Racism And The Dangerous Rayshard Brooks & George Floyd

I would be much more impressed by claims of “systematic racism”, especially by police, as proclaimed by so many Blacks if, and only if, Blacks were not so busy murdering each other at a rate many, many, times that of Whites murdering other Whites and almost infinitely more than those people-of-color whose ancestry is in such nations as China, Korea, India and Japan acting against “their own”.

In fact, the most systematic and dangerous racism in today’s USA is inflicted by those Black thugs who select-out, on the basis of race, Whites as targets for their criminal attacks at a rate many, many, times the reverse.

As to the shooting of Rayshard Brooks the available “film” clearly shows that the police officers involved were behaving in a low-key, even friendly, manner until Brooks both violently resisted arrest and took a dangerous weapon from one of those officers. 

It has been reported that Rayshard Brooks was on-probation for “Child Abuse” which, if true, has not been noted by those defending him or their co-actors in “The Media”.

As a drunk driver he represented “a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm to others” as allows OR requires the use of  deadly force to fore-stall any danger of his escaping and repeating that endangerment.

It may be that the persecution of those officers, by District Attorney Paul Howard is much more motivated by his lust for votes in an upcoming, contested, election than any careful-and-considered examination of all of the evidence and of The Law.

The autopsy report on Mr. George Floyd demonstrated that he had  fentanyl, methamphetamine and THC in his body at the time of his horrid death.

In other words, he had been supporting those criminal dealers in illegal drugs who murder many, many, Blacks (And other Americans) at a rate, perhaps a million times more often, than those Americans killed (Legally or illegally) by Police. 

Even a cynic would admit that the manner of Mr. Floyd's death was a gross violation of his constitutional and human rights. It does not take a cynic to wonder if his life should have been celebrated m OR condemned.