Welcoming MS-13

After listening to Mr. Juan Williams, Nancy Pelosi and too many others discussing AND defending the human status of "MS-13", it appears that they require a reorientation to reality.

They should be required to:

1. Personally view the battered bodies of some victims, in some medical examiner's office, of those sub-animal monsters; And,

2. Talk to the families of those massacred, real, humans.

If, and only if, they are willing to back up their pathological words with compassionate actions, they might take some member of MS-13 into their homes and introduce such to their children and grandchildren---As their new baby-sitter.

Of course, that would likely require someone else to perform the viewing and interviews listed above as to their families.

Britain's Military Needs

At this time it does not appear that the United Kingdom needs an overly strong Royal Navy or RAF. In this era it seems most unlikely that the Muslim besieged French will invade the Channel Islands or some new Vikings will come out of the self-castrated Scandinavian nations.

The United Kingdom's greatest and great military need is for a strong and totally loyal Army as is especially trained to suppress internal Jihad attacks on its institutions and peoples.

In the case of any such (Pray forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorist attacks, the first Army targets would best be Mosques as have been the traditional places for storage of weapons and as headquarters for Jihad.

The Army should keep its detection operations separate from the Muslim infiltrated or directed civil police and look for other properties as have been used in Western nations (ie Including the USA) as armories.

Two Democrats Khali Shiek Mohammed & Treason

After reading the article reproduced below, I must wonder if the Democrats (And their co-actors) named below are in violation of the "adhering to the enemies" (Of the USA) provision of 18 U.S. Code § 2381 and of Article-III, Section-3 of our Republic's Constitution as define TREASON.

Being a Member of The Congress does not provide immunity from such a charge. I suggest that Attorney General Sessions order an investigation into this matter and, thereafter, have a "presentment" (As to a charge of Treason) made to a Grand Jury.

As I have "put my life on the line" by dangerous military service and have performed dangerous (Paid and unpaid) civilian service for the protection of my fellow Americans I must insist that those traitors be punished.

     

                                         

              <https://canadafreepress.com/article/sleeping-with-the-enemy>

"It’s outrageous that the Democrats are attempting to enlist the assistance of Khalid Sheik Mohammed to attempt to block the confirmation of Gina Haspel, a 30-year career CIA agent, as Director of the CIA. It’s even more outrageous that the Senate Intelligence Committee would consider a submission by the mastermind of the 9/11 outrage that resulted in the death of 3,000+ Americans.

Mohammed has asked a military judge at the Guantanamo Bay military prison yesterday to forward an attachment containing “six specific paragraphs of information” that supposedly details Haspel’s wrongdoing for inclusion in the Senate Committee’s considerations. One can only guess who encouraged Mohammed to write these paragraphs and try to send them to Washington.

Informed readers will recall that Khalid Sheik Mohammed is the mastermind behind the attacks against the United States that took place on September 11, 2001 and resulted in more American deaths than the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. It also caused substantially more economic damage and its results are felt to this day, as anyone wishing to board an aircraft anywhere in the free world will attest.

Mohammed was captured in 2003 and was detained at several CIA-sponsored ‘black-ops’ sites in Afghanistan and Poland before being incarcerated at Guantanamo. There’s no dispute that he was subjected to so-called ‘enhanced interrogation’ that included, among other things, sleep deprivation, rectal hydration (also known as enemas) and 183 instances of waterboarding.

Eventually Mohammed cracked and spilled the beans, detailing how the plan was conceived and executed.

It’s mind boggling that the Democrats would stoop to this level of collusion with one of America’s most intransigent and evil enemies in their fruitless efforts to stop the success of President Trump.

Four of the Democrats on the Committee have asked Daniel Coats, the current Director of National Intelligence to declassify how, when and to what extent Haspel was involved in the interrogation of Mohammed. These are Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). Two of these senators, Heinrich and Wyden could rightly be excused for being ignorant of the circumstances surrounding Mohammed’s interrogation and incarceration, as neither served in the Senate at the time these events transpired.

However, both Senators Feinstein and Harris are more than just a tad disingenuous, as both were in the Senate on 9/11. And let us not forget that Flight 93, which was brought down by its passengers and crashed in a Pennsylvania field, was intended to hit either the White House or the Capitol, which could easily have resulted in the death of both senators. In point of fact, Sen. Feinstein, as well as then House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi were made aware by the Bush Administration that enhanced interrogation was taking place. But like all things political, Democrat leaders didn’t seem to have a problem with it, as there was no political upside.

American politics has become so toxic, so corrupt and so single-mindedly partisan on the part of the Democrats, as to border on treason. Allowing Khalid Sheik Mohammed to submit his thoughts about Haspel to the Senate Intelligence Committee is akin to allowing Heinrich Himmler to pick the judge at the Nuremberg Trials. To call this a travesty is an understatement.. (Boldface added)"

Doctors, Journalists & Guns

 Doctors and “journalists” do NOT “see” the very many whose lives and “bodily integrity” are safe-guarded by the private use (Most often “mere” display) of guns by citizens. They treat and report on only those events as where medical attention is needed reporting is had.

Herr Robert Mueller III Vs. ALL.Privileged Communications

The acts of Herr Robert Mueller (Gestapofuehrer) has now caused the FBI (aka KGB) to seize the once "privileged communications" of an attorney.

We may now expect other such Fascists to force the release of like-privileged knowledge of:

1. Loyal wives or husbands;

2. Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Social Workers and other such civil counselors whose help for others demands privacy of much information received and sometimes put down in writing;

3. Confidential information given journalists (ie Especially as to public officials); And,

4. Communications given, in confidence, to Pastors, Rabbis, Priests and other ministers-of-religion.

It appears to be either improper or illegal or "too political" for our President to "fire" Mueller [Please note that I did not support Mr. Trump's campaign until his democratic (Without "Super Delegates) and honest (Without the fraud inflicted by H. R. Clinton on her Party) nomination by my Party].

However, Mueller and his co-actors (In the criminal justice meaning) must be removed from their positions by one or more of the following means:

4. Attorney General Sessions doing so by fiat; Or,

5. Attorney General Sessions ordering a Special Prosecutor to investigate their actions and, upon evidence received, make a "presentment" to a Grand Jury as to probable charges of "Violations Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" or "Fraud"; Or,

6. The Congress taking such actions as "Impeachment" and trial OR removing operating funds from those tyrants; Or,

7. Other means not known to me.

THE FAILURE TO DO THIS WOULD BE: AN ATTACK ON ONE OF THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLES OF LAW IN OUR DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC; AND, EVIDENCE OF GROSS COWARDLYNESS BY OUR ATTORNEY GENERAL OR MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS.

Today's Real Danger To USA's Blacks

The real danger to our Black fellow citizens and legal immigrants, does NOT spring from:
1. Some fool wearing "Blackface" or posting like images on-line and on-campus; OR,
2. The small share (> 0.5%)) of White Americans who can, rationally, be described as "Nazis" or like, mentally deranged, persons; Or,
3. Those Americans of Chinese ancestry who, as a racially identified group, have suffered historical, race-based, abuse (Some by murder) and have left that behind to generally achieve superior academic performance [ie To the extent that some universities (eg Harvard) have been acting against them due to that success] and like success in other areas---And, an almost zero rate of imprisonment or being murdered by members or their own race or being shot by police.

The real danger the USA's Blacks comes from those Black thugs who murder (Quickly by misuse of guns and slowly by illegal drugs), rape and prostitute, rob and otherwise attack, insult and diminish other  (Chiefly law-abiding and innocent) Blacks. (Those critters also select-out, on the basis of race, White victims at rate many, many, times the reverse.

Those delusional or destructive Blacks who cast blame at the first two groups cited above and are:
4. Ignorant of the facts; Or,
5. Are, for their own profit or over-developed sense of self-worth, stirring up inter-racial hate and mistrust; Or,
6. Are so full of self-hate or racist-hate as must be removed from any attention or respect by others.

The AR-15---A Citizen Needed “Weapon Of War”

The "AR-15" is short-hand for all semi-automatic-only long arms with magazines holding more than eight-rounds. That (Such) weapons have be decried as "weapons of war" by opponents of the fullest exercise by citizens of "the right to keep and bear arms" (Without "infringement).

Although I do not own such a firearm, I will accept that application---And approve of it on the basis of the following points.

1. The "AR-15" is the ideal weapon to resist the war-like attacks of home-and-business invaders, those waging Jihad and other dangerous thugs as: It  is much more accurate at the usual self-defense distances of 30-feet or less than are hand-guns; Its light weight and recoil make it more suitable for women and trained youths to use in the home/business defense of self and innocent others; And, its "round" will tumble when hitting walls or criminals---And, not go through them to kill or injure other persons at great distances as do, for example, the "30-30" round so common in hunting rifles.
2. Its (Their) large magazines allow the usually-needed three rounds to "put down" some thug and for the (According to reports on home invasions) multiple such critters.

3. As Islamic-Terrorists are now waging war (With both guns and bombs) in the USA, that such war-weapon allows citizens (During the usual too-long wait for effective police action) to have a "war weapon" which allows them some chance of defeating those orthodox Muslims waging Islam's commanded "perpetual war" (Jihad) against those "unbelievers" who are 99% of our fellow citizens.

4. Possession of large numbers of such weapons by law-abiding and sane (Unless declared otherwise, for each challenged citizen, by a court-of-law after a full "due process hearing) citizens provides a safeguard against government tyranny as so properly feared by the Founders of our Republic as exampled by the below quotes.

A. "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE ARMS.” "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (President Thomas Jefferson)
B. . “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Their swords and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.” (Emphasis added); “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms (Tench Coxe; Member of The Continental Congress and, later, constitutional scholar and author). [Emphasis added]

Method For Lowering Handgun Murders

FBI: Handgun Murders Dropped when These States Abolished Concealed Permit Requirements

FBI crime report figures show that Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming–three states that abolished their concealed requirement years ago–have since witnessed a decreased in handgun murders.

This runs completely counter to the left’s doom and gloom predictions whereby they claim doing away with a government-issued carry permit will mean more bad guys carrying guns, more shootings and violence, etc.

FBI figures published by the NRA show that Alaska’s handgun murder rate “declined after the state enacted permitless carry in 2003.” Moreover, in the years since Alaska’s permit requirement was abolished “handgun murders have declined as a percentage of the total number of murders.”

A drop in handgun murders also took place in Arizona after that state abolished its concealed carry permit requirement in 2010. And in Wyoming–which abolished its permit requirement in 2011–handgun murders have declined as well.

A total of 12 states have abolished their concealed carry permit requirement. Those are Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming, and West Virginia. And Arkansas and Montana recognize permitless carry in the vast majority of their states too.

Republican lawmakers in Michigan and North Carolina are currently pushing to abolish concealed permit requirements in their states. Gabby Giffords’ gun control group is opposing these efforts by ominously warning that “almost anyone could carry a concealed, loaded gun in public” if the permit requirement is abolished. In reality, the only people who would legally be able to carry without a permit are those who could now meet the legal threshold to carry with a permit. And gun controllers’ hand wringing ignores the hard evidence that permitless carry led to lower handgun murder rates in Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming.

AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of “Bullets with AWR Hawkins,” a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

"Gun Insurance"

The proposal to require "Gun Insurance" of those law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizens who wish to "keep and bear arms" is an unconstitutional "infringement" on those rights which should be protected by Amendments II and XIV to our Republic's Constitution as they limit those rights by income (This would be parallel to the "Poll Tax" as has been declared unconstitutional!).

National Defense Zone On Southern Border

As an "Old Navy Hand" I recall that there were and are places, including along our nation's shorelines, as exclude citizens and other unqualified persons, from entry. Although most of these areas have been or are used for "live fire exercises" other such zones (Unless my memory has failed me) were for other national security reasons.

I must wonder if such a zone can be established North (eg 1000 yards) from our border with Mexico:
1. Would declare its residents and their ("Checked out") guests, employees and agents as authorized persons;
2. Would be under only military law (By Act Of Congress) as would exclude the jurisdiction of civilian courts;
3. Might not be in urban areas where the Border Patrol could saturate those places;
4. Provide commissioned officers of our Armed Forces the authority to arrest unauthorized persons found in those zones and to use enlisted personnel to do so;
5. Authorize, if not require, them to force across our Southern border any persons entering those zones from the South---And, to use any level of force to do so; And,
6. Authorize, if not require, them to immediately use lethal force against any persons "presenting a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm" against members of our armed forces or authorized civilians in those zones.

Alternatives To Knives Or Guns---Updated

Since police are often unable (Or is it unwilling?) to protect the People from criminals, those potential victims should take measures to protect themselves. As too many officials (Especially very "political" Police) appears to frown on citizens having readily accessible firearms or, even knives, to do so, I suggest that the People keep ready and use one or more of the following: Gas or elastic powered fish spears; Ordinary harpoons; Maces or "War Hammers" of the many historical varieties; Home made (Liquid Petroleum Gas) flame throwers disguised as walking sticks OR other "innocent" objects; Sling shots"  with steel ball bearings as projectiles; Chain saws; Lead shot filled garden hose sections; Chinese style repeating cross bows; Batons plugged into wall current OR (Disguised as walking sticks or other "innocent" objects and with today's high discharge-rate batteries and capacitors) with sharp prong electrodes to jab into thugs; Old style "zip guns" using sharpened flooring materials as projectiles; Packets of red pepper dust to be followed with boots and clubs (The Maori and Iroquois have some nice designs); "Nail Guns"; And, any number of other improvised weapons. 

Facts Vs. Frenzy On Guns

Those students (And their co-actors) marching and "protesting guns" today, should be tested to determine if they have been properly educated-to and understand the following facts:

1. The use (ie Very often the "mere" display) of firearms, by law-abiding and legally presumed sane, citizens in self-defense of innocent others saves many, many, more of our fellow Americans (ie INCLUDING SCHOOL AGE YOUTHS/CHILDREN) from murder, rape, wounding and other horrors than that caused by the mis-use of guns;

2. All types of rifles are used less often as murder weapons than either knives or "blunt objects";

3. Most gun-inflicted murders are by misuse of handguns as are legally not available to persons under 21-years of age;

4. The vast majority of mass or notorious shootings in the USA are by White males who are members-of or supporters-or or somehow "connected" with the Democratic Party (Which is taking the lead towards the destruction of the individual rights of citizens, including those between 18 and 21 years-of-age) to "keep and bear arms" AND without, as far as I know, any "contributions" to such crimes by members of the NRA;

5. The vast majority of mass shootings have been in "NO GUNS OR OTHER WEAPONS" zones;

6. If the USA's Blacks were "removed from the numbers" the USA would have a much lower rate of violent crime much like that had by very developed Belgium before its recent endemic of (Please forgive the redundancy) Islamist-violence; And,

7. The most violent nations in the world are those Muslim-majority lands where, having murdered or exiled their Christians and Jews, daily records of violence are being set by Muslims murdering other Muslims.

USA NOT The Most Violent Nation But > > >

Among the other lies and more dangerous half-truths/lies vomited out by the opponents of our law abiding (And legally presumed sane) fellow citizens' individual right to "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement"), is the lie that the USA is the most dangerous (By reason of shootings) nation in the world.

From the data available the fact is that the really most violent nations are those Muslim majority nations, having exterminated or driven out their Christians and Jews, now set daily records of violence (Often by use of firearms) of Muslims murdering other Muslims.

That fact is carefully avoided by the "main street media", those under-educated children "protesting gun violence" and the above-cited Fascists.

However, I must note that the violent (Shooting) crime in the USA is aggravated by select groups as:

1. Those White males who both inflict the vast majority of mass or notorious shooting AND who are also members or supporters or somehow "connected" with the Democratic (sic) Party without, as far as I know, any "contributions" to the list of those murdered in such events by members of the NRA;

2. Those Black thugs, using hand guns, who inflict a disproportional part of such gun-related violence (eg Chicago); And,

3. Imported or domestic Muslims who have copied their overseas cousins by bringing violent, by misuse of guns, Jihad to such places as Orlando (Florida), San Bernardino (California) and Fort Hood.

Those who demand the effective disarming of law-abiding citizens (ie Including those from 18 to 21 years-of-age) should have no problem with the much more fact-based disarming all Democrats, Blacks (eg Those not graduating from high school) and all Muslims.

Bombs & Bullets

I am, almost, afraid to write this note.

But if, and only if, our domestic Fascists would defeat the letter and intent of the Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution and effectively take away modern firearms from the People [Including both law-abiding citizens and street thugs, those waging Jihad (Yes, as has been executed in the USA) and other criminals], there are still "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" (WMD) as make faux assault rifles (eg The AR-15) and even small bombs (As very recently used in Texas or even the larger devices in the apartment of the Aurora theater mass shooter) seem only minor inconveniences.

