Monday, February 13, 2017

Presidents Protecting Daughters

The "Hate Trump Lobby" has been attacked our democratically elected President's through his daughter as to her clothing line. 

Those critters are ignorant of the history of our presidents. (Although a Republican, I considered Harry S. Truman the best and most honest of the last century's presidents.) Music critic Paul Hume panned a concert preformed by Margaret Truman. The letter provided below was sent to Mr. Hume by Mr. Truman.

I cannot but wonder what rage would be provided by the DNC's slaves (The “Lame Street Media”) if President Trump would copy President Truman's declaration!

Of course, much of those professional-haters' attack are likely based on a well-deserved sense of inferiority based on their malfeasance as compared to the President's daughter's prior successes.

Of course, this is only one proof of their general ignorance and dishonesty as to democracy, the Constitution and the November, 2016 election (Where, outside of mob-ruled California, President Trump did get a majority of votes AND
other popular votes have increased and maintained the GOP's control over The Congress and as continues to march towards an even greater control of State Houses and State legislatures). 



THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
Dec. 6, 1950
Mr. Hume:
     I've just read your lousy review of Margaret's concert. I've come to the conclusion that you are an "eight ulcer man on four ulcer pay." It seems to me that you are a frustrated old man who wishes he could have been successful. When you write such poppy-cock as was in the back section of the paper you work for it shows conclusively that you're off the beam and at least four of your ulcers are at work.
Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!
      Pegler, a gutter snipe, is a gentleman alongside you. I hope you'll accept that statement as a worse insult than a reflection on your ancestry.
H.S.T.

The Democrat's "Main Stream"

 "BOTOX" Pelosi and other "leaders" of the Democratic (sic) Party continue to vomit out the term "Main Stream". She and those other, self-poisoned, Democrats have ridden their stream to a constitutional election of President Trump (With a majority of the popular vote if California were not counted) AND, what is much more important, based on popular votes:
  1. The GOP's ongoing control of The Congress; And,
  1. A steady Republican take over of the USA's State Houses and State legislatures.

As a Republican I must thank such critters (And their co-actors) for supporting the future victories of my Party.

The last time I saw-and-smelled a stream like unto the Democrat's “main stream” was during my one (And last) visit to the "Chicago Sanitary Canal" which dumps that city's filth (Unfortunately not including its armed gang members, Democrat administration and other criminals) towards the Mississippi River.


The election of President Trump allows of a new "Clean Water Stream" as will be the preferred "Main Stream" for the voyages of more voters to the only real polls to cast ballots for Republicans.

Tuesday, February 07, 2017

Adopt A Terrorist Letter

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your many letters as to our attempts to stop “unvetted” immigrants from that minority of Muslim-majority nations which produce so many terrorists.

President Trump takes these matters seriously and your opinions were
 heard loud and clear here in our nation's capitol. You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new department here at the Department of Homeland Security, to be called 'Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers' program, or L.A.R.K. for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new
 program, we have decided, on a trial basis, to divert several terrorists and place them in homes of concerned citizens such as yourself, around the country, under those citizens personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence in Monday.

Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud is your detainee, and is to be cared for
 pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. You will be pleased to know that we will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with your recommendations.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his 'attitudinal problem' will help him overcome those character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counseling and home schooling, however, we strongly recommend that you hire some assistant caretakers.


Since this immigrant refused to learn English you will be required to hire (At your own cost) a translator.

Please advise any Jewish friends, neighbors or relatives about your house guest, as he might get agitated or even violent in their presence, but we are sure you can reason with him. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless in your opinion, this might offend him. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills either in your home or wherever you choose to take him while helping him adjust to life in our country.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters except sexually,
 since he views females as a form of property, thereby having no rights, including refusal of his sexual demands. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him. If you take him to your cousins' farms, it would be best to keep him away from sheep and goats.

You also should know that he has shown violent tendencies around women who
 fail to comply with the dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka over time. Just remember that it is all part of respecting his culture and religious beliefs' as described in your letter.

You take good care of Ahmed and remember that we will try to have a
 counselor available to help you over any difficulties you encounter while Ahmed is adjusting to the culture of our nation,

Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you
 keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. Good luck and God bless you.


/Khachadour Garabedian, Director

L.A.R.K. Program

Friday, February 03, 2017

Muslims In American History---NOT

Muslims My Ass...                     

I want to shake the guy's hand that wrote this...

Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital?

Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?
Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?

Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?

Have you shaken hands with a Muslim Girl Scout?
Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?
The answer is no, you have not. Just ask yourself WHY ???

Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's history."

AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE

Dear Mr. Obama:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed?  Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?   Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the: United States Constitution?
Declaration of Independence ?
Bill of Rights?
Didn't think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England ?  No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ?   No, they did not.
In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery.  Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves."  Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?
Not present.

