The Thymus Gland, Children, & Pandemics

It is a scientific fact that children are far less at risk for infection by the COV|ID-19 virus than those past puberty.

It is a scientific fact that such resistance (Immunity?) to diseases is a product of the THYMUS GLAND which begins to atrophy at that "interesting" age.

Although not a medical doctor or a scientist in some, related, area of knowledge I must wonder if the synthetic equivalent of the products of children's thymus glands might offer a sound and safe treatment-of or, even, immunity-to the cited virus (Or, others which have or can become pandemics.

Non-Virus Deaths From DOVID-19

There are only a very few persons who have noted the other deaths which will result from the "Chinese Virus" [ie COVID-19 for those fools or traitors still supporting the tyrants who now rule the "Peoples Republic (sic) Of China" AND are waging an asymmetrical WAR against the USA].

Those include, but are not limited to, such as:

1. Who will die of cancer and other diseases due to the stopping of medical tests and procedures (ie Some, strangely, still listed as "elective") in our Republic's 

excellent hospitals and clinics; And,

2. Those whose lives will be shortened (eg By suicide or aggravated heath conditions) by the despair caused by unemployment or loss of businesses.

Some Questions For Dr. Fauci

Some Questions For Dr. Fauci

Yahoo/GovernmentFederal

• 
  

  
  

  It appears that "The Media" will not ask Dr. Fauci the below-provided questions nor are they presented by agents of President Trump's Administration or, for the most part,by Members of The Congress and them of either Party.

  
  

  1. How many Americans will die or be mutilated by the present hold on many (Most?) medical tests, procedures and tests (eg Regarding cancer)?

  2. How many Americans, losing employment or businesses which will not "recover", will suffer from: A lack of medical services due to lack of 

  insurance-coverage as would, otherwise, provide such services; Or, whose health will be weakened or destroyed by the, already, in-effect 

  depression from such economic loss; Or, will suicide-out or injure or destroy family members as a product of the same stresses?

  3. How many Americans will be murdered or raped or otherwise destroyed or injured by those criminals being released from prisons and jails

  on a claim that the cited actions will, without any scientific proofs, somehow reduce the risk of COVID-19 to law-abiding Americans?

  
  

  I now call upon President Trump. others in his Administration, Members of the Congress and any remaining (Rational, patriotic and honest) agents of "The Media" to, VERY PUBLICLY, ask Dr. Fauci those questions---And make his, forced answers, well known to

  all of us.

  
  

    

Race, Diseases & SCIENCE

There have been many Blacks (And others) who have claimed that Blacks are at greater risk of death or other harm from the "Chinese Virus" (ie "COVID-19" or "Corona-19 Virus" for those who are still attempting to protect the source of that pandemic---Communist China) because of their higher rate of poverty than Whites.

"Real Science" would require a study of other poor people as can be found among:
1. The tightly packed, low income, people of Chinese ancestry found in New York City;
2. The many poor Whites found in Appalachia, Louisiana and other places throughout the USA.

If there is a statistically meaningful relation between poverty and disease, are there like differences between the races as might, for example, be attributed to cultural differences?

Limiting Constitutional Rights---NOT

The Bill Of Rights lists some rights which have only the most rare limits as can be inflicted only in the most rare circumstances.

For example, the  right (ie Privilege in archaic terms) to Habeas Corpus may only be suspended, according to our Constitution: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it". Please specially note that this, rare limit, to our Rights can be constitutionally applied only in the case of "rebellion or invasion".

There are NO like provisions for the suspension of other rights.which include:
1. Free speech;
2. The free exercise of religion; And,
3. The individual right of law abiding citizens (ie Age 18-years and above) to (Buy) "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").

With regard to the "free exercise of religion" I must note that: Christians have a long history of supporting, if not requiring, communal worship; Jews are required to form Minyan of ten or more, adult, worshipers to have, real, worship; And, Sikhs require both communal prayer and a shared meal (ie Offered-to and shared-with all, Sikh or other/no religion).

THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR REPUBLIC'S CONSTITUTION WHICH ALLOWS ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL OR BODY TO SUSPEND COMMUNAL WORSHIP WITH IS A CORE PART OF "THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION". "Official" acts doing sore a (Actionable?) "Violation of civil rights under color of law" which may be a felony if anyone is injured in such violations.

Of course, religious leaders or bodies my suspend communal worship for any purpose as has been done in the face of the Chinese virus pandemic.

NOTES

A. <https://rts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/201305-Spina-John.pdf>

B. <http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/the-worshiping-assembly-at-mass.cfm>

C. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minyan>

D. <https://www.patheos.com/library/sikhism/ritual-worship-devotion-symbolism>

War & Hydroxychlorquine

There is no doubt (Except by fools and traitors) that the USA is in a 

state-of-war against the Chinese Virus.

When war is waged not all tactics-strategies-weapons are successful (eg A - C)

The dangers from our nation's enemies do NOT allow awaiting "scientific" (ie Controlled) studies.

When the first A-Bomb was tested in New Mexico the scientists were not sure if it:

1. Would go Pssst like a wet firecracker; Or,

2. Set off a world-destroying chain reaction.

The danger of using  Hydroxychloroquine is very much less than the first test of the A-bomb or suicidal parachute assaults on prepared enemy forces.

Therefore, the decision to use that drug should be directly assigned to physicians for the "Off Label" treatment of the "Chinese Virus" (Perhaps with a requirement that case reports be sent to a central site for evaluation).

NOTES

A. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panjandrum>

B. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fustian>

C. <https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1042&context=hist_etds>

The More Dangerous Pandemics

"Looking at the numbers" about the deaths and suffering caused by COVID-19 it appears that it is very much LESS harmful than the more dangerous epidemics discussed below.

THE VIOLENCE IN AND FROM THE PRC: Although the PRC might be described as a "Socialist" nation (ie Like Stalin's USSR) the pattern of its violence against is (ie Especially non-Han) peoples and all the world is much

more a clone/copy of traditional Chinese imperialism AND governance. 

The USA must admit that The PRC has been in a state-of-war against our

Republic for many decades and that war includes: Military threats AND actions; Sending corrupted and even poisonous products into our nation; Active economic warfare; Industrial and academic espionage; And, perhaps purposeful, control of the sources of the antibiotics needed to fight-off endemics, epidemics and pandemics.

Any citizen of the USA who aids that nation's attacks on the USA are guilty of TREASON within the meaning set by our Republic's Constitution.

At the least, the USA must: Expel all citizens or agents of the PRC in private (Industrial and other) and public (University and other) research programs or facilities; Make it a (Felony?) violation of The Law for corporations to share "Trade Secretes" with The PRC; Embargo all imports from The PRC which do not meet our public health requirements; AND, IMMEDIATELY, ON A WARTIME BASIS, MAKE PROVISIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THE ABOVE NOTED BIOLOGICALS IN THE USA.

I must wonder if the "Chinese Virus" (ie COVID-19) came out of the secret "Biological Research" (ie "Biological Warfare"?) facility in Wuhan (Hubei Province) China.

ARMED CRIMINAL VIOLENCE: In the USA the murders, maimings and other sufferings inflicted by young, illegally armed, Black (And Latino?) thugs is far greater than the cited, new, virus (ie This includes such as caused by the 

criminal misuse of motor vehicles).

 The solution to that infection is:

1. NOT to disarm law-abiding citizens who can "put down" those carriers of that disease during those "golden minutes" before arrival and effective action by police/deputies (If, and only if, they are able to summon such assistance); And,

2. NOT to treat such good-and-armed citizens as presumed criminals when they exercise their lawful right to "keep and bear arms" and use deadly force in self-defense or the defense of innocent others.

Very basic to greatly limiting this disease requires:

3. The very public statements of political officials and other "leaders" that the vast majority of such crimes are inflicted by those Blacks who commit more crimes, more serious crimes and them more often than Whites and almost infinitely more so that those born in or ancestry is in China, India, Korea and Japan OR who come from traditional Jewish families;

4. The expressed-and-exercised public policy of police and prosecuting attorneys to assume that any-and-all, law-abiding (ie Lacking a prior record of convictions for violent crimes) is innocent of any crimes after using or threatening-the-use of deadly force in the face of such criminal conduct as "presents a clear-and-present danger of death or great bodily harm to others; And,

5. Perhaps, the commitment of The Bar to provide, on a pro bono basis, especially qualified attorneys to defend those good citizens

described above in those cases (Or jurisdictions) where they are presumed to be criminals and persecuted for exercising their, above cited, rights.

ISLAMIST VIOLENCE: Throughout the wider world and for the last 1400-years the true-believing followers of Islam have inflicted like, criminal, violence as extends far beyond that described above as it has led to: Actual genocide; The destruction of two-thousand year old communities; The forced exile and migration of millions (ie Being the primary source of this era's refugees); Physical enslavement of many; And, the sexual abuse of females---Some as young as nine years-of-age. These crimes are in strict obedience to the commands of that fellow Mohammed (Of Mecca and Medina). 

Very basic to countering this pandemic is the very public declaration, within and without the USA,by public, religious and academic leaders of:

6. The facts of those unalterable teachings;

7. And that treaties (Or like agreements) with Muslims are not binding on them if such interferes with obeying those commands or achieving

the ultimate goal of Islam---The universal control of all humanity under Muslim, male, rule.

"SOCIALIST" VIOLENCE: For the last hundred-or-so years there have been millions of humans murders, tortured and enslaved by "Socialists" who include such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and historic-and-current clones [I do not include the "People's Republic (sic) Of China as that nation's crimes are more a matter of traditional imperialism OR North Korea which is a case of insanity].

Basic to countering such "Socialists" are:

8. The very public declaration of the above-cited leaders that there has been no nation-wide "Socialism" without official murders (ie Up to genocide), deprivation of all civil rights (eg After disarming all citizens except the ardent supporters of the tyrannical-rulers) and a degeneration of "the quality of life" in such places (ie The Scandinavian nations are, at most, "Semi-Socialist" and now based on very active. capitalist, economies); And,

9. Maintaining those military forces AND economic practices fully capable of resisting the open and hidden aggression of "Socialists".

Corona Virus, The Black Death & California

After considering the the Chinese source and spread of the Corona Virus I must conclude that disease is only a very minor threat to the peoples of this world. On the base of the population exposed-to and contracting and dying of that disorder it is much more a subject for poof-pieces by media seeking attention than any real risk of a pandemic.

Now, you should consider the Bubonic Plague (aka "Black Death") which once killed up to 60% of the population of Europe and inflicted like mortality in other places.

With very early diagnosis (Most of the USA's physicians do not have the training to readily identify the early stages of that disease) and intensive treatment, the most common form of The Plague has a mortality rate of ~15%. Even with such diagnosis-and-treatment some forms of that disease kills almost 100% of infected persons.

In the USA there are places (eg About the "Four Corners" part of the Southwestern States, Denver's parks AND San Francisco) which have seen

outbreaks of The Black Death. The last locus may be due to: Travelers from plague-active areas of China or India; And, its spread by fleas living

on rats. As there is now (In filth encrusted San Francisco and other parts of California) plagues of rats [I have not seen any scientific (Valid and

reliable) studies as to flea populations among rats in California.] 

As far as I know there is NO vaccine to protect us from The Plague.

Are our governments honest and active enough to deal with an outbreak of "The Black Death" in, for example, California?

"Advantages" Of Deaths By Illegal Drugs

If, and only if, we reject  moral teachings (eg Of Jews, Christians an Sikhs), then the deaths (And reduction in the USA's "Life Expectancy) by such illegal drugs as fentanyyl does provide our nation with some long-term advantages:
1.. It removes from the human genome, in the USA, those who have an "addictive personality" which may have a genetic base or, at the least, one based on transmitted social/cultural habits;
2. That, in turn, reduces the population of those who support the manufacturees, importers and distributors of those drugs;
3. Which reduces the income of the enemies of the USA (ie The PRC) and of all humans (ie All those noted in #2 above);
4. May reduce the number of deaths-by-firearm, the (Vast?) majority of which are inflicted by and upon Black thugs (ie Using only illegally possessed handguns) involved in "the drug trade" which very specific deaths are not reported by "politically correct" academics, officials and The Media as a part of the reduction in the USA's life expectancy;
5. May well reduce the huge sums of the USA's wealth (In dollars) sent out of our Republic and chiefly to organized criminals; And,
6. Which may reduce the tyranny of those slugs as is basic to the corruption of Mexico and Central American nations which is one of the reasons for the mass of illegal immigrants invading the USA and costing billions of dollars to our citizens and legal-immigrants.

Psychiatrists, Politics & The "Goldwater Rule"

I, VERY MUCH, OPPOSE ANY WEAKENING OF THE "GOLDWATER RULE" AS IT REPRESENTS YET ANOTHER DETERIORATION OF ETHICAL STANDARDS AMONG TOO MANY PHYSICIANS. 
                           /James Pawlak

A PROBLEM WITH THE GOLDWATER RULE IN PSYCHIATRIC ETHICS.

Peter A. Olsson MD

The Goldwater rule is the informal name for a precept of medical ethics promulgated by the American Psychiatric Association. It forbids psychiatrists from commenting on individuals' mental state without examining them personally and being authorized by the person to make such comments.^[1] The rule has no official name; it is simply Section 7.3 of the APA's ethics principles.^[2]

The issue arose in the 1960s when Fact magazine published the article "The Unconscious of a Conservative: A Special Issue on the Mind of Barry Goldwater." The magazine polled psychiatrists about American Senator Barry Goldwater and whether he was fit to be president.^[3][4]  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

The rule itself reads:

On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.^[2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

PARADOXICAL INTENTIONS AND HISTORICAL CONUNDRUMS

It is interesting to explore what conservative psychiatrists, (If some could be found?), would have opined about’ Lyndon Johnson’s conscience of a Liberal’ ,  like Barry Goldwater’s  Conscience of a Conservative was analyzed. The majority of psychiatrists in the FACT MAGAZINE article thought Goldwater was dangerous. Johnson who was thought to be safer for America by psychiatrists actually escalated America’s tragic involvement in the Vietnam War. Would Goldwater have been more conservative about escalation in Vietnam? I think so.

Should no psychiatric perspective or opinion be available about prospective candidates for president of the United States?  The liberal and conservative presses appropriately and sometimes inappropriately , investigate details about a presidential candidates family background, education or lack of it, and the writings offered by candidates for president. Many candidates write books about themselves and their prospective policies, etc. If journalists can speculate as amateur “Shrinks”, why can’t psychiatrists offer their spectrum of opinions?

If a psychiatrist has seen a candidate professionally, he or she must of course adhere to the ethic of confidentiality.  But, it seems unfortunate for the electorate to be devoid of perspectives from psychiatry about the candidates. Mature psychiatric observations about candidates for president would be of great value especially in light of the gray-hair- promoting- stresses the presidency brings and the importance the position holds for America.

How could opinions about the candidates by psychiatrists be accomplished?  One domain of difficulty is that in general, psychiatrists tend to be liberal Democrats or liberal Republicans. In fact, it seems at times that some psychiatrists automatically assume that it is inherently “therapeutic” to be liberal politically. Conservatives are subtly or not- so- subtly,  assumed  to be cold, unempathic  and therefore, “anti-therapeutic”.

One approach to this dilemma would be to have a psychiatric journal or magazine survey a sample of psychiatrists who would agree to disclose whether they were liberal, independent, or conservative. They could offer their observations and opinions about the candidates’ strengths, possible blind spots, and vulnerabilities. An equal number of conservative, independent,  and liberal opinion holders could be published.

The American Psychiatric Association should reframe the Goldwater Rule so psychiatrists can offer informed opinion about presidential candidates.

SUGGESTED ADDITION TO THE GOLDWATER RULE (Section 7.3 of the APA  Ethics Principals.)

The process of electing an American president is so important that voters would benefit from having mature observations, opinions and perspectives by psychiatrists.  Such discussion must be clearly labeled as OPINION in the media. Of course, if a presidential candidate has been seen professionally by a psychiatrist in private consultation this situation would be covered as usual by section 7.3,  as would be the case with all other public figures.