The Thymus Gland, Children, & Pandemics

It is a scientific fact that children are far less at risk for infection by the COV|ID-19 virus than those past puberty.

It is a scientific fact that such resistance (Immunity?) to diseases is a product of the THYMUS GLAND which begins to atrophy at that "interesting" age.

Although not a medical doctor or a scientist in some, related, area of knowledge I must wonder if the synthetic equivalent of the products of children's thymus glands might offer a sound and safe treatment-of or, even, immunity-to the cited virus (Or, others which have or can become pandemics.

Some Questions For Dr. Fauci

Some Questions For Dr. Fauci

Yahoo/GovernmentFederal

• 
  

  
  

  It appears that "The Media" will not ask Dr. Fauci the below-provided questions nor are they presented by agents of President Trump's Administration or, for the most part,by Members of The Congress and them of either Party.

  
  

  1. How many Americans will die or be mutilated by the present hold on many (Most?) medical tests, procedures and tests (eg Regarding cancer)?

  2. How many Americans, losing employment or businesses which will not "recover", will suffer from: A lack of medical services due to lack of 

  insurance-coverage as would, otherwise, provide such services; Or, whose health will be weakened or destroyed by the, already, in-effect 

  depression from such economic loss; Or, will suicide-out or injure or destroy family members as a product of the same stresses?

  3. How many Americans will be murdered or raped or otherwise destroyed or injured by those criminals being released from prisons and jails

  on a claim that the cited actions will, without any scientific proofs, somehow reduce the risk of COVID-19 to law-abiding Americans?

  
  

  I now call upon President Trump. others in his Administration, Members of the Congress and any remaining (Rational, patriotic and honest) agents of "The Media" to, VERY PUBLICLY, ask Dr. Fauci those questions---And make his, forced answers, well known to

  all of us.

  
  

    

Race, Diseases & SCIENCE

There have been many Blacks (And others) who have claimed that Blacks are at greater risk of death or other harm from the "Chinese Virus" (ie "COVID-19" or "Corona-19 Virus" for those who are still attempting to protect the source of that pandemic---Communist China) because of their higher rate of poverty than Whites.

"Real Science" would require a study of other poor people as can be found among:
1. The tightly packed, low income, people of Chinese ancestry found in New York City;
2. The many poor Whites found in Appalachia, Louisiana and other places throughout the USA.

If there is a statistically meaningful relation between poverty and disease, are there like differences between the races as might, for example, be attributed to cultural differences?

The More Dangerous Pandemics

"Looking at the numbers" about the deaths and suffering caused by COVID-19 it appears that it is very much LESS harmful than the more dangerous epidemics discussed below.

THE VIOLENCE IN AND FROM THE PRC: Although the PRC might be described as a "Socialist" nation (ie Like Stalin's USSR) the pattern of its violence against is (ie Especially non-Han) peoples and all the world is much

more a clone/copy of traditional Chinese imperialism AND governance. 

The USA must admit that The PRC has been in a state-of-war against our

Republic for many decades and that war includes: Military threats AND actions; Sending corrupted and even poisonous products into our nation; Active economic warfare; Industrial and academic espionage; And, perhaps purposeful, control of the sources of the antibiotics needed to fight-off endemics, epidemics and pandemics.

Any citizen of the USA who aids that nation's attacks on the USA are guilty of TREASON within the meaning set by our Republic's Constitution.

At the least, the USA must: Expel all citizens or agents of the PRC in private (Industrial and other) and public (University and other) research programs or facilities; Make it a (Felony?) violation of The Law for corporations to share "Trade Secretes" with The PRC; Embargo all imports from The PRC which do not meet our public health requirements; AND, IMMEDIATELY, ON A WARTIME BASIS, MAKE PROVISIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THE ABOVE NOTED BIOLOGICALS IN THE USA.

I must wonder if the "Chinese Virus" (ie COVID-19) came out of the secret "Biological Research" (ie "Biological Warfare"?) facility in Wuhan (Hubei Province) China.

ARMED CRIMINAL VIOLENCE: In the USA the murders, maimings and other sufferings inflicted by young, illegally armed, Black (And Latino?) thugs is far greater than the cited, new, virus (ie This includes such as caused by the 

criminal misuse of motor vehicles).

 The solution to that infection is:

1. NOT to disarm law-abiding citizens who can "put down" those carriers of that disease during those "golden minutes" before arrival and effective action by police/deputies (If, and only if, they are able to summon such assistance); And,

2. NOT to treat such good-and-armed citizens as presumed criminals when they exercise their lawful right to "keep and bear arms" and use deadly force in self-defense or the defense of innocent others.

Very basic to greatly limiting this disease requires:

3. The very public statements of political officials and other "leaders" that the vast majority of such crimes are inflicted by those Blacks who commit more crimes, more serious crimes and them more often than Whites and almost infinitely more so that those born in or ancestry is in China, India, Korea and Japan OR who come from traditional Jewish families;

4. The expressed-and-exercised public policy of police and prosecuting attorneys to assume that any-and-all, law-abiding (ie Lacking a prior record of convictions for violent crimes) is innocent of any crimes after using or threatening-the-use of deadly force in the face of such criminal conduct as "presents a clear-and-present danger of death or great bodily harm to others; And,

5. Perhaps, the commitment of The Bar to provide, on a pro bono basis, especially qualified attorneys to defend those good citizens

described above in those cases (Or jurisdictions) where they are presumed to be criminals and persecuted for exercising their, above cited, rights.

ISLAMIST VIOLENCE: Throughout the wider world and for the last 1400-years the true-believing followers of Islam have inflicted like, criminal, violence as extends far beyond that described above as it has led to: Actual genocide; The destruction of two-thousand year old communities; The forced exile and migration of millions (ie Being the primary source of this era's refugees); Physical enslavement of many; And, the sexual abuse of females---Some as young as nine years-of-age. These crimes are in strict obedience to the commands of that fellow Mohammed (Of Mecca and Medina). 

Very basic to countering this pandemic is the very public declaration, within and without the USA,by public, religious and academic leaders of:

6. The facts of those unalterable teachings;

7. And that treaties (Or like agreements) with Muslims are not binding on them if such interferes with obeying those commands or achieving

the ultimate goal of Islam---The universal control of all humanity under Muslim, male, rule.

"SOCIALIST" VIOLENCE: For the last hundred-or-so years there have been millions of humans murders, tortured and enslaved by "Socialists" who include such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and historic-and-current clones [I do not include the "People's Republic (sic) Of China as that nation's crimes are more a matter of traditional imperialism OR North Korea which is a case of insanity].

Basic to countering such "Socialists" are:

8. The very public declaration of the above-cited leaders that there has been no nation-wide "Socialism" without official murders (ie Up to genocide), deprivation of all civil rights (eg After disarming all citizens except the ardent supporters of the tyrannical-rulers) and a degeneration of "the quality of life" in such places (ie The Scandinavian nations are, at most, "Semi-Socialist" and now based on very active. capitalist, economies); And,

9. Maintaining those military forces AND economic practices fully capable of resisting the open and hidden aggression of "Socialists".

Corona Virus, The Black Death & California

After considering the the Chinese source and spread of the Corona Virus I must conclude that disease is only a very minor threat to the peoples of this world. On the base of the population exposed-to and contracting and dying of that disorder it is much more a subject for poof-pieces by media seeking attention than any real risk of a pandemic.

Now, you should consider the Bubonic Plague (aka "Black Death") which once killed up to 60% of the population of Europe and inflicted like mortality in other places.

With very early diagnosis (Most of the USA's physicians do not have the training to readily identify the early stages of that disease) and intensive treatment, the most common form of The Plague has a mortality rate of ~15%. Even with such diagnosis-and-treatment some forms of that disease kills almost 100% of infected persons.

In the USA there are places (eg About the "Four Corners" part of the Southwestern States, Denver's parks AND San Francisco) which have seen

outbreaks of The Black Death. The last locus may be due to: Travelers from plague-active areas of China or India; And, its spread by fleas living

on rats. As there is now (In filth encrusted San Francisco and other parts of California) plagues of rats [I have not seen any scientific (Valid and

reliable) studies as to flea populations among rats in California.] 

As far as I know there is NO vaccine to protect us from The Plague.

Are our governments honest and active enough to deal with an outbreak of "The Black Death" in, for example, California?

Geography, Division & Western Civilization

Once the Age-Of-Migration ended in Europe (c 900 AD), that part of the Euro-Asian land mass began a period of divisions into, very many, political units divided, often by geography, who were in often constant wars (And other forms of competition)..It may be that age did not end until c 1945..

