The Best. Persecuted, Immigrants For The USA

After considering all of the arguments supporting the USA's taking in alleged victims of terrorism (From Central America)as refugees (ie Most of whom are not literate or not literate in English and are a "clear and present danger" to our stressed social systems) I suggest that we and very quickly offer refugee status to those non-Black (ie Boer and "English") victims of murderous Black racism in South Africa. 

After all they are known as hard-working and (Even most Boers) literate in English, educated, skilled workmen, willing to obey such just laws as are the general rule in the USA (Outside of our West Coast and New York State) and most unlikely to include Islamist terrorists or nation-destroying (eg As in Venezuela) Socialists among their members.

As the "leaders" of the USA's Blacks support the uncontrolled immigration of job-stealing and income-suppressing Latino "illegals" (Whose primary victims are poor Blacks), there should be no rational objections to these South African immigrants who are unlikely to do anything but improve our Republic.

Why Simple, when with a little effort. . . "---Court Decision On Guns

<http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf>

Although I approve of the ruling in the above-cited case I maintain that the judges were closely following the maxim, "Why simple, when with a little effort, it can be made so beautifully complicated".

All that was necessary was to state:

1. The Second Amendment to our Republic's Constitution is directly founded on the intent of the Founders (A & B);

And,

2. Subsequent restrictions, by laws or regulations, on the rights of law-abiding and legally presumed sane citizens [ie Above the age of 18-years] to keep and bear (Modern) arms, without infringements, are unconstitutional. and serve only in the interests of those favoring racial or political enslavement of our fellow such citizens.

NOTES

A.  <http://www.crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2014/09/founders-of-usa-guns-tyrants-updated.html;

B. http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2016/11/shall-not-be-infringed.html> 

Trump, Putin & China

Joseph Stalin was a genocidal, insane, pervert. He was the second most horrid man inflicted on the world during my lifetime. Yet, Franklin D. Roosevelt (And many others) made common cause with him against the more immediate threat of the worst such critter---Adolf Hitler.

From all reports Vladimir Putin is a cunning man and retail murderer. However, he is:

1. No greater a liar than many national leaders (eg Obama);

2. Not someone intending to found a political dynasty as opposed to many (eg The Kennedy and Bush families); And,
3. Is a Russian patriot more than some of our Presidents (I name no name) have been American patriots (eg Who have, very directly, aided and abetted inter-national terrorists and other enemies of the USA).

I certainly hope that our constitutionally elected President Trump (Or his cohorts) understand and have reminded President Putin that his nations most dangerous enemy is "The Peoples Republic Of China" which:

4. Looms over a border with Russia;

5. Since 1929 has fought many, "unofficial", mini-wars against Russia ;

6. Represents a clear-and-present danger to Russia by its support of North Korea's nuclear-armed dictator; And, 

7. Has been, as far as I can tell, very interested in the undeveloped resources of Russia's Siberia.

We should not "trust" President Putin or his inept efforts to interfere in the USA's political processes (eg As have been likewise failures in the case of Obama's efforts against "Brexit" and opposing Israel's Prime Minister).

The USA will benefit from finding some common cause against the often genocidal and always aggressively expansionist PRC [Which has been waging economic war against the USA for many years and is expanding it military forces at a horrid rate for no good for the USA, Russia, Vietnam (Which has been resisting Chinese aggression for hundreds of years and to this era) and many other nations.]

Those liars and America-haters in "The Resistance" and among RINOs (And even some real Americans) appear to not understand the above. Some of them wish for such immediate "success" from President Trump's contacts with Putin as is a demand for "instant gratification"---Which is arch-typical of infants and criminals.

The "Why" Of Those Who Oppose Judge Brett Kavanaugh

There are many who are vomiting out objections to the appointment of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to a position on The Supreme Court Of The United States. Their motives appear to be very various.