I know of two WMD (Which I will not describe here!) which: Can be made from legally and readily purchased materials; Can be easily fabricated by those with no more or less education and training than that had by "The Texas Bomber"; And, are capable of totally destroying a large building (eg A high school) or an entire suburban neighborhood or a large group of students leaving their school at the end of of classes. 

Large numbers of such (And under-educated) students have been conducting "marches", such truancy as aggravates their ignorance and other poofs-of-passion as are to counter "gun violence" (sic). Their ignorance (As aggravated by such teachers as support "The Left" as represented by the Democrat's Jihad against The Bill Of Rights) includes the facts the the use (ie Most often the "mere" display) of firearms saves many times more Americans from murder, rape, maiming and other injuries than that inflicted by the illegal use of guns. 

In today's world "good guys"  (As include females and armed citizens who are not law enforcement officers) with guns may be those who stop someone attempting to place such a WMD as cited-above.

I suggest that is is better to face the threat offered by a very few mass killers armed with firearms than to try to extract survivors or bodies from the effects of multiple WMD.

                                

PS---VERUM ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

Safe Guns In Schools

Many of the uneducated or biased opponents of allowing or requiring teachers to be armed in schools do not want teachers CARRYING guns.

To a very limited extent they are correct!

The best method of arming teachers, to provide an effective and immediate defense against armed terrorist who force or sneak into schools, is to have the firearms in such safes:
1. Which are bolted in the teachers' desk drawers;
2. Will instantly open to the hand-print of only an authorized person; And,
3. Which will alert both schools' administrators and a police dispatcher if opened or if efforts are made to remove such safes.

It would be best if such defensive procedures were " backed up" by like safes in administrators' offices containing long arms (eg AR-15s).

It should be that every second delay in an armed response to school shooters equals one dead student or teacher during those delays caused by:
1. The time required for in-school police officers to go to the site of massacres-in-progress;
2. The much longer time for outside officers to arrive; And,
3. As has been the case at the Columbine High and Marjory Stoneman Douglas high schools, cowardly police officers "charging to the sound of gunfire" or confronting potential criminals.

This requires teachers to be much more concerned about the lives of "their" children than their personal or political views about guns and are willing to invest a few hours for training (Probably less than 40 for initial training and an hour each month for practice)

Racial Discrimination In Schools As Fitting & Proper

Some  (eg California's Member of Congress Barbara Lee) and others are still vomiting out the lie that there is improper, race-based, discrimination against Blacks in our schools---Chiefly on the evidence that they are subject to more disciplinary actions than Whites (ie And almost infinitely more that students of Chinese decent).

The fact is that Blacks commit many more crimes and other offenses (ie Including traffic violations and against school rules), more serious violations and them more often that Whites. 

Therefore, a school which shows more disciplinary actions against Blacks than Whites is, with a high "level of confidence", demonstrating "equal justice under law" by enforcing the school's rules on a valid-and-fair, case-by-case, basis.

A school which does not show such a difference, by logical extension, must fall into one of the following classes:
1. A clear demonstration of "unequal, racist, injustice"; OR,
2. Is a school with a Black majority approaching 100%  which does not allow of such differences; OR,
3. Has very few or no Black students (eg In many rural areas) as such "disparity"is impossible.

Those persons who hold to some other position are Fascist enemies of truth.

NRA Not Primary Opponent Of Raising Gun Purchase Age

I must declare that the National Rifle Association is NOT the primary opponent of raising the age to purchase "long arms" to 21 years-of-age.

The primary opposition is from Amendments II, IX, X and XIV to our Republic's Constitution!

In other words, enacted or proposed laws that forbid a law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizen who is 18-to-21 years of age from buying any weapons allowed those over 21 years-of-age is a clear and present "Violation Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law". Such laws are "actionable" as a most unconstitutional attack on citizens' rights.

SCOTUS has declared that: The Second Amendment provides each citizen with an individual right to "keep and bear arms" and does not exclude those between the ages noted above; And, has extended that ruling to the "Several States" under the authority of the 14th Amendment. (All citizens are subject to removal of that right only by courts-of-law, exercising full due-process-of-law, as find individual citizens too criminal or too, dangerously, mentally ill to exercise that right---WITHOUT REGARD TO AGE.

