Is Obama A Citizen Of The USA---Again?

From "GOPUSA"

According to published reports, Barack Obama's legal team has been paid over one million dollars, so far, to STOP anyone from seeing his birth certificate, or, for that matter, ANY of his actual identification documents:

* Actual long-form birth certificate (NOT an easily-forged electronic copy of a short-form document that is not even officially accepted in Hawaii)
* Passport files
* Harvard Law School records
* Columbia University records
* Occidental College records, including financial aid that he may have received
* Punahou School records, where Mr. Obama attended from the fifth grade until he finished high school
* Noelani Elementary School records, where Barack Obama attended kindergarten (according to the Hawaii Department of Education, students must submit a birth certificate to register -- but parents may bring a passport or student visa if the child is from a foreign country)
* Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
* Illinois State Bar Association records
* Baptism records
* Obama/Dunham marriage license
* Obama/Dunham divorce documents
* Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
* Soetero/Dunham Adoption records

The issue of the Occidental College records is especially pertinent. The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) served officials at Occidental College with a subpoena to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980's, because those records could document whether he was attending as a foreign national. You see, Mr. Obama attended the school on a scholarship -- and there are questions as to whether the financial aid he received was reserved for foreign students. The Obama attorneys have bent over backward to block us. He doesn't want anyone to see those records. Those financial records STILL have not been released.

WHAT is Barack Obama trying to hide? WHAT is he afraid of? WHY doesn't he just release these documents to prove that he is a natural-born citizen and, therefore, qualified to serve as President -- especially his actual birth certificate?

Six Monotheistic Religions VS Islam

There are only six true monotheistic religions in this world: That of the Jews,
Samaratans, Druze Christians, Bahai and Sikhs. They may see God in different ways; But, agree on a God of Justice and Good.

Then, what about "Islam" (Or, "Mohammedism")?

First, I doubt that "Islam" is really a religion. Like the Mafis, Chinese Triads and the Thugee worshipers of Kali it seems more like a criminal or terrorist movement with an thin overlay of religion. After all, the behavior of the "true believers" of "Islam" (Probably in excess of 40% of all Muslims) follow or enable the approval or encouragement, if not commands of Mohammed, to use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, robbery, perpetual war and the other horrors-and-injustices taught by that inventor of "Islam".

Secondly, if "Islam" is a religion, then it is reasonable to ask: What entity does it worship? It could be reasonably asserted that Mohammed of Mecca and Medina took the word Allah and misapplied it to God's opposite (And inferior) Shaitan or Iblis. What other entity could insist on his followers conforming to the evils taught in the Koran and other works of "Islam", which they do to this day in such places as the Sudan, other parts of Africa, the Philippines and throughout the world.

Try and find a "moderate Muslim" who will very publicly (By identifying himself by name, address, workplace) condemn those teachings of Mohammed

Yes, Christians and Jews and others have done evil to others in the names of their Faiths; But, such actions have always been finally acknowledged to be wrong and sinful. On the other hand, Muslims rejoice (eg "Dancing in the streets on news of "9/11", the beheading of their victims and, most specially, any killing of Jewish men, women and children) in the performance of horrid deeds in the name of "Islam".

The Thugee worshipers of Kali killed in the name of their "goddess"; And, took such money and other valuables found with their victims. The worshipers following the teachings of Mohammed kill in the name of their Allah (Not the same as that of Christian Arabs); And, they have taken personal property, lives, women-and-girls for sexual debasement and even whole nations from their rightful owners.!

At least L. Ron Hubbard (The inventor of "Scientology") was more honest when he laid out his "religion" foundation motive (Inventing a religion was a sure way to wealth and power) than was Mohammed (The inventor of "Islam"). Both were motivated by lust for money (ie Power) and other like sins.

Michael Jackson

As a child-star and young man Michael Jackson was GREAT! Since then Mr. Jackson began a process of abusing his own body (And, perhaps, that of other persons) and a pathological decent into his own and empty "Never Never Land".

During those same years many other American young people worked physically and mentally even harder at those careers which have, so far, kept us free from tyrants and ideological fanatics---The career of arms. Many of those young people have died in applying themselves to the "common good and common defense" AND every one of those deaths was of greater value and meaning to us than that of Michael Jackson.

An Apology For Crusades---NOT

I seldom copy out other writers blogs; But...

John C. Wright ([info]johncwright) wrote,
@ 2009-06-22 11:27:00
Previous Entry Add to memories! Tell a Friend! Next Entry
An Apology for the Crusades, or, View from Another Continuum
"So, Roman Catholic Church, it is time to confess to your sins and prepare to meet your maker. Open your archives for all to see. Tell us the truth about your origins. Give back to the Jews any items from the temple of Solomon you have in your possession. Ask the Muslims to forgive you for the Crusades. Explain the total truth of your church and ask for forgiveness, which shall most certainly be granted since, in the overall karmic balance, your good works far exceed your sins." This quote comes from here.

That noise you heard was me spitting my coffee all over my computer screen in shock.

Savor, O reader, the utter historical illiteracy of these words: Ask the Muslims to forgive you for the Crusades.

Ask the paynims to forgive the Holy Church for resisting their mad butchery and enslavement of all Christian lands from the pillars of Hercules to Constantinople?

The demand is not that the Christian princes who organized the campaigns apologize, not the monastic knightly orders of Templars or Hospitaliers, but the Catholic Church.

We are asking them to forgive us for opposing their rapine of the seven churches of Anatolia, or the overthrow of Alexandria, once the foremost seat of learning and civilization, now a sty? On your knees, Richard the Lionheart! Kneel, Roland, and beg forgiveness from the Paynim and from Ganelon! Bow, Don Juan of Austria! Vienna, apologize for not throwing open thy stubborn gates! Crawl, Charlemagne! Kneel, Geoffrey of Bouillon! El Cid, grovel for daring to oppose the conquest of the Prophet! Down, Saint James Motomoros, your face in the dust and kiss the boot sole of Baphomet and Mahound!

Does that sound reasonable?

In a nearby parallel universe, one where the Middle East and North Africa remained Christian, those places are the seat of the latest industrial and high-tech revolutions in biotechnology and computer AI and space travel.

The Archbishop of Mars, a colony settled by Jesuits, in this timeline is returning to Earth to attend the baptism of Heke Kohola, the first cetacean raised to sapience by uplift procedures: albeit some theologian question the validity of immersing a sea creature in water to wash away original sin.

Meanwhile, the newly-Christened Orion-drive interstellar vessel, LANTERN OF BETHLEHEM, begins her main acceleration burn for 36 Ophiuchus, where intelligent extraterrestrial life has been discovered. The mission is funded by the Vatican Observatory and various ecumenical missionary groups, since no worldly reason exists to bear the expense of an expedition not to be culminated until our greatgrandchildren's time. However, the monks and eremites of the voyage are note motivated by any worldly concerns.

Only in our timeline, where the southern half of Christendom was raped by the an obscurantist and legalistic heresy called Mohammedanism, the resources of the Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Enlightenment was wasted in wars, resources that otherwise would have been used for progress. The amounts absorbed and lost in the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire cannot be calculated. As a hint, for those of you who forget, during the administration of Thomas Jefferson, some twenty percent of the federal budget was spent on payola to Tripoli. Who knows what would have happened had trade routes to India and China been kept open?

The names of all the scholars and thinkers from that timeline, who, in our timeline, were harassed and killed in Spain and Carthage and Persia, and never studied in universities, and never published their results, are memorialized in the special wing of the Museum of Lost Eternities maintained by the Time Custodians, as an homage to opportunities for progress aborted here.

