At 17-years
young, I enlisted in our armed forces. Thereafter, I found myself in
one of the US Navy's five/six most dangerous, enlisted grade,
specialties. After my Honorable Discharge I served in dangerous (Paid
and unpaid) civilian service directly towards the physical safety of
my fellow Americans. Some of my age-peers (Who also entered our military services) had immediate access to
fully automatic, true, assault rifles and even more dangerous weapons
as had in the defense of all of us.(Did you or anti-gun Fascists so serve?)
At 79-years I am more than confused than is usual by the following.
1. Those 18-years of age are : Are able to vote; Manage their own
financial and personal affairs; If males, are liable to The Draft;
Are automatically liable to criminal prosecution (Some at earlier
ages) if accused of crimes; And, can enter into and be held
responsible-for civil contracts.
2. Yet, they and other citizens, under 21-years of age,are not
allowed to purchase hand-guns or, were otherwise allowed, to obtain
a permit/licence to carry concealed weapons.
3. Why do legislators, university officials and other officials AND
judges fail to understand that the Founders of our Republic
meant exactly what they stated when they included the "Shall
Not Be Infringed" clause in the Second Amendment to our
nation's
Constitution?
4. From where is the
constitutional authority for public
authorities to limit and
infringe-upon (Law abiding
and legally presumed sane) citizens (
***), under 21 and over
18-years old, their full rights under
The Bill Of Rights to
buy,keep and bear arms (
eg On public university properties)?
*** Properly excluded
from such rights are those who have been found, but only by
a court-of-law and only after
full "due process-of-law", who: To be felons who
lose such rights for such periods-of-time as prescribed by laws;
Those found mentally incompetent to manage their affairs; And,
specially, those who have been found too dangerously mentally
ill to "keep and bear arms".
No comments:
Post a Comment