The Supreme Court Of The United States has, again, refused to review ( SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFF SILVESTER, ET AL. v. XAVIER BECERRA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 17–342. Decided February 20, 2018.) as to another attack on that part of The Bill Of Rights as should protect the ajudicated-and-individual rights of citizens to "keep and bear arms" (ie Without "infringement").
As a (Self-declared) "Avocational Historian" I suggest that SCOTUS is avoiding confronting this matter as they realize that it would require them to confront the intent of the Founders of our Republic and their legal reasoning as to that constitutional right as the primary test for rulings (As our Constitution does not contain any provision for "evolving standards" outside of its own provisions for amendment).
They might also be required to address the question: "Are there any constitutional grounds to deny those (Law-abiding and presumed sane) citizens, from 18 to 21 years of age any constitutional rights including those under the 'Second Amendment'?"
The Congress should address those issues by such legislation as enforces this and other provision of The Bill Of Rights---Especially against: Judges "making law and amending our Constitution from the bench" as such Fascists as misrule California.
All should remember that depriving a citizen of this, individual-constitutional, right can legally only be done by a court of record, after a full "due process of law" hearing as would find each, individual, citizen too criminal or too dangerously mentally ill to "keep and bear arms".
VERUM ET ARMA SUNT HOSTIS TYRANNI
No comments:
Post a Comment