Banning The Koran In Spain?

H/T "Gates Of Vienna"
A Pakistani apostate now resident in Spain wants the Spanish government to ban the Koran. Below is the message we received yesterday from “Imran Firasat”, the owner of the Spanish website World without Islam:

I have formally asked the Spanish government through a legal petition for the prohibition of the Quran in Spain.

Many newspapers from Spain and some other European countries have published this news. I would like to request you to publish this very important and necessary news on your website please. We have to help each other in our fight against the Islamic dragon.

My petition calling for the prohibition of Quran is the sign of a grand revolution which we shall bring together against Islam. With this email I send you scans of the petition presented to the numerous institutions of Spanish Government. And below here I send you some links of media which published this news, and then after the links you can find the English translation of the news.

1.		Un pakistaní afincado en España pide formalmente “la prohibición del Corán”
2.		Un refugiado pakistaní residente en España pide la prohibición del Corán por incitar al odio y la violencia
3.		Pakistansk flygtning opfordrer til at Koranen skal forbydes

The English translation of the news:

A Pakistani settled in Spain asks formally “the prohibition of Quran”

“Imran Firasat” A Pakistani citizen with legal residence in Spain as a political refugee has presented an official petition to the numerous institutions of the Spanish government calling for the prohibition of the Quran.

Imran has formally sent the petition to the President of Spain, Parliament of Spain, ministry of the exterior and also to the ministry of the interior. A copy of the petition is attached at the end of this news.

In the document presented to the government of Spain, Imran reveals 10 points which will support his petition for banning the Quran:

1.		The Quran is not a sacred and religious book, but a violent book, full of hatred and discrimination.
2.		The Quran is a horrible book which provokes a community calls Muslims to undertake Jihad, kill innocent people and destroy the peace of the world.
3.		The Quran is responsible for all the terrorism we have seen in recent years in which thousands of people lost their lives.
4.		The Quran is a book which contains evil teachings and forces its believers to capture the entire world and total power at any price.
5.		The Quran is a book which legally permits and incites hatred and violence and for that reason it is not compatible with the modern world including Spain.
6.		The Quran is a book which directly discriminates between human beings.
7.		The Quran is a book which doesn’t allow freedom of expression nor religious freedom.
8.		The Quran is a book which causes women to suffer and be tortured by means of its being full of injustice and macho laws.
9.		The Quran is a book which rather than teaching unity, teaches disunity and in this way it doesn’t allow its believers to form friendships with those who are not Muslims, because in the eyes of Quran they are infidels.
10.		The Quran is a major threat to the free society of Spain. A book which clearly preach the messages of Jihad, killing, hate, discrimination and revenge. For that reason it can’t be compatible with the Spanish system in any sense. It is a book totally contrary to what the law and constitution of Spain say and it incites hatred and violence in our country. NOTES A. In the USA its Constitution would likely ban such a ban. B. However, our laws do provide additional penalties for those involved with terrorist organizations, even if not directly involved in criminal-terrorist acts, AND, against such organizations as such. C. The following organizations have been so designated: Animal Liberation Front; Alpha 66 & Omega 7; Army Of God; Aryan Nations; Black Liberation Army, The Covenant, The Sword and the Arm of the Lord; Jewish Defense League (?); Ku Klux Klan; May 19th Communist Organization; The Order; Phineas Priesthood; Symbionese Liberation Army, United Freedom Front; And, The Weathermen. D. That designation was based on: The stated goals of those groups; The self-approved means towards those goals; And the unlawful acts of ONLY SOME OF THEIR MEMBERS. E. The goals of Islam include: The destruction or heavy suppression of all other ideologies and of all religions; Killing all Jews; Rule of all nations only by Muslims and that by a most undemocratic, single, ruler; Replacement of all legal systems with Sharia without regard to the democratic sources of those other law systems; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of adult, male, Muslims; Subjection of all educational systems to Islamic standards, Etc. F. The approved and often command Islamic means to achieve those goals include: Murder; Genocide; Enslavement of others; Rape, Banditry. Lying; Vengeance; And other like violations of both Natural Law and just systems statutory laws. G. THEREFORE, no person can be punished for possession of or publication of the Koran OR, as an individual, for being a Muslim or proclaiming the teachings of Islam. H. HOWEVER, and-and-all Muslim organizations (Such as Mosques, CAIR) can be declared terrorist organizations and held responsible for acts-of-terrorism by imposing civil and criminal penalties. This should be done asap for the protection of the Republic and its, still free, citizens. Ceterum autem censeo Islam esse delendam---ex Cato Novo SANTIAGO Y ESPANA!

Obama's Declaration Of War Vs. Constitution

Mr. B. H. Obama has declared war against all who would resist his efforts to destroy the rights guaranteed by the Constitution. In addition to parallel attacks he has most clearly declared that war against all Catholics who oppose the use of tax moneys to support abortion and birth-control and do so on the basis that such is a violation of the right to the "free exercise of religion".

Many citizens, other than Catholics, have also concluded that Mr. Obama's attack against Catholic-citizens is an attack on the constitutional rights of all citizens, without regard to their religions---Or lack thereof.

Perhaps it is that Mr. Obama (Due to his education in a Muslim land and by agents of the far and very anti-religion Left) has not absorbed the lessons of History that deep (Chiefly Christian) religious faith (And not the rule-of-caliphs or that of atheist-dictators as Hitler or Mao or other tyrants) is at the heart of our freedoms.

B. H. Obama's war against the Constitution is NOT limited to the "free exercise of religion" provision of the First Amendment. He has, sometimes directly, attacked the "Fist Amendment" (aka The Second Amendment) through allowing his Attorney General to involve BATF agents as law-breaking "straw buyers" of weapons. His attacks on the "separation of powers" provisions of the Constitution are almost without number. (They should be numbered and listed in a "Bill Of Impeachment").

If, and only if, Mr. Obama is contemplating the use-of-force (Armed Federal agents OR Orders from his tame judges) to enforce his unconstitutional directives, he should remember that the victims of tyrants sometimes react as our political ancestors did in 1775. Since Mr. B. H. Obama appears to be ignorant of US history, I suggest that he consider the statement (Paraphrased) of a militia officer at Lexington: "If he wants a war, let it start here!".

For myself, I will consider all of the supporters (eg Democrat Members of the Congress, members, NOW, DNC and such as support Mr. Obama's attack equally liable for the reactions of patriots.

Non-Resistance As Sin

There are some (Pathological) pacifists who maintain to use force (Especially deadly force) to resist criminal attacks and evil persons/movements/ideologies is against the will of Jesus the Christ. That is sooooo wrong!

Most specially, where there is a criminal threat of death, failure to resist is a form of suicide which has been described as the ultimate sin as it denies hope in the saving grace of God. Such is also a most insulting rejection of the Natural Law, given to all by God to all humans, containing the right of self-defense (And, by extension, the defense of innocent others).

The Christ's concern for children (And other innocents) is well supported in the Gospels. Failure to defend such against criminal assaults appears to also be a violation of that Natural Law and, by extension, of Jesus' concern for children and the "meek".

If, and only if, there is some sin in resisting evil (Even by deadly means), then the non-suicide of resistance allows for obtaining God's forgiveness at some future time (If, and only if, such is truly required in such cases).

Of course, at the beginning of such criminal attacks it is impossible to determine if non-resistance will bring death and the threat of such is warrant enough for any level of resistance.

You might reflect on the value of resisting (By prior-and-preventive liquidation) those KKK monsters who bombed some young girls, in a Southern church building, too early out of this world. You might consider the effect of even one bullet or dagger-thrust as to stopping or, at the least, slowing down the beyond-horrible crimes of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao. Mohammed and those who they convinced-or-forced to follow them.

For myself, I will place my trust in Divine Justice (Justice, not suicidal peace being the proper center of the Will of God) and stand my Judgement (Which will come in a very few years)---And continue to resist evil by word and, if that Justice allows it to me, by affirmative deed.
============================================================
Doubters may wish to consider the instructions of St. John The Baptist to the soldiers, the Christ's evaluation of the Centurion and St. Paul's support of the use of deadly force to inflict justice on evil men. Catholics may also wish to consider the advise of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (A "Doctor of the Church"), in his De Laude Novae Militae, as to the pre-conditions AND the sometimes need to "strike blows for Christ".

Caucuses Are Anti-Democracy

The use, by some political parties, of "caucuses" to directly-or-indirectly select candidates for presidential nominating conventions is very much in opposition to the best, democratic, traditions of the USA! Why?
Because they exclude: Members of the Armed Forces who serve well away from their home towns; Many fire-fighters (Many of whom serve 24-hour shifts); Police officers (Many of whose actual work hours exclude caucus participation); Medical professionals who may are assigned to work during caucus hours; Over-the-road truck drivers; The old, infirm and sick who still have active minds but cannot travel to caucus locations or tolerate the conditions of such meetings; And, many others in like straits.
Although some have cited such court cases as have concluded that such caucus systems are the "property" (Within the jurisdiction) of the sponsoring political parties. However, there are other court cases which have noted that those parties must provide for the equal treatment and paticipation without regard to race. The exclusion of the above cited (And other) Ameicans is as much a violation of our best principles---If not the Constitution.