That age was marked by:
1. Intense development of weapons, strategy and tactics, from the level of "craft" to that supported by engineering-and-science as NOT seen in other parts of the World which was typically dominated by large political or ideological blocks (eg China, Islam); And,
2. Intense development of ideas,from theology to science, as supported by logic (nb Try and work your way through such Medieval works as St. Thomas' Summa Contra Gentiles or Bertrand Russell's far more recent The Principles Of Mathematics) which led to the advances in Medicine and other forms-of-engineering which erupted out of real universities [ie Not found outside of Europe,Canada, Israel and the USA except as, sometimes pale, copies AND to like, idea generating, military establishments in more recent times (eg The science of epidemics as rooted in US military research c 1900)].

I may well be that the "Nationalism", in Europe, the USA and Israel, has supported those developments.

I am sorry to note that the cited level of idea-generation and foundation-of-logic is being destroyed  or limited, those Western Universities, by "political correctness"---Which is neither based on logic nor on such ideas as are subject to scientific (ie Reliable and valid) tests.

Life Before Columbus---Updated

Nota Bene: Comments may be sent to: James Pawlak, 8706 West Oklahoma Ave. (#255),
West Allis, WI 53227, USA; Or, . For more of my thoughts (Ravings?) please go to: www.crusaderknight.blogspot.com

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Life Before Columbus

It appears that the average life span for male members of the "First Peoples", in the Americas, was about 26-years (Lower for women as is common in all early populations). The following factors, among others, seem to be basic to those "short, dirty and dark" lives:
1, Periodic periods of starvation as common to hunter-gatherer and marginal-farming societies (eg As based on one crop---Potatoes or Corn);
2. Deaths of women and new-born children aggravated by both such lack of proper foods and that same poor prevention of death as was, also, common in the West until c. 1900;
4. The most primitive of medical care as was also common in Europe until about the same time; And,
5. War and genocide as evidenced by such events as: "The dark and bloody ground" between the Eastern Northern and Southern First Nations; And, the "Flower Wars" of the "Aztecs" as were waged to allow its priests to rip the hearts of many thousands out of living humans or, skin alive, girls.

Since Columbus and others coming to The Americas, from Europe, were totally unaware of the nature of infectious diseases (ie Which, like, "The Black Death") also killed many of them. In fact, that plague killed off a very large part of Europe's population Lacking that knowledge Europeans had and do not have any moral guilt for those diseases which killed First Peoples.

The brutality of European invaders was equaled or exceeded by the practices of such First Peoples as the Iroquois, Aztec and others and that without the moderation as injected by such Europeans as the Franciscan Friars.

Europeans did bring to the Americas: Better medicine; Better variations-in and distribution-of foods; The basics of Science as already was germinating in Europe; Such music and other arts as were welcomed by those First Peoples; And, perhaps greatest of all, LITERACY. (Before Columbus there were NO "vibrant" cultures in the Americas, but only very STAGNANT cultures and societies which, with the possible exception of the murderous "Aztecs", were NOT civilizations.)

LEST WE FORGET, THE "FIRST PEOPLES" WERE ALSO IMMIGRANTS INTO THE AMERICAS.

Uptated Info On Guns & Violent Crimes In USA

With the ongoing debate about the place of armed citizens in the USA all should be educated as to the most recent facts about that issue.

First, I admit that "Coincidence is not causation". But, it should be noted-and-understood that:

1. The rate of violent crimes in the USA has been decreasing; 

2. That at the same time as the number of persons licensed to carry concealed weapons has been increasing; And,

3. That at the same time when the number of States which do not require licenses/permits to carry concealed weapons has been increasing.

The meaning of the revocation of those licences/permits is much more difficult to evaluate as:

4. Some are revoked for only changes of address (eg Moving to another state);

5. There is no sure, nation wide data, as to the number of such revoked for involvement in such causes as criminal misuse of weapons or other crimes or other reasons; And,

6. It appears that only two States have revocation rates higher than 0.5%.

The data I could not locate is some (Clear and lucid), by race [Asian, Black, 

First Peoples (aka "Native Americans"), Whites, Other], data for convictions,

as should be known to all Americans, for:

7. Violent crimes with weapons; And,

8. All violent crimes.

I am still confused at the Jihad being waged against "Assault Rifles" as those 

(In combination with ALL other rifles) are use to commit murders less

than knives or "blunt objects" (Combined?).

Psychiatrists, Politics & The "Goldwater Rule"

I, VERY MUCH, OPPOSE ANY WEAKENING OF THE "GOLDWATER RULE" AS IT REPRESENTS YET ANOTHER DETERIORATION OF ETHICAL STANDARDS AMONG TOO MANY PHYSICIANS. 
                           /James Pawlak

A PROBLEM WITH THE GOLDWATER RULE IN PSYCHIATRIC ETHICS.

Peter A. Olsson MD

The Goldwater rule is the informal name for a precept of medical ethics promulgated by the American Psychiatric Association. It forbids psychiatrists from commenting on individuals' mental state without examining them personally and being authorized by the person to make such comments.^[1] The rule has no official name; it is simply Section 7.3 of the APA's ethics principles.^[2]

The issue arose in the 1960s when Fact magazine published the article "The Unconscious of a Conservative: A Special Issue on the Mind of Barry Goldwater." The magazine polled psychiatrists about American Senator Barry Goldwater and whether he was fit to be president.^[3][4]  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

The rule itself reads:

On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.^[2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule

PARADOXICAL INTENTIONS AND HISTORICAL CONUNDRUMS

It is interesting to explore what conservative psychiatrists, (If some could be found?), would have opined about’ Lyndon Johnson’s conscience of a Liberal’ ,  like Barry Goldwater’s  Conscience of a Conservative was analyzed. The majority of psychiatrists in the FACT MAGAZINE article thought Goldwater was dangerous. Johnson who was thought to be safer for America by psychiatrists actually escalated America’s tragic involvement in the Vietnam War. Would Goldwater have been more conservative about escalation in Vietnam? I think so.

Should no psychiatric perspective or opinion be available about prospective candidates for president of the United States?  The liberal and conservative presses appropriately and sometimes inappropriately , investigate details about a presidential candidates family background, education or lack of it, and the writings offered by candidates for president. Many candidates write books about themselves and their prospective policies, etc. If journalists can speculate as amateur “Shrinks”, why can’t psychiatrists offer their spectrum of opinions?

If a psychiatrist has seen a candidate professionally, he or she must of course adhere to the ethic of confidentiality.  But, it seems unfortunate for the electorate to be devoid of perspectives from psychiatry about the candidates. Mature psychiatric observations about candidates for president would be of great value especially in light of the gray-hair- promoting- stresses the presidency brings and the importance the position holds for America.

How could opinions about the candidates by psychiatrists be accomplished?  One domain of difficulty is that in general, psychiatrists tend to be liberal Democrats or liberal Republicans. In fact, it seems at times that some psychiatrists automatically assume that it is inherently “therapeutic” to be liberal politically. Conservatives are subtly or not- so- subtly,  assumed  to be cold, unempathic  and therefore, “anti-therapeutic”.

One approach to this dilemma would be to have a psychiatric journal or magazine survey a sample of psychiatrists who would agree to disclose whether they were liberal, independent, or conservative. They could offer their observations and opinions about the candidates’ strengths, possible blind spots, and vulnerabilities. An equal number of conservative, independent,  and liberal opinion holders could be published.

The American Psychiatric Association should reframe the Goldwater Rule so psychiatrists can offer informed opinion about presidential candidates.

SUGGESTED ADDITION TO THE GOLDWATER RULE (Section 7.3 of the APA  Ethics Principals.)

The process of electing an American president is so important that voters would benefit from having mature observations, opinions and perspectives by psychiatrists.  Such discussion must be clearly labeled as OPINION in the media. Of course, if a presidential candidate has been seen professionally by a psychiatrist in private consultation this situation would be covered as usual by section 7.3,  as would be the case with all other public figures.

Atomic Theory & Bureaucrats

Oxford University researchers have discovered the densest element yet known to science.
The new element, Governmentium (symbol=Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pillocks.
Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact.

A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete.
Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2 to 6 years.

It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.
In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes.

This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration.

This hypothetical quantity is referred to as a critical morass.
When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium (symbol=Ad), an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium, since it has half as many pillocks but twice as many morons.

ANON

"Mayor Pete", God & Sexuality

Mayor Peter Buttigieg has declared himself as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States.

In response to others who hold to the traditional views as to his homosexuality he has also declared that he is (ie An active, practicing, homosexual) what God made him.

Mr. Buttigieg's intelligence and advanced education have also been highly touted.

However, he avoids or denies the following;
1. As far as I know there is no scientific (ie Valid, reliable and confirmed by those "with no axes to grind") proofs that there is any genetic basis for the argument that homosexuals are made (By God if you will); And,
2. As far as I know, basic Christian teachings maintain that each of us has such "Free Will" as allows us to chose between not-good (eg The sterile perversion of homosexuality) and good---Without regard to any "inclinations" towards either.

I must wonder what other denials-of-reality or policy-perversions are at the core of Mr. Buttigieg's thinking and core principles.

Who Liked CO2?

In recent times there have been many who rage against the production of CO2. I find that a curious (And ignorant) objection,

After all, plants require that gas to grow and produce the present high production of food stuffs which  CO2 may be basic to the lack of major famines in our time.

After all, that CO2 produced by internal combustion engines allows the distribution of food as also has brought the risk of general famines to almost zero.

Rep. Steve King Punished For Being Truthful

TO THE GOP LEADERSHIP:

It has been reported that Representative Steve King has been stripped of his committee assignments for:

1. Telling the truth about our Western Civilization (Or what is left of it) as was invented, nurtured and developed  by White humans; And,

2. Having some minimal contacts with questionable persons who are also opposed to those who would destroy that core of our national and personal beings.

I expected AND expect our (Your???) Party to not surrender-to or adopt-the deceit inflicted by "the other Party" and such other enemies of truth and The People as: CNN; The Washington Compost and The New York Slimes; Such supporters of (Please forgive the redundancy) Islamist-terrorism as Keith Ellison, CAIR and Rashida Tlaib; And, such supporters of other terrorism as AntiFa and Maxime Waters.

By punishing Mr. the GOP is adding to what is becoming universal deceit. Even the Socialist George Orwell noted "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act". 

Now, the only reason to support our Party is that the alternative is too horrid to allow.

Now, I suggest (Demand) that Mr. King be reinstated in his House assignments AND formally praised for telling the truth.

Reduction In USA's Violent Crime. Why?

It has been reported that the rates of violent crime in the USA have been steadily going down over the last few years.

WHY?

Some have proposed that that decrease is parallel-to, if not caused-by, the increase in the number of
law-abiding (And legally presumed sane) citizens who possess modern and effective (ie At police or military grade, exempting fully automatic) guns.(Yes, I know that "coincidence is not causation").

I think that proposition is worthy of intensive study as would require the consideration of the following variables:
1. The races of violent criminals and their victims;
2. The number of all sworn peace officers, per square mile, in each jurisdiction;
3. The rated laws regarding the purchase and carrying (Concealed) firearms;
4. The decrease or increase rates of violent crimes in each jurisdiction;
5. The number of firearms seized in each jurisdiction and the portion of those seizures as resulted in criminal convictions;
6. The portion of each place's population as are illegal immigrants; And,
7. Other factors as fair-minded and informed researchers might examine.

A Year After Charlottesville Mob Warfare

Yes, it has been a year since two gangs of tyrannical thugs fought on the streets of Charlottesville (Virginia) with some pathological excitement-seekers and, on both sides, some "good people" who foolishly did not expect such violence.

One person was killed/murdered during that treasonous riot.

I must wonder, since that one death, how many:

1. Blacks have been illegally killed (ie Murdered) by Whites; And,

2. Whites have been illegally killed (ie Murdered) by Blacks.

Short-Term Benefits Of Limiting 2nd Amendment Rights

After the Florida high school massacre (As allowed by cowardly deputy sheriffs) there are those who would extend "infringements" on the individual and constitutional rights of:
1. Law abiding and presumed sane citizens who are 18 to 21 years-of-age by halting their right to buy the same long-arms as allowed older adults and continue the same violations-of-rights as now inflicted by not allowing them to purchase handguns or obtain permits/licenses to carry concealed weapons; Or,
2. Forbidding all, even older (Law abiding and presumed sane), citizens access to modern and effective firearms as allows them to defend themselves or innocent others---Especially when civil police are unable or (As in Florida or at the Columbine High School or a Florida night club) unwilling to do so;
3. The most common faux "Assault Rifles" offer our smaller and weaker fellow citizens (eg Women) a manageable and accurate weapon as allows them to defend self and innocent others from criminal attacks (eg "Home invasions as are often inflicted by multiple thugs and can require multiple "hits" to stop)

Those acts violate the very exact maxim given us by Founder Benjamin Franklin: "They who can give up an essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"!

Here, I note that there are "weapons of mass destruction" which:
4. Include trucks as might be used to murder children upon their mass leaving of schools at the end of each school-day;
5. Can easily (Without extraordinary technical abilities) be made from legally obtained materials;
6. Can destroy a large building (eg A high school building) or an entire residential neighborhood;
And,
7. I will not describe for obvious reasons.

Even the banning of all, civilian held guns (Or only semiautomatic rifles with large magazine)  would only be temporary safety. (Which efforts would likely begin an armed civil war).