Among those motives are:
1. A fear that a Mr. Justice Kavanaugh will apply our Republic's Constitution in accordance with the intent of the authors of it and its amendments;
2. That fear extends to such probable rulings as will call halt to those tyrannical judges who "make law from the bench" and, much more horridly, amend our Constitution without going through the democracy-based amendment process required by that, most basic, law and, thereby, keep the most basic power in the hands of THE PEOPLE;
3. Those who fear that Judge Kavanaugh will be a part of a too long delayed SCOTUS ruling that our law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) fellow Americans have a right to "keep and bear arms "without "infringement" in the accordance with the views of such Patriots as: Presidents Washington, Madison, Jefferson; Benjamin Franklin; Patrick Henry; Samuel Adams; And, George Mason (Who feared such internal tyranny as is now the case in California and New York and maintained that a well armed citizenry was the best defense for our righs);
4. Those who hate such Christians as Judge Kavanaugh who prove their Faith through the fruits of good works as quietly given to family, community and the World; And,
5. Those that fully understand that they are inferior human beings when compared to Judge Kavanaugh.

SCOTUS, Trump & "The Right To Petition"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The right to petition is protected by the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.
In the United States the right to petition is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which specifically prohibits Congress from abridging "the right of the people...to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
Although often overlooked in favor of other more famous freedoms, and sometimes taken for granted, many other civil liberties are enforceable against the government only by exercising this basic right. The right to petition is regarded as fundamental in some republics, such as the United States, as a means of protecting public participation in government."

MY NOTES
There are those who attack President Trump's use of suggestions, for judicial nominations, from the Federalist Society as being enslavement to a "far right organization".
• Those suggestions are, in fact, an example of the execution of the above-cited and most basic constitutional right.
• The "grievance" addressed is the making-of-law and amending the Constitution from the bench by those judges who would take that power from The People as executed through their democratically elected representatives.

The Suppression Of Mobs

This is in response to Chicago's riot of this week.

Mobs are, as such, a probable “clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm” to others..

When such mobs are armed or commit such dangerous crimes as “Arson” (eg Both evident at Berkeley in recent days) they clearly demonstrate and multiply that “clear and present danger”---And justify the police or any good citizen to use any level of force (Including deadly force) to suppress that danger.

In fact, the failure of police (Or, if called up by Governors who understand their duties, the National Guard), to fire upon such extremely dangerous mobs as both individuals (ie By snipers under the direct control of a command officer) and by volley-fire in the case of any group attack is a gross neglect of duty.

Of course, free (ie Armed) citizens can assist the police by "marking" such and other violent criminals with holes [eg .222', 9mm, .32' (The diameter of "OO" buckshot),

.38', .45'].

[For general information, the hard touch of a triangular file to the lands of a gun's barrel and the lighter touch of a flat file to the firing-pin and extractor of such will negate the usual forensic information.]

[The above possibility of citizen actions may well be the reason that the mis-leaders of the Democratic (sic) Party have taken the lead in attempts to deprive our fellow citizens of modern-and-effective firearms. "Putting down" such dangerous animals is likely to reduce the Democrats power base.]

A Cowardly SCOTUS

The Supreme Court Of The United States has, again, refused to review ( SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFF SILVESTER, ET AL. v. XAVIER BECERRA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 17–342. Decided February 20, 2018.) as to another attack on that part of The Bill Of Rights as should protect the ajudicated-and-individual rights of citizens to "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").

As a (Self-declared) "Avocational Historian" I suggest that SCOTUS is avoiding confronting this matter as they realize that it would require them to confront the intent of the Founders of our Republic and their legal reasoning as to that constitutional right as the primary test for rulings (As our Constitution does not contain any provision for "evolving standards" outside of its own provisions for amendment).

They might also be required to address the question: "Are there any constitutional grounds to deny those (Law-abiding and presumed sane) citizens, from 18 to 21 years of age any constitutional rights including those under the 'Second Amendment'?" 

The Congress should address those issues by such legislation as enforces this and other provision of The Bill Of Rights---Especially against: Judges "making law and amending our Constitution from the bench" as such Fascists as misrule California.

All should remember that depriving a citizen of this, individual-constitutional, right can legally only be done by a court of record, after a full "due process of law" hearing as would find each, individual, citizen too criminal or too dangerously mentally ill to "keep and bear arms".

                                 VERUM ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

SCOTUS, Religious Test & Defense

It appears that there are those (eg Democrats, Atheists, Tyrants) who will attack President Trump's nominee for a seat on The Supreme Court Of The United States:
1. On the basis of that most-excellent person's religious faith (If any);
2. With special regard to the case of Roe v. Wade.

Article VI (Clause 3) of our Republic's Constitution forbids any (Emphasis added) "religious test" for such positions as a Justice of SCOTUS.

It appears likely that some such opponents of our Constitution will, during hearings or debate, on such nominations attack (ie Probably by carefully composed, but indirect, questions)  any faithful nominee on their religious beliefs regarding abortion. 

The chairman of the Senate committee or sub-committee considering such a nomination must, instantly, rule any such questions illicit, forbidden and out-of-order upon the authority of the noted and exact prohibition provided as cited-above.

It is not allowable to excuse so ruling on the basis of "Senatorial Courtesy" or the informal customs of the Senate's "Old Boys/Girls Club".

Lessons From Annapolis Newspaper Shooting

The domestic terrorist who shot up The Capital Gazette [Annapolis (MD)] newspaper office was able to murder five and wound two of our fellow citizens:
1. With a legally purchased and commonly had hunting weapon; And,
2. In police saturated Annapolis where it only took about one-minute for them to arrive [Uncommonly rapid for almost all the USA).]

If, and only if, one/more of those journalists had ready (ie Concealed carry) access to a modern and effective firearm, they might well have popped-up and put all rounds (eg Best with hollow point bullets) into the head of that monster---Reducing the "body count".

[At age 70-plus I self-trained and that within 40-hours, with a semi-automatic handgun, to: At the common distances in such offices; Charging, side-to-side, at the target; And, placing seven of eight rounds in the head of the silhouette target. An experienced instructor could do that training in less time. (A very few hours each month are required to keep up those skills).]

Since most of "The Media" and governments dominated by Democrats (eg Maryland) are intensely opposed to our law-abiding and legally presumed sane citizens having such ready access and such modern weapons, the staff of The Capital Gazette were offered up on the bloody altar of "Political Correctness". That betrayal of reality ignores the fact that the defensive (Often by "mere" display) use of guns by those good Americans prevents harm to innocents at a rate many, many, times that inflicted by criminal misuse of firearms.

VERITAS ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI

Mexico Waging War Vs. USA

The drug-lord ruled semi-nation of Mexico has aided those fleeing, rather than fighting (As they have been disarmed), the like semi-governments of Central America to travel through its land and to and, too often, across our Southern Border.

THAT IS AN ACT-OF-WAR BY MEXICO AGAINST THE UNITED STATES! 

The USA should NOW: Advise all of its citizens, in Mexico, to leave that semi-nation asap; Stop all aid to Mexico; Stop all direct and indirect money transfers to Mexico; Put halt to all trade agreements with Mexico; And, shut down all of Mexico's consulates in the USA--Until we have absolute proof-positive that Mexico's government is stopping such movements of illegal immigrants through its land (And check for compliance on a monthly basis).

Discrimination; And Application(s)

“1 a :  to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of

b :  distinguish, differentiate <discriminate hundreds of colors>

2 :  to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences; especially :  to distinguish from another like object

intransitive verb

3 a :  to make a distinction <discriminate among historical sources>

b :  to use good judgment “

Such discrimination can be as to properly selecting:

1. Mind-and-spirit elevating classical and jazz music vs that “rap” and “hip hop” ravings as support murder and abuse of women; 

2. The essential teachings of Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and Sikhs as support peace vs those of the Nazis, Atheistic Communists and Muslims which inflict terrorism on the world; 

3. Such poetry as reflects craftsmanship vs the unorganized flushing of apparently random non-thoughts as come from the distorted minds of those who claim to be poets;

4. The facts that young Black youths commit more violent crimes than those of other races (As properly noted by the Rev. Jessie Jackson as to groups of youths as might be following him down a dark street) vs the claim that acknowledging such reality is race “discrimination”;

5.  The fact that the family, based on pairings of women and men has been the basic unit of (Most) civilizations which have gone beyond primitive hunting-gathering societies vs.the false claim that homosexual couples provide the same value-to and maintaining-of civilization;

6. That the intent of the writers of the Bill Of Rights as to the "Establishment Cause" was to keep only the Federal Government from establishing an official "National Church" vs those who maintain that the "free exercise of religion" should be limited to the insides of homes and places-of-worship;
7. The views of our nation's founders that an armed citizenry is basic to controlling tyranny vs the position that they should be disarmed “for their own good”; And,

8. Those immigrants who legally come into the USA with those skills and cultural conditioning as will improve our Republic Vs. those who: Illegally enter the USA in violation of our democratically enacted laws; Bring with them diseases; Bring other parents' children and cast them on our stressed social services agencies OR sell them into child prostitution; Increase the common good of the USA by providing goods and such services as do NOT depress wages or steal jobs from the poorest of our fellow citizens.

If no one else does so, at least journalists  should use the best definitions of words.

Questions For SCOTUS Nominee(s)

Upon today's news of Mr. Justice Kennedy's retirement from our Republic's Supreme Court, I have elected to ride my "Hobby Horse" into the "conversation" about who will  take the seat vacated by him. 

I  am not interested om which candidate is selected and, without doubt, confirmed by the United States Senate.

I am concerned that President Trump, The Senate and, most importantly, The People know the nominee(s) answers to the questions provided below.

1. Do you agree or disagree that the original Constitution of the United States could not be ratified without a Bill Of Rights, that resulting in the latter document being the first ten amendments to the first?

2. Do you agree or disagree with President Thomas Jefferson that the intent of the authors of the Constitution (ie As the above-noted "Package Deal") is to be considered when involved in interpretation of that document?
3. As to the Second Amendment, do your agree or disagree that we can clearly understand the intent of those authors be understood from the comments of Presidents Jefferson, Washington and Madison---And, the other patriots who established our Republic?
4. Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the "Shall Not Be Infringed" clause of the Second Amendment is the strongest statement of a limit-to or prohibition-against Federal acts in violation of the above-noted "package deal"?
5. Will you actively support  the declaring the rights under the Second Amendment as due every citizen without regard to membership in  a "militia" and applicable to all law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizen over the age of 18-years and that in all of the Several States and the other jurisdictions of the USA?

"Turning The Other Cheek" & The Downside Of Anger

Yes, the Christ told us to respond to insults, even to a slap to the face, by “turning the other cheek”. That is, even the most gross insults are not an excuse for such evils as revenge by criminal infliction of death or injury or great fear.

To better understand this, it must be remembered that for time immemorial any blow to the head or face was the worst of insults in most cultures. Even in the “civilized” Western world, it has not been so many years since such a blow would result in two “gentlemen” standing ten-paces from each other with pistols in hand and murder in their hearts.

Yet, I do not find in the Scriptures any instructions to accept murder, rape, genocide, mutilation or even robbery/theft (ie The taking of that part of a honest person's life expended in honestly earning property) without taking effective and immediate actions to forestall the execution of such crimes. Such are beyond insults and are dealt with such force (Even deadly force) as is needed to stop such crimes.

Anger does have the following "downside": It spoils the accurate aiming of modern-and-effective firearms in "putting down" dangerous animals.

Maxime Waters Calling For Fascist Violence

Representative Maxime Waters (D-CA) has solicited others to actively "confront" members of President Trumps Administration so that they cannot function in our nation as do other Americans. (<http://thehill.com/homenews/house/393874-maxine-waters-calls-on-supporters-to-confront-trump-officials-in-public-spaces>).

It is well known that "confrontation", too often, leads to such violence or perceived threat of "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm". Such a real or reasonably perceived threat allows the direct target of such "confrontation" OR a near-by person to use even deadly force in self-defense.

I have no doubts but that Representative will protect herself by not being anywhere near such "incidents" and will deny any fault if someone is hurt or killed as a result of her asking others to commit crimes.

Yet, I think that the House Of Representatives should begin an investigation of her misconduct as to a possible expulsion from The House and, for the remainder of this term,  remove her from all committee assignments.

If They Want War

Our (First) American Revolution truly began at Lexington, MA on April 19, 1775 when some armed citizens lined up (And some died) to protect their freedom (ie Against tyrant’s efforts to seize their arms and munitions).

There and before the shooting began, Militia Captain John Parker is alleged to have declared, "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here".

The shooting of Americans, at an Arlington (Virginia) park, by a follower of Senator Sanders is only one example of an act-of-war inflicted by the far-left (And their allies of "The Resistance") against the Constitution, laws and People of the USA. [Other examples of such declarations-of-war have recently been displayed at such places as the University of California---Berkeley and other academic cess-pools.]

The only proper response to such war-waging tyrants is to use effective-and-immediate, deadly, force. [In the Arlington case, it was only the chance presence of police which prevented a massacre. Where the police are not immediately available OR are unwilling (As at Berkeley) OR are ordered to not act (As at the Madison campus of the University of Wisconsin) to put-down dangerous thugs, the only recourse of the targets of such terrorists is to have ready access to modern firearms and to use them to for self-defense AND the defense of innocent other humans, our Constitution, our laws and the security of The Republic.]  

NOTA BENE:  The vast majority of modern and effective firearms (ie At military and police levels), as are privately held in the USA, are in the hands of "political conservatives" who will use deadly force to defend themselves and innocent others from any threat as is or appears to be "a clear and present danger of death or great bodily harm". THIS APPEARS TO BE BASIC TO THE DEMOCRAT'S JIHAD AGAINST CITIZEN'S FULLEST EXERCISE OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO OUR CONSTITUTION.

Self-Defense Protocols

SELF-DEFENSE PROTOCOLS

AGAINST CRIMINALS [OF ANY AGE] PRESENTING A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER OF DEATH OR

GREAT BODILY INJURY TO OTHERS

1. From the FBI---"Two to the chest and one to the head”; OR,
   2.  From the SEALS/SAS---"A double tap to the head"; OR,
   3. From the "Old Sarge"---"Four inches with the point and twist the blade, REPEAT"; Or,
   4. From other sources--- "An intense strike to the temple, spine or "Adam’s Apple" with a heavy cane OR use of the point of a cane or umbrella or “teacher’s pointer” to the throat, groin, eyes or male genitals---Followed by a disabling/killing thrust to the base of the skull or spine; Or, Any of the common cuts in kenjitsu.

The only insurance that an attacker or bully or other tyrant is no longer a danger is when s/he has stopped breathing.

Catholic Teachings On Immigration---And Limits To It

Today, the following information was brought to my attention.

"Catechism Of The Catholic Church (No. 2241)

The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various judicial conditions especially as to the immigrants duties towards the company of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of those who receive them, to obey its laws and assist in carrying out civil burdens". (Bold-face and italics added)

1. The term "Guest" excludes invaders.

2. The noted laws include, in the USA, our democratically-enacted immigration laws and, secondarily, derived and formal policies and regulations. 

3. Respect for our Republic's "spiritual heritage" excludes such acts as: Waving the flags of foreign nations while illegally entering the USA; Flying such foreign flags over or instead-of the USA's flag in public forums; And, most horrid of all, destroying or insulting that flag in public places.

4. "Assistance in carrying our civic burdens" includes, but is not limited to, the following: Not working at less than the legal minimum wage which depresses the income of the poorest of America's citizens and other (eg Legal) immigrants; Immediately reporting to the police all observed criminal acts; Pay all taxes due all units of our governments; Learn the English language and the basic laws and history of the USA; And, most of all, insure that their children be taught those subjects and learn to respect them.

At this time those who hate the USA are vomiting out statements about the rights-of and ignoring the duties-of (Illegal) immigrants.