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era?
Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.   So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband.  Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they?

Where were Muslims during World War II?
They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?
If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East.  No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news network's that day.  Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America ....

Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates.  They were Muslims.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan .


Also, don't forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers. That, Mr. Obama is the "Muslim heritage" in America

Muslim Heritage, my ass!

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Revised Questions For Judicial Nominees

I have yet to read or hear the fullness of (Federal) judges or candidates for Federal elective/appointive offices (Especially to the Federal Bench) responses to the following questions.
1. Do you agree or disagree that the original Constitution of the United States could not be ratified without a Bill Of Rights, that resulting in the latter document being the first ten amendments to the first?

2. Do you agree or disagree with President Thomas Jefferson that the intent of the authors of the Constitution (ie As the above-noted "Package Deal") is to be considered when involved in interpretation of that document?
3. As to the Second Amendment, do your agree or disagree that we can clearly understand the intent of those authors be understood from the comments of Presidents Jefferson, Washington and Madison---And, the other patriots who established our Republic? (Provide copy to nominees!)
4. Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the "Shall Not Be Infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the strongest statement of a limit-to or prohibition-against Federal acts in violation of the above-noted "package deal"?
5. Will you obey or resist the ruling of the Supreme Court Of The United States in declaring the rights under the Second Amendment as due every citizen without regard to membership in  a "militia"?
6. Will you obey or resist that Court's making that ruling binding, through the 14th Amendment, on the States?
7. How (If at all) have Federal judges considered/addressed the noted "shall not be infringed" clause as contained in the Second Amendment to our nation's Constitution?

Islam's Teachings: Updated

Some Teachings Of The Koran

  verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25
SOME OTHER UNALTERABLE COMMANDS OF ISLAM
Listed below are a few passages from the Quran that clearly compel Muslims to violence.  
Quran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.
Quran 3:28   “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends
Quran 3:85   “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
Quran 5:33   “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.
Quran 8:12   “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran.
Quran 8:60   “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.
Quran 8:65   “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.
Quran 9:50   “When opportunity arises kill the infidels where you find them.
Quran 9:30    "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them.
"Quran 9:123  “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.
Quran 22:19  “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.

Quran 47:4    “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.

Dealing With Those Waging Jihad: Updated

The lessons of history and current events demonstrate that the only means of "communicating" with those Muslims waging Jihad is by the application of over whelming and deadly force as at: Tours (732 AD); Las Navas de Tolosa (1212 AD); Granada (1492 AD); Lepanto (1571 AD); Chocim/Khotym (1621 AD); Vienna (1683 AD); The USA's campaigns against the Islamist-Pirates of the Barbary States (1805-1815); Navarino (1827 AD); Israel’s various and defensive wars from 1948 on (Just in case you ask, I am not of the Jewish Faith nor do I have any financial interests in the State of Israel); Multinational mini-campaigns against the Islamist Pirates operating off the Muslim Sudan.

To these I add the most excellent shooting down of the worm who assassinated a ceremonial guard on Canada's Parliament Hill and by the armed citizen who shot down the Muslim  swine who beheaded a lady in Oklahoma!


THE ABOVE METHODS ARE THE ONLY EFFECTIVE MEANS OF COMMUNICATING WITH MUSLIMS WHO ARE INFLICTING JIHAD ON OTHERS IN STRICT OBEDIENCE TO THE UNALTERABLE COMMANDS OF ISLAM.



FROM George Santayana: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

New Dictator For DNC


Ms. Sally Boynton Brown (Idaho Democrat State Chair?) is a very active candidate for position of Chair of the DNC. She does, very exactly, represent the policies and "principles" of that Party as marched (Goose Stepped?) towards the constitutional election of President Trump and the even greater GOP victories in taking control of so many State Houses and State Legislatures.

Mz. Brown would, as head of the DNC, "shut White people down when they want to interrupt".  It appears that any White statements as to "Black LIES Matter" or other Fascist mobs would be a forbidden interruption under her rule.

Of course, Democrats do not have to vote for her. Instead they can support Keith Ellison Mohammed who (As far as I know) has very much refused to condemn the horrid commands of his ideology, Islam, as support/command perpetual war (Jihad), murder, rape, the sexual abuse of very young girls, torture, beating wives, exile and other forms of genocide and other like crimes.

As a Republican I must thank such critters (And their co-actors) for supporting the future victories of my Party.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Keeping Illegal Immigrant Families Together


Very early in the last century my father, then a child, legally immigrated into our Republic and that without any prior knowledge of English. Although his in-family language and much of his education was in Polish, immersion in our land quickly gave him a good command of English and laws, customs and mores. This is the basis of my comments as provided below.

There is no need to separate deported, illegal immigrant, families apart. The deported violators of our democratically-enacted laws need only take their children with them. Immersion in the culture of their parent's legal homeland will shortly learn that place's language and customs. (I suggest that the vast majority of such children of real families will have had that nation's language in daily use.)


It also appears that the laws of many (Most? Vast majority?) of other nations make the nationality of children that of their parents. Perhaps, the USA should do the same as to illegal immigrants---Even if, and only if, it requires an amendment to the Constitution. Of course, there are the questions: “Are illegal immigrants within the full jurisdiction of the USA as they, by that law breaking, avoided that status?”; And, “If that is the law, do their children automatically gain citizenship through the illegal presence of their mother in the USA?

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

(Left) Coast Vs. American Definitions

In  California                                        In Real America

Diverse or Lifestyle Choice                     Sinful and Perverted
Arsenal of Weapons                               Gun Collection
Delicate Wetlands                                   Swampland
Undocumented Worker                          Illegal Alien
Cruelty-Free Materials                           Synthetic Fiber
Assault and Battery                                Attitude Adjustment
Heavily Armed                                      Well-protected
Narrow-minded                                      Righteous
Taxes or Your Fair Share                      Coerced Theft
Commonsense Gun Control                   Gun Confiscation Plot
Illegal Hazardous Explosives                  Fireworks or Stump Removal
Nonviable Tissue Mass                          Unborn Baby
Equal Access to Opportunity                 Socialism
Multicultural Community                        High Crime Area
Fairness or Social Progress                   Marxism
Upper Class or "The Rich"                    Self-Employed
Progressive, Change                             Big Government Scheme
Homeless or Disadvantaged                  Bums or Welfare Leeches
Sniper Rifle                                           Scoped Deer Rifle
Investment For the Future                     Higher Taxes
Health Care Reform                              Socialized Medicine
Extremist, Judgmental, or Hater            Conservative
Truant                                                  Home schooled child
Victim or Oppressed                            Criminal or Lazy Good-For-Nothing
High Capacity Magazine                       Standard Capacity Magazine
Religious Zealot                                    Church-going
Reintroduced Wolves                           Sheep and Elk Killers
Fair Trade Coffee                                Overpriced Yuppie Coffee
Exploiters or "The Rich"                       Employed or Land Owner
The Gun Lobby                                   NRA Members
Assault Weapon                                  Semi-Auto (Grandpa's M1 Carbine)
Fiscal Stimulus                                     New Taxes and Higher Taxes
Mandated Eco-Friendly Lighting          Chinese Mercury-Laden Light Bulbs

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

"Due Process" Updated

Sunday, November 13, 2016


"Due Process" In Administrative Hearings



  1. Right to prior notice-of/access-to the: “Charges” against the citizen; Law/rules/regulations alleged to be violated; The names and other identifying information of all witnesses who have provided testimony or other evidence; Documents/physical-evidence as to the “charges”.
  2. The right to compel personal testimony of witnesses and to have that testimony given on oath/affirmation (Allowing for criminal or civil punishment for perjury/false-swearing if such is inflicted).
  3. The right to a hearing before a neutral hearing examiner.
  4. The right to a written decision from that examiner.
  5. The right to appeal any such decision to a court-of-law based on the facts, the law and state and federal constitutions.
When I was a "Hearing Officer" for a State "Department Of Corrections", these were the rights given convicted criminals for hearings as to revocation of probation or parole.

Certainly, the above should/must apply to "disciplinary" hearings conducted by universities/colleges!

Monday, December 26, 2016

White Racists---NOT (Updated)


Have you ever wondered why Whites are racists, and no other race is... 
  
Michael Richards, better known as Kramer from  
TV's 'Seinfeld' does make a good point. 
  
This was his defense speech in court after making  
racial comments in his comedy act.  
  
In it he raised a few interesting points...  
  
Someone finally said it. 
But how many are actually paying attention to this?  
 
======================================
  
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.  
And then there are just Americans... 
  
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.  You call me 'White boy', 'Cracker', 'Honkey',  
'Whitey', 'Caveman'...  And that's OK...  
  
But when I call you Nigger, Kike, Towel head,  Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook,  or Chink .. You call me a racist.  
  
You say that whites commit a lot of violence  against you...  
So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places  to live in?  
  
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.  You have Black History Month.  
You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah.  You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.  You have the NAACP.  You have BET...  
  
Imagine if we had WET (White Entertainment Television)... 
we'd be racists.    If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.    If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.    If we had any organization for whites only to  'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists. 


  We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce,  a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just  have the plain Chamber of Commerce.  
Wonder who pays for that???    A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but a woman of any color can be in the  Miss America pageant.  
  
If we had a college fund that only gave white  students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.  
  
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US ..  
Yet if there were 'White colleges',that would be a racist college.  
  
In the Million Men March, you believed that you  were marching for your race and rights.  
If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.    You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and  orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.  
But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.  
  
