There are many organizations/companies
which forbid the bringing of guns and other weapons into their
buildings or even (Illegally/unconstitutionally?) on their open
properties (eg
Parking lots). This is most specially noted by the many persons
entering medical facilities. In most such cases there is a “posting”,
by signs at entrances, of that prohibition. With very few exceptions,
that also applies to employees.
Those
who establish such policies seem to have ignored the following:
- The best recent evidence (eg From The Centers For Disease Control) is that the armed person is much less “likely” to be murdered or maimed by a criminal than the “Nanny State Dependent” and unarmed targets of criminal attacks;
- The time between a “911” call and effective police action is long enough for a criminal to kill or injure many persons;
- There have been cases where the police did not respond to a call for help (In Madison, WI) in such cases or long delayed such responses (In Milwaukee, WI) until the victim was murdered;
- Unless a private organization/company has a level-of-security at/above that found at airports, requiring staff (And visitors) to disarm themselves before entering such companies or organizations may be financially liable for damages in the cases of the death-of or injuries-to such weapon-deprived persons; And,
- Without exact information, I suggest that there are many more deaths/injuries caused by criminal intruders than by the staffs or law-abiding visitors to such places (Further research needed!).
You
might note the possession of a handgun, in violation of employer's
rules, by Dr. Lee Silvermann at the Mercy Fitzgerald Wellness Center
(In Pennsylvania) as allowed him to shoot-and-kill a mental patient
who had just murdered a staff member---And do so before (Alleged)
armed security staff and very much before police responded. [Should
such an employee be subject to discipline OR honored and that by
means including a change in anti-weapon policy?]
No comments:
Post a Comment