitution and laws of the United States and of the Several States.
(C) The Constitution is the sole authority for the adding to or removing of the rights of the People of the United States.
(D) This Amendment shall take effect upon ratification; But it is not retroactive in its force."

I put to you that this will return the authority and power of the Constitution to the People AND bring back into balance the power of the three branches of government.

Our Real State Religion

Forget that nonsense that there is a wall of separation between church and state in the USA. We have an official, growing and ever more powerful state religion. That religion is the Law---As made by judges, especially those in our Federal Courts. You think not? Please examine the present and probable future state of the law under our judges as if it were a religion. You will see the religion-of-the-law exposed in the facts.

Our law has a “holy book”, called the Constitution. Our judges claim that they cling to the teachings of that document; But, vary from it as much as did the Catholic and Protestant fanatics of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation varied from the teachings of Jesus Christ when they burned and murdered each other. The “priests” or “mullahs” of that religion are, of course, judges. The “High Priests” or “Grand Ayatollahs” are the Supreme Court Justices. Their “dogma” is set in their judgments. Our judges take the clear and simple teachings of the Constitution and subject them to “mystical interpretation” in an effort to make us think that black-is-white, up-is-down and truth-is-lies.

They claim to uphold the Constitution's protection of individuals, but had allowed children, at the point-of-birth, to have their brains sucked out of their little skulls to facilitate abortions (And still allow the dismemberment of such children)---Even when there is no threat to the life of their mothers. Those judges claim to only interpret our American Constitution in light of the democratically passed laws of the People's elected representative, but use the legal decisions of foreign nations in their making of laws. They ignore the provision in our Constitution for its amendment and declare that new “rights” exist without the consent of the People. They repeatedly inflict their own social and political judgments and show great disdain for democratically approved laws. They suppress the joined freedom-of-speech and free expression of religion by denying the People to present their religion by such expressions as posting or exhibiting the Ten Commandments or other like symbols on public land. [This last technique is one common to power hungry priest-hoods, which is to do every thing possible to suppress and destroy other religions.].

When the founders of this nation outlined our government in our Constitution, they set a careful balance between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. That balance has been seriously disturbed and the whole structure of our government now is moving towards collapse and the dictatorship of the judicial elite---Who care little for democracy. That balance must be reset. My suggestion to enact the following Amendment to the Constitution, which would give the Congress the power to correct the errors which have infiltrated our society by judicial usurpations.

The Congress of the United States may reverse or nullify any decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States or of the lesser Courts of Appeal by a two-
thirds vote of the member present and voting in either House OR by a simple
majority of the members present and voting in both the Senate and House of
Representatives. The vote of each member of the Congress in such matters is to
be separately recorded and immediately made public. Such matters are to have
priority over all other business of the Congress.

The recording and immediate release is to prevent the members of the Congress from hiding behind the curtain of voice votes. The granting of such matters absolute priority is to prevent such matters from being “buried in committee”.

Of course, the “bother” of amending the Constitution could be avoided by the confirmation of new Justices on our Supreme Court and judges to other courts as will NOT make laws, but only interpret them according to our State and Federal Constitutions and the intent of the People as expressed by the intent of their representatives who wrote those documents.

I also note that this “worship” of the “Great God Law” is only the face of “Secular Humanism” which, in turn, is the front or false-flag for the “religion” of Atheism. (Every court decision restricting the rights of “free exercise” of other religions is a blow for the USA's state religion of law, secular humanism and atheism.)


At the least, the Federal Courts have declared “Atheism” a religion (James J. Kaufman VS Gary R. McCaughtey et.al.; 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, #04-1914; Decided On
August 19, 2005)