Limiting Constitutional Rights---NOT

The Bill Of Rights lists some rights which have only the most rare limits as can be inflicted only in the most rare circumstances.

For example, the  right (ie Privilege in archaic terms) to Habeas Corpus may only be suspended, according to our Constitution: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it". Please specially note that this, rare limit, to our Rights can be constitutionally applied only in the case of "rebellion or invasion".

There are NO like provisions for the suspension of other rights.which include:
1. Free speech;
2. The free exercise of religion; And,
3. The individual right of law abiding citizens (ie Age 18-years and above) to (Buy) "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").

With regard to the "free exercise of religion" I must note that: Christians have a long history of supporting, if not requiring, communal worship; Jews are required to form Minyan of ten or more, adult, worshipers to have, real, worship; And, Sikhs require both communal prayer and a shared meal (ie Offered-to and shared-with all, Sikh or other/no religion).

THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR REPUBLIC'S CONSTITUTION WHICH ALLOWS ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL OR BODY TO SUSPEND COMMUNAL WORSHIP WITH IS A CORE PART OF "THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION". "Official" acts doing sore a (Actionable?) "Violation of civil rights under color of law" which may be a felony if anyone is injured in such violations.

Of course, religious leaders or bodies my suspend communal worship for any purpose as has been done in the face of the Chinese virus pandemic.

NOTES

A. <https://rts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/201305-Spina-John.pdf>

B. <http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/the-worshiping-assembly-at-mass.cfm>

C. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minyan>

D. <https://www.patheos.com/library/sikhism/ritual-worship-devotion-symbolism>

"Advantages" Of Deaths By Illegal Drugs

If, and only if, we reject  moral teachings (eg Of Jews, Christians an Sikhs), then the deaths (And reduction in the USA's "Life Expectancy) by such illegal drugs as fentanyyl does provide our nation with some long-term advantages:
1.. It removes from the human genome, in the USA, those who have an "addictive personality" which may have a genetic base or, at the least, one based on transmitted social/cultural habits;
2. That, in turn, reduces the population of those who support the manufacturees, importers and distributors of those drugs;
3. Which reduces the income of the enemies of the USA (ie The PRC) and of all humans (ie All those noted in #2 above);
4. May reduce the number of deaths-by-firearm, the (Vast?) majority of which are inflicted by and upon Black thugs (ie Using only illegally possessed handguns) involved in "the drug trade" which very specific deaths are not reported by "politically correct" academics, officials and The Media as a part of the reduction in the USA's life expectancy;
5. May well reduce the huge sums of the USA's wealth (In dollars) sent out of our Republic and chiefly to organized criminals; And,
6. Which may reduce the tyranny of those slugs as is basic to the corruption of Mexico and Central American nations which is one of the reasons for the mass of illegal immigrants invading the USA and costing billions of dollars to our citizens and legal-immigrants.

"Allies" & Withdrawing Troops

Those of our "allies" who are upset with President Trump's order to withdraw some troop from a part of the Middle East are more than welcome to sent their own troops to that area.

I do have my doubts about the impact of that action which endangers the Kurds and supports Turkey's, Islamist, would be Caliph.

Improving "Diversity" At State Universities/Colleges

There are very many at many universities-and-colleges who maintain that their schools are not sufficiently "Diverse" as to the many world cultures. Therefore, I offer the following measures to correct that lack.

1. Provide altars (On pyramids if possible) with the usual blood channels and obsidian knives as will allow the reactivation of the Aztec religion. The first to be sent to "speak to the gods" should be "diversity officers" and those attacking The Bill Of Rights (ie With the meaning as intended by its authors) or physically attacking those exercising peaceful "free speech". [The skinning-alive of virgins will be a problem as they are now an "endangered species".]

2. Provide stoning-pits and tip-over-walls as will allow Muslims to more easily enforce Sharia as to homosexuals and those women accused of adultery who cannot produce the number of witnesses who would swear to their innocence.

3. Allow the very peaceful and civilized Sikhs to carry their prescribed daggers on campus.

4. Allow any worshipers of Kali to practice thugee on campus---Beginning in "diversity" offices  and the meeting places of those served by the officers in such places.

5. For those worshiping "The Old Religion" provide some oak trees from which they may hang (Bound by one hand and one leg) their alive human offerings. (I regret to note that the Druid branch will not be allowed to use the traditional burning-baskets due to the problem of their "carbon footprint".)

6. For Atheists colleges/universities should set up Pol Pot style "reeducation" camps (With the usual burial trench-pits).

The Church's "Big Lie" About Islam

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Vatican-II, Other Religions & Islam

DECLARATION ON
THE RELATION OF THE CHURCH TO NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONSNOSTRA AETATE
PROCLAIMED BY HIS HOLINESS
POPE PAUL VI
ON OCTOBER 28, 1965

3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.
Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.
=======================================================================
       The above document was quoted (Although not the section provided above) in a homily at my parish on September 29, 2012 as to toleration, The Pastor dealt more with intolerance towards Hindus who some Catholic call “stupid”. The “highest thinkers” in that religion have concluded that there is only one God and the “gods” worshiped by the People are only facets of that one God just as the facets of a great jewel are not the entire gem.

        The Jews are our spiritual ancestors and, as such are and should-be honored and not persecuted as was the sin of too many Christians (Including my Polish ancestors). They signed a covenant (Contract) with G_d. Such agreements are not had between a tyrannical master and worm-like slaves.

      Jesus the Christ makes us his co-heirs in the Kingdom and his brothers-in-love. Although asking for peace among men of good will, his last “General Orders” to his disciples (Luke 22: 35-38) was to do all that was needed to obtain the means sufficient to defend themselves. .

        The Sikhs, lately come to the World's religions, worship a universal and just God. They are great sustainers of equality between man and women and between all human beings. Their teachings advocate for peace; But, specially emphasis the right of self-defense and the duty to defend the innocent against criminal attacks. They also support practical charity and what we know as Charitas.

 

        The Allah of Islam (And NOT that of Arabic speaking Christians) demands a slave-like obedience to irrational and unpredictable commands. Islam also supports, if not commands, the use of the slavery of human beings and the sexual-slavery of girls and women. Islam also allows, permits and very often commands the use of murder, genocide, lying and stealing from “unbelievers”; aggressive war and institutionalized revenge.

 The noted document is one that “subtracts from the sum-total of human knowledge”. In the voice of the People, it is poisonous garbage.

Vatican-II, Other Religions & Islam

DECLARATION ON
THE RELATION OF THE CHURCH TO NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONSNOSTRA AETATE
PROCLAIMED BY HIS HOLINESS
POPE PAUL VI
ON OCTOBER 28, 1965

3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.
Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.
=======================================================================
       The above document was quoted (Although not the section provided above) in a homily at my parish on September 29, 2012 as to toleration, The Pastor dealt more with intolerance towards Hindus who some Catholic call “stupid”. The “highest thinkers” in that religion have concluded that there is only one God and the “gods” worshiped by the People are only facets of that one God just as the facets of a great jewel are not the entire gem.
        The Jews are our spiritual ancestors and, as such are and should-be honored and not persecuted as was the sin of too many Christians (Including my Polish ancestors). They signed a covenant (Contract) with G_d. Such agreements are not had between a tyrannical master and worm-like slaves.

      Jesus the Christ makes us his co-heirs in the Kingdom and his brothers-in-love. Although asking for peace among men of good will, his last “General Orders” to his disciples (Luke 22: 35-38) was to do all that was needed to obtain the means sufficient to defend themselves. .

        The Sikhs, lately come to the World's religions, worship a universal and just God. They are great sustainers of equality between man and women and between all human beings. Their teachings advocate for peace; But, specially emphasis the right of self-defense and the duty to defend the innocent against criminal attacks. They also support practical charity and what we know as Charitas.

        The Allah of Islam (And NOT that of Arabic speaking Christians) demands a slave-like obedience to irrational and unpredictable commands. Islam also supports, if not commands, the use of the slavery of human beings and the sexual-slavery of girls and women. Islam also allows, permits and very often commands the use of murder, genocide, lying and stealing from “unbelievers”; aggressive war and institutionalized revenge.