Some Americans supporting the widest exercise of those rights have included: Presidents Washington, Monroe, Madison  and (Please see note below) Jefferson; Benjamin Franklin; Patrick Henry; Samuel Adams; George Mason; And, Richard Henry Lee. (If, and only if, the reader is unaware of any of those Patriot Founders, s/he should immediately pause and "Google" them.)

NOTE ON PRESIDENT JEFFERSON: Any person who "slangs" President Jefferson must: First be required to provide proofs that s/he has made greater contributions to the USA than did he; And, be subject to a forensic  examination of their entire life as to any, if any, sexual misconduct or crimes and any such faults widely published.

Reducing Costs Of Prisons

Much of the costs of prisons are due to maintaining, in maximum security, those many violent offenders (ie As include those who murder by the illegal drugs they sell and the very dangerous  “car-jackers”) who would represent “a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm to others” if not so confined.

However, the solution to those dangerous animals is best dealt with before even arrest and court process.

That is by some good, law-abiding, legally-sane and well-armed citizens, when endangered by those thugs, following one of these protocols:

1.     From the FBI, two to the chest and one to the head; Or,

2.     From the SAS or the SEALs, a double-tap to the head; Or,

3.     From the “Old Sarge”, four inches with the point, twist and very quickly repeat at least thee times.

Of course, that would require heart-felt support from investigating police, district-attorneys, judges and our legislators who are in direct contact with reality.

2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights Of 18-To-21 Years Old Citizens

LAW-ABIDING AND LEGALLY PRESUMED SANE AMERICANS WHO ARE BETWEEN 18 AND 21 YEARS-OF-AGE ARE FULL CITIZENS OF OUR REPUBLIC AND ARE DUE THE SAME CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS THOSE OVER 21 YEARS-OF-AGE. 

THIS DOES APPLY TO THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS PROVIDED BY THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO OUR CONSTITUTION.

Taking away that right by legislative or judicial action is "A Violation Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law".

Teaching Children How To Die

Most of the present "models" (ie Drills) for schools' reactions to armed intruders are, in fact, forms of teaching children how to die.

In today's large school buildings even an on-site police officer may be far (In time) from a terrorist-monster as "each second = one death". That assumes that such officer(s) will "charge to the sound of gunfire"---As was NOT the case at Florida's Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School or Columbine High School.

The only rational "model" is to have a trained (ie Requiring no more than 40-hours) hero in every classroom (ie Those teachers who are more interested in the immediate-and-effective defense of "their" children than in their personal or political opposition to firearms).

Guns, Violent People, Mental Health, Democrats, Muslims

In the USA the vast majority of those inflicting mass shootings appears to have have been members or supporters or “connected-with” the Democratic Party which may include some of those Muslims waging Jihad within our borders. As far as I know, there was no contributions made to such mass killings by members of the National Rifle Association.

I have not seen any reports as to Party connections, if any, regarding the Las Vegas massacre or the like horrors at a Sutherland (Texas) church (Where an citizen, armed with an AR-15, chased down and killed that terrorist as police did not do) or at Florida's Stoneman Douglas High School.

I must wonder if “law enforcement” and “journalists” are avoiding determining and reporting on any, if any, such direct or indirect connections with the Democratic Party.

Outside the USA the (Under-reported) majority of mass killings (By guns, but also by bombs and fire) are committed by orthodox Muslims who are strictly obeying the horrid commands of their ideology (Some of which are also attached).

Of course, a cynic might maintain (With a factual basis) that membership-in or connection-with the Democratic Party OR being an orthodox Muslim is a dangerous mental disorder

Who Misuses Guns To Murder

The recent massacre at a Florida high school has produced many lies about guns and killers. Below are some facts about such critters who use firearms to murder others.

The vast majority of those who misuse firearms in mass or notorious killings are White males who are Democrats with, as far as I know, no contributions by the members of the National Rifle Association. (Proof of that statement will be provided upon written request to )

The vast majority of other murders-by-gun are by members/supporters/client-beneficiaries of the Democratic (sic) Party. It should also be noted that if the USA's Blacks were "removed from the numbers", our nation would have a very much lower violent crime rate and that about that had by very Western and developed Belgium---Before the recent endemic of (Pray forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorism.