Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Questions For Nominees For AT/Judgeships--UPDATED


Questions For Nominees For AG/Federal Judgeships



I have yet to read or hear the fullness of (Federal) judges or candidates for Federal elective/appointive offices (Especially to the Federal Bench) responses to the following questions.


1. Do you agree or disagree that the original Constitution of the United States could not be ratified without a Bill Of Rights, that resulting in the latter document being the first ten amendments to the first?
2. Do you agree or disagree with President Thomas Jefferson that the intent of the authors of the Constitution (ie As the above-noted "Package Deal") is to be considered when involved in interpretation of that document?
3. As to the Second Amendment, do your agree or disagree that we can clearly understand the intent of those authors be understood from the comments of Presidents Jefferson, Washington and Madison---And, the other patriots who established our Republic? (Provide copy to nominees!)
4. Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the "Shall Not Be Infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the strongest statement of a limit-to or prohibition-against Federal acts in violation of the above-noted "package deal"?
5. Will you obey or resist the ruling of the Supreme Court Of The United States in declaring the rights under the Second Amendment as due every citizen without regard to membership in  a "militia"?
6. Will you obey or resist that Court's making that ruling binding, through the 14th Amendment, on the States?
7. How (If at all) have Federal judges considered/addressed the noted "shall not be infringed" clause as contained in the Second Amendment to our nation's Constitution?
8. Do you admit that the teachings of Islam and its laws (Sharia) provide only grossly inferior legal status to all women and all non-Muslim males as is in great violation of our principle of "Equal Justice Under Law"?
9. Do you understand that the teachings of Islam allow/require/allows such Muslims as witnesses/attorneys to lie to non-Muslims if it furthers the causes of that ideology---Even on 
oath/affirmation?

No comments: