Jews, Muslims, Due Process & Academic Freedom

                   
                                            GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
I am, more-or-less, a Christian. I am also very familiar with:  The contents of the Koran and other basic works of Islam; The 1400-history (And to this very day) of the acts inflicted on the world by those waging Jihad; And, the too-many , on campuses, Jihad-style campaigns against those who defend the State Of Israel and, more generally, all Jews and against those who would publicly raise rational questions  about the above-cited contents and history.

Although much of those attacks are executed by Muslims, they have been aided-and-abetted by those others (eg
those at who should remind all of the Fascists of Hitler's Germany (Including those burners of Jewish authored books at that nation's universities) or the  pogrom-generating Czars of Old Russian and like tyrants in the USSR.

Some of those attacks have been forwarded by Non-Muslim students (And faculty/administrators?).
[I cannot but wonder if those mob-members are, each-and-collectively, pathologically jealous of so many Jew's superior academic performance, stable family life and a cultural history of honoring scholars and laws.]

                                         RESPONDING TO ATTACKS-I

1. Hire an attorney.
2. Give formal notice, best on oath/affirmation, by your formal complaints against any individuals, groups, or or organizations (Including colleges/universities) who have injured (In the widest sense) AND what corrective actions, damages, punitive damages and other costs you are demanding at that time AND if corrective action is not taken by a date-certain.
3. Formally demand that any-and-all complaints or accusations against you be in written form AND upon  "oath or affirmation"---And, consider, after taking counsel, refusing to attend any meetings or hearings until that is done.
4. Obtain as much evidence (eg Video Tapes; Written affidavits from witnesses) as possible as to any attacks.
5. As needed file civil actions and criminal complaints (eg "Violations Of Civil Rights"; "Misconduct In  Public Office"; "Perjury"; "False Swearing") as needed to deal with all attackers.
6. Consider filing a formal complaint, with the accrediting organization demanding a formal hearing as to why you school's accreditation should not be vacated or made conditional on such corrective actions as you recommend.

                                   RESPONDING TO ATTACKS-II

      You are NOT required to allow any physical attack on you or your supporters as includes "grabbing" or "hitting" or even being charged [eg By someone within the "Tueller Drill" distance of 21-feet, especially if they are display any object which might be used as a weapon OR shouting threats (eg "Allahu Akbar")].
      In the "hitting" or "grabbing" situations you are required to limit your response to that which is proportional to the threat/danger'
     In the case of being charged (Or, "mobbed"), you may use any level-of-force, including deadly force, if you believe that you are in a clear-and-present-danger of death-or-great-bodily-harm.

                                    DUTIES OF COLLEGES/UNIVERSITIES

1. To provide immediate-and effective protection of all on their campuses from those who perform OR threaten any form of physical attack.
2. To protect the "Academic Freedom" and constitutional "Free Speech Rights" of those who wish to present OR hear any views from those who use noise/blocking-movement/other-means to stop or limit such by students, faculty, guest speakers, Etc..
3. To be alert and proactive to such potential attacks by such means of video-taping on-campus activities/events where such violations of law or university rules may occur.
4. To use their own (Or, others) to identify students and school-employees who are in such violations and to, after providing "Due Process", fire those employees and formally expel those guilty of offence such violations.
5. To file criminal charges where warranted in any applicable cases.
6. To, for those employees or students in the USA only because of a previously issued (Academic) visa,  request the US Government to vacate those visas and expel those guilty enemies of freedom from the USA.

Islam NOT ISIS & Suppressing/Punishing Terrorists

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

ISIS is NOT "The Problem"!  The same can be written of Boku Haram, Hamas, CAIR, The Muslim Brotherhood and other like organizations as have, boil-like, erupted in our world---And, will do so under other names in the future. The same can be said of "Lone Wolf Islamist Terrorist" (eg The traitor Nidal Hasan of Ft. Hood infamy) OR very small groups of like critters (eg The pair who were the "Inside The Belt-Line" snipers; Those who fired upon a US Army recruiting station murdering one of our Soldiers).

"The Problem" is the core and essential teachings of Islam which include: 1. The command for almost all Muslims to wage "perpetual war" (Jihad) against all "unbelievers" until they become Muslims OR abjectly accept the slave-like state some call dhimmitude; And, 2. The encouragement/permission/commands to those waging Jihad to use murder, genocide, rape, torture, banditry and other horrors to forward Islam or "reward" those creatures.

There is some "research" as demonstrates that not less than 50% of Muslims support the "fullness" of Jihad.  There is some reason to believe that the current Administration favors the immigration of Muslims (ie Who are not likely to comply with the above) over the today's real targets of Jihad---Christians.

Although the USA may not be at war with Islam, Islam is at war with the USA.

Thursday, February 05, 2015

Communicating With Jihadists---Updated

The lessons of history and current events demonstrate that the only means of "communicating" with those Muslims waging Jihad is by the application of over whelming and deadly force as at: Tours (732 AD); Las Navas de Tolosa (1212 AD); Granada (1492 AD); Lepanto (1571 AD); Chocim/Khotym (1621 AD); Vienna (1683 AD); The USA's campaigns against the Islamist-Pirates of the Barbary States (1805-1815); Navarino (1827 AD); Israel’s various and defensive wars from 1948 on (Just in case you ask, I am not of the Jewish Faith nor do I have any financial interests in the State of Israel); Multinational mini-campaigns against the Islamist Pirates operating off the Muslim Sudan.

To these I add the most excellent shooting down of the mad dog who assassinated a ceremonial guard on Canada's Parliament Hill and by the armed citizen who liquidated the swine who beheaded a lady in Oklahoma. I can now gladly add the lessons of The Sniper!

FROM: George Santayana. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Ummah, Muslims,Jihad & Punishment

“Ummah” is the Muslim-Arabic term for the world wide community of all Muslims. It is a general, Islamist, principle that an attack on any one member of that “community” is an attack on all members (ie All Muslims).

Equity demands that an attack, on Non-Muslims, by any (Muslim) member of that “Ummah” must be considered an attack by all Muslims and make them equally guilty AND equally liable to punishment for such crimes.

However, any Muslim is able to remove him/her-self from that guilt and risk-of-punishment by openly and clearly declaring, in her/his local Mosque and in places open to Non-Muslims (To be video-taped for later broadcast) that s/he:

1. Absolutely condemns all of the teachings of the Koran and the Hadith (The collected sayings of that fellow Mohammed of Mecca & Medina) which command Muslims to wage “perpetual war” (Jihad) against “unbelievers” and those which allow/encourage/command the use of murder, rape, genocide, torture and other horrid crimes against others and against civilization to advance Jihad OR the individual/collective goals of Muslims;
2. Will always determine the end recipients of any charity s/he gives AND will not give to any domestic (eg CAIR) or foreign organizations which directly/indirectly support the above crimes.

Those Muslims who do/will not make that withdrawal from those horrid teachings and the resultant horrors of Jihad are to be the subjects of official/unofficial punishment for the crimes of other members of “Ummah”.

Unofficial punishment is morally allowed as the civil authorities of the many nations have been unable or unwilling to crush those waging Jihad with the active/passive support of Muslims enrolled in the “Ummah”.

IN RE JIHADII CAEDITE EOS NEVIT ENIM DOMINUS QUI SUNT ELUS

Ummah, Muslims,Jihad & Punishment

“Ummah” is the Muslim-Arabic term for the world wide community of all Muslims. It is a general, Islamist, principle that an attack on any one member of that “community” is an attack on all members (ie All Muslims).

Equity demands that an attack, on Non-Muslims, by any (Muslim) member of that “Ummah” must be considered an attack by all Muslims and make them equally guilty AND equally liable to punishment for such crimes.