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.  
But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running  
from the law and posing a threat to society, you call  him a racist. 
  
I am proud... But you call me a racist.  
  
Why is it that only whites can be racists??? 
  
There is nothing improper about this e-mail...  

Monday, December 19, 2016

Ultimate Test For Free Speech On Campus

In recent months a University Of Wisconsin (Madison) Black student produced and sold "hoodies" printed with the phrase "ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACISTS"

If, and only if, a college or university allows all the below statements be posted or worn on clothing on campus AND will punish students or employees who physically attack those who post or wear them, then any such school values free speech and academic freedom; Otherwise NOT so.

(Please specially note that I may or may-not support the views expressed below, but provide them as a limiting test.)

CHINESE STUDENTS ARE GENENETICLY SUPERIOR TO YOU!

BLACK LIVES MATTER!

BLUE LIVES MATTER!

UNBORN BABIES LIVES MATTER!

ALL LIVES MATTER!

USA's BLACKS WERE FIRST ENSLAVED BY OTHER BLACKS:
THEY WERE LOSERS THEN---MOST STILL ARE

UNIVERSITIES WERE INVENTED BY WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES
(And Later Perverted By Inferior Others)

APRENDE INGLES O BESAME CULO!

MALE HOMOSEXUALS ARE DISEASE VECTORS

MOHAMMED WAS A SEX PERVERT

Politically Incorrect Model---Revised

Politically Incorrect Model For Blacks & ALL Others



Blacks should give up the very inferior model as described in Professor Thomas Sowell's Black Rednecks and White Liberals and which : Now supports “Victimhood”; Supports and honors those entertainers who support/advocate abuse-of-women and attacking police; (That inferior model is now being advocated by various, Democrat and Socialist, non-thinkers.)

Blacks and all others should follow the example of most Americans of Chinese decent who:

  1. Came to the USA as racially identifiable incomers, speaking very foreign languages, having “strange” social customs;
  2. After arriving here they were:Subject to legal-and-illegal attacks (Some fatal); Excluded from the vote and other civil rights; Lived (Some voluntarily as did Italians, Jews and my Polish grandparents) in “Ghettos”; And, were very ill-treated as serf-like and almost slave-like workers;
  3. After this they demonstrated their cultural superiority by: Dedication to deferring rewards (Avoiding the crippling, criminal/infant-like, demand for instant gratification) by hard physical and academic work (The latter leading to some universities discriminating against them for being “too qualified/successful); Cleaving to the support and other advantages of two-parent (One of each gender) families; Honoring scholars over criminals; And, Disproportionally avoiding violations of law; And,
  4. Earning the rewards of: Great academic success (With the racist reactions of some schools noted above); A disproportional awarding of Nobel Prizes (Especially in the apolitical areas of science); And, a disproportional and greatly lower part of the populations of our jails and prisons OR being murdered by members of their own race OR being shot by police.

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Dangerous Duty Before Public Employment

Of late there have been many who have objected-to or raged-at Mr. Donald Trump's (Who I did not support before his nomination by my fellow Republicans) selection of a number of retired generals for key-and-core members of his Administration.

Do those creatures also object to the historic involvement-in-government of such as: General George Washington; (Militia) Captain Abraham Lincoln; General Dwight D. Eisenhower; "Chief Artillery Officer" Henry Knox; Captain Harry S. Truman; And, the many other like persons who have served in government after putting their "lives on the line" in protecting all citizens from the enemies of the USA?

[In fact, I have recommended that retired Lt.Col. (And, ex-Congressman) Alan West be appointed as "Secretary Of The Army".]

As an honorably discharged veteran, who has been a "Public Servant", I am mightily insulted by the cited slanderers.

However, there are parallel and dangerous positions that can also and clearly demonstrated a potential public official's full commitment to the "Common Good". These include, but are not limited to, the following examples: As a
 police/peace officer (Especially in this time of targeted assassinations against them); Being a full-time or volunteer fire-fighter;Performing at-risk duty in the United States Coast Guard; Executing voluntary public-service work AND residence in high-risk foreign nations or such USA locations as the South Side of Chicago; Being a married women who voluntarily engender children---And, then properly raise, educate and guide them to true adulthood; And, other like sacrificial work.

Beyond the last item, it appears that all of the cited "work" is now available to the USA's adult females.

Such services seem to be largely missing from among: Members of the Congress; The faculty of universities and colleges; And, on the staffs of "The Media"!

Members of the Clergy have and can serve in such dangerous roles.

I must wonder how much of the noted objections and rage come out of a sense if shame over not performing such positive duties.

Friday, December 02, 2016

The Standard For Islamists

It appears that the most Islamist of  Muslims follow the below ideology.

Quote from Ayatollah Khomeini from 1942:
“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world…. Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers] Islam says Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us Islam says Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy Islam says Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”