Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Why Democrat Leaders Oppose An Armed Citizenry




The possibility of law-abiding citizens using guns to effectively-and-immediately stop criminal attacks may well be the reason that the mis-leaders of the Democratic (sic) Party have taken the lead in attempts to deprive our fellow citizens of modern-and-effective firearms. That is, the effective-and-immediate use of firearms, by law abiding citizens, to "put down" dangerous criminals is more likely to reduce the Democrat's “power base” than otherwise.

1 comment:

Jared Lafferty said...

I agree. The purpose of an Armed citizenry is the protection of a free state. And to keep it free. It is the job of the individual citizen, not the government, to protect a free state. Check out my post, the constitutionality of assault weapons. Sorry its long! I break down Heller v. DC and Scalia’s opinion on the case.

http://jaredlafferty.blogspot.com/search?q=are+assault+weapons+constitutional%3F