However, any Muslim is able to remove him/her-self from that guilt and risk-of-punishment by openly and clearly declaring, in her/his local Mosque and in places open to Non-Muslims (To be video-taped for later broadcast) that s/he:

1. Absolutely condemns all of the teachings of the Koran and the Hadith (The collected sayings of that fellow Mohammed of Mecca & Medina) which command Muslims to wage “perpetual war” (Jihad) against “unbelievers” and those which allow/encourage/command the use of murder, rape, genocide, torture and other horrid crimes against others and against civilization to advance Jihad OR the individual/collective goals of Muslims;
2. Will always determine the end recipients of any charity s/he gives AND will not give to any domestic (eg CAIR) or foreign organizations which directly/indirectly support the above crimes.

Those Muslims who do/will not make that withdrawal from those horrid teachings and the resultant horrors of Jihad are to be the subjects of official/unofficial punishment for the crimes of other members of “Ummah”.

Unofficial punishment is morally allowed as the civil authorities of the many nations have been unable or unwilling to crush those waging Jihad with the active/passive support of Muslims enrolled in the “Ummah”.

President Jefferson On The Constitution

On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed." [Please specially note that the term "trying" was used as in "boiling down" something (eg Whale blubber or the Constitution) to obtain what the actors wish (eg Whale oil or perverse decisions by judges "making law from the bench"; About which please see the novel Moby Dick.]

Stopping Criminals By Gunfire

FBI Study

The FBI study In the Line of Fire: Violence against Law Enforcement—A Study of Felonious Assaults on Law Enforcement Officers shows that 41 percent of officers who fired in the study hit their intended targets, and the average distance to the target was 21 feet.4 Although this is a limited study, these averages are fairly consistent with the multiple shooting data available.

During court proceedings concerning an officer-involved shooting, the number of rounds fired by the officer or officers involved will be released to provide full disclosure. Grand juries often question why numerous rounds were fired. It is important, especially in handgun shootings, to show that (1) immediate incapacitation of the target with handgun rounds is not a reliable factor, even if there is a direct central nervous system shot; and (2) direct shots that cause lethal blood loss are also not immediate. There is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10 seconds to 15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed.5 A determined individual who has received a fatal shot may continue to function because of adrenalin, sheer emotion, or stimulants in their system. Law enforcement personnel are taught to shoot at center mass and to continue until the threat is removed. Under stress, it is difficult to fire accurate shots that strike vital organs, and, in the average shooting, less than half of the shots fired hit the intended target. As the distance increases, more shots may be fired by officers to compensate for decreased accuracy.

Bullets do not physically knock people to the ground. Jury participants often have limited weapons knowledge or experience and base their perceptions on novels, TV shows, or movies in which the hit ratio is high and bodies fall violently after being shot. It is important to explain that a fired round’s impact on the body is no more than recoil from the weapon. Sir Isaac Newton proved this in the seventeenth century with his hypothesis: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. To stop a determined threat, multiple rounds are often needed. To stop shooting also causes a delay because the officer’s senses must send a message to their brains to stop the physical movement of trigger pulls..

OTHER CITATION

Adams. Ronald Et. Al.: Street Survival---Tactics for Armed Encounters; Caliber Press; 1987.

(At Page-215) “Medical researchers have established that nearly 20 percent of the time, suspects who are shot will not be incapacitated by just one round even though they are fatally wounded. (Followed by some examples and a photo of an armed robber's body where 33 rounds were needed to “put him down.)

Rational Selection Of Immigrants From Middle East

Those refugees fleeing Islamist terrorists in the Middle East, should be selected for immigration on a rational basis---That is, the risk they now face and would face upon any, if any, future return to their ancestral homes (Some in 2000-year-old communities). The following are the proper priorities:

1. Jews as Islam demands that they be killed (As there are few, if any, Jews left in such lands, we must go to the next group)

2. Pagans (ie Who are NOT "people of the Book") who, under Islamic law must instantly convert to that ideology or die (Again, there are few if any, such in Muslim ruled lands);

3. Christians who have few, if any, rights under Islam (Obama's Administration appears to favor Muslims over others as to granting special immigration status);

4. Kurds  who are Muslim---But are direct targets of both ISIS and imperialist Turkey; And,

5. If, and only if, the receiving nation has "economic room" for them, any Muslim who will formally and publicly (On "oath/affirmation") denounce and reject those teachings in the Koran and Hadith which command perpetual war against "unbelievers" and the attendant murder, rape and other forms of woman/child abuse, genocide, torture and unequal rights-under-law to all women/non-Muslims AND will, likewise, state that the laws of receiving nations are superior toSharia.

The "Get Up & Go Gene"

THE “GET-UP-AND-GO-GENE”

(GUGG)

Introduction

The essay below was written on the basis of an unsigned and yellowed manuscript which I found in a box of old documents. I added to it and cleaned up the spelling, grammar and logic AND added some current examples.

I specially note that my contact with “people-of-color”, other than the corrections' inmates and parolees/probationers I met, was as generally as satisfactory as other relationships. For the most part the Black (Well, Brown) people I worked with were, on average, as good as others in my “shop”---Except for a very, very, few who elected to be “Professional Blacks” rather than “Black (Well, Brown) Professionals”.

I have had Black (Well, Brown) guests in my home, some as overnight guests and for a month stay. My son's Black (Well, Brown) friends were welcomed and appreciated as were others. His one Black (Well, Brown) lady friend was one I hoped he would “get serious about”---But, then I realized that she had much, too much, strength of personality and will for him to deal with---At that time in his life.

If you have the historical or anthropological evidence (The state of genetics is, as of yet, too primitive, to be of value here) to refute the positions given below, please provide me with such.

The Essay

Some years ago I was in the error that the Human Races must have concurrently evolved as I could not see my ancestry coming from an African source. However, the scientific proofs have overcome me and I have no current doubts that humanity evolved in some African “garden of Eden”---Perhaps more than once.

After all, there is less than one-percent (1%) of differences in the genetic structures of all human beings, being about the same difference between us and the other “Great Apes”. On the surface, that 1% in humans is attributable to differences in hair, bone structure, blood types and some other, very physical differences.

However, I here posit (On the basis of historical and anthropological evidence) another gene, which I have elected to call the “Get-Up-And-Go-Gene” (GUGG). The early African possessors of GUGG were those humans interested in what was on the other side of the lake, of the river, of the mountain, etc.. Some changed in physical appearance, becoming blond or oriental, some (eg The “First Peoples” of Australia and Melanesia) stayed very “African” in appearance (Thus proving that the GUGG has and had nothing to do with color, face shape, type of hair, etc.). Many went to the “ends of the Earth” to places as Australia, New Zealand, Patagonia and Greenland. That search went in waves and in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand, the Whites came after the Black and Brown People. Of course, some posit Non-Asian immigration into North America by Aniu-like immigrants OR by others traveling along the Atlantic ice pack.)

There is, however, one group of the original Africans who seemed to lack GUGG. They are the ancestors of those people who initially did not go out-of-Africa except as slaves (Sold by other Blacks or captured by Islamic slavers) and did not even migrate into what is now the Union of South Africa until pushed there by the Zulus and others---At about the same time as Whites came into “The Beautiful Country”. (Before that time, the original Peoples of that land were not true Blacks but those having an almost saffron complexion).

The exploration of those Peoples with GUGG extended, in many places (ie China, Europe, India and the pre-Islamic Middle East) to the realms of the mind in the invention of many things and, in fact, of civilization itself. This development was hardly detectable in either Black Africa or in post-Islamic ruled areas, where Islam discouraged or destroyed the inventive urge allowed by GUGG.

Where in Black Africa can you find any universities (Beyond Islamic theological schools which discourage thought more than otherwise) which were not “inflicted” by White colonialists upon those areas? Where are the pre-colonial sub-Saharan cities, roads, bridges (They did have access to stone!)? Other than in Christian Ethiopia, where are the great paintings and metal work of Black Africans beyond some very simple iron weapons and late brass effigies? Basic wood carvings, some very good, are found; But, no wood carvings such as the great altar piece at Krakow's cathedral (Poland being another land with few, early, natural resources beyond wood)---Yet Black Africans certainly had access to many excellent hard woods.

The “cultural worth” of humanity (Its arts, laws, sciences, philosophies, etc.) have developed in Europe, China, the pre-Islamic Middle East, India and, later, in the New World and, even later, just about every where except Black ruled Africa---Which is, for the most part, an economic, legal, medical, political and social disaster area. (The only area of hope there is the growth of Christianity---Some of it even orthodox and based on sound teaching.)

In the USA and some other lands (Where the State does NOT support the false promise of socialism such as Cuba) the admixture of Black and other Races has enhanced both

where, and only where, Blacks have accepted the culture provided by Whites, Orientals and some others. It has not been effective where Blacks (Encouraged by “Professional Blacks” and not “Black Professionals”) have committed themselves to such horrors as “Gangstra Rap” and the “Victim Culture” OR the local equivalent. It is also not effective where Islam has limited, or killed, creative thought in sciences and arts.

In the case of the USA “thinking White” is the only path to true economic, social, intellectual and other forms of real success. Unfortunately there is a small minority of Blacks (Well, Browns) in the USA who have made political (eg The totally ineffective one-time and Black mayors of New Orleans and Atlanta), social (eg Jessie Jackson & Al Sharpton) and academic, “Black Studies” (Such as the inventor of Kwanzaa), careers out of a contrary presentation---Even if they “secretly” do not believe in what they present to others.

Time For Police Responses

From "Women's Self-Defense Institute"

Average-Police-Response-Time to a 911 call?

What is the average-police-response-time to a 911 call?

      When we talk to people about violence and what they would do when confronted with violence, the response is always the same. "I would just call 911 for help." There's this false sense of security that we have created with the 911 system that has people believing that with a single call, a swat team will be dispatched immediately to save you and your family within moments of the call.

      Unfortunately, this couldn't be further from the truth. So what is the average-police-response-time to a 911 call?

      According to American Police Beat, the average response time for an emergency call is 10 minutes. Atlanta has the worst response time with 11 to 12 minutes and Nashville comes in at a lightning speed of 9 minutes.

       The Department of Justice, with their statistical prowess, reports that the best response time is 4 minutes and the worst over 1 hour. Interpretation? If you live in an upper income area you probably are privy to the 4 minute response time, while middle to rural areas will see a much longer response time.

      Now here is where things get interesting. Even though the Department of Justice determined that the average police response time to a 911 call is 4 minutes, the average interaction time between a criminal and his victim is 90 seconds.

That translates to you being robbed/injured/maimed/raped/murdered and waiting for an additional 2 and a half minutes for the police to arrive. The truth of the matter is that the police will almost always arrive AFTER the crime has happened and the criminal has gone.

The truth is that the police are not your body guards. They cannot be at all places at once. And thanks to our Supreme Court, they don't have to be. The Castle Rock vs. Gonzales case is just one of many which says that the police cannot be sued for failing to enforce a restraining order that lead to the murder of her three children.

The reality is that you are on your own for at least 4 minutes or more. Anyone who has been in any type of altercation knows that it only takes seconds to inflict serious injury.

It's up to you to defend yourself. The police cannot be everywhere. As a citizen, you are accountable for your own personal safety.

       Do you know what you need to to do to protect yourself? Do you have the mental and physical training to protect yourself? If no, then we strongly suggest that you take a women's     self-defense course and learn how.

      Because when crime comes looking for you, you don't want to be vulnerable while the minutes tick away for the average police response time to a 911 call

Questions For Nominees For AT/Judgeships--UPDATED

Questions For Nominees For AG/Federal Judgeships

I have yet to read or hear the fullness of (Federal) judges or candidates for Federal elective/appointive offices (Especially to the Federal Bench) responses to the following questions.

1. Do you agree or disagree that the original Constitution of the United States could not be ratified without a Bill Of Rights, that resulting in the latter document being the first ten amendments to the first?

2. Do you agree or disagree with President Thomas Jefferson that the intent of the authors of the Constitution (ie As the above-noted "Package Deal") is to be considered when involved in interpretation of that document?
3. As to the Second Amendment, do your agree or disagree that we can clearly understand the intent of those authors be understood from the comments of Presidents Jefferson, Washington and Madison---And, the other patriots who established our Republic? (Provide copy to nominees!)
4. Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the "Shall Not Be Infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the strongest statement of a limit-to or prohibition-against Federal acts in violation of the above-noted "package deal"?
5. Will you obey or resist the ruling of the Supreme Court Of The United States in declaring the rights under the Second Amendment as due every citizen without regard to membership in  a "militia"?
6. Will you obey or resist that Court's making that ruling binding, through the 14th Amendment, on the States?
7. How (If at all) have Federal judges considered/addressed the noted "shall not be infringed" clause as contained in the Second Amendment to our nation's Constitution?

8. Do you admit that the teachings of Islam and its laws (Sharia) provide only grossly inferior legal status to all women and all non-Muslim males as is in great violation of our principle of "Equal Justice Under Law"?
9. Do you understand that the teachings of Islam allow/require/allows such Muslims as witnesses/attorneys to lie to non-Muslims if it furthers the causes of that ideology---Even on 
oath/affirmation?

History & Responding To Jihadists

Effective Communications With Muslims----The Lessons Of History

There have been too many whining and sniveling for "reaching out" for more and better communications with Muslims. There have been such communications in the past at such places as: Tours (732 AD); Las Navas de Tolosa (1212 AD); Granada (1492 AD); Lepanto (1571 AD); Chocim/Khotym (1621 AD); Vienna (1683 AD); The USA's campaigns against the Islamist-Pirates of the Barbary States (1805-1815); Navarino (1827 AD); Israel’s various and defensive wars from 1948 on [Just in case you ask, I am not of the Jewish Faith nor do I have any financial interests in the State of Israel]; Multinational mini-campaigns against the Islamist Pirates operating off the Muslim Sudan and in other places in more recent years; Etc.. [To these I add the most excellent shooting down of the worm who assassinated a ceremonial guard on Canada's Parliament Hill and by the armed citizen who shot down the swine who beheaded a lady in Oklahoma. I can now gladly add the lessons of The Sniper!]

NO OTHER FORMS OF COMMUNICATIONS APPEAR TO "GET THROUGH" TO MUSLIMS.

George Santayana "Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it.

PS---As the police are too often too late and too few to respond to criminal attacks, the real "first line of defense" is citizenry armed with readily available and modern firearms.

Islam On Waging Jihad

The Verse of the Sword

THE SECOND to the last chapter of the Quran contains the infamous "Verse of the Sword." This is chapter 9, verse 5:

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the jizya (a tax for non-Muslims), then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

And how about this quote from Ayatollah Khomeini from 1942 who set the pattern for Iran’s form of Islam.

“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world…. Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers] Islam says Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us Islam says Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy Islam says Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” 

Obama's Islamist Government

I have not yet verified all of the below claims; But have done so for some. Some of the persons named may have left the Administration.

.  -

EVERYONE BETTER START FACING THE FACTS WE AMERICANS ARE LIVING UNDER A MUSLIM GOVERNMENT Read it until it hits you like a ton of bricks.  Read it again until you understand!!

"We now have a Muslim government.

      John Brennan, current head of the CIA, converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia .

      Obama's top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live. She, very much supports the infliction of Sharia on/in our Courts.

      Hillary Clinton's top advisor, Huma Abedin, is a Muslim whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brother hood in Egypt .

      Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.

     Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.

     Obama adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.

     Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid of the Islamic Society of North America, is a Muslim.

      Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.

      1/13/15: Nancy Pelosi announced she will appoint Rep Andre Carson, D-Ind, as the first Muslim lawmaker on the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.  It would make Carson the first Muslim to serve on the committee that receives intelligence on the threat of Islamic

militants in the Middle East !  He has suggested that U.S.   schools should be modeled after Islamic madrassas where education is based on the Quran!!!

And last but not least, our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama.

It's questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in.  He didn't repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution.  Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private.

CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible.

      Congressman Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur'an a book which commands Muslims to wage "perpetual war"on us.

      Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and verbally tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government.

      Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East .

In his book, it is reported that Obama said, "….If it comes down to it, I would go with the Muslims."

If All Blacks Left The USA

IF ALL BLACKS LEFT THE USA

   You just can't dispute basic Math...Unless you attend Brown/Yale/Harvard

WHAT IF ALL BLACKS SUDDENLY LEFT AMERICA (13.3% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION):

The prison population would go down by 37%
There would be 53% less gang members
Obesity percentage would drop 11%
Average IQ would go up 7.4 points putting us 3rd in the world tied with Japan
Average Sat scores would go up almost 100 pts
Average ACT scores would go up 5.5 pts
AIDS & HIV would go down by 65%
Chlamydia cases would go down 54%
Gonorrhea would go down 69%
Syphilis would go down 58%
The average income for Americans would go up over 20,000 dollars a year
Amount of people in poverty would drop 34%
Homelessness would go down 57%
Welfare recipients would go down by 42%

DEMOCRATS WOULD LOSE 76% OF THEIR VOTING BASE

...And many criminal defense attorneys would have to find another line of work!  

Executive Orders & New President

Immediately upon being sworn in, the new, GOP, President should sign a previously prepared “Executive Order” suspending all such Orders inflicted on the People during the prior eight years.

 

After that and asap the following “Executive Orders” should be totally vacated and that in the following order:

1.               Those which violate the letter of the Constitution OR the documented intent of the Authors of that, most basic law and of The Bill Of Rights (And, later amendments);

2.               Those which deal with subjects properly under the authority of The Congress;

3.               Those which are opposed to the security and common good of the People; And,

4.               Perhaps, those opposed to the official “Platform” of the GOP as expressed before the prior national election.

 

Remaining, if any, “Executive Orders” may be modified-and-reissued if they serve a public interest OR be properly assigned “to the dustbin of history”.

 

GOP candidates for election to the Presidency should now be asked to very publicly proclaim their commitment to the above actions

Mental Health, Guns, Due Process

I am becoming more-and-more disturbed  about the far too many politicians, news commentators/reporters, those opposed to the fullest exercise of Second Amendment rights and others of that ilk who loosely  substitute the terms  "mentally ill"  OR "emotionally disturbed", for the more accurate term "dangerously mentally ill" as to those who should not be allowed to obtain firearms.

It is fit-and-proper and legally/constitutionally-sound  that someone should be declared "Dangerously Mentally Ill" only after a fact-based and contested hearing before a judge-and-jury, in accordance with our 1000 year old system of laws and our Constitution. Why? Because to tag any citizen as being "dangerously mentally ill" takes from such citizens as many civil and political rights as a conviction of a felony---And, deserves the same legal protections.  

At this time there are too many government units (eg -- The FBI) who will accept the unverified and non-judicial comments of some (Anonymous?) Psychologist/Psychiatrist/Other-persons as sufficient "Proof" to deprive citizens of a basic civil right.  Even super-sane me (If, and only if, you accept my self-diagnosis)  once consulted a psychologist, with my wife, to iron out some marital problems---Which smoothing did occur. .

 Should I or some child with home/school problems who sees a school psychologist or some active-duty member of the Armed Forces/Veteran for whom war/other-problems has resulted in s/he seeking counseling, and other like and law-abiding citizens be deprived of a basic civil right without "due process of law"? [I believe we have another, of too many  Federal Laws which provides for both criminal and civil prosecution for "Deprivation of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which should deal with and punish those who would do so to those who are not dangerously mentally ill.
The FBI has reportedly placed entire groups of innocent military veterans on the "no buy"  list and that without "due process of law".

April, 2013 Note: the New York State Police are seizing guns from citizens who are lawfully taking anti-depression medications without any prior “due process of law”. After the death of my beloved wife I took such “meds” for a short time which, in NY, would have led to my being deprived of my rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution by violating my other rights to “due process of law”. Such are unconstitutional acts of tyrants---About which see President Jefferson’s comments as to tyrants, guns and citizens—As attached..

THE “SOVIET SOLUTION”: As the old USSR developed, a political decision was made to deal with those who “dissented” by considering-and-declaring them, per se, mentally ill for doing so. Such persons were involuntary confined in prison like “hospitals” and subjected to “aggressive” treatment”

It appears that too many (Chiefly, but not universally Democrats) consider anyone who wishes to fully exercise their rights (And, implied duties) under the “Second Amendment” as likewise “mentally ill”. I suspect that many Democrats consider anyone who opposes any of Mr. Obama’s extra-constitutional actions as likewise “crazy”.

LIKEWISE DOCTORS & JOURNALISTS: Doctors and “journalists do NOT “see” the very many whose lives and “bodily integrity” are safe-guarded by the private use (Most often “mere” display) of guns by citizens. They treat and report on only those events as where medical attention is needed OR “politically correct” reporting had.

THOSE WHO ARE NOT CURRENTLY DANGEROUSLY MENTALLY ILL DESERVE THE PROTECTION OF ARMS PROVIDED IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT..

Helping Obama ID Terrorists

“We Just Can't Seem to Pinpoint the Problem", says OBAMA.....


The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims. 

Think of it: So, What are their Major Organizations?

Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS/ISIL : AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION

AND A LOT MORE!

And We just can't figure out who's causing the problem.

But at least President Obama knows it's not the Muslims.

Guns And Self-Defense

<http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp>

Crime and Self-Defense

* Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms.[11]

* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[12]

* Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders.[13] [14] [15] Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun.[16]

* Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18]

* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 3.5% of households had members who had used a gun "for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 1,029,615 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[19]

* A 1994 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that Americans use guns to frighten away intruders who are breaking into their homes about 498,000 times per year.[20]

* A 1982 survey of male felons in 11 state prisons dispersed across the U.S. found:[21]

 

• 34% had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"

• 40% had decided not to commit a crime because they "knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun"

• 69% personally knew other criminals who had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"[22]

There Are NO "Radicalized" Muslims

THERE ARE NO "RADICALIZED" MUSLIMS! 

There are those who closely follow the commands contained in the Koran. Those commands include that of waging of military war (Jihad) against "unbelievers" (Or, supporting its warriors with all their wealth) and to use the allowed/encouraged/commanded acts of murder, rape, genocide, torture, banditry, etc. to win battles and wars against opponents to real Islam. These are Muslims.

Anyone else who claims to be a Muslim and does not obey those commands is guilty of Bid'ah (Essentially "Heresy") as they vary-from or leave those core teachings of Islam and may be killed or otherwise punished by true Muslims.That authority to kill and so many person's demonstrated-and-enthusiastic willingness to do so condemns the entire community of Islam (Ummah) to never fully leave the medieval, murderous, tyrannical and self-defeating ideology as taught by Mohammed (Who was, himself, a murderer, bandit, liar and treaty-breaker and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child---Which makes him the "Ideal Man" and example for all of his followers.)

As there is no true central authority in Islam each-and-every Muslim (Male as females do not "count") is expected to be the self-judge of his status as areal follower of Mohammed. No "radicalization" is needed except, only perhaps, some reminder (By a person or current events) of the command to wageJihad binding on individuals (eg Nidal Hasan of Fort Hood treason)  or bands/small-groups (eg The District Of Columbia "Belt Line Shooters"; This week's shooters in San Bernardino) or much larger (Even such semi-national groups as ISIS or Boku Haram or HAMAS) or entire nations (eg Ottoman Turkey or today's Iran).

It may be "politically correct" to refer to Islamist-Terrorists as "radicalized" or "extremest" Muslims. However, they would better AND more honestly be described as "orthodox" Muslims.