Speaker Pelosi Education RE: Guns

Someone please instruct Speaker Pelosi that there is no "Gun Crime" or "Knife Crime" or "Blunt Object Crime" or "Firebomb Crime" or "Fist & Boot Crime". There is only "PEOPLE CRIME".

As to those PEOPLE, please instruct her that the majority of crimes committed with firearms are inflicted on our fellow Americans by members or supporters or client-beneficiaries (ie That majority of Blacks who vote for that Party and illegal immigrants who commit a very high and disproportional share of violent crimes in the USA) of the Democratic (sic) Party.

Please also instruct her that the number of Americans save from murder/rape/other-violent crimes by the use (Often the "mere" display) of firearms is several to very many times the harm caused by the illegal use of guns. 

Please also instruct her that the chief concern of the Patriot Founders of our Republic (And very many of today's, often legally armed, Americans), as to arms, was insuring a well armed citizenry capable of resisting the tyranny of our own governments---Especially those who would, like Pelosi (And her co-actors), inflict the disarming of our law-abiding (Legally presumed sane) good citizens.

Of course, such instruction may not be useful as Ms. Pelosi's pathological lust for, tyrannical, power makes her ineducable. 

Muslim Congress Member(s) As Dangerous

The real problem with Member-of-Congress I. Omar is not that she is against Jews (And Israel) but that she is for (ie Loyally Supports) the criminal-terrorist ideology termed "Islam".

That ideology has such unalterable commands (Please see the partial list below), binding on its orthodox members, as are directly opposed to civilized behavior and the democratically-enacted laws of our Republic.

Islam and its true-believing followers:
1. Are opposed to "equal rights under law" for women and persons believing in other ideologies or true religions;
2. Allows (Following the personal example of that fellow Mohammed, of Mecca & Medina) the "marriage" and sexual use (ie Rape) of girls down to nine-years-young;
3. Rewards the wagers of Jihad with the "right" to enslave and  rape women and girls---As done by Boko Haram (In West Africa where they also slaughtered students of "Western Knowledge);
4. Demands  governmental rule by only Muslim males; And,
5. Too many other other violations of our laws and the best principles (Based on Judeo-Christian teachings) of our nation and what remains of Western Civilization.

I must wonder if she and the other Muslim Members of the Congress will publicly denounce and reject those horrid teachings of Islam.

FROM THE KORAN

•  verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
* verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
* verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25

SOME OTHER UNALTERABLE COMMANDS OF ISLAM

Listed below are a few passages from the Quran that clearly compel Muslims to violence.  

Quran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.

”Quran 3:28   “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends

”Quran 3:85   “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.

”Quran 5:33   “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.

”Quran 8:12   “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran.

”Quran 8:60   “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.

”Quran 8:65   “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.

”Quran 9:50   “When opportunity arises kill the infidels where you find them.

”Quran 9:30    "The Jews and Christians are perverts, fight them.

"Quran 9:123  “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.

”Quran 22:19  “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies.

Quran 47:4    “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.

Congress, Muslims & Treason

The Congress now has four Members who are members-and-followers of the criminal-terrorist ideology known as Islam. The below offers my position that being someone who supports that ideology is guilty of TREASON and must be excluded from The Congress.

Supporting Islam = Treason (#2)

I have elected to apply the "KISS Principle" to this matter.
1. Treason, under our Constitution, is limited to waging war against the USA (Which includes adhering-to or supporting those who are active in such acts).
2. Islam has been in a state of self-declared war against all non-Muslims for 1400-years.
3. Islam requires all of its adult male members to either be personally involved in such warfare
(Jihad) or to "support it with all their wealth".
4, Much (Most?) of all contributions to "Islamic Charities" ends up, as the Koran commands in the hands of terrorists whose program includes attacks on the USA.
5. No believing Muslim will publicly condemn or deny those parts of the Koran or other Islamic teachings which call for such wars---Including against the non-Muslim citizens of and lawful visitors to the USA.

Muslims' murderous attacks, in the name of Jihad, against the USA (And its citizens and allies) have been ongoing, as acts-of-war, both within and without the USA. Those acts are "Treason". Those who support them (By words, moneys and acts) are also guilty of "Treason".

