Monday, January 26, 2009

Children As "Collateral Damage"

Today my local daily paper published a "Washington Post" article ("War leaves deep scars on Gaza's Children") in which the psychological damage to those small people as inflicted by the air and other response-attacks by Israel---Without noting the like damage caused by the steady and grinding rocket attacks by Hamas thugs against the Jewish, Muslim, Christian and Druze children of Israel.

Yes, the deaths of and damage to Gaza's children are war-time "collateral damage" which resulted from their parents' election of Hamaa to govern their non-state and Gazian sheltering of rocket, mortar and gun firing Jihadi in their homes, schools and other places where children are.

Of course, I should note that the number of those Gazian deaths are statistically meaningless compared to the number of killings caused by the "collateral damage" of Mr. Obama's and the DNC's policies in supporting and expanding the murder of children in the womb. (No doubt editors will wish to note the children of Israel and aborted babies in newspaper editorials and TV commentary.)

12 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
James Pawlak said...

Another "subtraction from the sum-total of human knowledge" by the great Anonymous. Perhaps a map showing the Christian lands taken over by Muslim thieves and another documenting those rescued by the Crusaders in Iberia, Greece and other lands.

Anonymous said...

Go ahead, Show me the maps you lazy fat asshole.

Instead, you say "Perhaps a map showing bla bla bla..." like it proves your point. You are too lazy/stupid to back up your claims with any facts.

If you do get around to making brilliant maps, don't forget the one showing Christian theft of American Indian lands.

James Pawlak said...

I do understand you better on the basis of the level of your discourse. (I am leaving your comments on this site only to allow others to so evaluate you. You might take "credit" for them by providing your name.)

The maps exist: They show the nations noted and more besides.

If you are really interested in the history of the Americas, you might note the pre-Christian land grabs by various NA tribes from others; And, the high level of pre-Christian civilization marked by ripping out of hearts, skinning alive of young girls and ritualized torture.

Oh---If you want to contest this on the basis of my weight, I note that my excess fat is about my waist and not between my ears.

Anonymous said...

Much as I expected ... you are simply too lazy to back up your claims with simple facts and citations.

And regardless, Arab v.s Christina land grabs have nothing to do with the topic at hand, do they...

So, back to the topic at hand; This is a funny way working for peace.

Don't get me wrong, James, I appreciate many of your points and am very glad we live in a society where we don't have to cover our women and keep them locked up. Still, you aren't doing any favors by deflecting and attacking the messenger, instead of engaging in intelligent discourse.

If someone has a serious point to make please discuss the point and not a cat pushing a watermelon out of a lake. K?

Have a nice day.

James Pawlak said...

"Lazy, fat, asshole" is "intelligent discourse"? Hmmmm! Go to my blog and look under "History" and "Islam" for references. Somewhere in there is a reading list to educate the ignorant, a reading list you very much need. Or, in other words, do your own research from sources which are more honest than you.

Anonymous said...

Oh Dear. Mr. Pawlak, you opened the incivility door with "Another "subtraction from the sum-total of human knowledge" by the great Anonymous." Did you forget that part?

Anyway, I'm a big boy and can take a hit for truth and knowledge.

OK, so back to the point at hand which you've been avoiding like a squealing stuck pig;

Namely this.

James Pawlak said...

No, I do not forget facts!

What is your name and email address?
(Another fact I would like to remember!)

Anonymous said...

What is your name and email address?

what does my name and email address have to do with this?

James Pawlak said...

So I can privately point out your errors in thinking without bothering the whole world.

Anonymous said...

...
what does my name and email address have to do with this?
...
So I can privately point out your errors in thinking without bothering the whole world.

James, do you have any idea how ridiculous you look right now? You have consistently avoided the topic at hand, running away from it like a squealing stuck pig.

And as far as the incivility you opened the door too, didn't your mother teach you any manors?

Anonymous said...

So I can privately point out your errors in thinking without bothering the whole world.

Holy cow! did I read this right? You want my name and email address so you can malign me behind my back? Makes sense - you sure as hell aren't going to win this argument on logic, in public view for all to see.