 The noted document is one that “subtracts from the sum-total of human knowledge”. In the voice of the People, it is poisonous garbage.

Equitable Responces To Islamic Attacks

There is a world-wide campaign of attacks against Jewish, Christian Buddhist. Sikh and other true religions' communities, places-of-worship and individuals by Muslims acting alone (As a result of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"), small groups, larger mobs and regional OR world wide organizations.

Yet, when any Muslim is asked about such attacks, their usual response is that, "Oh. those are the other and radicalized Muslims". That is a lie OR a much more dangerous "half-truth" or "half-lie"---For the following reasons.
1. All Muslims must believe that the whole of the Koran are the actual words of their Allah and may not be altered or modified or softened by any person since the death of Mohammed AND such commandments and examples are to be followed;
2. The Koran (Along with the sayings of Mohammed and the examples of his life) encourage or allow, and often command, the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, banditry, perpetual war with "unbelievers", sexual use of girl-children as young as nine-years-of-age and the other horrors taught by that creature.
3. One of the best kept secrets of Islam is that all Muslims consider themselves of a world-wide brotherhood (ie Ummah) with full responsibility for each other and with a duty to support each other against the "unbelievers".

Since #3 above is true, I see no reason to NOT hold any Muslim (Group) responsible for the actions of ANY other Muslim Group(s) anywhere in the world.

Therefore, the burning of a Christian Church in Egypt could result in the like destruction of a Mosque in the USA or Londonistan or Paris. The like destruction of a Sikh temple (Gurdwara) in Cape Town would result in parallel and counter action in Denmark. The same should hold for Muslims' attacks Synagogues, Hindu-Buddhist temples, Etc..

The just means of doing so would require:
1. Prior and world-wide warning of such actions-to-come if the noted Islamic attacks do not fully stop;
2. Further such warnings after the first few instances of such "reactions";
3. That should be done without hate or other illicit passions and only as a "teaching example"or matter-of-justice or "balancing Karma". [For traditional Christians, the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae" should be applied .]
4. Unlike Muslims, others should not attack women children and should attempt to, as much as possible, minimize "collateral damage".

It may be that Muslims will not respond to such attacks by stopping their attacks as they worship death and welcome such for their Allah (NOT the same as Arabic speaking Christians and other non-Muslims).

But, we must remember that compromise with evil is evil and our human and basic goal, under "Natural Law", is Justice above Peace.

Those who object by saying "Do you want to start a war with 1.5 Billion Muslims should be remember that Mohammed declared perpetual war against "unbelievers", which war obviously continues to this day.

A Falseness Of Pacifism

A BOOK REVIEW

Fahey, Joseph J.
War & the Christian Conscience: Where Do You Stand?
Orbis Books; Maryknoll, NY:; 2005
ISBN -13: 978-1-53075-583-5

This volume presents itself as a “fair and balanced” discussion of violence, conscience, war, pacifism and related issues. However, there are enough errors-of-fact, twisted facts and half-truths (Worse than lies in my view), neglected sources and like weaknesses to allow a fair reader any conclusion other than it is an apologia for pacifism. Some of these issues are provided below.
Fahey lumps together Jews, Christians and Muslims in a essentially like group, falling into a major error of this era.

The Jews entered into a “covenant” (A contract) with the Almighty one. Tyrants do not enter into such contracts; But, rule with total disregard as to the welfare of his subjects. G_d punished and punishes violators of that contract; But, Jews were known to complain to Him of His abuse of “His People”.
The teachings of the Christ presented a family model for the Faith, with a Father, Son, uniting Holy Spirit and, even a mother in Mary, The People were encouraged to consider themselves as part of the Body of Christ in a more intimate-than-family relationship. The Triune God is forgiving, but just, in his actions and judgments, allowing free will and its freedom to fail or succeed an inherent part of humanity.
Islam worships an Allah (So unlike that of Christian Arabs) who is arbitrary, not obeying even his own laws or pronouncements, full of violence and evil. The ideology of Islam teaches that it is allowed or encouraged, and sometimes commanded, to use murder, rape-and-enslavement, genocide, perpetual war with “unbelievers” and the other horrors inflicted upon the world by Mohammed.
Mr. Faley ignores the other two, just and essentially peaceful and monotheistic religions, that of the Baha'i and the Sikhs. The latter group, although being essentially peaceful, know that they have a Natural Law right to self-defense and a duty to defend others. Where the law allows they wear swords and knives to remind themselves of the above. (Their last Guru, in fact, died in the defense of Hindus.)

