There are those who maintain that even its Supreme Court justices should "recuse" themselves if some prior contributor to their election campaign(s) has some interest in a case before them.
What such proponents skillfully avoid is:
1. That position has been well known-to and apparently rejected by the People who cast their ballots for those justices;
2. Contributions are made to such campaigns not as an effort to buy/rent/lease justices, but because the citizens using money to express their "free speech rights" approve of the candidates' general philosophy on The Law or oppose their opponents' like stances;
3. Requiring some judges to so recuse themselves provides a default victory to their opponents; And,
4. Attempts to inflict such recusal is a Fascist effort to vacate the above-noted democratic acts of our fellow citizens.