The "AR-15" is
short-hand for all semi-automatic-only long
arms with magazines holding more than eight-rounds. That (Such) weapons have be
decried as "weapons of war" by opponents of the fullest exercise by
citizens of "the right to keep and bear arms" (Without "infringement).
Although I do not own such a firearm, I will accept that application---And approve of it on the basis of the following points.
1. The "AR-15" is
the ideal weapon to resist the war-like attacks of home-and-business invaders,
those waging Jihad and other
dangerous thugs as: It is much more accurate at the usual self-defense
distances of 30-feet or less than are hand-guns; Its light weight and recoil
make it more suitable for women and trained youths to use in the home/business
defense of self and innocent others; And, its "round" will tumble
when hitting walls or criminals---And, not go through them to kill or injure
other persons at great distances as do, for example, the "30-30"
round so common in hunting rifles.
2. Its (Their) large magazines allow the usually-needed three rounds to "put down" some thug and for the (According to reports on home invasions) multiple such critters.
2. Its (Their) large magazines allow the usually-needed three rounds to "put down" some thug and for the (According to reports on home invasions) multiple such critters.
3. As Islamic-Terrorists are
now waging war (With both guns and bombs) in the USA, that such war-weapon
allows citizens (During the usual too-long wait for effective police action) to
have a "war weapon" which allows them some chance of defeating those
orthodox Muslims waging Islam's commanded "perpetual war" (Jihad) against those
"unbelievers" who are 99% of our fellow citizens.
4. Possession of large numbers
of such weapons by law-abiding and sane (Unless declared otherwise, for each challenged citizen, by a
court-of-law after a full "due process hearing) citizens provides a
safeguard against government tyranny as so properly feared by the Founders of
our Republic as exampled by the below quotes.
A. "No
freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms"; "The strongest reason
for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort,
to protect themselves against tyranny in government"; “What
country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to
time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. LET THEM TAKE
ARMS.” "The laws that forbid the carrying
of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither
inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the
assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an
unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (President
Thomas Jefferson)
B. . “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Their swords and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.” (Emphasis added); “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms (Tench Coxe; Member of The Continental Congress and, later, constitutional scholar and author). [Emphasis added]
B. . “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Their swords and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.” (Emphasis added); “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms (Tench Coxe; Member of The Continental Congress and, later, constitutional scholar and author). [Emphasis added]
No comments:
Post a Comment