Naturally, knowledge of this timeline is a closely-guarded secret of the joint KGB-CIA project investigating the Marconi-Tesla moebius-coil alternative continuum engine, Project Timegate, since it would be an embarrassment to the Islamic world to discover that Christianity is the only mainspring of progress history has known, and an embarrassment to the secular powers to have it publically known that attempts to engender progress on secular grounds merely end in holocaust, as in Germany, Russia and the Far East during the Bloodshed Century (as what we call the Twentieth Century is known in by comparative historians from our neighboring timelines), or in bankruptcy and supine indifference to one’s own self-destruction, as socialist Eurotopia is currently discovering.

The discovery of alternative realities is the biggest blow to the current secular powers ever known, since it invalidates and humiliates the popular theories of the forces driving history. The chronochosm seems to be unfairly Euro-centric, even racist, in a fashion that is not merely politically incorrect, but even insensitive. Historians are not merely shocked, they are angered, to discover that Christ exists in every timeline, including the Narnia-like world where lions rather than human beings are the dominant form of life.

The Museum of Lost Eternities, is, meanwhile, asking for an apology for the crusades, but in different terms. They are demanding we apologize to the Crusaders, who shed such blood and made such sacrifices in Outremere, only to have their dreams abandoned by Christian princes too concerned with local bloodshed to face the general enemies of the faith.

The apology is owed to Geoffrey of Bouillon, Protector of Jerusalem, to Baldwin and Melisende, to Almalric and Sibylla--the apology we owe is that we of the West have forgotten their names and deeds.

But what says the Poet Ariosto on this matter? Here below is the John Huntington translation, which he penned during the reign of Elizabeth, of the Seventeenth Canto of ORLANDO FURIOSO, starting in stanza 51:

... They all were Christens then, but now alas,

They all are Turks; unto the endlesse shame,
Of those that may and do not mend the same.

52 -

For where they should employ their sword and lance,
Against the Infidels our publike foes,
Gods Word and true Religion to advance,

They to poore Christens worke perpetuall woes:
To you I write, ye Kings of Spaine and France,
Let these alone, and turne your force on those:
And unto you also I write as much,
Ye nations fierce, Zwizzers I meane and Dutch.


Lo, tone of Christen Kings usurps a name,
Another Catholike will needs be called:
Why do not both your deeds declare the same?
Why are Christs people slaine by you and thralled?
Get backe againe Jerusalem for shame,
That now the Turke hath tane from you and walled
Constantinople get that famous towne,
That erst belonged to th'Imperiall crowne.
-

Dost not thou Spaine confront with Affrike shore,
That more then Italy hath thee offended?
Yet to her hurt thou leavest that before,
Against the Infidels thou hadst intended:
O Italy a slave for evermore,
In such sort mard, as never can be mended,
A slave to slaves, and made of sinne a sinke,
And sotted sleepe like men orecome with drinke.


Ye Swizzers fierce, if feare of famine drive you,
To come to Lombardie to seeke some food,
Are not the Turks as neare? why should it grieve you
To spill your foes, and spare your brothers blood?
They have the gold and riches to relieve you,
Enrich your selves with lawfull gotten good,
So shall all Europe be to you beholding,
For driving them from these parts, and withholding.


Thou Lion stout that holdst of heav'n the kayes,
(A waightie charge) see that from drowsie sleepe
Thou wake our realme, and bring her joyfull dayes,
And from these forren wolves it safely keepe,
God doth thee to this height of honor raise,
That thou mayst feed and well defend thy sheepe,
That with a roring voice and mighty arme,
Thou mayst withold thy flock from ev'ry harme.

An apology to Constantinople for looting rather than saving her, of course, should be forthcoming. But somehow, I doubt the writer above intended that.

Apples & Oranges; Murders & Executions

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's June 3, 2009 editorial ("Domestic Terrorism") is a classic example of "comparing apples and oranges". The extra-judicial and very extra-ordinary execution of a genocidal mass murderer ("Tiller The Baby Killer") cannot be compared with the case of yet another Muslim, infected with the "Jihad disease", who continues the 1400-year pattern of Islam's approved and all-too-successful acting out the teachings of Mohammed in attacking and killing "unbelievers" throughout the world.

The Tiller case is much more like the US Army's extra-judicial, World War-II, killings of SS-troops, especially after the Malmedy massacre by the SS of unarmed, American, POWs. (To give a full picture in that paper's current "WAR STORIES: THE GREATEST GENERATION REMEMBERS" series, its editors and reporters might wish to note that war crime and our troops' deadly response to it.)

By specially attacking two uniformed members of our military, Jihadist Abdulhakim Muhammed (aka Carlos Bledsoe) appears to be guilty of treason as he waged war against the USA (The Constitution's test for that crime) and should be subject to the death penalty.

As our current Administration favors the killing of unborn children and appears to favor Muslims, I suspect that no treason charge will issue and Tiller's executioner may be charged also in Federal Court.

Investing In Death---Dividends Paid

Investing in the "culture of death" yields large dividends---Paid in death. Dr. George Tiller (aka "Tiller The Baby Killer") discovered that when he was gunned down on 31 May 2009.

The followers of Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo likewise received such and large dividends for their investment in those leaders' Nazism, Fascism and "Imperial Way" cultures of death. Some such persons were paid off in non-judicial executions of SS troops in the field or by the teaching experience of the Nuremberg, and legally unprecedented, trials and hangings OR the non-judicial and justified execution of Bonito Mussolini.

I will skip over the death-investment and death-worship of one of the world's major "religions" and of a certain sub-culture in the USA. BUT, I point out the parallels noted above and the lessons which should be learned by all such investors!

Justitia fiat, ruat coelum

Facts VS Hate Crime Laws

The number of Blacks who select Whites as the victims of their crimes is many, many, times the reverse. Blacks as victims of White rapists are so few as to be statistically meaning less, which is most certainly not the reverse. (I have not been exposed to the same information as to Latinos and Whites, but suspect from local crime reports that the same holds true.)

It is obvious that the number of Gays and Bi-Sexual persons who infect others (And kill them) with AIDS/HIV is infinitely greater that the opposite.

In fact, most deadly and other serous assaults are within the same groups: Black on Black, Latino on Latino, Gay on Gay and White on White.

Hate crimes laws do two, very unfortunate, things:
1.Provide an irrational (ie Not based on facts) unequal protection of the law; And,
2. Cover up the failure of each group to change its own cultures towards civilized, law-abiding and life-respecting behavior---Rather than hiding under another "excuse" for bad behavior chiefly within, but also without, each such "minority group"

"The Contested Public Square"--Book Review

Forster, Greg; The Contested Public Square (The Crisis Of Christianity And Politics);IVP; University Press, Downers Grove, Illinois; 2008;ISBN 978-0-8308-2880-7


After reading a column noting Mr. Greg Forster's The Contested Public Square, I did buy and read (Study?) it. To anyone who has done so and finds it an "easy book" I bow before their vastly superior knowledge of Theology and Political Philosophy! It was a difficult and challenging "read" for me; But, it did hold my attention by the high quality of its organization and presentation, as well as the usefulness of its content in understanding our social, political and religious world. In fact, it was sometimes very difficult to put this excellent book down.

Most specially I obtained a much better (First?) understanding of St. Augustine's "City Of God" VS "City Of Man" dichotomy. To my untrained mind it appears that the USA's "separation of church and state" (But, only in its original configuration) is a natural, logical and necessary development of Western Christian thought and such early, shining, shining examples as that in Cleves (Germany) as noted by the author and the "freedom of religions" (NOT "freedom from religions") which has, since 1789, boiled and frothed in the USA---Until the artificial "wall of separation" began to end the necessary transfers between the goals of the "City Of God" and the real and political world in which we daily function. I think there is little doubt that the sword of judicial activism has led, since 1948, to a worsening of both public and private morality through the cutting off of a common (Yes, Judeo-Christian) provision for the reality of "right" and "wrong".

The author's analysis might have been extended to what occurs when "The City Of God" is divorced from secular governments. This divorce appears, generally out of the West, to result in various forms of socialism (Nazism, other Fascist movements, Marxism, Stalinism, Maoism, etc.) and generates a true worship of the State as God, often in the persona of such "Glorious Leaders" as Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Castro, Kim Il Jung and others of that ill-favored ilk. In less murderous and more "democratic" states (eg Sweden and the UK) the nameless bureaucrats provide all of the tyranny needed to grind down that spark of the divine which makes us truly and fully human.

Living in the USA of today, I fear for the like future of my nation.

Islam offers a special case example of the reverse results of no separation between the cities of God and of man by its appeals to the basest (Please see note #5 below) and most horrid of inhuman desires with its approval or encouragement, if not commands, to use murder, rape, genocide, enslavement, robbery and perpetual war to further its collective goals and the pathological power and sexual desires of its followers. This degeneration flowed from a gross misunderstanding and Mohammed's personal misuse of the Judeo-Christian teachings to the selfish divorce from any real application of Natural Law to those outside of the believers' view of Islam.

In the East only the Sikhs appear to have the key to that application. In Shinto everything of Japan is holy and nothing and no-one outside of it is of worth. Other Eastern religions appear to be focused on a drive towards an ultimate goal of nothingness that the value of the Divine is lost to them in as to the human world. and worth (Unless I grossly misunderstand these philosophies),

The Church, Natural Law, Torture & Self-Defense

At one time the Holy See controlled and ruled a large part of Italy then known as the Vatican States. During that time the Church was required to protect the innocent and punish the guilty as was any other state which was often done by the execution of horrid criminal by hanging and, if my data is correct, beating them to death. Certainly the police of that time, such as they were, used such extraordinary and severe questioning techniques as make "water boarding" appear as a child's game.

Now that the Pope and his advisers are cozy and safe in their stained-glass windowed ivory towers they no longer need to directly protect the People from criminal and military attacks as terrorize and physically threaten individuals, cities and entire peoples. The Pope et.al. can now wring their hands over the necessary use of threatened and real force needed for the common good and protection of the innocent by such statements, attributed to the Holy Father via John Carr of the USCCB staff, reported (NCR; May 17-23, 2009; Page-1): "Pope Benedict XVI has said the the prohibition torture 'cannot be contravened under any circumstances.' Simply put, torture is a classic case of ends and means." said Carr. "Good ends cannot legitimize immoral means".

Certainly the use of deadly force is justified by Natural Law as a right in self-defense and, very likely, as a duty for the protection of the innocent. To enforce that right and enable that duty the means to do so must be allowed including such as ready access to modern arms (Where the civil authorities are unable OR unwilling to do protect) and also the use of force short of killing, which includes what some describe as "torture".

At a more morally balanced time the Church encouraged the use of "the edge of the sword" in counter-attacking those (eg The Cathars and the followers of the false prophet Mohammed) who were attempting to destroy the core of our Faith and its daughter Civilization. As the threat to both are even more severe now than then, I do not understand the Holy See's reluctance to use necessary force to provide the Natural Law rights of the People and resultant protection to the Churches of God.

Real Torture

For some time I have read many claims that "water boarding" and other severe interrogation methods used against terrorists are "torture"---Without any proofs that it has caused lasting physical or psychological damage to those thugs.OR to the strangely sensitive US or world citizens of a leftist orientation.

Our "torturers are WIMPS ! They should rather select out the more-or-less less useful or wanted subjects, make other subjects watch and use one of the following methods to encourage them to comply: Inject strong acids or other chemical to burn away the subjects bodies with the expected convulsions due to gross pain; OR, slice their living bodies into pieces in imitation of the traditional Chinese "Death Of A Thousand Cuts";
OR, crush their or pierce their skulls and suck their living, functional, brains out of their quivering bodies.

Does this proposal shock you? Why? In the USA and some of those nations whose ethical pundits oppose to "water boarding", this is already done, It is called (Late Term) abortion and the subjects are not terrorists, but the most innocent of all humans.

Now, why does such genocidal actions against the unborn and, sometimes, almost born not shock the consciences of those same, very selective, critics of potentially life saving actions against terrorists?

What Immigrant Rights?

Today the "Milwaukee Journal Sentinel" published a report on the "Immigrant Rights Parade" . But, What are those rights? Who is entitled to them? Many rely on the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution or related statutes or court cases to define those rights.

The intent of the writers of that Amendment was to force the rebelling, Southern, States to accept as citizens those Black slaves held by Whites, Native Americans and other Blacks. Many rights (But NOT all, such as voting) were extended to legal immigrants and legal visitors to the USA.

Although I am not an attorney, I put to you that the requirement of being "...subject to the jurisdiction.." of the USA and the several States excludes illegal immigrants who have avoided that jurisdiction by their unlawful entry into the USA. I put to you that such "illegals" have NO rights under the Constitution including, but not limited to: Voting in our elections; Possessing firearms; Judicial or other "due process" hearings, beyond that needed to determine their immigration status, before forced deportation; Habeas Corpus; Conditions of confinement pending deportation; Granting of citizenship to their children born in the USA; ETC..

Perhaps, we should now emphasize "duties" as much as "rights" and insist that "illegals" perform the duty of returning to their homelands and only then and only legally re-enter the USA.

Of course, enforcement of such a concept would require Federal Judges who hold faith to the letter and intent of the Constitution and its Amendment.

____________________________________________________________________________________

U.S. Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment - Rights Guaranteed Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship, Due Process and Equal Protection

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In Favor Of Discrimination---And Prejudice

The too common and currently popular meaning of "discrimination" or "discriminate" has made that term a negative thing, a civic crime, even (For those who believe in such) a sin. In recent years that use has been generally limited to matters of real-or-alleged and unthinking words or actions against others on the basis of their race, gender, age and other factors over which individuals have no control (And some over which are subject to personal or cultural choices).

Yet, within my memory there was a time when both words were more used to define choices between what was good VS. evil, artistic VS vulgar, harmonious VS discordant, pleasing VS repulsive, moral VS harmful (To individuals and the "common good") AND many like selections.

Today's best discrimination can be applied to: Music as in the contrast between the violence praising (Especially against women and lawful authority) of the worst of "hip hop" and "rap" music VS the deepest emotions so well expressed by jazz, classical and liturgical tunes and lyrics; Poetry where almost random rantings can be seen as inferior to the careful craft of the true poet who communicates by great efforts the most subtle concepts and emotions; To science where some would inflict a religious-like and permanent faith VS the real science of ongoing-and-unbiased collection and reexamination of hard data; In politics where "sound bites" and appeals to truly base emotions and mob actions are opposed to fact-based and reasoned discourse; In journalism where philosophic-or-political biases have erased the differences between reporting and opinion VS the classical separation those two, equally useful, sides of the journalistic coin; In philosophic-and-religious words and actions of those who teach hate, war and crimes as proper VS those who maintain that peace, love and helping others are superior AND, in every other area of human-and-humane endeavors.

What this nation and this world needs is much more of the best variety of "discrimination"; And, basic to that use, a full understanding-and-acceptance of the fact of real differences between "good" and " bad" in all areas.

It is harder to defend "prejudice" as the common definitions include a factor of making decisions other than on clearly defined facts. However, many decisions are made on an intuitive integration of previously established facts. A classic example is that of Mr. Jessie Jackson admitting that he would feel safer walking down a dark street followed by a group of White youths rather than Black young men without knowing, as a matter of fact, their criminal records, if any, and intent, if any, to assault him.

Experienced police officers are able, by such experience and schooling, to act on probability to likewise pick out for special attention those persons who are most likely to be real or potential offenders. Such intuitive knowledge can be characterized by prior-and-factual data, integrated into decision making by means of probability statements as to the most likely reality and by the best use of intuition.

Perhaps, it is time to reexamine the benefits of traditional discrimination and of intuitive prejudice.

Religion And Violence

Do you consider the Mafia, Chinese Triads, original Assassins ("Hashishin"), the Thugee worshipers of Kali (Who infested the roads of India killing-for-Kali and robbing-for-themselves---Until those "evil" English suppressed that sect)and the drug-and-murder followers of "Santeria" (An African-Cuban sect) as religions? After all, they all contain religious-like rituals and beliefs.

NO???

Then why do so many consider Islam a religion as its basic texts (The Koran and Hadith) allow or encourage, if not command, the use of murder, rape, enslavement, robbery and perpetual war. The history of that criminal-terrorist movement has clearly demonstrated, to this very day, that Mohammed's followers closely follow those teachings.

Let me not hear of "crusaders" as they were only those who combated the horror that is Islam and to take back lands and peoples criminally taken by Muslims.

Let me not hear of the "Inquisition" as the deaths caused by such were very, very, few in number considered with even one month's Jihad killings in the Sudan or one week's murder of unborn children in the USA.

Of course, the leaders (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Obama) and followers of "Secular Humanism" (Or its true self of "Atheism") have resulted in even more (Millions) of illicit deaths and untold suffering than even Muslims have inflicted on the world----And show the same anti-Jewish and anti-Christian teachings and practices.

Justifiable And Proper Killing

This post is in response to the killing of three Somali-Muslim pirates by US Navy Seals
AND as to an on-line debate with a coward who refuses to identify him/her-self and who wishes to hold a "pity party" for those thugs.

Killing such is a natural function of ridding the "body politic" of toxic wastes. It should be done without passion (Lest sinful enjoyment ensue),without false pride (Which leads to pathological delusions of grandeur) and without guilt (As would prevent or slow down repeating such cleansing actions again as needed).

As St. Bernard of Clairvaux noted (In his De Laude Militae Novae), it is sometimes necessary to "strike blows for Christ" in defending the People of God from Muslim aggressors; But, that should be done without sinful motives or passions.

I see no reason not to apply the same cool, controlled and effective means to liquidate street criminals, home invaders----And tyrants.

Pirates, Europeans, Big Guns, Islam & Law

At one time the USA joined the European powers in paying off the (Islamic) Barbary pirates who held their captives as slaves when they did not ransom them. After a short time of this futile bribery, the USA sent its new navy (And its early Marines) to "the shores of Tripoli" and used its big guns to sink pirate ships and bombard their bases. This "got their attention"---And resulted in a peace treaty favoring the USA.

I see no reason why the solution to today's Islamic pirates should not be the same and effective use of big guns to sink pirate "mother ships", without warning or question, and to bombard their home bases. (If we have any "eight inch gun cruisers" left, we should deploy them to the East Coast of Africa to reteach a lesson to this era's ideology driven pirates who are, by legal definition, "the enemies of all humanity".

"Those who fail to learn from history will be condemned to repeat it"!

'Tis Justice Ginsburg Who Does Not Understand

In her very recent comments at Ohio State University Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg noted her failure to understand the many objections to citing foreign judges in the interpretation of our laws and, yes, the Constitution of the USA.

What Justice Ginsburg fails to understand and has rejected is that there is such a thing as "American exceptionalism" (Why else would so many people, legally and illegally, risk life and their family connections to flee to the USA?) AND that the differences which made this nation great and hold some remaining like hope for the future is based on the letter of the Constitution and the intent of its authors and that of its Amendments.

Foreign Law is directed towards a socialist collective view of society where individual rights towards political freedom, freedom of (NOT "from") religion, free speech, life itself must all be subjected to the collective will---Of overbearing bureaucrats

Obama! USA Is A Christion Nation!

Mr. B. K. Obama has informed the Turkish Parliament that the USA is NOT a Christian (Or Jewish or Muslim) nation. That is a lie! Most of our citizens and resident aliens are, more or less, Christian and will so inform you of that fact if asked in a clear and honest manner.

What Mr. Obama exposed is his plans and that of his worshipers and other supporters that religion is to be erased from our nation's public life, history books, classroom instruction, role as the core of private charities which has so helped so many in and out of the USA and in all ways which would resist the impostion of a Fascist State headed by him and others "made in his image".

Admiring Today's Europe---NOT

B. H. Obama appears to feel that Americans think lightly, at best, of Europe and might be even considered arrogant towards and derisive of that sub-continent and its culture.

I could not disagree more! Americans admire Europe--The Europe that was. That is, the Europe which that was the source of our freedoms (Especially the UK), intellectual and academic systems (Especially Germany and France) AND of democracy itself..

Too many Europeans have long ago thrown away these sources and foundations (Especially those soundly built on the Christian Churches) for socialist "feel-goodness" and the "nanny state".. Those Europeans of today are unwilling to remember, cherish and protect their once world leading culture. They are now in the process of surrendering it to Islamists and turning their nations into a collective Euroarabia with Londonistan as its capitol.

American has an earned right to be arrogant, a realistic evaluation of its own worth.

The USA is the goal, even in these economically bad times, for those who are seeking economic and political freedom and the right to be better than the others left behind to stew in their own socialistic and cultural dead-ends. In the UK, there is a shortage of physicians as many have fled that more-and-more tyrannical and incompetent nation for the USA and such other English speaking nations that still maintain some shadows of opportunity for those who wish to succeed and be free.

America has a right to be arrogant in its academic excellence (Even as it rots out by the disease of "political correctness") where domestic and foreign-born scholars win so many Nobel Prizes and draw so many students from so many nations.

It has a right to be arrogant in the ability and ethics (In spite of what the New York Times and other John Paul Goebbels style "journalists" put out) of our Armed Forces---Who have twice rescued Europe from tyrants. There has never been a military so able and willing to punish those who violate the Laws Of War.

American has a right to be arrogant in its tolerence (Until last January) for such differing religious and political views as would (And have) yielded bloody civil wars, dictatorships and genocides.

As part of his rights as a presumed American citizen, Mr. B. H. Obama has the right to give up his citizenship and become a citizen of some European nation---Or of Kenya or Indonesia. Perhaps he would feel more at home there and would certainly be less destructive of the American traditions of effort and earned success.

Ideal Affirmative Action Candidate

This is a "Can You Top This" application to comments made by Mr. Mark Steyn on the Macleans magazine-online (Canada)in his April 2, 2009 "Knock-knock. It's The Gag Police".

In the USA the ideal candidate for any "affirmative action job", under the Obama administration, is a Black, Lesbian, single-amputee, Spanish-surnamed, dishonorably discharged military veteran, dope-smoking, ex-convict still on parole, Muslim convert with a semi-faked birth certificate from the State of Hawaii.

(For those of you under 65-years of youth, "Can You Top This" was a radio show on which well known comics would take a common theme and try to out do each other with jokes---Many of which would be "politically incorrect" now.)

When Talk Fails

There are some people and movements who/which do not respond to "talk" or "reaching out" or like methods specially favored by those in ivory towers (Especially those with stained glass windows). This was my experience as a Probation & Parole Agent and prison Social Worker as to most criminals. This is the common experience of history as to dealing with Islam, socialists (eg Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao) and arrogant secular humanists. That Doctor Of The Church St. Bernard of Clairvaux proposed that for some, it was necessary to use the edge of the sword to strike blows for Christ. The "Crusade In Europe" dealt with Hitler.

In today's world the Jihahists and aggressive socialists still do not respond to words, reason and "reaching out" (Something not understood by the Holy See). I suggest that we all sharpen our swords and oil our guns. We will need them.