In discussion the De Laude Novae Militae of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (A “Doctor Of The Church”) Mr. Fahey was very selective in the one verse he selected. He might better have chosen” :The knights of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear his sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller; But, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ

Six Monotheistic Religions VS Islam

There are only six true monotheistic religions in this world: That of the Jews,
Samaratans, Druze Christians, Bahai and Sikhs. They may see God in different ways; But, agree on a God of Justice and Good.

Then, what about "Islam" (Or, "Mohammedism")?

First, I doubt that "Islam" is really a religion. Like the Mafis, Chinese Triads and the Thugee worshipers of Kali it seems more like a criminal or terrorist movement with an thin overlay of religion. After all, the behavior of the "true believers" of "Islam" (Probably in excess of 40% of all Muslims) follow or enable the approval or encouragement, if not commands of Mohammed, to use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, robbery, perpetual war and the other horrors-and-injustices taught by that inventor of "Islam".

Secondly, if "Islam" is a religion, then it is reasonable to ask: What entity does it worship? It could be reasonably asserted that Mohammed of Mecca and Medina took the word Allah and misapplied it to God's opposite (And inferior) Shaitan or Iblis. What other entity could insist on his followers conforming to the evils taught in the Koran and other works of "Islam", which they do to this day in such places as the Sudan, other parts of Africa, the Philippines and throughout the world.

Try and find a "moderate Muslim" who will very publicly (By identifying himself by name, address, workplace) condemn those teachings of Mohammed

Yes, Christians and Jews and others have done evil to others in the names of their Faiths; But, such actions have always been finally acknowledged to be wrong and sinful. On the other hand, Muslims rejoice (eg "Dancing in the streets on news of "9/11", the beheading of their victims and, most specially, any killing of Jewish men, women and children) in the performance of horrid deeds in the name of "Islam".

The Thugee worshipers of Kali killed in the name of their "goddess"; And, took such money and other valuables found with their victims. The worshipers following the teachings of Mohammed kill in the name of their Allah (Not the same as that of Christian Arabs); And, they have taken personal property, lives, women-and-girls for sexual debasement and even whole nations from their rightful owners.!

At least L. Ron Hubbard (The inventor of "Scientology") was more honest when he laid out his "religion" foundation motive (Inventing a religion was a sure way to wealth and power) than was Mohammed (The inventor of "Islam"). Both were motivated by lust for money (ie Power) and other like sins.

Sikhs, Swords & Christians

It has been reported that the Sikhs of the USA will not meet with the Pope next month as such an event would require them to NOT bear the (Miniature) swords they wear to bear witness of their Faith. I think this is foolishness on the part of the overly nervous security personnel which are assigned to protect him.

In fact, it might be better to follow the example of my Polish ancestors who bore real swords and burnished them at the proclamation of the Gospel during the Holy Mass as witness to their willingness to fight and die to protect the Church.

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, that great Doctor of The Church, laid down (In his De Laude Novae Militae) the right and duty of Christians to use the sword to defend Christ and his Church Considering the persecutions faced by the People of the Church (Especially by Muslims in today's world as it was in that of St. Bernard), we would do well to display the naked steel of Christian warriors to assure the enemies of Christ that his People will be protected from evil doers (Especially when the Pope OR anyone meets with Muslims).

A READER'S RESPONSE

The concept of saint-soldier is a unique feature of Sikhism. Every Sikh is required to aspire to sainthood by his devotion to God and service to mankind, but also, according to the situation, to adopt the role of the soldier. A Sikh is also commanded, if necessary and circumstances allow, to lay his or her life down to protect the poor and weak, regardless of race, religion, sex or creed. The Sikhs look at the martyrdom of the 9th Guru for trying to protect Hindus from religious persecution, in Delhi, on 11 November 1675 AD, as an example to be followed.[29]