Tuesday, June 07, 2011

Exclusion From The House Of Representatives

In 1919 AD the House Of Representatives refused to “seat” Congressman Elect Victor Berger of Wisconsin's Seventh District apparently because: Mr. Berger was honestly an honest Socialist (Of the variety called “Sewer Socialists” who were much more interested in protecting the health and well being of the People than in an “theoretical” socialism); And, in response to violent acts by union members and socialists in other parts of the USA, which had little, if anything, to do with Mr. Berger.

My recollection of contemporary press reports were the considerable number of claims that allowing Socialists a role in government would result in: Murder and mass-murder in the streets; The disease of “free love” being rampant throughout the nation; The sexual abuse of little girls; Overthrown of our democratic systems of laws and government; Destruction of the Middle Class in this nation, that part of our population seen as the bulwark of our land; And, of everything which makes Western Civilization the mainstay of our world.

The not-seating of Mr. Berger did not appear to stop “free love”, murder and serial mass-murder and various forms of sexual abuse of children. Our subsequent, especially of late, Administrations have made considerable progress in abolishing the Middle Class and weakening those standards and institutions which support Western Civilization.
Strangely enough, the Congress has seated two persons who subscribe to a 1400-plus year old, medieval, criminal-terrorist ideology-or-movement which does, in fact, use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, perpetual-and-violent military-level actions (ie “Declared War), lying and organized theft and lying to accomplish its very anti-democracy goals being: The destruction or near suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslim; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.

The 1919 Congress saw even Mr. Berger's brand of Socialism as a clear-and-present danger, That position might, without “20/20 hindsight”, be considered not unreasonable considering the concurrent and bloody revolutions occurring in such newsworthy places as Russia and Germany. Even without that “clarity of vision” as demonstrated by such leftists as Adolph Hitler, J. I. Stalin, Mao and others of that ilk.

It appears that the case of "Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486 (1969) would probably prevent such removal today. However, as the Supreme Court no longer holds fast to the rulings of prior courts, I could be wrong.

With our much better knowledge of history (If we use it as, to paraphrase: “Those who do not study history, learn from history and apply those lessons will be condemned to repeat its worst lessons”) and what should be our better knowledge of the goals-and-means of Islam, we should wonder at why the current Congress and those of future terms should seat any Muslims---Who do not, publicly and fully, deny those horrid and perpetual Islamic goals and means.

"Red Flag" Laws---NOT

I have read and heard much of "Red Flag Laws" which allow any person to request the police, with some-sort-of judicial approval to take guns (And other weapons?) away from Americans upon a claim that such persons are too dangerous to have weapons.

The taking of guns or other property (Except on an immediate arrest for a probable, criminal, violation of law) from an American requires:

1. An arrest or search warrant issued, only on "probable cause" that a crime has been committed, by a judge/magistrate of a "Court Of Record"; Or, 

2. The prior provision of a notice for a judicial hearing to consider the taking of such property as provides the "reasons why" (In detail as supported by judicially allowable evidence), the name(s) of those who have requested that hearing, a time distant enough for the property owner to obtain legal counsel (Please see below) and to prepare a defense against that action;

I must wonder if, in "Red Flag" seizures of guns: If the owner is immediately provided with a competent (Experienced in such constitutional matters) if her/his income does not allow retaining of such; And, in the case where the guns are ordered returned to the owner the immediate payment by the Court (To be collected later by Order from those requesting that action) which would protect the average American from the untimely and expensive methods of obtaining such payments (As might represent many weeks of wages or other income).

I recommend that such laws provide for the immediate punishment (For "Perjury" or "False Swearing" or, more immediately, "Contempt Of Court") of those providing false or very misleading information to the Courts  (eg Vindictive spouses during who are planning/forwarding a divorce).

Such provisions allow full "due process of law" for the poorer or, even, the average citizen.

Such laws also appear to be in violation of our Republic's Founders in establishing the individual rights in The Bill Of Rights AND for providing "Due Process Of Law", in a very timely way, to citizens who cannot afford or retain qualified attorneys.

Islam & Science Today

A very long time ago there were two "Golden Ages" in Muslim ruled lands as chiefly were in the Iberian peninsula and centered about Baghdad. During those too short years Muslims did:
1. Take in and share with the West that scientific and other knowledge that existed in India, Greece, Egypt and other Pre-Islamic lands; And,
2. Both improved some of that learning and added to it.

However, the ultra-orthodox theologians of Islam found much of that new knowledge as a threat to the teachings-and-commands of Mohammed (Of Mecca & Medina) and, through orthodox rulers, suppressed such "seeking" as would now be called "research".

With the exception of the products of weapons technology and, for the rules, Western medicine, that distrust and dislike (Hate?) of study outside of the Koran, Hadith and some limited-and-derivative sources still continues as well-and-exactly exampled by:
3. Muslims' murder of Western medical staff bring Polio vaccine for the children in Afghanistan; And,
4. The massacre, by Boko Haram, of technical school students for studying "Western Knowledge". [Those monsters also followed Islamic permission, for those waging Jihad, and kidnapped young girls and "Sexually Used" (ie Raped) them.]

"Religious Test" At Public Universities

The Constitution of the USA prohibits any religious test for appointment to any employment by the United States.

Some public universities (eg The University of Colorado) demands that faith-based organizations allow its officers to be of any or no faith. I must wonder if such a demand is unconstitutional.

As such demands have been, for the most part, been made on Christian organizations, such may be made to advance the religion of Atheism ***. That is a most clear violation of the current Law on the "separation of church and state".

*** 

James J. Kaufman
VS
Gary R. McCaughtey, et. al.
7th US Court Of Appeals
#04-1914
Decided Aug. 19, 2005.

"Toxic Masculinity" & The APA

Some years ago I defined "Femininity" as the distilled essence of the best of what separates women from men. That quality is not an aspect of sexuality or physical beauty. (One of the most "feminine" woman I knew of was the actress Helen Hayes---In her later years. I have known very young girls who were very feminine well before becoming, physical, women.)

Then, what is "Masculinity"?  As a male I find that harder to define---Without being accused of
self-description or self-inflation.

Perhaps, it is that, greater, willingness to be very forward in risking blood, suffering, limbs and life to protect family, friends, nation and what is otherwise held precious. (Yes, there are females who do so by, for example, police, firefighter and military service; But, they do not seem to stay in those good works for even a small part of the years which males commit to such service.)

Of course, that willingness can be perverted by the influence of tyrannical or insane leaders (Such as
Hitler, Stalin or others of that ilk). For the most part the soldiers of those horrid creatures were more loyal to their comrades-in-arms than to any such mis-leaders (Which characteristic may be much more common to real men than to others).

Why does the American Psychological Association and so many other postulate "Toxic Masculinity" as a clinical-disorder or social-fault or, even, a sin-like disorder?

I will be non-diplomatic (ie "Snarky") and state that those persons are either biological males who are not masculine or biological-females who are, in the common speech, "castrating bitches." or "butches".
















s

The Real Danger To Virginia's Blacks

The real, physical-and-mortal, danger to Virginia's (And other State's) Blacks is not some fool (eg Dr. R. N.) wearing "Black Face" or a KKK uniform. The real-and-deadly danger comes from:
1. "Medical professionals" aborting Black, unborn, babies at a rate many times than those of other races; And,
2. Those Black thugs who murder (Quickly by the misuse of guns and slowly by illegal drugs) other Blacks at a rate many, many, times: That between White criminals and their White victims; And, many, many, more times than those Blacks murdered or otherwise maimed/injured by Whites.

The above applies to all of the "Several States" and, as to abortion, is now lurching towards the murder of babies at the point-of-viable birth OR AFTERWARDS.

As a "strict constitutionist" and a (Self-declared) avocational historian, I am compelled to note that the same Party which supports that disproportional murder of Black babies is the same Party as is attempting to deprive the American People of those weapons as, now, allows them to resist the above-cited thugs---And other, political, criminals.

The New & The Old Socialists

As some of the "New Democrats" describe themselves as "Democratic SOCIALISTS" we should all remember the "track record" of the following persons who began or described themselves as socialists: Adolf Hitler; Joseph Stalin; Mao; Pol Pot; Fidel Castro; And, the current and penultimate, tyrannical, rulers of Venezuela.

We should look at those "track records" as to: Assassinations; Show trials; Torture; Genocide; Starvation of their people while remaining well fed with the best foods; Destruction of free speech and academic freedom---As parallels their taking modern weapons away those who might be opposed to them or their night-raiding police; And, attacks on Christianity in those nations where it previously existed and supported some, better, levels of morality and justice. 

In fact, we must examine those new "Democratic SOCIALISTS" to see which of those goals they support or, in fact, have already begun attacking.

PS---"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it". (George Santayana)

A Co-Equal Commander-in-Chief

The President Of The United States. acting as "Commander-in-Chief", has powers which cannot be reversed or limited by the Courts of the United States except, perhaps, by the Supreme Court Of The United States,

That is, no jumped-up District Court judge or Circuit Court Of Appeals judges is have the power to restrain-or-enjoin POTUS acting in that capacity.

That is, if POTUS declares a "State Of Emergency" and invokes his powers as Commander-In-Chief, he should and must ignore any contrary-or-countermanding orders from courts lower than SCOTUS while performing those duties for the physical protection of the citizens, sovereignty and the common good of our Republic. As far as SCOTUS is concerned, POTUS may "consider" its orders.

After all, the powers of "Commander-in-Chief" are established by our most basic law, our nation's Constitution. The performance-or-execution of those duties are NOT some violation-of-law; But, an affirmation of the apparent intent of the Founders and beyond the authority of those judges who "make law from the bench" or, worse yet, amend that Constitution without going through the prescribed and democratic amendment procedures.

Those persons or organizations who physically attempt to interfere with such lawful orders must be placed under arrest by our military and tried under military law (ie With first appeals only to the "Military Court Of Appeals and only thereafter to SCOTUS.)

Congress, the other and co-equal branch of our national government, has the authority to impeach, try, convict and remove from office any President for gross violations of that basic law or other-and-specified violations-of-law.

Life Before Columbus

It appears that the average life span for male members of the "First Peoples", in the Americas, was about 26-years (Lower for women as is common in all early populations). The following factors, among others, seem to be basic to those "short, dirty and dark" lives:
1, Periodic periods of starvation as common to hunter-gatherer and marginal-farming societies (eg As based on one crop---Potatoes or Corn);
2. Deaths of women and new-born children aggravated by both such lack of proper foods and that same poor prevention of death as was, also, common in the West until c. 1900;
4. The most primitive of medical care as was also common in Europe until about the same time; And,
5. War and genocide as evidenced by such events as: "The dark and bloody ground" between the Eastern Northern and Southern First Nations; And, the "Flower Wars" of the "Aztecs" as were waged to allow its priests to rip the hearts of many thousands out of living humans or, skin alive, girls.

Since Columbus and others coming to The Americas, from Europe, were totally unaware of the nature of infectious diseases (ie Which, like, "The Black Death") also killed many of them. In fact, that plague killed off a very large part of Europe's population Lacking that knowledge Europeans had and do not have any moral guilt for those diseases which killed First Peoples.

Europeans did bring to the Americas: Better medicine; Better variations-in and distribution-of foods; The basics of Science as already was germinating in Europe; Such music and other arts as were welcomed by those First Peoples; And, perhaps greatest of all, LITERACY. (Before Columbus there were NO "vibrant" cultures in the Americas, but only very STAGNANT cultures and societies which, with the possible exception of the murderous "Aztecs", were NOT civilizations.

LEST WE FORGET, THE "FIRST PEOPLES" WERE ALSO IMMIGRANTS INTO THE AMERICAS.

The Sin Of Bishop Joseph Foy

I have considered the knee-jerk and condemnatory response of Covington (KY) Bishop Joseph Foy (And the Principal of his diocese's high school) to the carefully-and-maliciously edited story about the interactions between the very Catholic students in Washington and those Black racists who attacked them and a lying member of some band of the USA's "First Nations" who has joined in the more general attack on those, most excellent young men, truth.

That Bishop was, most exactly, "Bearing False Witness"! He joined with those who oppose the Church and would destroy it.

Islam NOT A Relligion

1. Islam is NOT a religion; But, is a criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology not far
different from the KKK or Nazi-Party (Sharing the same principles of hate-of-Jews and all real religions, use of violence and the other horrors taught in Mein Kampf and the Koran;
2. Islam (Like the KKK, Mafia and the SS brand of Nazism) has/had a very thin veneer of religion;
3. The false-prophet Mohammed (Who was a murderer, liar and treaty breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child) declared perpetual war against all "unbelievers" (Until they join Islam or accept the slave-like state of dhimmitude), a war which continues in our era in the Sudan, Thailand, parts of the Philippines,,Fort.Hood and New York City on "9/11";
4. Most Mosques are, to some extent, funded by the most regressive, medieval and anti-civilization branch of Islam (ie Wahhabism) and use that sect's hate literature, much printed in Saudi Arabia;
5. Lying to "unbelievers" is one of the standard and common responses of Muslims to any questions, about their ideology, from "unbelievers", including before the Courts in the USA whose authority Muslims do NOT recognize;
6. Muslims "behave themselves" ONLY until their part of any local, regional or national population reaches certain levels (eg France; "Londonistan"; the Nordic nations; Dearborn, Michigan);
7. The true believers of Islam must believe that the words of the the Koran are directly from its Allah (Not the same as Arabic speaking Christians) and, along with the sayings and examples of Mohammed, are totally binding on them;
8. The declared goals of Islam include: The destruction or effective suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all real religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslims; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.
9. The allowed, approved and too often commanded methods of Islam and Muslims to achieve those goals include: Murder and mutilation; Rape and enslavement; Genocide;
Perpetual war with "unbelievers" until they become Muslims or accept the slave-like state of "dhimmitude"; Lying to "unbelievers" as the approved and commanded tactic of Muslims as to "pointed questions" regarding Islam; AND, the consideration of any resistance to or complaints about Islam as an attack which the "faithful" are required to counter-attack, very often by physical attack.

16 Democrats Who Support A Terrorist Organization

A very long time ago I enlisted in the US Navy and found myself in one of the six most dangerous (Enlisted grade) specialties. Later I performed (Paid and unpaid) civilian duties as involved physical risk above that of most Americans. Both were directly had for the protection of my fellow citizens (And legal immigrants) against foreign and domestic enemies.

The "Council on American-Islamic Relations" (CAIR) has previously assisted the transfer of money from the USA to Islamist terrorists. To the best of my knowledge that organization has never admitted-to or apologized-for that attack on our Republic. The leaders of that organization should have been charged with "Treason".

Like other Muslim organizations and "leaders", CAIR has never condemned the horrid and unalterable commands of the Koran as are EVIL.

Now, sixteen leading (ie "Possibles" for a nomination in the next presidential election) Democrats have endorsed-and-supported CAIR.

For myself, I strongly assert that any veteran of dangerous military or civilian service who votes for any of those sixteen will have insulted self AND all those who protect the USA from ordinary criminals, other terrorists and other dangers.

All Democrats should  publicly ask their Party's candidates and officers if they support those sixteen betrayers of our Nation.

YOU CAN, WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT, IDENTIFY THOSE DEMOCRATS.

Rep. Steve King Punished For Being Truthful

TO THE GOP LEADERSHIP:

It has been reported that Representative Steve King has been stripped of his committee assignments for:

1. Telling the truth about our Western Civilization (Or what is left of it) as was invented, nurtured and developed  by White humans; And,

2. Having some minimal contacts with questionable persons who are also opposed to those who would destroy that core of our national and personal beings.

I expected AND expect our (Your???) Party to not surrender-to or adopt-the deceit inflicted by "the other Party" and such other enemies of truth and The People as: CNN; The Washington Compost and The New York Slimes; Such supporters of (Please forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorism as Keith Ellison, CAIR and Rashida Tlaib; And, such supporters of other terrorism as AntiFa and Maxime Waters.

By punishing Mr. the GOP is adding to what is becoming universal deceit. Even the Socialist George Orwell noted "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act". 

Now, the only reason to support our Party is that the alternative is too horrid to allow.

Now, I suggest (Demand) that Mr. King be reinstated in his House assignments AND formally praised for telling the truth.

DearAmericanMuslim

Dear Mr. American Muslim:

This note, with the definition below, is being sent to you in response to your presumed claim to be a “Moderate Muslim”. If you are indeed such a person, then you will have no problems falling within the definition of “Moderate Muslim” given below.

“MODERATE MUSLIM” DEFINED

1.A person who makes a very public proclamation that s/he is a Muslim along with giving out his/her name, address, occupation and place of employment.
2.A a person who then makes a very public OR on-oath rejection and condemnation of all of the teachings within the Koran, Hadith, Sharia and other Islamic teachings which allow or encourage, and sometimes command, the use of murder (eg Killing anyone who “insults” Mohammed or the Koran), rape and enslavement, genocide (eg Killing all Jews), perpetual war with “unbelievers” until they submit to Islam, lying to and stealing from such “unbelievers” and the very inferior legal and social status given by Islam to all “unbelievers” and all women.
3.A person who then demands that all such teachings be stricken and removed from the Islamic texts noted above.
4.A person who then very publicly inks-out of a copy of the an all those verses which support the above noted, inhumane and anti-civilization acts.

Of course, you would be much more believable, as to your claim of being a “Moderate Muslim” if you would very publicly state the historical truths that Mohammed of Mecca and Medina was a murderer, bandit, liar and treaty-breaker and the sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child.

Now, are you a “Moderate Muslim” or a standard-and-dangerous follower of the ideology called Islam with all of its differences in teachings from the Faiths of the Jews, Christians, Baha'i and Sikhs?

Curiously yours,

James Pawlak

Certain "African" Immigrants Needed By USA

In recent times some, in my nation, had proposed that the USA "needs more immigrants from Africa".

That is agreeable to me---If, and only if, the ability of individual immigrants to positively contribute to the "Common Good" of the USA is emphasized and group selection is favored, we should look for populations who have a culture or tradition as has already produced educated, knowing our English language and with a cultural commitment to obeying such laws as are democratically enacted.

Two such groups can be found in South Africa. They are the Afrikaners and those known in that land as "The English". At this time those peoples are being persecuted and even threatened with genocide.

Therefore, the "Africans" we should intensely encourage (And recruit), as members of  identifiable groups, to immigrate into our Republic should be from the two, best qualified, African groups noted above.               

PS---I can, again, expect that some will call me a "Racist". However, I am a "Culturist" who knows those committed to the best of what remains of Western Civilization have-made and will-make a better USA----By legal immigration.

HISTORIC NOTE/QUESTION: Some have claimed that the original inhabitants of that land were not "Black", but of another indigenous (Yellow hued skin) race, and that Blacks were driven South to SA by other and more aggressive Blacks not too long before the Afrikaners went inland.

Religious Test---NOT

It has been reported that Senators M. Hirono & K. Harris are proposing that any association with the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations is a block to confirmation as a United States Judge.

If, and only if, any Fascist Members of the Judiciary Committee would present that violation of Article-VI, Clause-3 of our Republic's Constitution during hearings on those nominated by POTUS, the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee must rule that "line of questioning" is not allowed upon the authority of the above-cited provision.

Such violations of the Constitution must not be excused by "Senatorial Privilege" or any other practice. We might consider that such questions are "a violation of civil rights".

The Right To Defend Vs. Fascist Critters

Tonight, Mr. Tucker Carlson listed-and-described some who have physically and economically attacked and injured those who exercised the constitutional right of "free speech" and that without injuring other persons. Those Fascists have not been "punished" for their attacks.

Among those were the following:
1. An employee of a very, very, powerful corporation who was fired for a mild disagreement with those controlling that company;
2.A university professor driven off campus by mobs which the police failed to confront-and-control, and later forced, by such threats and lack of protection, to resign his academic position (Because he disagreed with Anti-White racist actions);
3. A teacher who was fired after, respectfully, refusing to use one of the several "pronouns" demanded by people  who claim to be one of the 50-plus "sexes"(sic) now in vogue; And,
4. A teacher who used a lock-on-chain to strike and injure those whose views he disliked as did result in an arrest but not a trial in spite of video evidence showing him inflicting "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" on others who were not physically attacking him.

The last case, in the lack of effective action by "the criminal justice system" could be solved by the use-of-arms (ie  Modern and effective firearms instantly available for self-protection and the protection of innocent others) by law-abiding, presumed sane and courageous citizens who would have "put down" that dangerous animal. [That attack was in one of the States who are misgoverned by Democrats who are the prime actors attempting to suppress the individual rights under the Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution. Mr. Tucker's home, with his terrified wife alone-at-home, was also attacked by a mob. That mob-action is in the District of Columbia which is the most tyrannical opponent of allowing citizens the means to defend themselves against such and other criminals (Those police did not arrive in time to arrest those thugs.)]

The other crimes should be a matter of great concern to: POTUS who should instruct the (New) US Attorney General to (Civilly or criminally prosecute the offenders); Some private organizations which will now defend Americans from Fascists (As did the ACLU which has now become the "American Christian Loathing Union").

Lacking effective actions, by those agencies, the only recourse is to follow President Jefferson's prescription: "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE ARMS.”

As Jefferson did not foresee private organization with the income and power grater than some nations, his instruction applies to those Fascist cess pools.

I also note that AntiFa is NOT active in such States as Texas and Wisconsin which have many thousands of citizens licensed to carry concealed weapons---And, do so.

                  VERITAS ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

Commander-In-Chief, The Border & Emergency Powers

President Trump (And any POTUS), as "Commander-in-Chief" of our Armed Forces, has the authority to:
1. Declare parts of our border with Mexico as "Military Exclusion Zones" (Or such security sites as "Area 51") and restrict, with the use of lethal force allowed to maintain security, unauthorized crossings;
2. Provide for the "clearance" of residents and their guests and employees to be in such places;
3. Move our regular troops, reservists and National Guard (Military police, combat units and other personnel) to those places to prevent the illegal entry-into and passage-through those places; And,
4. To place those areas under military law (eg As civilians are on US Navy ships) with violations of the UCMJ to be by courts martial, with appeals to the "Military Court Of Appeals" before any appeal to SCOTUS.

It would be best to limit such actions to those wild areas as cannot be effectively controlled by the "Border Patrol"or other civil authorities. This would allow those non-military forces to be focused on: Airports; Seaports; The arrest, detention, prosecution and expulsion of those aliens who have overstayed or otherwise violated (eg Working and stealing jobs from Americans) the conditions of visas; More intense scrutiny at the usual places of entry.

I still maintain that all  "barriers" to illegal entry into my nation be supplemented by four-plus rolls of "razor ribbon" (aka "Barbed tape").

Funds for such actions could be had within DOD (eg By reducing "Flag Officers" to a much smaller portion of military personnel).

Defending Against Horrid Attacks On Border

In recent days Federal agents have been subject to such attacks (eg Thrown rocks, bottles and dangerous fecal materials) from across our border with Mexico. The attacking thugs have put women and children near or in front of them as human shields.

THOSE ATTACKS PRESENT "A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER OF DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM' TO AMERICAN CITIZENS! THEY FULLY AND LEGALLY ALLOW THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE TO STOP SUCH ATTACKS.

For myself, I recommend that high towers be built at the appropriate places to support a sniper, spotter and a command officer. Such persons would identify, target and kill those attacking US citizens from inside Mexico.

If the Mexican government does not want shots fired into that nation's (sic) territory, then it is the absolute duty of it to use its police and army to immediately-and-effectively stop those attacks.

[I, again, suggest/demand that: Five-plus rows of "razor ribbon" (ie "Barbed tape") be added to any "wall" or "barrier"); And, (Applying the authority of the President as "Commander-in-Chief") set up "military exclusion zones" in the wild-parts of that border where military law would apply and our troops ordered to use all force necessary (ie Including shooting, without warning, any armed invaders) to repel all invaders of the USA.]