- After considering the above-cited offering, I must note the following:1. Our Republic's Constitution gives the duty and authority to nominate persons to fill judicial vacancies to POTUS and to no one else.2. Obama failed to execute that duty in many (100s of?) cases allowing President Trump to (Gleefully?) do so.3. The entire US Senate (ie There being NO constitutional provisions for politic consultations OR, much more importantly, the "Blue Slip" veto) has the sole authority to approve or (Even by ignoring such) not-approve such nominations.4. I have not seen any scientific proofs as establish any relationship between the amount of melanin or estrogen (Or, sexual choice, style, orientation, etc.) and any person's ability to demonstrate excellence in any or all areas of human "work"; And, there is no constitutional provision for the consideration of such characteristics in the making of judicial nominations or of approving/rejecting them.5. As to race, it appears that those "People Of Color", whose ancestry is in India/China/Japan/Korea, are grossly under-represented on the "Federal Bench"---Even though such peoples have set a very superior record above Whites and even far more so over Blacks as to both academic performance and obedience to our democratically-enacted laws. These inter-racial differences are a matter of superior Vs. inferior cultural norms and models.6. There is no constitutional provision for any "quota" of those SCOTUS justices who are "originalists" Vs.those who are not so.Those who are "unhappy" with the above-noted provisions/restrictions of our Constitution are welcome to attempt to amend that document by, and ONLY by, that most basic law's, democracy-based, required amendment process.
James Pawlak
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment